Part I Optics. FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C. Johnstone Fermilab/Particle Accelerator Corporation Trinity College, Oxford University Oxford, U.K. 9/13/ 2011.
Advertisements

Linear Collider Damping Rings Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
FFAG Ring of magnets, like synchrotron, not solid like cyclotron Fixed field magnets, like cyclotron, not variable like synchrotron Can work at relativistic.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
Vertical Orbit-Excursion FFAGs (VFFAGs) and 3D Cyclotrons I.Principle & Magnetic Fields II.Proton Driver Study III.Isochronous 3D Cyclotrons June 2014.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Y. Mori Kyoto/KEK FFAG C. OH FFAG: Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Strong focusing(AG focusing, phase focusing) Like synchrotron, but fixed field Moving.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
FFAG for next Light Source Alessandro G. Ruggiero Light Source Workshop January 24-26, 2007.
Muon Acceleration Plan David Kelliher ASTeC/STFC/RAL UKNF WP1, October 9 th, 2008.
Novel Constant-Frequency Acceleration Technique for Nonscaling Muon FFAGs Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, October 2004 Classical scaling FFAGs (MURA) have geometrically.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Muon Acceleration and FFAG Shinji Machida KEK NuFact05 Summer Institute June 12-20, 2005.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
1 Fixed Field Alternating Gradient (FFAG) Accelerator Part I Shinji Machida ASTeC/RAL 3rd March, 2008 The Cockcroft Institute Lecture Course.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Study of Compact Medical FFAG Accelerators - Radial Sector Type - T. Misu, Y. Iwata, A. Sugiura, S. Hojo, N. Miyahara, M. Kanazawa, T. Murakami, and S.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou. PS2 meant as potential replacement of existing PS PS2 main characteristics given by LHC requirements – Circumference defined.
1 Introduction and overview of FFAG accelerators S. Machida CCLRC-ASTeC 7 February, ffag/machida_ ppt.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Dejan Trbojevic Non-Scaling Fixed Gradient FFAG Optimization and Proton Therapy Accelerator from 25 – 250 MeV 12 – 16, October 2004 CONTENT:
Scaling Gas-filled Muon Ring Coolers Al Garren, UCLA Ringcooler Mini-workshop Tucson, December 15-16, 2003.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
ADSR Inst.July 2009 From PAMELA to ADSR, T.Yokoi From PAMELA to ADSR Takeichiro Yokoi (JAI)
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Suzie Sheehy DPhil Candidate, John Adams Institute 3/9/08 PAMELA lattice studies Dynamics of the Machida lattice.
Introduction to NS-FFAGs and EMMA Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Part I Optics

FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating Gradient focusing with DC magnets. Orbit moves depending on momentum like cyclotron. Although orbit moves, focusing (or tune) is the same for all momentum. –zero chromaticity

Storage rings such as LANL-PSR, SNS are FFAG? They were not. –They are Fixed Field and Alternating Gradient. –However, do not satisfy zero-chromaticity within a wide momentum range, say a factor of 3. –They are ordinary synchrotrons. Since there is no acceleration or ramping of magnet, DC magnet can be used. Nowadays they are, however, called FFAG. –New concept of “non-scaling” FFAG. –Non-scaling means no zero-chromaticity condition satisfied. –If the orbit excursion due to acceleration is small (namely, small dispersion), acceleration without ramping magnet is possible. –Since chromaticity is finite, tune moves in a wide range. Tune may cross even integer resonance several times.

Non-scaling FFAG Essentially only bends and quads, no nonlinear elements As small dispersion as possible to make orbit excursion small Large swing of phase advance, say 150 deg. at low momentum and 30 deg. at high momentum. Nonlinear longitudinal dynamics.

Non-scaling FFAG example by Trbojevic at BNL Orbits corresponding to dp/p=-33% to 33%. Integer part of tune moves for about 2 units.

Cardinal conditions of scaling FFAG Geometrical similarity   : average curvature  : local curvature  : generalized azimuth Constancy of k at corresponding orbit points k : index of the magnetic field [figures]

Solutions Magnetic field profile should be radial dependence Bz(r) r

Two kinds of azimuthal dependence (1) “radial sector type” satisfies machine center

Two kinds of azimuthal dependence (2) “spiral sector type” satisfies since machine center

Radial and Spiral From K.R.Symon, Physical Review, Vol.103, No.6, p.1837, 1956.

