An Introduction to Heat Transfer Morteza Heydari.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Transient Conduction: The Lumped Capacitance Method

Advertisements

Computational Modeling for Engineering MECN 6040

Finite Element Method (FEM) Different from the finite difference method (FDM) described earlier, the FEM introduces approximated solutions of the variables.

By S Ziaei-Rad Mechanical Engineering Department, IUT.

ECIV 301 Programming & Graphics Numerical Methods for Engineers.

CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 12 – MULTI- DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.

Lecture 34 - Ordinary Differential Equations - BVP CVEN 302 November 28, 2001.

Finite Element Modeling with COMSOL Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford Presented at CINVESTAV-Queretaro December 2010.

CONDUCTION HEAT TRANSFER IN A MASS SPECTROMETER FILAMENT Conduction Heat Transfer MEAE-6630 Angela Mangio.

CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 11 – ONE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.

Implicit Differentiation. Objectives Students will be able to Calculate derivative of function defined implicitly. Determine the slope of the tangent.

Transient Conduction: The Lumped Capacitance Method

CISE301: Numerical Methods Topic 9 Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) Lectures KFUPM (Term 101) Section 04 Read & CISE301_Topic9.

SE301: Numerical Methods Topic 9 Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) Lectures KFUPM Read & CISE301_Topic9 KFUPM.

MATH 685/ CSI 700/ OR 682 Lecture Notes Lecture 10. Ordinary differential equations. Initial value problems.

CHAPTER 8 APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS THE INTEGRAL METHOD

1-D Steady Conduction: Plane Wall

Chapter 5 NUMERICAL METHODS IN HEAT CONDUCTION

CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 5 – GENERAL HEAT CONDUCTION EQUATION.

Heat Transfer Rates Conduction: Fourier’s Law

Chapter 2 HEAT CONDUCTION EQUATION

Numerical Methods Due to the increasing complexities encountered in the development of modern technology, analytical solutions usually are not available.

Bechtel Bettis, Inc. Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory P.O. Box 79 West Mifflin, PA International RELAP5 User’s Seminar Assessing the RELAP5-3D.

CHAPTER 7 NON-LINEAR CONDUCTION PROBLEMS

Lecture 35 Numerical Analysis. Chapter 7 Ordinary Differential Equations.

Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.

Introduction to Numerical Methods for ODEs and PDEs Methods of Approximation Lecture 3: finite differences Lecture 4: finite elements.

Chapter 2 HEAT CONDUCTION EQUATION

Computational Physics Introduction 3/30/11. Goals  Calculate solutions to physics problems  All physics problems can be formulated mathematically. 

1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 4 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu

Lecture Objectives: Analyze the unsteady-state heat transfer Conduction Introduce numerical calculation methods Explicit – Implicit methods.

Module 4 Multi-Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction.

Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. ~ Ordinary Differential Equations ~ Stiffness and Multistep.

Chapter 5: Numerical Methods in Heat Transfer

1 CHAPTER 4 TRANSIENT CONDUCTION Neglect spatial variation: Criterion for Neglecting Spatial Temperature Variation Cooling of wire by surface convection:

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Part 8 - Chapter 29.

Transient Conduction: Finite-Difference Equations and Solutions Chapter 5 Section 5.9  

Chapter 4 WORK AND HEAT

HW2 Due date Next Tuesday (October 14). Lecture Objectives: Unsteady-state heat transfer - conduction Solve unsteady state heat transfer equation for.

MECN 3500 Inter - Bayamon Lecture 9 Numerical Methods for Engineering MECN 3500 Professor: Dr. Omar E. Meza Castillo

The Configuration Factors between Ring Shape Finite Areas in Cylinders and Cones Cosmin DAN, Gilbert DE MEY.

HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION

Heat flux through the wall

FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Chapter 27.

Chapter 2: Heat Conduction Equation

MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEAT TRANSFER  This equation governs the Cartesian, temperature distribution for a three-dimensional unsteady, heat transfer problem.

Finite-Difference Solutions Part 2

3/23/05ME 2591 Numerical Methods in Heat Conduction Reference: Incropera & DeWitt, Chapter 4, sections Chapter 5, section 5.9.

ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.

Heat Transfer Review. What type of heat transfer does this picture describe? Radiation.

FINITE DIFFERENCE In numerical analysis, two different approaches are commonly used: The finite difference and the finite element methods. In heat transfer.

HEAT TRANSFER Problems with FEM solution

Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.

S5.40. Module Structure 30% practical tests / 70% written exam 3h lectures / week (except reading week) 3 x 2h of computer labs (solving problems practicing.

244-1: INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAMMING

Part 8 - Chapter 29.

Extended Surface Heat Transfer

Chapter 2. Mathematical Expression of Conduction

Announcement MATHCAD for solving system of equation for HW1b

Introduction to Partial Differential Equations

21th Lecture - Advection - Diffusion

Announcement MATHCAD for solving system of equation for HW1b

Finite Volume Method for Unsteady Flows

Analytical Tools in ME Course Objectives

Procedures in deriving element equations (General field problems)

Numerical Computation and Optimization

Numerical Method Lecture 1: Introduction

Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Heat Transfer Morteza Heydari

Numerical Methods In Heat Conduction WHY NUMERICAL METHODS? The ready availability of high-speed computers and easy-to- use powerful software packages. Engineers in the past had to rely on analytical skills to solve significant engineering problems, and thus they had to undergo a rigorous training in mathematics. Today’s engineers, on the other hand, have access to a tremendous amount of computation power under their fingertips, and they mostly need to understand the physical nature of the problem and interpret the results. But they also need to understand how calculations are performed by the computers to develop an awareness of the processes involved and the limitations, while avoiding any possible pitfalls. WHY NUMERICAL METHODS? Limitations of exact solution Better Modeling of numerical method Flexibility of numerical method Complications of exact solution

The numerical methods for solving differential equations are based on replacing the differential equations by algebraic equations. In the case of the popular finite difference method, this is done by replacing the derivatives by differences. Finite Difference Formulation of Differential Equation

Finite Difference Formulation of Differential Equation (cont)

Finite Difference Formulation of Differential Equation (example 1-D)

Finite Difference Formulation of Differential Equation (example 2-D)

One-Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction

Boundary Condition Specified temperature

Specified Heat Flux Boundary Condition Convection Boundary Condition Radiation Boundary Condition Combined Convection and Radiation Boundary Condition Boundary Condition (cont)

Interface Boundary Condition (perfect contact) Boundary Condition (cont)

Transient Heat Conduction

Transient Heat Conduction (cont)

Transient Heat Conduction example explicit

Transient Heat Conduction example (cont) implicit

Stability Criterion for Explicit Method: Limitation on Δt The explicit method is easy to use, but it suffers from an undesirable feature that severely restricts its utility: the explicit method is not unconditionally stable, and the largest permissible value of the time step t is limited by the stability criterion. If the time step t is not sufficiently small, the solutions obtained by the explicit method may oscillate wildly and diverge from the actual solution.