Mike Ridler Head of Hearings General Dental Council An overview of Fitness to Practise www.gdc-uk.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Human Services Sex, HIV and the law Dr Rosemary Lester Communicable Disease Control Unit Department of Human Services.
Advertisements

The Risk Management Process (AS/NZS 4360, Chapter 3)
South West Dental Network Event 19 June 2008 The Councils fitness to practise function.
Good Medical Practice Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006.
Standards for the Dental Team An Introduction
The role of the Parish Clerk Local Determination of Complaints.
Complaints An Overview for Staff Prepared by MSM Compliance Services Pty Ltd.
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
1 Discipline, Capability and Grievance resolution: for those with responsibility for others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division.
Croeso i Gaerdydd Welcome to Cardiff 21 May GENERAL DENTAL COUNCIL
GENERAL CHIROPRACTIC COUNCIL The UK’s Regulatory Body Dr Christina Cunliffe 1.
Complaints in the NHS Awes Siddique STGP1. “Patients who complain about the care or treatment they have received have a right to expect a prompt, open,
Understanding decision making - Investigating complaints Tony Kofkin Director of Investigations Health Care Complaints Commission Dr Walid Jammal Medical.
Student Fitness to Practise
Baltic Dental Meeting Palanga Dana Romane The Patient in the Centre – Patient’s Involvement in the Treatment Process, Full Awareness and.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
 Increasing concerns about the nursing profession in the U.K.  Concern from NMC over the number of new registrants reported for fitness for practice.
Development of Barring Criteria for the Protection of Vulnerable Groups Scheme Voluntary Sector Issues Group 16 February 2009.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board The Clarified ISAs, Audit Documentation, and SME Audit Considerations ISA Implementation Support Module.
1 The Dentist’s Legal Responsibilities to the Patient Dental Law and Ethics.
Role of a Dental Nurse Unit 313 AC 678 Range 4c. Principles of Practice 9 principles which are set out in the Standards for the dental team.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
Welcome to the GDC GENERAL DENTAL COUNCIL
Meeting your Legal Duty to Refer. ISA Bichard Inquiry Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (SVGA) Our aim is to prevent unsuitable people from working.
Medical Education Governance Implications for Clinical Tutors Kathryn Livingston Governance Manager IHSE Secretary to the PCC, SMD.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Serious Untoward Incidents -The role of the GMC - Dr Colin Pollock GMC Employer Liaison Adviser (Y&H) Y&H Deanery School of Surgery Conference 26 th April.
REVALIDATION: THE BASICS January What is revalidation? Revalidation is not an FPH process Revalidation is the process whereby you will: a) maintain.
Overview of Disciplinary Hearings & Sanctions Lisa Davis, Head of Fitness to Practise Friday 17 October 2014.
Modernising Pharmacy Regulation An inspector calls: A new regulatory model in pharmacy Deborah Hylands Inspector, GPhC 19th February 2014.
Annex A ASBOs are a powerful tool for protecting victims and stopping anti-social behaviour. Much effort goes into getting the ASBO by the agencies involved.
PHARMACY LAW & ETHICS ASSOCIATION David Reissner 18 May 2011.
Mitigating Circumstances 2015/2016 Leicester Medical School.
What rules apply to unregistered health practitioners? Kieran Pehm Commissioner Health Care Complaints Commission.
Review of Midwifery Supervision Workshop 20 th April 2015 ‘Revalidation’ Are you ready?
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
14 June 2011 Michael Wright Clinical Governance Team, Department of Health The Responsible Officer: Moving Forward.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
THE MEDICAL AND DENTAL DEFENCE UNION OF SCOTLAND Dr C George M Fernie
Copyright © 2007, 2003 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 2 The Nursing Assistant in Long-Term Care.
Key Individual Chapter 2. Purpose of FAIS Consumer protection Professionalize intermediary and advisory services in Financial Services industry Regulate.
Derbyshire County Council PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY PROCEDURE TRAINING FOR MANAGERS PUBLIC.
Building and keeping a revalidation portfolio
Derbyshire County Council PUBLIC HANDLING GRIEVANCES - BRIEFING FOR MANAGERS.
GDC Strategy 2016 – 2019 Local Dental Committees 5 October 2015.
Mitigating Circumstances 2014 Leicester Medical School.
Community surgery : staying out of trouble. Miss Nicola Lennard : 12 June 2015:
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
1 To help each team member feel more confident when the CQC Inspector comes to visit your practice © The Dental Business Academy
Safeguarding the public: Through ensuring Fitness to Practise.
Health practitioner registration: what you need to know For students of approved programs of study November 2015.
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE Presentation for Assembly of Governors Thursday 15 December 2011.
1. On a blank sheet of paper… Write down one reason why you may be disciplined (written up) at work.
The FPP Test What you need to know Commercial Transport/Tourist Flight Operators Presentation AIA Aviation Week Conference July 2011.
ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTH AND NURSING PRACTICE CODE OF ETHICS, STANDARDS OF CONDUCT, PERFORMANCE AND ETHICS FOR NURSES AND MIDWIVES.
Fitness to Practise Dominique Chauwin
Non-contentious disposals
Information Session May 2017
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
The Regulation of Nurses & Midwives
Health Professions Councils
Fitness to Practise Investigation process and what might happen
SSSC Fitness to Practise Calum Davidson Intake and Engagement Officer.
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
What is revalidation? Every three years, at the point of your renewal of registration, you need to show that, as a professional, you are living by the.
Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006
Advanced practice and professional regulation
Presentation transcript:

