“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk-Informed Decision Making Charles Yoe, PhD Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Analysis The Fundamentals and Applications K. Subramaniam, Lecturer (Envt.Health) & Safety Faculty of Health Science, UiTM Jpuncak Alam.
Advertisements

Key Themes in Environmental Sciences
TMDL Implementation and The Precautionary Principle May 5,2004 Waterkeepers Northern California Photo courtesy USGS.
Precaution WTO Symposium, 6-7 July 2001 Current issues facing the World Trading System Session:Food Safety and SPS D. TAEYMANS, Director Scientific & Regulatory.
Risk Analysis Fundamentals and Application Robert L. Griffin International Plant Protection Convention Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Determining the Significant Aspects
Law and Sustainability: The Basics Dr Liz Fisher, Fellow and Lecturer in Law, Corpus Christi College and Law Faculty, University of Oxford.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Project Management Risk Management. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Definition of Risk 3.Tolerance of Risk 4.Definition of Risk Management 5.Certainty, Risk,
Better risk management in support of regulatory quality Incorporating risk assessment tools in RIA to prepare better rules Charles-Henri Montin Senior.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Outline What is the precautionary principle? Precautionary principle in the context of DSM Obligation to apply the precautionary approach Precautionary.
Project Management.
Risk Analysis & Management. Phases Initial Risk Assessment Risk Analysis Risk Management and Mitigation.
Service Design – Section 4.5 Service Continuity Management.
Port Ludlow Workgroup Report Precautionary Principle 2003 NW HW Conference, Pasco, WA June 1-6 Marni Solheim Washington Department of Ecology Solid Waste.
Interpretation of precaution in CEE countries – use it or abuse it? Liina Eek Ministry of Environment, Estonia 18 April 2006 Vienna.
References: J.A. & Geiser K. 2001: The precautionary principle stimulus for solutions and alternatives based environmental policy Menv. 2003: Québec adoptes.
PPRT PREVENTION DES RISQUES ET LUTTE CONTRE LES POLLUTIONS Safe Communities & a Sustainable Hazaedous Industry : Present and Future Discussion.
1 UNGC Module 3 – Session 1 THE UN GLOBAL COMPACT MODULE 3 - THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES Session 1: Principle 7.
Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisation Intelligence Step 8 - Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisaiton Considering the risks associated with action.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Integrated Risk Management Institute for Water Resources 2010.
10/6/08ESPP-781 Outline Why care about the precautionary principle? Political contexts and controversies Definition and sources of the precautionary principle.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
Risk and Uncertainty Econ 373 Environmental Economics February 8,
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Innovation, public health & the precautionary principle Dr Alexandra McConnell BIICL Conference “Innovation in Lifesciences” 25 September 2008.
“PRECAUTION AND THE REGULATION OF LIVING MODIFIED ORGANISMS (LMOs)” EMMA ISSATT.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Environmental Risk Analysis
Cost-Benefit & Risk Analysis in Public Policy
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Environmental and technology ethics Uncertainty, risk and precaution.
“Science is the knowledge of consequences, and dependence of one fact upon another. “ Thomas Hobbes ( )
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Obligations to Future Generations and the Precautionary Principle Ethics of Sustainability Class 6 Leslie Paul Thiele, Ph.D. Department of Political Science.
The Precautionary Principle in the Sweden, the EU and the US Comparative Risk Regulation Workshop at University of California, Berkeley December
The Precautionary Principle “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” is worth a pound of cure” “Better safe than sorry” “Look before you leap”
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
RISK MANAGEMENT The process of weighing policy alternatives in the light of the results of risk assessment and, if required, selecting and implementing.
Advanced Project Management Project Risk Management Ghazala Amin.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
IT Risks and Controls Revised on Content Internal Control  What is internal control?  Objectives of internal controls  Types of internal controls.
Regulating Precaution: San Francisco’s Precautionary Principle Ordinance Debbie Raphael Toxics Reduction Program Manager
Precautionary Principle – From Vision Statement to Practical Policy Precautionary Principle – From Vision Statement to Practical Policy Debbie Raphael.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions The Contemporary Language of Risk Analysis Campaign Goal 2a Risk Technology.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
Rossella Bargiacchi Contact:
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Topic 5.2.4, Page 180 Tiger Book Precautionary Principle.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Uncertainty & Variability Charles Yoe, Ph.D.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
 Political contexts and controversies  Definition and sources of the precautionary principle (or precautionary approach)  Problems and questions  Operationalizing.
Principles in international environmental law April 30, 2014 Edmunds Broks.
RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Scarce resources create opportunities costs, which renders the idea of a zero-risk society a noble but unattainable goal. 1.
Framework Programme : 7th Research Framework Programme : Some aspects.
  PLAUSIBLE HYPOTHESIS OR SCIENTIFIC CERTAINTY: PROTECTING BIODIVERSITY FROM INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES IN AN ERA OF CLIMATE CHANGE.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Mitigation.
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
General concepts of Environmental Health
Presentation transcript:

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk-Informed Decision Making Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2010

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions In a Nutshell Decision making is going to change if we do risk assessment Making decisions under uncertainty Using the available information –Considering more than expected value

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk-Informed Decision Making Confluence of risk management and risk assessment –Assessors convey significance of uncertainty –Managers take it explicitly into account in decision making Develops and uses risk information to aid decisions made under uncertainty –Decision metrics and rules developed by decision makers –Use risk assessment approach to develop science-based values of risk metrics

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions The Job Success in risk management is defined by practical and useful solutions for dealing with uncertainty It is the risk assessors’ job to address the uncertainty and variability in inputs It is the risk managers’ job to address the uncertainty and variability in the decision criteria –And to manage risks that are not acceptable

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Key Focal Points Decision criteria/metrics Acceptability/tolerability Principles for choosing an option Uncertainty Strategies for managing risk

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Metrics Decision criteria will reflect –Risk metrics –Other risk management objectives These are the usual impacts of interest to decision makers –Costs, benefits, compliance with laws, budget impacts, capability, and so on

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Possible Risk Metrics Life safety risk –Number of lives at risk, social vulnerability Economic risk –Net economic benefits, financial risks Engineering risk and reliability –PUP Residual risk New, transformed and transferred risk New metrics like partitioned risk

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions First, Understand …assessors have to become more clever and help risk managers know what is possible …conditional probabilities can help –…given that something happens then how bad is it?

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Consider the Hydroeconomic Risk Model Existing Levee

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Expected Annual Damage $12,411,000 $2,151,000 Existing Risk Residual Risk

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Refining Residual Damage Existing flood risk (EAD) = $12,411,000 Residual flood risk (EAD) = $2,151,000 Flood risk reduction (EAD) = $10,260,000 What are the EAD given that a flow with an exceedence frequency of (.2 on left) or less occurs? This conditional probability requires a risk partition. Rescale the partition Integrate this rescaled partition and the expected damage is now $872,659,000. Given that a ‘bad’ flood occurs, it will be very bad.

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Extreme Event Conditional Expected Values With condition residual = $2,151,000 Benefits = $10,260,000 Partitioned residual = $872,659,000 A channel or nonstructural project could have lower benefits and a much reduced partitioned risk

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions What Kinds of Decisions Is the status quo acceptable? Can we accept this risk? If the existing risk is not acceptable, what level of risk is tolerable? What is the best way to achieve a tolerable level of risk?

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Two Important Ideas Acceptable Risk-A risk whose probability of occurrence is small, whose consequences are so slight, or whose benefits (perceived or real) are so great, that individuals or groups in society are willing to take or be subjected to the risk (or that the event might occur). Tolerable Risk-A tolerable risk is a non- negligible risk that has not yet been reduced to an acceptable level, but the risk is tolerated due to the inability to reduce it further, the cost of doing so or the magnitude of the benefits associated with the risky activity.