Days of invention In 1950s, the FFAG principle was invented independently by –Ohkawa, Japan –Symon, US –Kolomensky, Russia FFAG development at MURA (Midwestern University Research Associate) –Radial sector electron FFAG of 400 keV –Spiral sector electron FFAG of 180 keV Both has betatron acceleration unit, not RF. There was a proposal of 30 GeV proton FFAG. Even collider was proposed called “two beam accelerator”. –Same magnet (lattice) will give counter rotating orbit for the same charge.

Two beam accelerator The same charged particle can rotate in both directions. –Sign of neighboring magnets is opposite. –Outer radius has more bending strength. Colliding point

Comparison with cyclotron CyclotronFFAG Magnetic fieldstatic (small field index)static (large field index) Orbit radiusmove in wide rangemove in small range Trans. focusingweak (n<1)strong Long. focusingnoyes Duty factor100%10-50% RF frequencyfixedvaried Extraction energyfixedvariable Pros:- Small orbit excursion assures small magnet. - Strong focusing in transverse and synchrotron oscillations keep bunch tight. - Extraction energy is variable. Cons:- Field with large index may be more involved. - Duty factor is not 100%. - RF frequency must be varied.

Comparison with synchrotron synchrotronFFAG Magnetic fieldtime varyingstatic Orbit radiusnonmove in small range Trans. focusingstrongstrong Long. focusingyesyes Duty factor1%10-50% RF frequencyvaried and synchronizedvaried with bending field Particles per bunchlargesmall Pros:- Much rapid acceleration without synchronization of magnet and RF. - Higher duty factor. - Intensity effects are not critical. Cons:- Orbit excursion need bigger aperture magnet.

Prospects of FFAG Repetition rate can be 1 kHz or even more. –Only RF pattern determines a machine cycle because magnetic field is DC and no need of synchronization between RF and magnets. High beam current can be obtained with modest number of particles per bunch. –Space charge and other collective effects are below threshold because of small number of particles per bunch. Transverse acceptance is huge.

Design procedure Rough design with approximated methods. –Elements by elements (LEGO-like) or matrix formalism –Smooth approximation 3D design of magnets with TOSCA Particle tracking –Runge-Kutta integration –More systematic way If necessary, back to the previous phase.

Combination of gradient of body and angle at edge Focusing of gradient magnet Focusing of Edge Type –Radial sector Singlet (FODO) Doublet Triplet (DFD, FDF) –Spiral sector

Elements by elements In a body, focal length is proportional to r. Length of drift space is proportional to r. At an edge, focal length is proportional to r.

Orbit (assumption) Assume orbit consist of arc of a circle straight line Example of triplet radial Sector.

Model of singlet From the center of F to the center of D.

Example of singlet 8 cells

Collider (two beam accelerator) Additional conditions to singlet (approximation) F and D has the same strength, only the sign is opposite. Bending angle is scaled with radius.

Example of two beam accelerator 16 FODO cells

Model of DFD triplet From the center of F to the center of drift Edge focusing

Example of DFD triplet 8 cells, similar to POP FFAG at KEK.

Model of FDF triplet From the center of D to the center of drift. Edge focusing terms.

DFD vs. FDF If k is the same, phase advance in horizontal is smaller in FDF. Injection and extraction is easier in FDF.

Model of spiral Vertical focusing mainly comes from edge, while horizontal focusing is in the mail body.

Example of spiral 16 cells

Model of doublet Need iteration

Example of doublet 8 cells

Edge of FFAG Edge angle of radial sector FFAG is determined once opening angle is fixed. Stronger vertical focusing can be realized with more edge angle.

Model of fringe in synchrotrons Steffen (CERN handbook): linear fringe –1/f = -1/rho [Tan[e]+b / (6 rho Cos[e])] e, face angle b, fringe field region rho, bending radius Enge and Brown: Enge function –1/f = -1/rho Tan[e-psi] psi = (g/rho) F[e] F[e] = F1/(6 g) (1+Sin[e]^2) / Cos[e] [1-F1 / (6 g) k2 (g/rho) Tan[e]] F1 = 6 Int[Bz/B0 - (Bz/B0)^2, {s, -Inf, Inf}] –If linear slope, F1=b. and when psi<<1 、 it becomes the same as Steffen. SAD: expansion of Hamiltonian to 4th order. –1/f(fringe part only) ~ -1/rho [F1/(6 rho) - 2/3 z^2/(F1 rho)] /p^2

Model of three fringe functions It is not clear which is correct.

Smooth approximation (results only) For radial sector For spiral sector

Particle tracking Runge-Kutta Thin-lens kick Symplectic map

Comparison Runge-kutta and map based tracking.