WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION A.I. ZOUBOULIS Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Chemistry, Div. Of Chem. Technol. Main aspects: Introduction Dangerous substances in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring of toxicants in the surface water in Poland Ewa Szalińska Cracow University of Technology, Poland curriculum in natural environmental science,
Advertisements

Overview of Environmental Contamination in Lao PDR Dr. Kesiny Phomkeona Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science National University of Laos.
Landfill Water Quality Project Paul Brooks, Lea Bullard, Leslie Harper, Amanda Strickland, Sarah van Schagen April 30, 2004 University of North Carolina.
Introduction to Chemistry Activity. SJWP June 18, Fish Kill Scenario There has been a massive fish kill in Lake St. Louis. Your team has been dispatched.
Regulation on Industrial Discharge to Public Sewer Regulation on Industrial Discharge to Public Sewer Kinji YAMADA Kinji YAMADAJSWA.
Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference June 2013 Curtis M. Goodman Marquette Area Wastewater Treatment Facility Jerald O. Thaler, P.E.
Hyojin Kim May 9 th 2008 California Water Symposium.
Metals and alloys in external constructions – changes in speciation and bioavailability of corrosion-induced metal runoff upon environmental entry. Associate.
ECOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT QUALITY DEVELOPED BY: Research Organization “Ukrainian Scientific Centre of the Ecology of Sea” (RO UkrSCES)
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
Central California ASBS Program Annual Report May 13, 2015.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Project. EM&A Program Structure Under Chemicals Management Initiative –SMOC projects and EM&A projects Main areas.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Case Studies from Egypt
Standards for Pollution Parameters
Water Quality of the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra) Huang Xiang and Mika Sillanpää November 19th, 2011, New Delhi International conference of ”River Waters:
1 Small Tributaries Loading Study #2: Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 1 – Draft FINAL report Lester McKee and Alicia Gilbreath Sources Pathways.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Calculating Numerical Local Limits Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pretreatment Program.
1 Relations between PM and persistent toxic substances Alexey Ryaboshapko, Meteorological Synthesizing Center “East” EG on Particulate Matter, Berlin,
AMGI/EURASAP Workshop Air Quality Management, Monitoring, Modeling, and Effects Zagreb, May 24-26, 2007 Andrija Mohorovičić Geophysical Institute Department.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009 S.I. No. 272 of 2009 Pat Duggan.
Challenges of Conducting Analytical Chemistry in Environmental Matrices May 8 th 2006 Meg Sedlak and Don Yee San Francisco Estuary Institute Oakland, California.
Water Chemistry Notes Mr. Distasio. Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Colorless, odorless gas Source: Respiration Removal: Photosynthesis Highest Levels: at night,
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Initial considerations of trace metal bioavailability: some regulatory experiences E. Unsworth 1, A. Peters 1, J. Comloquoy 2, M. Campbell 2 1 Scottish.
Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets set for the Demands of European Water Framework Directive Ulrich.
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI Dept. of Civil Engineering Division of Hydraulics & Environmental Engineering Laboratory of Environmental Engineering.
CEC SPA "Typhoon"Tiksi Meeting, Boulder, 7 March Experience in monitoring of airborne POPs, mercury and other metals in Russian Arctic. Perspectives.
Water Quality in San Francisco Bay J.A. Davis San Francisco Estuary Institute.
Potomac Toxics Monitoring Status and Issues ICPRB March 8, 2004.
Integrated initial Assessment of pressures and state of the Mediterranean marine environment in the framework of the application of Ecosystem Approach.
Proposal for estimation of surface water bodies background levels for selected metals Slovak Republic.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Metal bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive Implementation in monitoring and assessment frameworks Implementation of Bioavailability 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Associate Prof. Meral TOPCU SULAK
1 Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-1 Lecture -4 & 5.
Lynas Advanced Materials Plant
Dedicated maps on contaminants
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
Identification of River Basin Specific Pollutants and Derivation of Environmental Quality Standards under Water Framework Directive: Turkish Experience.
* Bioaccumulation of trace metals in Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Algerian west coast Y.L. Rouabhi 1,2,*, Z. Boutiba 2,
Current Status Chemical Metrology Sub Division, RCM LIPI
Public Meeting February 3, 2010
Common Toxic Pollutants and Analytical Methods
French groundwater monitoring networks
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets under the WFD Jens Arle, Ulrich Claussen & Patrick Müller Federal.
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Cations (mg/l) Wavelength Trace Elements (µg/l) Wavelength
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Environmental Engineering
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Spencer Bohaboy Policy Development Specialist Water Quality Policy
Dedicated maps on contaminants
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
Nickel Risk Assessment
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Analysis.
Heavy Metal Pollution.
Presentation transcript:

WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION A.I. ZOUBOULIS Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Chemistry, Div. Of Chem. Technol. Main aspects: Introduction Dangerous substances in water bodies 1 rst list 2 nd list Red list Industrial wastewaters

Permissible concentration limits for pollutants “Standards” Maximum permissible concentrations of pollutants based upon the available technology Number of controlling parameters: depended upon the specific use/application of water bodies Water Quality Standards (WQS) Related with: Toxicity Bioaccumulation Chemical speciation Bioavailability (not dissolved) Persistence Example: Cu

