EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Goals and Implementation Challenges Overview of NCore Aspects of the Monitoring Rule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AIR MONITORING REGULATIONS ON TRIBAL AIR MONITORING A First Look.
Advertisements

Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
EPA’s Lead Modeling Study at the Santa Monica Airport Kim Hoang, PhD, MPH EPA Region 9.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
Air Pollution Grab Bag. Middletown Coke Produce coke from coal which will be used by AK Steel to produce iron Facility will have 100 ovens and produce.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
NACAA FALL MEMBERSHIP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 21-23, Overview of NAAQS Monitoring Issues Lewis Weinstock NACAA Fall Meeting Boston, MA September 22,
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Precursor Gas Quality Assurance Implementation Dennis K. Mikel EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Database and Analytical Tool Development for the Management of Data Derived from US DOE (NETL) Funded Fine Particulate (PM 2.5 ) Research.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
Gordon Pierce WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Denver, CO November 6, 2013.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 Overview of the National Monitoring Strategy with an Emphasis on NCore Mike Papp Ambient Air Monitoring Group EPA OAQPS Dec. 12, 2006 Las Vegas.
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Conceptual Design of an Enhanced Multipurpose Aerometric Monitoring Network in Central California NOV. 15, 2002 AWMA SYMPOSIUM ON AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENT.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Ambient Monitoring Update NACAA Fall Meeting Chet Wayland, AQAD Division Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 1 October 3-5, 2011 Cleveland,
What’s on the Horizon? Allabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
National Ambient Air Monitoring Networks Now and Later PM model evaluation workshop.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
Regional Air Grant Coordinators Meeting PM 2.5 Monitoring and Funding April 17, 2007.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Current Capabilities and Future Directions of CASTNET
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment
National Monitoring Steering Committee Report
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Scorecards.
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
2018 State Implementation Plan for the Imperial County 12 ug/m3 PM2
Presentation transcript:

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Goals and Implementation Challenges Overview of NCore Aspects of the Monitoring Rule

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Goals of the Today’s Workshop NCore monitoring rule requirements. NCore monitoring objectives and network design implications Meeting the data quality objectives. Technological and procedural requirements. Challenges of NCore-type site operations. Follow-up issues. NCore

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Number of Criteria Pollutant Monitors Reporting to EPA’s AQS Database (2004)

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Station Attributes Collocation of multiple pollutant and supporting measurements. Robust suite of filter- based PM samplers. Emphasis on continuous operating instruments. Use of high-sensitivity precursor gas monitors. Diversity of representative site locations. Leverage with existing multipollutant networks. Candidate NCore Site Pinnacle Park, New York

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Relating NCore Monitoring System Objectives to other Ambient Networks ObjectiveMonitor TypesExample Analyses/Rationale Public reporting (continuous PM 2.5 and ozone)Local sites (primary) NCore sites (secondary) direct reporting through AIRNow and AIRNowTech Emission strategy development (trace gases, PM 2.5 speciation, VOCs*) NCore sites (primary)model evaluation, source apportionment and other observational models Assessing effectiveness of emission reductions and AQ trends (trace gases, PM 2.5 speciation, VOCs*) NCore sites (primary) Local sites (secondary) time series comparisons to emissions projections Support health assessments and NAAQS reviews (trace gases, O 3, PM 2.5 and PM (mass and species)) NCore sites (primary) Research and local sites (secondary) ambient input to exposure models; direct association analyses Compliance (NAAQS comparisons) (PM 2.5 and O 3 ) Local sites (primary) NCore sites (secondary) point and spatial field comparisons to NAAQS Science support (all pollutants)Research sites (primary) NCore sites (secondary) methods evaluation, size distribution analyses, diagnostic analysis (model processes, particle formation) Ecosystem assessment (NO y, HNO 3 *, NH 3 *, O 3 )NCore sitesmass balance analysis, deposition calculations * Not required in NCore regulation

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Minimum NCore Network Requirements (All fifty States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands) 1 Site 2 or 3 Sites

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Between 62 and 71 stations must be operational by January 1, –NCore monitoring plan due July 1, 2009 as part of annual monitoring network plan. Items that can be negotiated: Selection of two versus three stations in listed States. Delegation of required sites between State and local agencies. Operation of additional sites by States, local agencies, and/or Tribes. Urban versus rural locations. NOy and meteorological measurements (more later). –NCore sites are approved at Administrator level. Ultimate size of deployed network:~75 stations. Other Aspects of NCore Network Requirements