Mike Ridler Head of Hearings General Dental Council An overview of Fitness to Practise

THE FIVE BASIC STEPS FOR STAYING OUT OF TROUBLE Keep your registered address up to date Set up a Direct Debit for your ARF Always have professional indemnity Never ignore the GDC if we write to you (we don’t forget and we won’t go away !) Do your CPD and submit the returns

Referrals 2013: 2990 complaints (almost double the number for 2011) 2014 : : predict 3,300

FTP Overview New complaint Triage Assessment Investigating Committee Practice Committee Resumed Hearing

Triage - overview Test – “is the allegation capable of forming an allegation that the Registrants FTP impaired”? Complaints are ‘triaged’ and cases that cannot or should not be pursued are closed In 2014, 888 cases were closed at Triage The remaining complaints continue on to casework for investigation and assessment

Triage – case examples Examples of cases closed at Triage: Registrant’s profession is entirely incidental to the case i.e. no indication that patients are at risk or evidence of a risk of detriment to the profession e.g. a registrant in dispute with neighbour or registrant registered on internet dating site.

Triage – case examples Further examples of cases closed at Triage: Dispute re clinical judgment provided in clinical dental report e.g. in civil claims where a dentist’s interpretation of a patient’s treatment is contradicted by a second expert Customer service issues which do not impact on care Level or quality of service where there is no suggestion that a registrant is directly responsible e.g. complaints relating to waiting time

Triage – case examples Examples of cases closed at Triage: Complaints where the GDC has simply been copied in to correspondence and there is no suggestion that patients are at risk Anonymous complaints where there is no suggestion that patients are at risk Contractual or employment disputes where there is no suggestion that patients are at risk and there is an appropriate recourse available through the courts

Assessment Caseworkers are allocated & investigate cases until sufficient information for assessment Casework Managers test – “Does the information provided amount to an allegation that the registrant’s fitness to practice is impaired?” Managers close cases that cannot be pursued In 2014, 1298 cases were closed at assessment Cases with a prospect of success are referred to the Investigating Committee

Investigating Committee (IC) The IC test: Is there a reasonable prospect of the allegations being found proven? If yes, is there a real prospect of a Practice Comm finding the registrant’s FTP impaired? Investigating Committee can:  Close a case with no further action  Give advice or issue a warning (published or unpublished)  Adjourn a case for further information  Or if the case is sufficiently serious, they will refer it on to a practice committee.

Investigating Committee (IC) If there is a serious risk to patients, the public or the registrant themselves, the IC can refer the case to the Interim Orders Committee (IOC) at the same time as referring it to Professional Conduct (PCC), Health (HC) or Professional Performance Committees (PPC) In 2014, the IC decided 1012 cases and referred 321 registrants to the PCC In 2014, the IC and Registrar together referred 264 cases for Interim Orders

Interim Orders Committee (IOC) The IOC does not make findings of fact – it can only make an assessment of risk An IO can only be imposed for a maximum of 18 months and must be reviewed every 6 months The High Court can extend orders on application The IOC can only impose a suspension or conditions Grounds for making an IO - public protection, in the public interest and in the registrant’s own interests The Registrar can also make referrals to the IOC In 2014, out of 264 referrals, 144 IOs were made and 104 were not made. 25 were adjourned for various reasons

Practice Committees [1] 3 committees – Health Committee (HC), Professional Performance Committee (PPC) and Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) 129 cases heard by PCC in cases heard by PCC in

After Referral by the IC (KPI: 9 months to the hearing) Legal activities Prosecution investigate Hearings - Case Management actions, set date and length Service and notification Defence prepare case Hearings activities Assemble panels Arrange venue Book LA, Steno etc. Cttee Sec, Usher Programme of business and other documents

