Rural Development Programme SR 2007 – 2013 Axis 4 LEADER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
Advertisements

Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Implementation of Transnational cooperation in the Czech Republic in Markéta Pěchoučková
Financial support for integrated rural development in the Nitra Self-governing Region Office of the Nitra Self-governing region Department of strategic.
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020 Local Government Practioners Workshop 12 th February Lorraine Lynas RDP Managing Authority.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Axis 3: Diversification of the rural economy and Quality of Life in rural areas Axis 4: The Leader approach DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Rural Development Programme for Ireland – Pat Moynan, Dept. of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
CLLD Anna Parizán Rural Development Desk Officer Ministry of Rural Development 28. May 2014.
Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary Anna Parizán Counsellor - Rural Development Officer Ministry of Rural Development.
Implementation of Axis 4 Leader Programme Measure 421 In Romania 2012.
1 Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme April SWISS-SLOVAK COOPERATION PROGRAMME  New possibilities of financial support for the 10 new member states.
1 Implementation of the measures of priority Axis 4 Ministry of Agriculture Latvia 05/11/2009.
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
1 The South Bohemian Region The South Bohemian University UNICREDS, Truro, 27 th April 2010.
TERRITORIAL COHESION AND NATIONAL-REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP for the programming period Benchmarking Seminar on The Regional Competitiveness and Employment.
Technical meeting for LFA in Bulgaria MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY National Program for Rural Development in Bulgaria Bonn, Germany.
OVERVIEW OF LEADER METHOD IMPLEMENTATION The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Chief specialist.
The Implementation of the Acquis into the Polish Official Statistics Special MGSC Meeting, Warsaw, 21 June 2002.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Transnational Cooperation or how to implement Local Development Strategy efficiently through the Leader measure 421 Matej Štepec Rural Development Division.
Alena KuruczovaERASMUS MUNDUS Nitra, 4th August 2011 Implementation of the EU LEADER in Slovakia via RDP
LEADER experience in Hungary László Simon Building up support for rural development, Conference in Radom, Poland, May 2007.
LEADER transnational projects in Estonia Rural Development Department Local Initiative and Human Environment Bureau Konstantin Mihhejev Druskininkai, Lithuania,
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND WATER ECONOMY PREPARE Gathering M acedonia Ohrid, 31 August, 2010 “ THE MACEDONIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT.
Tbilisi, 5 th March 2015 The LEADER Approach. Practical information and implementation The Leader method - transferring V4 experiences to Georgia (No.
Diversification into non-agricultural activities under the conditions of Slovakia By: Miroslav Krčmár, IBA Stanislav BUCHTA Zuzana FEDERIČOVÁ Research.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
Experience of the Slovak Republic Budapest April 16, 2015 European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation.
To involve persons who have second home in rural areas Kristine Hindriks Ministry of Agriculture/ Rural Development Department
Best practices and future challenges of the LEADER approach / CLLD in the Czech Republic 28th May, 2014 Permanent Representation of the Czech Republic.
INTERNATIONAL LEADER PROJECTS IN LITHUANIA November 9, 2012 Ilona Sadovskaite Chief specialist of the Ministry of Agriculture.
NATIONAL FOREST CENTRE ZVOLEN SLOVAKIA Gender mainstreaming strategy for employment in mountain rural areas in Slovakia Ing. Viera Petrášová, CSc.
National Rural Development Network and experiences with Leader Implementation in Slovakia.
Ex-ante Evaluation of Local Action Group (LAG), Levoca Presented by: Ali, Festus Arroyo, Jose Bhandari, Thaneshwar Laing,Lan Nyoni, Abel Slovak University.
Sivu The Finnish LEADER model and reflections on the future Budapest, 12th Dec 2012 Petri Rinne
Rural Development Programme Ireland Finola Moylette Department of Community, Equality and Gaeltacht Affairs.
MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS: BEST PRACTICES COOPERATING IN SOUTH WEST EUROPE 12th of October 2005.
Ministry of Constructions and Regional Development Progress in regional development.
European Dialogue on Future Interregional Co-operation The main outcomes of the CENTURIO project within the partnership co-ordinated by Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok.
Chapter X. Policy of Support of Rural Development and Rural Tourism in Slovakia Ing. Barbora Milotová, PhD. Department of Regional Development
Experience of the Slovak Republic European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation.
Public and private partnership Muranska planina. Europa for citizens Europa for citizens Conference in Novy Bydžov The partnership net creation.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
Leader approach in 2007 – 2013 in SR Jela Tvrdoňová.
LOCAL ACTIVITY GROUPS Grzegorz Orawiec Brussels May 2012 ”Sweet home Alabama …”
The 3 rd model of the typology of LEADER implementation: The Greek Model (Global Grant schemes) Intervention Areas of LEADER In Greece.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
LEADER/CLLD guidelines in Slovak Republic Jela Tvrdoňová IMRD Case Studies SPU Nitra
Rural Development Programme of the SR 2014 – 2020 Measure M19 – Support for local development within the LEADER initiative.
Ave Bremse and Ivika Maidre Estonian Rural Network Unit
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Landfilling in the Slovak Republic – legislation and actual situation
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Practical information and implementation
Title: EastAgri Workshop
Rural Development Programme of the SR 2007 – 2013
LEADER transnational projects in Finland Leena Anttila Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland Leena Anttila/ Ministry.
The Emergence of SAPARD Agency in Slovakia
EU rural development policy
LEADER as a bottom - up approach for impelenting projects in Chopok South region - Case Study- Under the Transantional Cooperation Project: Touriism and.
Presentation transcript:

Rural Development Programme SR 2007 – 2013 Axis 4 LEADER

Selection of the Local Action Groups was based on two calls for proposals: 1 st call for proposals – announced on April 4 th 2008, acceptance of applications December 1 st - December 15 th nd call for proposals– announced October 30 th 2009, acceptance of applications January 15 th – January 29 th 2010 Statute of LAG was approved for 29 LAGs after administrative control of APA and decision made by the selection committee for assessment of integrated local development strategies.

Slovakia has inhabitants and covers the area of km 2. Highlands and mountains cover 60% of the territory, lowlands 40%. From the European point of view, Slovakia has character of mountainous country. According to the territorial and legal division, Slovakia is divided into 4 areas (NUTS 2), 8 regions (NUTS 3), 79 districts (LAU 1), 2890 municipalities (LAU 2) out of which 138 has a statute of town.

29 approved LAGs include: inhabitants of Slovakia (11,11 %), area 8995,32 km 2 of Slovakia (18,34%), 544 municipalities (18,82 %). On average 1 LAG includes inhabitants, area of 310,2 km 2 and almost 19 municipalities.

No. of municipalities in 1 LAG 4No of inhabitants No. of inhabitants During the programme implementation there were 627 calls for proposals announced from the side of LAG. What on average represents 21,5 calls for 1 LAG.

Measure 4.1 Implementation of ILDS Within the years 2010 – 2014 the APA accepted 2090 grant applications According to measures and actions as follows: 3.1 diversification into non-agricultural activities– 34 accepted applications 3.2.A support for activities in rural tourism part A (accommodation facilities) accepted applications 3.2.B support for activities in rural tourism part B (marketing of rural tourism and development of the region) – 92 accepted applications

3.3 training and information – 169 accepted applications Basic services for the economy and rural population – 915 accepted applications Village renewal and development – 736 accepted applications Limit for this group of measures and activities was €.

Measure 4.2 – implementing cooperation projects There were 67 applications accepted, out of which for: National cooperation - 29 accepted applications International cooperation- 38 accepted applications Limit of financial menas for the group was €.

Measure 4.3 – running of LAG There were 85 applications accepted, out of which there were 29 LAGs approved based on the administration control of APA and decision of committee of the managing authority (ministry). Limit of financial menas for the measure was €.

Measure No. Measure title Accepted grant applications LIMITS (EU+SR = public expenditures total ) Discarded projects Approved projects- enclosed contracts Balance limit I. (Limit- approv. grant) % contracting Number Eligible costs Requested contribution Number Approved grant NumberTotalz EU abcdefghi=d-g+sj=g/d 3.1 Divesrification to non- agricultural activites A Support for activities for RT- part A B Support for activities for RT- part B Training and information Basic services for rural inhabitants Village renewal and development Axis 3 implemented through axis 4 LEADER total % 4.1 Implementation of ILDS % Objective Convergence % Other areas % 4.2 Cooperation projects % National cooperation International cooperation Running of LAG % axis4 LEADER total %