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Parameter Requirements MeasurementsComments PM 2.5 FRM masstypically 24 hr. average every 3 rd day PM 2.5 speciationOrganic and elemental carbon, major ions and trace metals (24 hour average; every 3 rd day) PM FRM masstypically 24 hr. average every 3 rd day PM speciationtypically 24 hr. average every 3 rd day Species and analyses to be determined continuous PM 2.5 mass1 hour reporting interval ozone (O 3 )all gases through continuous monitors carbon monoxide (CO)capable of trace levels (low ppb and below) where needed sulfur dioxide (SO 2 )capable of trace levels (low ppb and below) where needed nitrogen oxide (NO)capable of trace levels (low ppb and below) where needed total reactive nitrogen (NO y ) 1 capable of trace levels (low ppb and below) where needed surface meteorology 2 wind speed and direction, temperature, relative humidity Not required but desirable: precipitation, solar radiation 1 In areas with negligible expected difference between NOy and NOx measured concentrations, the Administrator may allow for waivers that permit NOx monitoring to be substituted for the required NOy monitoring at applicable NCore sites. 2 The requirement for meteorological monitoring can be waived by the Administrator if the NCore site is not suitable for representative meteorological measurements due to the site’s physical surroundings and it is possible for nearby meteorological measurements to fulfill this data requirement.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Methods For SO 2, CO, NO 2, O 3, PM 2.5, or PM –Must be a FRM or FEM, or an Approved Regional Method (ARM) for any monitors intended for comparison with applicable NAAQS. –Alternative SO 2, CO, NO 2, O 3, PM 2.5, or PM methodologies can be proposed for monitors not intended for NAAQS comparison. Such techniques must be detailed in the network description required by §58.10 and subsequently approved by the Administrator. –Not an issue for NO Y monitors (no applicable NAAQS). FRM or FEM trace-level SO 2 and CO monitors are becoming more widely available, so this issue has become less significant. – The use of trace-level monitors is an integral part of meeting NCore data objectives. They are highly recommended in areas where the concentration of some pollutants are low. –Includes rural sites, background and transport sites, and many sites in urban areas where SO 2, NO 2, and CO levels have declined significantly over time.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Site Placement Design Issues –Need sites that are representative of ambient concentrations over an extensive area. Urban scale or larger. Neighborhood scale if location is representative of many similar neighborhoods. –Do not want to be influenced by local emission sources that are not generally impacting the entire urban or rural area. –Sometimes easier to screen sites based on what is not desirable (e.g., impact by significant nearby emission points, atypical topography, small- scale meteorological influences) Collocated with PAMS, NATTS, CASTNET, and STN sites where possible. Logistical Issues –Long term sites with reasonable assurance of 5+ year “permission” period. –Room for multiple gas monitors and associated equipment, integrated samplers, meteorology tower, NOy converter mounting. –Adequate utilities (broadband internet highly desirable), well controlled shelter environment. –Ground footprint allows accessibility for TTP audit vehicle.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Appropriate For NCore? - Cast Your Vote SITE #1 Urban location. Impacted by mobile source emissions. Approximately 1km downwind from major Interstate corridor. Located on school property bordering residential neighborhood. Existing STN station. SITE #2 Urban location. Impacted by mobile and point source emissions. Approximately 200m from a major point source. Located in a fire station parking lot. Existing PM station. Room for shelter expansion. SITE #3 Rural location. Impacted by some wind-blown dust and crustal PM. Approximately 500m from a medium-sized animal feeding operation. Located within a small State park. Potential new site location. SITE #4 Rural location. Affected by transport from a large urban area. No nearby emission sources. Site at elevation of approximately 1000m in an area of rolling terrain near mountains. Potential new site. Limited road access & utilities.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Appropriate For NCore? SITE #1: YES Urban location. Impacted by mobile source emissions. Approximately 1km downwind from major Interstate corridor. Located on school property bordering residential neighborhood. Existing STN station. SITE #2: NO Urban location. Impacted by mobile and point source emissions. Approximately 200m from a major point source. Located in a fire station parking lot. Existing PM station. Room for shelter expansion. SITE #3: NO Rural location. Impacted by some wind-blown dust and crustal PM. Approximately 500m from a medium-sized animal feeding operation. Located within a small State park. Potential new site location. SITE #4: MAYBE Rural location. Affected by transport from a large urban area. No nearby emission sources. Site at elevation of approximately 1000m in an area of rolling terrain near mountains. Potential new site. Limited road access & utilities.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Status Of NCore Pilot Program We have information on approximately 70 existing and potential NCore site locations. Some of these sites have equipment in varying stages of installation and operation. Regions are negotiating with States about some of these locations. Final proposed NCore sites must be included in July 1, 2009 plan but earlier approvals would be optimal. OAQPS is developing an AMTIC-based web tool to help organize information about NCore sites and serve as an outreach tool for potential data users. How you can help: –Insure that all fields in AQS are completed for candidate sites. –Data request sent through Regions for GPS-obtained coordinates, site and cardinal direction photographs (8 sectors), currently operating parameters. –Please forward information to Kevin Cavender at: – –Web tool being reviewed by EPA Regions and will be opened to States when site information has been received.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Network Web Tool

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Candidate NCore Site Locations November 1, 2006

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore To-Do List for Monitoring Agencies Work with Regions and OAQPS to finalize sites Discuss and resolve funding issues Instrument procurement –Trace level monitors –Calibrators, zero air sources, and gas cylinder standards –Meteorological equipment –Review data acquisition needs and communication status Attend related training workshops and conferences Proceed with instrument deployment –Draft specific SOP’s and revise QAPP’s based on operational experience –Start reporting data to AirNowTECH and AQS based on agency experience and internal QC/QA procedures

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop OAQPS Precursor Gas Team Supporting NCore Implementation Products and deliverables Method Fact Sheets complete Lab and field testing complete Testing tables available Instrument Specific SOPs complete CO, SO 2, NO y, calibration system Technical Assistance Document (TAD) Field operations are ongoing at Burden’s Creek site Project being completed on precursor gas DQO’s Future work on QAPP for Burden’s Creek could serve as NCore model. Training videos supporting meteorological work Information located on EPA’s web site at: Real-time data available from EPA field site (inquire for access information) –

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Precursor Gas/NCore Program Contact List ContactItem Phone XXXX Tim HanleyProgram Lead, funding, network design Lewis WeinstockNetwork design, data acquisition, training, calibrators Solomon RicksCO Kevin CavenderNOy Nealson WatkinsData acquisition, meteorology Dennis MikelQuality assurance, manifold systems Geri