Dangerous substances in water bodies Directive of E.U. - Aim: to eliminate pollution (1 rst list) to reduce pollution (2 nd list) Dangerous substances are controlled: Most countries - with Limit Values (LV) - in ww (based upon BAT) UK – with Environmental Quality Standards (EQS)-in receiving water body (based upon specific use) Similar to Water Quality Standards (USA) –WQS (based upon toxicological studies)

Comparison between LV and EQS for Hg/Cd (μg/l) Hg Cd LV EQS LVEQS Lakes-rivers 50 1 (total) (total) Wetlands 50 0,3 (dissolved) 200 2,5 (dissolved) Coastal waters 50 0,3 (dissolved) 200 2,5 (dissolved)

Quality concentration limits for toxic metals in water bodies (μg/l) USA Toxic MetalLakes-RiversSeaWatersHumanHealt h CMCCCCCMCCCCW & OO As Cd Cr (III) Cr(VI) Cu Pb Hg Ni Se Ag Zn CMC: Contaminant Maximum Concentration Level (1h), CCC: Contaminant Continuous Concentration, W&O: swimming, drinking, consuming water organisms, O: consuming water organisms

Chemical substances included in the 1rst list E.g. metals: Hg, Cd, organic compounds: aldrin, DDT, CHCl 3, etc. For 109 substances need to be suggested LV or EQS (1995) Problem: which is the lowest concentration limit of these substances De minimis approach: the concentrations of these substances must be as low a possible In Greece, the LV can also be expressed as: a)Total quantity (kg/y) b)G of toxic substance /kg used material or /tn product Example: Lindane Both approaches must be followed: LV-EQS USA: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits, NPDES Problem: the set concentration limits could be in lower levels than the respective Method Detection Level (MDL) Practical Quantitation Level (PQL)

PollutantConcentration limits MDL Aldrin Chlordane Cyanide15 DDT Dieldrin Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Hexachloro benzene Mercury PAHs (total)0.31 PCBs (total) TCDD Toxaphene

AreaConcentration Dalmarnock (treated) Dalmuir (treated) Shieldhall (treated) Paisley (treated)20.8 <1.0 < Garnock Valley (non treated)50.0 <1.0 <42.2 < Irvine Valley (non treated) < Lindane concentrations (ng/l) in industrial wastewaters discharges EQS values for Lindane (ng/l) Lakes-Rivers100 Wetlands20 Coastal waters20

USA-Total Maximum Daily Load- TMDL Based upon the following parameters: number of polluted water bodies Watershed-geographical area covered Number of TMDL limits Number of different industrial activities monitoring data/ prediction models importance of environmental threat for the specific area Water Quality Based Effluent Limits, WQBEL Can be up to 280 times lower than the LV

Chemical (hazardous) substances of 2 nd list Included: several metals (less toxic): Cr, Pb, Zn, Cu, Ni, As pesticides: endosulfan, dichlorvos, attrazine EC Directive: estimation of EQS Methodology from WRc (UK) Literature review Evaluation of laboratory toxicity experiments Estimation of min possible concentration for which there are not expected negative effects in the receiving water bodies Security factor Background levels Other important parameters (hardness, temperature) Publication of EQS Re-evaluation of EQS according to the experience Example: Pb (biomonitoring by trout) Flexibility in limits setting (relative, not absolute limits), Pollution trading

Hardness mg/l CaCO 3 Rivers with salmoidsRivers with cyprinids > Suggested values for inorganic Pb in U.K (mean annual values, μg dissolved Pb/l) Mean concentration values of Pb in Glengonnar river (μg/l) Distance from the point source (km) Pb totalPb dissolvedHardness (mg CaCO 3 /l)

Chemical toxic substances of Red list: Priority Pollutants Most toxic substances: All of 1 rst list and some of the 2 nd Criteria: Toxicity, Persistence, Bioaccumulation, Production rate, Physicochemical properties Elimination plans (timely) for certain substances Problem: there are not enough data for loading of controlled substances due to flowrate variabilities and to different concentrations In order to reduce the disposal of these toxic substances e.g. in North Sea, the inland disposal of them must be systematically controlled: Application of PP/waster minimization Environmental management techniques Nevertheless, it could be possible that also after the implication of these measures, a visible improvement in North-Sea environment could not be noticed In Greece: another parameter controlling also the sum of all toxix substances in wastewaters (not onlyindividually): Y1/S1 +Y2/S2 + Y3/S3 +……….Yn/Sn < 3

Management of industrial wastewaters and its limitations USA: Determination of a) a general frame (EPA) b) Specified regional limits Substan ces All Industries- Maximum concentration (mg/l) Industries with mean daily discharge >20000 m 3 /d Mean daily concentration (mg/l) Industries with mean daily discharge <20000m 3 /d Mean daily concentration (mg/l) As Cd Cr Cu8.0 Pb Hg Ni Ag Zn CN

Permitted maximum concentrations of pollutants in wastewaters Pollution parameterConcentration (mg/l) BOD5300 TSS350 pH5-10 Oil250 Fe250 Cu3 Pb0.5 Hg0.0005