1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Direct Measurement of the NuMI Flux with Neutrino-Electron Scattering in MINERvA Jaewon Park University of Rochester On behalf of MINERvA Collaboration.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
Measuring the NuMI Beam Flux for MINERvA Melissa Jerkins University of Texas at Austin NUINT 2011: Dehradun, Uttarakhand.
Physics Topics in MINER A David Boehnlein - Fermilab for the MINERvA Collaboration Overview of MINERvA The high intensity of the NuMI beamline at Fermilab.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Recent results from NA61/SHINE Seweryn Kowalski for the NA61/SHINE Collaboration University of Silesia, Katowice.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
The CAPTAIN Detector Liquid argon TPC – 5 instrumented tons – hexagonal TPC with vertical drift – 2000 channels, 3mm pitch – cryostat 7700 liter capacity,
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
NOW 2010 Otranto, 10 Settembre 2010 Hadro-Production Experiments and NA61/SHINE at CERN Alessandro Bravar.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
ICHEP 2010 Paris, 24 Juillet 2010 Hadro-Production Measurements for Neutrino Experiments by the NA61/SHINE Experiment at CERN Alessandro Bravar for the.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 22, 2011.
Žarko Pavlović, 2 Patricia Vahle, 1 Sacha Kopp, 2 1 University College, London 2 University of Texas at Austin Flux Uncertainties for the NuMI Beam.
1 Mariyan Bogomilov CERN,(Switzerland) University of Sofia and INRNE, (Bulgaria) Kiten, Bulgaria THE HARP EXPERIMENT THE HARP EXPERIMENT.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
The muon component in extensive air showers and its relation to hadronic multiparticle production Christine Meurer Johannes Blümer Ralph Engel Andreas.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Hadro-production measurements for the T2K experiment with the NA61/SHINE detector at the CERN SPS Claudia Strabel, ETH Zurich For the NA61/SHINE Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Wine & Cheese November 18 th 2005 Meson Production Results from E910 and Their Relevance to MiniBooNE E910 MiniBooNE.
Comparison HARP data with GEANT4 and MARS Simulations NUFACT06, UC Irvine 28 August 2006 Stephen Brooks 1, Paul Soler 2, Kenny Walaron 2 1 Rutherford Appleton.
The MINER A Experiment Sacha Kopp, University of Texas at Austin on behalf of the Minerva Collaboration.
D. Jason Koskinen IoP Nuclear and Particle Physics Divisional Conference 4/4/ MINOS Neutrino Flux Using NuMI Muon Monitors for calculating flux for.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Recent Results from NA61 (Flux Related Systematic Uncertainties) and Recent Results from T2K (Overall Systematic Uncertainties) NNN15 Stony Brook Oct.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.
Claudia Strabel, ETH Zurich SPS Annual Meeting June 21 – 22, 2010 Hadro-production measurements for T2K with NA61/SHINE at the CERN SPS.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM physics with a μ storage ring.
MINERvA Deborah Harris Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee Meeting January 22, 2014.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Cracow Epiphany Conference,
Conventional Neutrino Beams Day 2
Production Studies: the HARP results WP2 December 2008
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David Schmitz Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Hadron Production Measurements for Fermilab Neutrino Experiments at NA61/SHINE

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Though the details and size of the impact may vary, accurate neutrino flux predictions are an important issue for both long and short-baseline neutrino experiments (see S. Zeller’s talk from this morning)  Note also: Improved flux predictions -> improved cross section measurements, another important input for oscillation experiments Traditionally a very difficult problem in DIF neutrino experiments  Early wide-band beams limited to > 30% uncertainty in flux calculations Largest uncertainty comes from primary hadron production in the beamline target by incident proton beam  Impact of secondary interactions in the target varies depending on the proton beam energy and target design Calculating Neutrino Fluxes L. Aliaga

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, A quick look at two case studies of experiments which have collected dedicated hadron production data  MiniBooNE and HARP  T2K and NA61 Then will describe an on-going effort to explore possible collection of new hadron production data at the NA61/SHINE experiment at CERN with relevance for Fermilab neutrino beams  Provide external constraints for precise neutrino flux calculations for NuMI experiments (MINERvA, NOvA, MINOS+) and a future LBNE beamline  Perhaps also an opportunity to expand on measurements of pion production and measure kaon production for the Booster Neutrino Beam (MiniBooNE, MicroBooNE), though the low-energy beam introduces additional challenges Hadron Production for Neutrino Beams

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Booster Neutrino Beamline (BNB) impinges 8.9 GeV/c protons on a 1.7 beryllium target Case Study 1: MiniBooNE and HARP Example of predicted fluxes at MiniBooNE detector location using four different hadron interaction models available in Geant4 (circa 2003) Of course, with hard work one can do much better than this Phys.Rev.D79, (2009)

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, HARP Hadron Production Experiment at CERN PS (ran in 2003)  8.9 GeV/c protons  Thin (5% ) and thick BNB replica (0.5, 1.0 ) beryllium targets Case Study 1: MiniBooNE and HARP

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Case Study 1: MiniBooNE and HARP 6 Kinematic coverage of thin target data set at HARP component directly constrained by HARP thin target data Secondary interactions relatively small effect in BNB Errors on production cross sections can be propagated to neutrino flux prediction

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, T2K interested in both absolute flux predictions at their near detector for making cross section measurements and event rate ratios, Far/Near, for oscillation measurements T2K has collaborated with NA61/SHINE experiment to perform new hadron production measurements in p+C collisions at 31 GeV/c In 2011, published total production cross section and differential cross sections (p h,  h ) for  +,  - (arXiv: ) and K + (arXiv: ) production using initial lower statistics, thin-target data set collected in 2007 T2K example is relevant for looking at impact of dedicated hadron production data, but also as demonstration of capabilities of NA61/SHINE detector for making these measurements Case Study 2: T2K and NA61/SHINE