Measure titleRegion Accpeted applications Discarded projects Approved projects- enclosed contracts Number Eligible costsRequested grant Number Approved grant NumberTotalFrom the EU abcfghi 3.1 Diversification towards non-agricultural activities BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms.3.1 through LEADER Support for activities in rural tourism – part A BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms.3.2A through LEADER

Measure titleRegion Accpeted spplications Discarded projects Approved projects – enclosed contracts Number Eligible costsRequested grant Number Approved grant NumberTotalFrom the EU abcfghi 3.2. Support for activities in rural tourism – part B BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms.3.2B through LEADER Training and information BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Toral ms.3.3 throuhg LEADER

Measure titleRegion Accpeted applications Discarded projects Approved projects – enclosed contracts Number Eligible costsRequested grant Number Approved grant NumberTotalFrom the EU abcfghi Basic services for rural inhabitants BA BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms through LEADER Village renewal and development BA BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms through LEADER

Measure titleRegion Accepted applications LIMITS (EU+SR = public expenditures total ) % requested means from limits total Discarded projects Approved projects – enclosed contracts Number Eligible costs Requested grant Number Approved grant NumberTotal From the EU abcde=c/dfghi 4.2 Cooperation projects BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms % Running of LAG BB KE NR PR TN TT ZA Total ms %

Bratislava Banská Bystrica Košice Nitra Prešov Trenčín Trnava Žilina Axis 4 LEADER total % % Region Accepted applications Limits (EU+SR = public expenditures total ) % requested grantts from limits total Discarded projects Approved projects – enclosed contracts % of contracting Implemented grants Number Eligible costs Requested grant No. Approved grants No. o f payments Paied contributions TotalFrom the EUTotal From the EU No. abcde=c/dfghik=h/dlmn

Total ms.3.1 through LEADER Total ms.3.2A through LEADER Total ms.3.2B through LEADER Total ms.3.3 through LEADER Total ms through LEADER Total ms through LEADER Total ms % Total ms % Measure title Accepted applications Limits (EU+SR = public expenditure total ) % of requested grants from limits total D iscarded projects Approved projects – enclosed contracts Limit balance I. (Limits-approv. grant) number Eligible costs Requested grant No. Approved grant No.TotalFrom the EU abcde=c/dfghij=d-h

