InterDomain-QOSM: The NSIS QoS Model for Inter-domain Signaling J. Zhang, E. Monteiro, P. Mendes, G. Karagiannis, J. Andres-Colas 66 th IETF – Montreal,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Carrier Solutions Enabled by the OIF NNI Erning Ye Nortel Networks.
Advertisements

NSIS Operation Over IP Tunnels draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-04.txt Charles Shen, Henning Schulzrinne, Sung-Hyuck Lee, Jong Ho Bang IETF#71 – Philadelphia, USA.
Draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00IETF 81: 25 July LDP DoD draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00.txt Thomas Beckhaus (Deutche Telekom AG) Bruno Decraene (France Telecom)
IPv4 and IPv6 Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP draft-berzin-malis-mpls-mobility-00 Oleg Berzin, Andy Malis {oleg.berzin,
Pseudowire Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00 Rahul Aggarwal Yimin Shen
Multicasting Applications Across Inter-Domain Peering Points Percy S. Tarapore, AT&T Robert Sayko, AT&T Greg Shepherd, Cisco Toerless Eckert, Cisco Ram.
Resource Management – a Solution for Providing QoS over IP Tudor Dumitraş, Frances Jen-Fung Ning and Humayun Latif.
Controlled Load Service QoS Model Cornelia Kappler Xiaoming Fu Bernd Schloer.
VoIP and IP conferencing over satellites Workshop on VoIP Technology: Research and Standards for reliable applications PIMRC 08, Cannes France 15 September.
1 IETF 64th meeting, Vancouver, Canada Context Transfer Using GIST Xiaoming Fu John Loughney.
Applicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments (draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-03) Sung-Hyuck Lee, Seong-Ho Jeong,
Draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00IETF 88 RTGWG1 An Architecture of Central Controlled Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00 Zhenbin.
PMIPv6 multicasting support using native infrastructure draft-sijeon-multimob-direct-routing-pmip6-01.txt Seil Jeon and Younghan Kim 81 st IETF, July 2011,
NSIS Signaling for QoS Models (Was: QoS Model discussion) Cornelia Kappler, Jerry Ash, Chuck Dvorak, Al Morton, Percy Tarapore, Yacine El Mghazli, Sven.
EQ-BGP: an efficient inter- domain QoS routing protocol Andrzej Bęben Institute of Telecommunications Warsaw University of Technology,
NSIS Authentication, Authorization and Accounting Issues (draft-tschofenig-nsis-aaa-issues-00.txt) Authors: Hannes Tschofenig Henning Schulzrinne Maarten.
Unrestricted Connection manager MIF WG IETF 78, Maastricht Gaëtan Feige, Cisco (presenter) Pierrick Seïté, France Telecom -
68 th IETF, Prague Czech Republic Issues with L2 abstractions and how they affect QOS-based handovers Nada Golmie Advanced Networking Technologies Division.
Seong-Ho Jeong, Sung-Hyuck Lee, Georgios Karagiannis 63rd IETF Meeting
Using DHCPv6 for DNS Configuration in Hosts draft-ietf-droms-dnsconfig-dhcpv6-00.txt Ralph Droms.
RMD – QSP draft-bader-nsis-rmd-diffserv-qsm-01.txt A.Bader, L. Westberg, G. Karagiannis, C. Kappler, T. Phelan, H. Tschofenig IETF-61, Nov. 8, 2004.
CDN Interconnection Problem Statement draft-jenkins-cdni-problem-statement-02 Ben Niven-Jenkins Francois Le Faucheur Nabil Bitar.
OIF NNI: The Roadmap to Non- Disruptive Control Plane Interoperability Dimitrios Pendarakis
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Inter-domain SLA Exchange
Real-time Flow Management 2 BOF: Remote Packet Capture Extensions Jürgen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd, Heidelberg, Germany Georg Carle GMD.
1 Local Security Association (LSA) The Temporary Shared Key (TSK) draft-le-aaa-lsa-tsk-00.txt Stefano M. Faccin, Franck Le.
Interdomain IPv6 multicast Stig Venaas UNINETT. PIM-SM and Rendezvous Points Interdomain multicast routing is usually done with a protocol called PIM-SM.
ALTO BOF Charter Discussion. Charter Iterated (twice) on the list  Several comments on the first version Terminology, caching  No complains on current.
Resource control and signaling requirements and protocols in ITU-T Q5/SG11 DOCUMENT #:GSC13-GTSC6-15 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
QoS Model for Networks Using 3GPP QoS Classes (draft-jeong-nsis-3gpp-qosm-02) Seong-Ho Jeong, Sung-Hyuck Lee, Georgios Karagiannis, Gert-Jan van Lieshout.
AIMS Workshop Heidelberg, 9-11 March 1998 P616 - ENHANCED ATM ISSUES Network Layers over ATM Rüdiger Geib Deutsche Telekom Tel Fax +49.
