The IR lattice design and optimization of the dynamic aperture for the ring Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Yuan Zhang, Sha Bai, Dou Wang, Tianjian, Jie Gao.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEPC Machine Optimization and Final Focus Design Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Ming Xiao, Sha Bai, Yiwei Wang, Feng Su (IHEP) October 2013, CERN. Geneva, Switzerland.
Advertisements

CEPC/SppC and FCC Collaboration J. Gao On behalf of CEPC+SppC Group IHEP, CAS, China Pre-FCC ICB Meeting Sept. 9-10, 2014.
The strategy of Accelerator based High Energy Physics of China J. Gao On behalf of CEPC+SppC Group IHEP, CAS, China Roundtable discussion: “Future machines“
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Lattice design for CEPC main ring H. Geng, G. Xu, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, Y. Zhang, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai, Q. Qin,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Preliminary Result on L*=1.5m CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai Yingshun Zhu, Teng Yue CEPC acc. meeting, 5 September 2014.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
CEPC Interaction Region design and Dynamic Aperture Optimization Yiwei Wang, Yuan Zhang, Dou Wang, Huiping Geng, Xiaohao Cui, Sha Bai, Tianjian Bian, Feng.
CEPC DA due to magnets' error Sha Bai, Dengjie Xiao, Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Dou Wang, Tianjian Bian, Feng Su, Jie Gao The first IHEP-BINP CEPC Accelerator.
CEPC Accelerator Design Issues and International Collaboration J. Gao For the CEPC Accelerator Group Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, CAS The.
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
CEPC pretzel scheme study
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Partial Double Ring Lattice Design and DA Study
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
CEPC Partial Double Ring Lattice Design and DA Study
The new 7BA design of BAPS
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CEPC advanced partial double ring scheme
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
CEPC DA optimization with downhill Simplex
CEPC Partial Double Ring Lattice Design and DA Study
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Optimization of partial double ring optics
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
CEPC Partial Double Ring Lattice Design and DA Study
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
Lattice design for CEPC
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
CEPC Parameter /DA optimization with downhill Simplex
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

The IR lattice design and optimization of the dynamic aperture for the ring Yiwei Wang, Huiping Geng, Yuan Zhang, Sha Bai, Dou Wang, Tianjian, Jie Gao Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP, Beijing) CEPC workshop IHEP, Sep 2015 Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep 20151

Outline CEPC layout Lattice design of the Interaction region Optimization of the dynamic aperture Summary Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep 20152

CEPC layout P.S. IP1 IP4 IP3 IP2 D = 17.3 km ½ RF RF ½ RF RF One RF station: 650 MHz five-cell SRF cavities; 4 cavities/module 12 modules, 8 m each RF length 120 m C = 54 km IP1 and IP3 for CEPC Yiwei Wang Sep 2015

CEPC parameters Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep ParameterUnitValueParameterUnitValue Beam energy [E]GeV120Circumference [C]m54752 Number of IP[N IP ] 2SR loss/turn [U 0 ]GeV3.11 Bunch number/beam[n B ] 50Bunch population [Ne] 3.79E+11 SR power/beam [P]MW51.7Beam current [I]mA16.6 Bending radius [  ] m6094 momentum compaction factor [  p ] 3.36E-05 Revolution period [T 0 ]s1.83E-04Revolution frequency [f 0 ]Hz emittance (x/y)nm6.12/0.018  IP (x/y) mm800/1.2 (3.0) Transverse size (x/y) mm 69.97/0.15  x,y /IP 0.118/0.083 Beam length SR [  s.SR ] mm2.14 Beam length total [  s.tot ] mm2.88 Lifetime due to Beamstrahlungmin lifetime due to radiative Bhabha scattering [  L ] min52 RF voltage [V rf ]GV6.87RF frequency [f rf ]MHz650 Harmonic number [h] Synchrotron oscillation tune [ s ] 0.18 Energy acceptance RF [h]%5.99 Damping partition number [J  ] 2 Energy spread SR [  .SR ] %0.132 Energy spread BS [  .BS ] %0.119 Energy spread total [  .tot ] %0.177nn 0.23 Transverse damping time [n x ]turns78Longitudinal damping time [n  ]turns39 Hourglass factorFh0.658Luminosity /IP[L]cm -2 s E+34

Interaction region design As shown in beam-beam simulation, the luminosity are almost the same when  y* increased from 1.2 mm to 3 mm. For the first try, we just refit the final transformer. – the parts other than FT are almost kept L*=1.5m  y*=1.2mm Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep L*=1.5m  y*=3mm