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Chopok juh ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B , , ,18 90, ,00 3 0,00100, , ,56462,4499, , ,730,27100,00207 LAG Chopok Juh , , ,8998, LAG LEV, o.z ,00 3.2A , , ,4268, B , ,0071,9399, , , ,5079, , , ,74100, , , ,88100,60578 LAG LEV, o.z , , ,2397,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG "Požitavie - Širočina" , ,00300,0099, A , ,14714,8699, B00, ,002 0,00100, , , ,36100, , , ,28100,80266 LAG "Požitavie - Širočina" , ,78 100, LAG Dudváh , A00, B , ,6115,3999, , ,007,0099, , ,44-75,44100, , ,937,07100,00121 LAG Dudváh , ,98 100,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Stará Čierna voda ,00 3.2A ,214 0,00100, B ,002 0,00100, ,001 0,00100, , ,16-303,37100, , , ,27100,6816 LAG Stará Čierna voda , ,64 100, LAG RADOŠINKA ,00 3.2A 0,00 3.2B 0, , , ,0096, , , ,50100, , , ,77101,21292 LAG RADOŠINKA , ,27 100,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Horný Liptov ,00 3.2A , , ,6973, B , , ,9097, , , ,77-223,77100, , , ,85100,14386 LAG Horný Liptov , ,03 97, LAG Dolnohronské rozvojové partnerstvo , , A , , B , ,00360,0092, ,00 0, , ,440,00100, , ,58-0,02100, LAG Dolnohronské rozvojové partnerstvo , ,02 93,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG MALOHONT , , , ,5658, A , , , ,9499, B25 593,24 1 0,00100, , , ,0093,9399, , , , ,39104,01121 LAG MALOHONT , ,07 96, Podpoľanie ,452 0,00100, A , ,00577,3199, B , ,100,42100, ,001 0,00100, , ,375,49100, , , ,31101,40193 Podpoľanie , ,09 100,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Vodný raj - Aquaparadiso - Víziparadicsom ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B00, , , , ,0097, ,004 0,00100,0040 LAG Vodný raj - Aquaparadiso - Víziparadicsom , , ,0098, LAG SVORNOSŤ ,00 3.2A , , ,0028, B ,000 0, ,003 0,00100, , , ,85100, , , ,6298,54281 LAG SVORNOSŤ , , ,7790,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj Kopaničiarsky región- LAG ,00 3.2A , , ,8291, B , ,000,13100, , , ,3279, , ,391,95100, , ,74273,0099,96180 Kopaničiarsky región - LAG , ,78 97, LAG Dolná Nitra, o.z ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B00, , , ,0072, , ,01-574,01100, , ,450,55100,00221 LAG Dolná Nitra, o.z , ,46 99,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Teplička ,00 3.2A , , ,3566, B , ,00160,0099, , ,00380,0098, , , ,3999, , , ,9899,81142 LAG Teplička , ,28 99, LAG Podhoran A B 0, , konvergencia , konvergencia , ostatné obl , , ostatné obl , , LAG Podhoran , ,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Zlatá cesta ,00 3.2A 0,00 3.2B , , ,2095, , ,85-0,85100, , ,950,83100, , , ,01100, LAG Zlatá cesta , ,83 99, LAG BACHUREŇ ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B , , ,00102, ,003 0,00100, , ,7953,21100, , , ,00101,81228 LAG BACHUREŇ , ,79 100,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG ŠAFRÁN ,00 3.2A 0,00 3.2B 0, ,002 0,00100, , ,00170,0099, , , ,6899,40220 LAG ŠAFRÁN , ,32 99, LAG Vršatec ,00 3.2A , ,8610,14100, B , ,0038,0099, , ,00684,0099, , , ,20101, , ,00-761,00100,06353 LAG Vršatec , ,20 90,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Krtíšskeho Poiplia ,00 3.2A , , ,1299, B00, , , , ,0099, , ,05200,0799,96210 LAG Krtíšskeho Poiplia , ,81 99, LAG KRAS , ,44582,5699, A , , ,8179, B , , ,3897, , ,00378,0099, , , ,68103, , ,810,00100,00121 LAG KRAS , ,93 96,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Terchovská dolina ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B00, , , ,6383, , ,82-11,63100, , ,680,00100,00181 LAG Terchovská dolina , ,00 99, LAG HORNÁD - SLANSKÉ VRCHY, o.z , ,09242,9199, A00,00 3.2B , ,0019,0099, ,003 0,00100, , , ,25100, , , ,88102,43230 LAG HORNÁD - SLANSKÉ VRCHY, o.z , ,22 100,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG RUDOHORIE, o. z , , ,8099, A , , B ,003 0,00100, , ,00355,4299, , , ,02100, , ,060,00100,00150 LAG RUDOHORIE, o. z , ,80 95, LAG SPIŠ ,00 3.2A , , ,6778, B ,002 0,00100, , , ,0080, , ,750,25100, , ,000,00100,00272 LAG SPIŠ , ,08 96,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Považie ,00 3.2A00,00 3.2B , , ,0074, , ,0096, , , ,0099, , , ,3499, LAG Považie , ,66 98, Agroprameň ,00 3.2A 0,00 3.2B 0, , , ,55162,6699, , ,6046,36100,00170 Agroprameň , ,15 99,

LAG LAG code measure LIMITS LAG = Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 Approved grant for LAG ms.4.1 after transfers FP Approved projects – enclosed contracts Balance of limit for LAG (Limits- Approved) % of contracting No of accepted applications No of discarded applications No. O f calls for proposals by LAG Number Approved grant Suma €€ghi = d-hj LAG Tokaj - ROVINA, o. z , , ,0097, A ,005 0,00100, B , ,00470,0099, , ,00120,0099, , , ,40100, , , ,40100,44221 LAG Tokaj - ROVINA, o. z , ,80 99,

The overview shows that for 1 LAG there are (from – to): No. of calls for proposals11 – 39 No. of accepted applications36 – 178 No. of approved projects27 – 138 No. of discarded projects 1 – 37

Used abrevations: LAG- local action group APA– Agricultural paying agency

Thank you for your attention Ing. Eva BAKOVÁ