Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Organizational Learning for System Improvement. The Philadelphia Department of Human Services mission is to provide and promote safety, permanency, and.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
Youth Outcome Questionnaire & Arkansas Indicators Compliance Rates and Satisfaction with Services Kazi Ahmed Paula Stone October 18, 2012.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Elementary School Counselor
Module 1 Learning More about the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
LAKESIDE WELLNESS PROGRAM - PBHCI LEARNING COMMUNITY REGION #3 ORLANDO, FLORIDA, RUTH CRUZ- DIAZ, BSN EXT
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Webinar—General Information Training will begin in a moment; all phone lines are currently muted.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Committee on Health Equity and Policy (CHEP) AMHPAC Committee September 11, 2014 Presented by Greta Coe, AMH On behalf of CHEP.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Preventing Family Crisis Finding the Assistance that your Family Needs.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
The State of New Hampshire’s Family Involvement with the Child Outcomes Process.
DRAFT ENHANCED FOSTER HOME (EFH) Eckerd Youth Alternative Teen Foster Home Initiative Teen Foster Homes are challenging on several different levels. Teens.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Step 1: Build a Planning Team
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
North Carolina and the Supports Intensity Scale
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
1 CMHS Block Grant Peer Reviews Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council California Mental Health Planning Council April.
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Ms. Boldt.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Integrated systems of care Presented by: Jolanta McCall Head of Paediatric Audiology/NHSP.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
FY 2010 Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grant Application.
Strength-Based Feedback and Goal-Setting Sessions.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 19, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Parents, Caregivers and Youth Information on BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale April 13, 2012.
Schoolwide Systems Review: Module 3.0 Gather Cohort 7 Middle Schools.
Developing Smart objectives and literature review Zia-Ul-Ain Sabiha.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Sharing Your School Climate Data with STAFF Directions for PowerPoint users: The following is a sample template for sharing your DSCS results.
Data Collection Interview
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Team work makes the dream work!
Presentation transcript:

Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012

Purpose of this presentation Introduce care coordinators/facilitators to the process of conducting the ISA Progress Review and collecting BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale data. Assist you with steps to a successful process of data collection Review reasons why we are using these tools to collect outcome data Review scoring process and availability for the BERS- 2 Parent Rating Scale Review using the CPRS (Children’s Progress Review System) effectively in working with parents, caregivers and families

ISA Progress Review/BERS-2 The ISA Progress Review is comprised of the Progress Report Form and includes the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale, or BERS-2. ISA stands for Integrated Service Array. It describes the level of care a child needs, based on their level of service intensity determination done when they enter care.

What is the BERS- 2? The BERS-2 is a rating scale designed to assess the behavioral and emotional strengths of children, instead of their problems or weaknesses. The BERS-2 is being used for, and has been studied to be accurate for children 6-18 years of age.

Why do we do both measures every 3 months? Data collection is required by the state office AMH: Within 30 days of admission to ISA (Entry) Quarterly (Continuing Review) 90 days after Entry Review On Exit from ISA (Exit) AMH is interested in being able to report on the progress children in this higher level of care achieve while in care.

Why do we do both measures every 3 months? This information is used 1) to inform the child and family team of the child’s progress 2) for advisory stakeholder review and 3) to form a foundation for legislative reports and other data reports about the children’s mental health system. It is also important to track the changes more often in this group of children, whose behavior is quite changeable.

Advantages of BERS-2 The BERS-2 provides unbiased data about outcomes, showing: Youth’s functioning in various key areas Comparison of results regarding the youth’s functioning to a national sample Progress over time AMH requires use of the Parent Rating Scale. This is the version written into the MHO agreement to ensure caregiver input in the outcome data collection process.

Does the BERS-2 Measure What We Want It To? Since it was first developed in 1998, the BERS-2 has been studied and compared to other tools many times. These studies show that the BERS-2 accurately measures the personal and emotional strengths of children.