Composition: usually 3, max 5 (Dentists, DCPs, Lay) Legal Adviser Supported by Hearings Team (Cttee Sec and Usher) Separation of functions inside the GDC:  Fitness To Practise Team: complaints handling, IC, prosecution (want to win their case)  Hearings Team: listings, Panels, arrange and support sessions (neutral, want case to be heard fairly and efficiently with no grounds for appeal) Professional Conduct Committee

What does the Practice Committee do? Makes decisions on cases in a 2 stage process: Listens to evidence, decides on facts, announces its findings on each allegation Listens to explanations, mitigation, submissions; decides on impairment and sanction

Powers of Practice Committees Decides if Fitness to Practise impaired If FTP impaired, imposes sanction Reprimand Conditions Suspension for up to 12 months Erasure (not less than 5 years) Sanctions must be considered in ascending order of seriousness

Practice Committees

Resumed Cases Suspended or conditional registration that requires review from any Practice Committee Sanctions are slightly different – panel cannot erase on review. Instead they can vary, revoke or extend the existing order or substitute the order. They can also suspend indefinitely after a period of 2 years continual suspension A dedicated Case Review Team are responsible for monitoring registrants’ compliance with these orders In 2013, 52 resumed cases heard resulting in the continuation of 21 suspension orders and 31 condition orders

Other reasons for case closure… Voluntary Removal (VR) - a registrant can apply for VR at any part of the FTP process Rule 10 application – the IC can be asked to review a decision of a previous IC if appropriate, to reassess what allegation(s) ought to be considered by a Practice Committee – this can lead to cases being closed post reassessment

Issues* in Conduct Cases 2014 (1) Poor treatment94 Fraud/dishonesty47 Poor practice management15 Failure to obtain consent/explain treatment37 No professional indemnity/insurance 5 Conviction/caution (alcohol, drugs, theft, fraud, assault…)27 Conviction (possessing indecent or pornographic images) 2 Personal behaviour15 Indecent assault, inappropriate sexual behaviour 6 Other (miscellaneous) 8 * Cases often involve multiple issues: these figures cover the main ones but not every element which has been raised in Charges.

Issues* in Conduct Cases 2014 (2) Failure to take appropriate radiographs 41 Missing oral cancers 2 Failure to inform patient of adverse incident 4 Prescribing issues 21 Basis of treatment not clear (NHS/private) 5 Hygiene, Cross-infection control, Hazardous waste 10 No medical/dental history taken 14 Failure to co-operate with GDC or disclose convictions 16 Misleading advertising 6 Working outside scope of practice 12 Making racially offensive comments 2 * Cases often involve multiple issues: these figures cover the main ones but not every element which has been raised in Charges.

View from the other regulators Some seeing significant rises in referrals  Optical Council + 48%  Pharmaceutical Council + 54%  Chiropractors – 25%  Nursing Council + 10%  GMC / GDC – 0%

What does our caseload contain?

Treatment issues

Patients Interests

What would it be like for you ? Long drawn out (15 months +) Uncertain Worrying, pre-occupying Very stressful – for you, family, others Best avoided if at all possible

Importance of Communications Skills Probably 50% of cases involve communications issues of some sort Get those right and your risk of appearing at the GDC falls sharply Treatment plans: copies to patient, amend if plans change Explain options, details of treatment, benefits and risks Explain the basis of treatment (NHS or private), and costs Surgery and sedation: written pre- and post-operative instructions Obtain proper consent, document it, get signatures Keep good notes – could the next treating dentist understand them ? Handle complaints well and they most probably will not go further Keep in touch professionally: LDC, BDA, FGDP etc; do your CPD

The not too distant future….. Case Examiners to be introduced in 2016 Role of case examiners Effective from late summer 2016 Investigating Committee not abolished but scaled back Begin advertisement for case examiners posts – before end 2015 Interviews in early Spring 2016 Recruits train and work up from early Summer

Fitness to Practise Improvements – 2015 Initiatives Dedicated Screening Team – focus solely on triage (2 day KPI) and faster Interim Orders referrals (28 day KPI) Lean review of FTP process with added focus on quality/timeliness Customer Satisfaction – online feedback for Registrants/ Informants/ Witnesses Introduction of case examiners with powers to agree undertakings

Other New Initiatives New Research Regulation of Dental Services Programme Board Online Patient Panel

New Research Complaints Analysis Statistical analysis of GDC complaints data; Nature and trends of Fitness to Practise complaints to the GDC; Limitations of data; Potential similar analysis of data from external organisations and whether valid and meaningful comparisons or trends could be identified; Further research the GDC can take to continue to build our knowledge base in the coming years.