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Measurement of total production cross section for 31 GeV/c p+C Systematic uncertainties on differential cross section points 5-10% 2.3% overall normalization uncertainty Uncertainties on hadron spectra propagated directly into xsec and oscillation analyses Case Study 2: T2K and NA61/SHINE arXiv: ++

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Case Study 2: T2K and NA61/SHINE 9 Conclusions from the pion production paper, arXiv: :

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, At higher beam energies (order 100 GeV):  The Good: Invariant cross section scaling laws seem to work pretty well On-going analysis effort within MINERvA to make use of existing hadron production data to constrain primary and secondary interactions in NuMI beam Monte Carlo wherever possible  NA49 measurements of pion production in p+C at 158 GeV/c (Eur.Phys.J.C49: ,2007)  Use scaling laws to “predict” invariant cross sections at 31 GeV/c and compare to NA61 measurements. Such studies help determine systematic uncertainty in scaling from 158 GeV to 120 GeV  Available cross section data from HARP, Barton et. al., NA61, etc. for incident proton/  at energies from GeV very valuable for constraining secondary interactions in the beamline   /K ratio measurements from MIPP at 120 GeV to provide kaon constraint The Good and Bad of Higher Energies

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, At higher beam energies (order 100 GeV):  The Good: Invariant cross section scaling laws seem to work pretty well  The Bad: Secondary interactions are much bigger effect at high energy The Good and Bad of Higher Energies Secondary interactions in the NuMI target much larger effect than for Booster experiments [<10% in BNB]

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Combination of thin target cross section measurements and production off replica targets best constraint on flux Monte Carlos Group exploring possibility of collecting new hadron production data for Fermilab neutrino experiments at the NA61/SHINE experiment at CERN  Now assembling LOI including sketch of physics case and run plan  Opportunity to collect test data set with 120 GeV beam on thin graphite target this June ( ~ 2 days)  These data will already be useful for constraining primary production and further testing scaling approaches  More complete run would come in 2014 after CERN shutdown New Hadron Production Data at NA61

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Possible NA61 Data Sets 13

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Multiple experiments and beamlines represented:  MINERvA, MINOS, NOvA, LBNE, MiniBooNE, MicroBooNE  NuMI, BNB, LBNE Participating institutions:  FNAL  LANL  University of Texas at Austin  University of Colorado  Columbia University  University of Florida  Northwestern University  University of Pittsburgh  University of Rochester  William and Mary Participating Institutions (so far)

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NA61/SHINE Spectrometer 15 Incident beam is mixed p/  produced by 400 GeV primary SPS beam (NA61 physics run plan includes GeV/c) Particle Tracking performed in 4 TPCs Adjustable magnetic field settings allow tuning of kinematic acceptance (up to 9 Tm bending power) Particle separation performed through dE/dx and ToF

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Example NA61 Acceptance for NuMI 16 Pions accepted in NA61 Pions that make a   in an on-axis experiment at NuMI [‘low-energy’ beam tune] per 1e6 inelastic interactions Currently working on studies for the different beamlines, configurations, on/off-axis, etc.

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, Accurate neutrino flux calculations at super beam facilities are challenging but are increasingly important as we aim to make more and more precise measurements in neutrino physics (both cross sections and oscillations) Dedicated hadron production measurements a key ingredient to achieving precise flux calculations Group from 10 US institutions (so far) exploring possibility of collecting new data relevant for NuMI experiments (MINERvA, NOvA, MINOS+), Booster experiments (MiniBooNE, MicroBooNE) and LBNE at NA61/SHINE experiment at CERN Lower energy ( ~ 8 GeV) running is challenging, but could be worth the effort, especially for SBL program using the BNB (in particular, for measuring kaons and pions making low energy neutrinos) Important thin target test run (but with real physics potential) being planned for June, 2012 More complete data run could begin after CERN shutdown in 2014 SummarySummary

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Backups…Backups… 18

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NA61 Acceptance 19 Will require taking data in multiple field settings to get coverage of: low momentum/high angle & forward production

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NA61 Acceptance 20

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NA61 Particle ID 21

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Ex: T2K and NA61 22 ++ --

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NA61 Systematics 23 ++ --

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, First measurements of K + production from 2007 thin target 31 GeV/c data now also available Of course, important for determining electron neutrino beam content and high-energy muon neutrino spectrum Statistical errors large, but as with pions this is only 2007 data set (2009 = 10 x 2007) T2K and NA61 arXiv:

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21,

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21,

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, T2K e appearance PRL  Neutrino cross-section models contribute significant systematics; Important for both signal and background  Followed by detector systematics and flux Example: T2K e Appearance arXiv::

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NuMI Beam 28 Intensity: ~35e12 P.O.T per spill about 1 event and a few rock muons in MINER A per spill Spill length/frequency: 10ms / ~0.5 Hz. Beam power: 300 – 350 kW Mean energy of NuMI beam tuned by changing longitudinal positions of the target and horns Reversing current in focusing horns changes beam from mostly neutrinos to mostly antineutrinos

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 NuMI Flux Components 29

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Constraining NuMI Flux with NA49 Data 30 CERN experiment NA49 published measurements on thin carbon targets: p(158 GeV/c) + C ->  + + X p(158 GeV/c) + C ->  - + X (not shown) Also looking at lower energy data to cross-check secondary interaction models Eur.Phys.J.C49: ,2007 L. Aliaga

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Constraining NuMI Flux with NA49 Data 31 Eur.Phys.J.C49: ,2007 neutrino energy (GeV) Reweighted flux 20% below Geant4 flux prediction in the peak! L. Aliaga

Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Phi Dependence of NuMI Beam 32