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Principles for Choosing Management Option Policy Zero Risk Weight-of-evidence Precautionary Principle ALARA Principle ALOP Principle Reasonable Relationship Safety Standards

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Policy Some decisions have been made for the risk manager, e.g., the national economic development plan Corps guidance often restricts what can be done Working with EPA means dealing with their policy restrictions and requirements International treaties and agreements may identify solutions or limit options

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions © Charles Yoe, Ph.D. Zero Risk The ban or taboo—any action that involves any risk at all is forbidden—ignorance made it possible to imagine 0 risk “De Minimis”—numerical value of risk too small to be bothered about 1-in-a-million has captured the imagination in some contexts –1-in-a-million annually is 70 or 80 times more than 1-in-a-million lifetime –“Practically” zero PMF, 100-year, 500-year have all been used by the Corps

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Weight-Of-Evidence We like once and for all resolution on the basis of compelling scientific evidence Risk managers assess credibility of conflicting evidence about hazards and risks in a systematic and objective manner Diverse group of scientists examine the evidence to reach consensus views Weight-of-evidence is an ongoing activity attempting to balance positive and negative evidence of harmful effects based on the best available evidence

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Precautionary Principle "When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof." Wingspread Statement In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. UNCED Rio Declaration Principle 15

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions © Charles Yoe, Ph.D. ALARA Principle As Low As Reasonably Achievable Minimize known risks, by keeping exposures as low as reasonably possible, taking into consideration costs, technology, benefits to public health and safety and other societal and economic concerns Similar to best available technology WHO Backgrounder WHO Backgrounder

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions © Charles Yoe, Ph.D. Appropriate Level of Protection Risk society is willing to accept or tolerate Statement of degree of protection that is to be achieved by the risk management option implemented Can be intentional choice Can be result of what is doable –Sometimes overlaps with ALARA

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Factors in Determining ALOP Technical feasibilityTechnical feasibility of prevention and control options RisksRisks that may arise from risk management interventions benefitsMagnitude of benefits of an activity and the availability of substitutes for that activity Cost of preventionCost of prevention and control versus effectiveness of risk reduction Public preferencesPublic risk reduction preferences, public values DistributionDistribution of risks and benefits Policy

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Reasonable Relationship Costs of risk management should bear “a reasonable relationship” to corresponding reductions in risks Not a true BCA but balance of benefits and costs should at least approximate each other

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Safety Standards Safety standards –Zero risk standards –Thresholds –Balancing standards Risk-Benefit Trade-Off: Greater benefit => Greater acceptable risk Comparative Risk Analysis: Rank risks for seriousness of threat posed Benefit-Cost Analysis: Economic efficiency

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions © Charles Yoe, Ph.D. Safety Standards Threshold standards –Non-zero level of risk stipulated as acceptable Tolerable level of risk Appropriate level of protection Procedural standards –Agreed upon process –Negotiation –Referendum

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Uncertainty Consider net NED benefits as a decision criterion Which is the best plan? Net BenefitsPlan 1: RedPlan 2: BluePlan 3: Green Mean$6,998,000$6,001,142$4,000,039 Decision making will becoming multi-dimensional. Can we handle that?

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Uncertainty P(Negative return) Which is the best plan now?

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Possible Rules for Making Decisions Under Uncertainty Maximax—appeals to gamblers (R, G, B) –Choose plan with best upside payoff Maximin—appeals to cautious (B,R,G) –Choose plan with best downside payoff Laplace—risk neutral (R,B,G) –Choose plan based on expected value payoff Hurwicz—neither neutral nor extreme (depends) –Choose plan based on assigned weights Regret-make wrong decision and regret it (Red) –Identify the maximum regret associated w/ each choice –Choose plan that minimizes this regret

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Regret States of the world MinMax Red $ (10,173,310) $ 23,635,943 Blue $ (4,114,583) $ 16,894,192 Green $ (15,726,346) $ 19,273,900 Regret Matrix Maximum Red $ 6,058,727 $ - $ 6,058,727 Blue $ - $ 6,741,751 Green $ 11,611,763 $ 4,362,043 $ 11,611,763 Minimax $ 6,058,727 If we choose red our regret will at most be $6.1 million

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Trade-Offs

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Sensitivity

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions General Risk Management Strategies Accept Mitigate –Avoidance –Reduce probability of event (prevent) –Reduce consequence of event (mitigate) –Insurance

“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Charles Yoe, Ph.D. Questions?