Regulation of Dental Services Board Members: GDC, the CQC and NHSE (and now includes the NHS Business Services Authority) Aims: Better understanding of how the overall system of dental regulation in England works and what can be done to improve it. Identify areas of overlap between the GDC, CQC and NHSE and whether the right part of the system deals with issues about performance in the most cost effective way. Understand how risk is identified, how information is shared and how well co-ordinated the system is in the event of a significant incident.

Online Patient Panel Results 93% very or fairly satisfied, while 6% were very or fairly dissatisfied; 31% of panel members said that they have some concerns about quality of dental care; 24% indicated that they have some concerns about the behaviour of dentists and DCPs - the main concerns for panel members were about poor quality of work, competence, costs and /or transparency of pricing.

Future Engagement Stakeholder meetings to take place six times a year; Corporate Strategy Feedback; New monthly for dental professionals, plus quarterly Gazette.

Case examples……

Case example 1 - Smith S referred by Nottinghamshire Police for 2 x minor motoring offences – Careless driving and speeding Evidence suggests offences did not involve drugs, alcohol or other aggravating factors Offence 1 dealt with by way of Magistrates Court fine (£400) and offence 2 by way of a fixed penalty

Case example 1 - Smith Pass triage test? Refer for Interim order – if yes, when? Pass Assessment stage? Investigation Committee refer? If yes, which committee? Final hearing – likely sanction?

Case example 1 - Smith Closed at Triage Reassured no alcohol or drugs involved Registrant’s profession is entirely incidental to the case i.e. no indication that patients are at risk or evidence of a risk of detriment to the profession Not capable of forming an allegation of impaired FTP.

Case example 2 - Phillips Clinical treatment provided to elderly patient in 2012 Patient claims P failed to assess, record or address pain in his UL7 tooth – “severe pain on hot or cold” No x-rays taken and no follow up advice given P advised patient to use sensodyne toothpaste and applied “Duraphat” varnish to UL7 Pain continued for further 7-10 days Second dentist at practice identifies cavity after x-ray and fills tooth No FTP history and attended a training course following initial complaint

Case example 2 - Phillips Pass triage test? Refer for Interim order – if yes, at what stage? Pass Assessment stage? Investigation Committee refer? If yes, which committee? Final hearing – likely sanction?

Case example 2 - Phillips The Investigating Committee decided: “the Committee considers that in order to sufficiently diagnose the cause of the patient’s presenting symptoms, the Registrant should have carried out further investigations, such as taking radiographs. Consequently, the Committee is satisfied that there is a real prospect of allegations 1(a), 1(d) and 2(a) being found proven” Next step? “In the circumstances (no FTP history/remedial CPD), the Committee is satisfied that there is no real prospect of a practice committee finding that the Registrant’s fitness to practise is currently impaired and that it would therefore be inappropriate to refer this matter to a practice committee”

Case example 2 - Phillips The Investigating Committee decided to conclude the case: “To close this matter without action would fail to indicate to the Registrant the seriousness of the alleged deficiencies, which cover fundamental areas of dentistry including assessments and record keeping. Having again taken into account the Registrant’s lack of previous fitness to practise history and the remediation demonstrated by the Registrant, the Committee is satisfied that it is both sufficient and proportionate to close this case with advice” Advice: “Necessary to undertake thorough assessments and investigations of a patient’s presenting dental condition; and To maintain full, consistent and sufficiently detailed records which should include full details of all assessments, investigation and treatment carried out.”

Case example 3 - Bachada Defrauded NHS in excess of £80,000 Defrauded patients in sum of £3,000-4,000 – patients thought receiving NHS treatment but charged private rates Over 4 year period Attempted to conceal by re-writing/destroying patient records Pleaded guilty to 2 counts of conspiracy to defraud in months imprisonment Previous – 2004 suspended by GDC false claims against NHS/ providing unnecessary treatment

Case example 3 - Bachada Pass triage test? Refer for Interim order – if yes, when? Pass Assessment stage? Investigation Committee refer? If yes, which committee? Final hearing – likely sanction?

Case example 3 - Bachada FtP impaired by virtue of conviction Erasure “exists because certain behaviours are so damaging to a registrant’s fitness to practise and to public confidence in dental professionals that removal of their professional status is the appropriate outcome” Dishonesty – “Patients have a right to rely on registrants’ integrity. Important choices about treatment options and significant financial decisions can be made on the basis not only of registrants’ skill but also of their honesty. Dishonesty, particularly when associated with professional practice, is highly damaging to a registrant’s fitness to practise and to public confidence in dental professionals.” Ignored 2009 PCC warning Erased – no appeal.

Questions