Design principle of final doublet constraint R22=0, R44=0 at the exit of QF1 – point to parallel image on both x and y planes – The real design just adjust the gradient a bit (less than 10%) L*dl1 l2 QD0 QF1 L*, d, G1, G2  y,  x, R, B1, B2  y*,  x*, ay, ax l1, l2 our main concern

Optimization of final doublet L*=1.5m, G1=G2 When G>200T/m –  y decrease slowly with the increase of G – B increase almost linearly with G and independent of the space between QD0 and QF1 Seems possible to reduce the gradient from 300T/m to 200T/m –  y slightly increased from -148 to -149 and B significantly decreased from 6.4 to 4.5 T with ay (7.88*10^-8 m  rad) used in the pre-CDR – With a more optimistic ay (5.33*10^-8 m  rad), B could be further reduce to be 3.9 T – need to check with a full IR lattice. At present we still work with G=300T/m L*=1.5m, G1=G2

Local chromaticity correction Add additional sextupoles next to the main one* – Compensate the finite length effect (Lsext=0.3m) Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep *A.Bogomyagkov et al. k=1, S1/S2=-0.1 Adjust the phase advances between the final doublet and the sextupoles to minimize second order chromaticity – QD0 and VS1 – QF1 and HS1

Local chromaticity correction (cont.) Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep 20159

Lattice of the whole ring Close the whole ring – matching linear lattice function Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep Dispersion suppressor and FODO cell in the ARC

Tune vs. momentum deviation Adjust the tune to be.08/.22 ( x/ y) – determined by beam- beam study match Q’ to be ~0.5 with the sextupoles in the ARC – Currently only 2 family of sextupoles in the ARC Good region of ±1% in Dp/p Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Dynamic aperture for the ring without radiation damping, error of the magnets Synchrotron motion included Tracking with 3 times of damping time Coupling factor  =0.003 for emitty – -2% (2  x, 20  y), 2% (1  x, 7  y) Yiwei Wang Sep 2015 Result in Pre-CDR

Optimization of the dynamic aperture Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

FFS_3.0mm_v0_Feb_2015 FFS_3.0mm_v1_Mar_2015 FFS_3.0mm_v2.2_Sep_2015 Remove 2 quads in FT Additional sext at 1 st image point Reduce  y in CCY Remove 2 quads Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Beta and tune vs. deltap v1v2.2v0 Upper for FFS only and lower for the whole ring – Tune vs. deltap on vertical plane become very flat – Qx’ for FFS should be optimized in next step Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Tune vs amplitude Tune shift with amplitude: – d(Qx)/d(Ex) d(Qy)/(dEy) d(Qy)/d(Ex) – v0: E E E+04 – v1: E E E+04 – V2.2: E E E+04

Vertical dynamic aperture vs. deltap v0 -> v1: DA increased significantly for on-momentum and small off-momentum v1 -> v2.2: DA increased significantly for large off-momentum Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep X0=0.001  x 02-21

Dynamic aperture for both planes Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep v1 v0 DA for off momentum increased significantly effect from additional sextupole can be ease by further increasing dispersion v2.2

Summary A preliminary designs got for the CEPC interaction region Optimization to get a reasonable dynamic aperture for the whole ring – Reduce the chromaticity contribution for CCS and IT; Remove 2 quadrupoles in FT to reduce high order chromaticity; Additional sextupole at 1 st image point to further reduce high order chromaticity – DA increased significantly for both on- and off- momentum particles – Further optimization is possible Qx’ for FFS should be optimized break down of –I matrix 2 nd order dispersion … Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Acknowledge Yunhai Cai, Xiaohao Cui, Yingshun Zhu, Yuanyuan Guo, Tianjian Bian, Feng Su, Ming Xiao, Zhe Duan, Gang Xu, Jie Gao, Qing Qin, Demin Chou, Kazuhito Ohmi, Yoshihiro Funakoshi, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi, A. Bogomyagkov, Luis Eduardo Medina Medrano Thanks for your kind help and beneficial discussion! Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Thank you for your attention ! Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

reserved Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep

Comparison of  y*=1.2 mm and 3 mm Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep  y*=1.2mm  y*=3mm

Comparison of  y*=1.2 mm and 3 mm With the real ring DA for off momentum: – For  y*=1.2mm, the DA is almost zero for off momentum 2% – For  y*=3mm, the DA has been extended to 2% region: -2% (2  x, 20  y), 2% (1  x, 7  y)  y*=1.2mm  y*=3mm Yiwei Wang23-27 Sep