PCE Traffic Engineering Database Requirements draft-dugeon-pce-ted-reqs-01.txt O. Dugeon, J. Meuric (France Telecom / Orange) R. Douville (Alcatel-Lucent)
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
An NSLP for Quality of Service draft-buchli-nsis-nslp-00.txt draft-mcdonald-nsis-qos-nslp-00.txt draft-westberg-proposal-for-rsvpv2-nslp-00.txt Slides:
TEMPLATE DESIGN © SUPA – Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions Policy-driven Service Management Date: Wednesday, July.
1 QoS-NSLP QSPEC Template draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-05.txt Jerry Ash, Attila Bader, Cornelia Kappler NSIS WG Meeting, Paris, 5th Aug 2005 qupdates to current.
IETF 67 – SIMPLE WG SIMPLE Problem Statement Draft-rang-simple-problem-statement-01 Tim Rang - Microsoft Avshalom Houri – IBM Edwin Aoki – AOL.
SRI International 1 Topology Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF) Richard Ogier September 21, 2002.
Implications of Trust Relationships for NSIS Signaling (draft-tschofenig-nsis-casp-midcom.txt) Authors: Hannes Tschofenig Henning Schulzrinne.
Controlled Load Service QoS Model draft-kappler-nsis-controlledload-qosm-03.txt Cornelia Kappler, Xiaoming Fu (Robert Hancock presenting) IETF#65 – Dallas.
QoS Model for Networks Using 3GPP QoS Classes (draft-jeong-nsis-3gpp-qosm-00) Seong-Ho Jeong, Sung-Hyuck Lee, Jongho Bang, Byoung-Jun Lee IETF NSIS Interim.
26/07/2011 IETF 81 CDNI WG - draft-xiaoyan-cdni-requestrouting-01 1 CDNI WG draft-xiaoyan-cdni-requestrouting-01 IETF81 - Quebec Xiaoyan He
NSIS WG Meeting IETF 66 Montreal John Loughney (chair)
OSPF Hybrid Broadcast and P2MP Interface Type Nischal Sheth, Lili Wang, Jeffrey Zhang Juniper Networks 81th IETF, Quebec City.
NVO3 Architecture draft-narten-nvo3-arch-00.txt IETF87 – Berlin July 31, 2013 David Black, Jon Hudson, Larry Kreeger, Marc Lasserre, Thomas Narten.
Design Considerations for the Common MIH Protocol Functions draft-hepworth-mipshop-mih-design-considerations-01 Ele Hepworth (*), Robert Hancock, Srinivas.
Generic Aggregation of Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservation over PCN domains Georgios Karagiannis, Anurag Bhargava draft-karagiannis-pcn-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-01.
Additional NSIS Communication Patterns draft-stiemerling-nsis-mrm-patterns-00 M. Stiemerling and M. Brunner NSIS Working.
Partly-Decoupled Signalling in NSIS draft-hancock-nsis-pds-problem-03.txt Robert Hancock, Cornelia Kappler, Juergen Quittek, Martin Stiemerling IETF#65.
NSIS NAT/Firewall Signaling NSIS Interim Meeting Romsey/UK, June 2004 Martin Stiemerling, Hannes Tschofenig, Cedric Aoun.
Requirements for PCE Discovery draft-leroux-pce-discovery-reqs-00.txt Jean-Louis Le Roux (France Telecom) Paul Mabey (Qwest) Eiji Oki (NTT) Ting Wo Chung.
1 QSpec Template Jerry Ash, Attila Bader, Chuck Dvorak, Yacine El Mghazli, Cornelia Kappler, Georgios Karagiannis, Andrew Mc Donald, Al Morton, Percy Tarapore,
Draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-05.txt G. Karagiannis, A. McDonald, S. Van den Bosch.
IETF 66 – SIMPLE WG SIMPLE Problem Statement Draft-rang-simple-problem-statement-00 Tim Rang - Microsoft Avshalom Houri – IBM Edwin Aoki – AOL.
Draft-li-idr-cc-bgp-arch-00IETF 88 IDR1 An Architecture of Central Controlled Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) draft-li-idr-cc-bgp-arch-00 Zhenbin Li, Mach.
PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri IETF 49th Meeting - San Diego draft-papadimitriou-onni-frame D.Papadimitriou, M.Fontana, G.Grammel (Alcatel) Y.Xu, Z.Lin, S.Sankaranarayanan.
NSLP for Quality of Service Sven van den Bosch (ed) Georgios Karagiannis Andrew McDonald (et al.) draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-02.txt Slides:
Possible options of using DDS in oneM2M
L1VPN Working Group Scope
A. Báder, L. Westberg, G. Karagiannis,
ITU-T Study Group 15 Update to IETF CCAMP
The 66th IETF meeting in Montreal, Canada
Analysis of Use of Separate Identity Header for SIP RPH Signing
Problem Statement of PPSP
DetNet Information Model Consideration
IETF-100, MPTCP WG, November 2017
Standard Representation Of Domain Sequence
MVPN/MSDP SA Interoperation
DetNet Data Plane Solutions draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-ip-02  draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls-02  Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen, Janos Farkas, Lou Berger,
Presentation transcript:

InterDomain-QOSM: The NSIS QoS Model for Inter-domain Signaling J. Zhang, E. Monteiro, P. Mendes, G. Karagiannis, J. Andres-Colas 66 th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada2 Aims and Scope of the InterDomain-QOSM Draft (1)  Specify and standardize interface between intra- domain and inter-domain QoS control planes within an administrative domain;  Specify and standardize inter-domain QoS control plane within a domain as well as interface between peer inter-domain QoS control planes at adjacent domains via defining InterDomain-QOSM: done using both ITU-T Y-RACF QoS pull and push resource control modes

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada3 Aims and Scope of the InterDomain-QOSM Draft (2)  NSIS aware intra-domain and inter-domain control planes: standardized interface described in details when NSIS (e.g., the RMD-QOSM or Y.1541-QOSM) is deployed as intra-domain QoS control solution;  NSIS aware inter-domain control plane but non-NSIS aware intra-domain QOSM: an additional intra-domain signaling protocol needed to implement standardized interface between intra-domain and inter-domain QoS control planes in an administrative domain, which is out of scope of this draft

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada4 Assumptions about NSIS (1)  NSIS GIST supports off-path MRM (e.g., draft- hancock-nsis-pds-problem-03.txt) current proposal for off-path MRM (draft-hancock-nsis- pds-problem-03.txt) defines two discovery mechanisms, one starting in one off-path node and finishing in one on- path node, and another starting in one on-path node and finishing in one off-path node; However, it does not describe the mechanism for the discovery of an off-path QoS controller by its off-path peers.

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada5 Discover a downstream off-path node from an upstream off-path node.

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada6 Assumptions about NSIS (2)  InterDomain-QOSM makes no assumptions about intra- domain QoS solution (i.e., centralized or distributed, based on NSIS protocols or not), but: a distributed implementation of the IntraDomain-QoSM based on QoS-NSLP signaling over several intra-domain QNEs is more closer to NSIS’s work (independent from if the intra-domain signaling is done via the on-path or off-path MRM inside a domain);  InterDomain-QoSM makes use of messages, objects and procedures defined by QoS-NSLP for signaling exchanges between inter-domain QNEs;  SLS parameters and QoS control information required for inter-domain QoS interactions are specified by using/extending the QSPEC template draft.

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada7 InterDomain-QOSM modes a) Fully centralized, which means that InterDomain QNE functionality is implemented in interior network node; that is usually off path b) Fully distributed, which means that InterDomain QNE functionality is implemented in all edge network nodes; that is usually on path. c) Hybrid approach of a) and b), in which InterDomain QNE is co-located with interior network nodes close to edge devices one InterDomain QNE controlling a subset of edge devices; that can be off path;

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada8 IntraDomain QOSM and relations with InterDomain-QOSM  Distributed NSIS aware IntraDomain QoSM: InterDomain-QoSM uses features of NSIS aware intra-domain QOSM follows approach similar to the ITU-T RACF pull mode, independently of way inter-domain QNE is implemented;  Generalized Intra-domain QOSM: InterDomain QOSM may not use features of NSIS aware intra- domain QOSM follows approach similar to ITU-T RACF push mode message associations for inter-domain interactions may be between peer inter-domain QNEs.

July 9 th -14 th, th IETF – Montreal, Quebec, Canada9 Conclusions  draft adopts idea of distinct separation between intra-domain QoS control plane and inter-domain QoS control plane within each administrative domain: draft-hancock-nsis-pds-problem-03.txt ;  aim at specifying inter-domain QoS interactions via defining NSIS InterDomain-QOSM  Should this draft become a NSIS WG draft?