What are the five subscales? The 52 item scale measures five areas (subscales): Interpersonal Strength- a child’s strengths in relating to others Family Involvement – a child’s strengths in relationship with and participation in family life School Functioning- a child’s strengths in school tasks participation

What are the five subscales? Intrapersonal Strength- a child’s internal emotional strengths: their outlook on their own competence and accomplishments Affective Strength – a child’s strength in accepting affection from and expressing feelings toward others

Uses for BERS-2 1) Identifies children with limited strengths 2) Targets goals for an IEP or individual treatment plan 3) Identifies strengths and weaknesses for treatment 4) Documents progress in a strength area as a result of specialized services 5) Measures strengths for use in research and evaluation projects

Responses Are Kept Confidential All responses a parent or caregiver makes on the ISA PR/BERS-2 are confidential information. Data are entered into a database that is password protected. This means that only selected and authorized employees of organizations serving children and families can enter the data.

CPRS Database The Children’s Progress Review System is a web based format designed specifically for data entry for ISA PR/BERS-2 data. Individuals at each MHO are trained in data entry in this system. It has also been used by the Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative sites for data entry.

How is the data used? The Addictions and Mental Health Division (AMH) collects and analyzes this grouped outcome data to present to the legislature and interested stakeholder groups such as state and local advisory groups. This is important to make a case for funding of children’s mental health system needs.

Why is the data so important? Having this data available helps AMH advocate for continued funding for intensive mental health services for children, and educate the public on the outcomes for this group of children.

How to introduce the Progress Review to the Child and Family Team During engagement with the family describe the ISA Progress Review Report and BERS-2: Why it is important How the information is used Where the information goes How it can be useful to the team The Child and Family Team should be asked for input on information provided in the Progress Review Report.

BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale for Parents and Caregivers Parent/ Caregiver is defined as the person who has the most knowledge of the child over the past 30 days. Preferably this person has been living with and caring for the child or has daily contact with the child. Preferably this person will be consistently the one completing the BERS-2 over time.

Strategies for Completion of ISA Progress Review Report/BERS-2 ISA Progress Review Report should be completed during a child and family team meeting whenever possible. Schedule time before or after child and family team for caregiver to complete the BERS-2. Be available for assistance. Schedule a phone call with caregiver to complete BERS-2 over the phone. If mailing is the only option, schedule a reminder phone call to caregiver a week out.

Administration of the BERS-2 Provide the caregiver with the BERS-2 PRS form Instruct the caregiver to read each item at least twice, for understanding Avoid prompting the caregiver, they are the ones who should answer the question Remain available to answer the caregiver’s questions Scan the completed form and follow-up with caregiver if there are missing or ambiguous responses to any items

Lack of Response ? Double check responses with caregiver to ensure it was not an unintentional omission. If the caregiver has no response or refuses to respond, enter “0”. Following these instructions will ensure that data are made available and there will be consistency in the coding of missing items.

Validity For reliable and usable results, all items on the BERS-2 must have a valid response. If more than two items are missing on any subscale that subscale can’t be scored, and if any of the subscales cannot be scored, the overall Strengths Index cannot be scored. There is a large gap in the data over time when this occurs. Once data are entered into the CPRS system they may not be changed.

Missing Responses in CPRS If any Progress Review questions are left unanswered, or if there are missing responses on the BERS-2, the Progress Report Form cannot be submitted and will be saved as a draft. The MHO agreement requires this data submission and the MHO will be out of compliance in this area.

Scoring the BERS-2 After responses are entered into the Children’s Progress Review System (CPRS), raw scores for each subscale and overall are displayed. The system also displays percentile scores based on the child’s age and gender. The Strengths Index and Individual scores over successive administrations of the ISA PR/BERS-2 will be available in a later release of the CPRS.

Retrieving BERS-2 Results Results from each ISA client’s completed Progress Review/BERS-2 reports are available in the CPRS system. If your system administrator has granted you access to the CPRS, you can view and print client Progress Review/BERS-2 reports yourself. Otherwise, the person who enters Progress Review data for your MHO can provide a printout or PDF document.

Sharing Results It is important to share the results of the child’s progress reviews and BERS-2 measurements periodically with the family, and child if appropriate. This can be done individually or in the Child and Family Team setting. Upgrades to the CPRS system will provide the opportunity to show progress tracked over successive quarterly reviews.

Oregon Health Authority Staff to Call if Questions Kathleen Burns, MS Data Coordinator for Children’s Mental Health System ; Kathleen Newton, Children’s Mental Health Research Analyst ;