Investigating English majors’ affective and meta-affective strategy use and test anxiety Jakub Bielak Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak Adam Mickiewicz University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marta Chwalka Education Table of Contents : Introduction: Statement of the Problem Review of Literature Statement of the Hypothesis.
Advertisements

Sources of unwillingness to communicate in EFL language classrooms.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
The Effects of Achievement Priming on Expectations and Performance Kathryn Raso Team 14 PSY 321.
Marissa Bailey, Paola Perez, and Rocco Rosselli COCO 725: Interventions for children and adolescents.
Master’s Thesis Defense Presentation October 2014 Examination Committee:
Language Learning Strategies Employed by University Students of English in Qatar Haifa Al-Buainain Department of Foreign Languages Qatar University The.
1 Examining the role of Self-Regulated Learning on Introductory Programming Performance Susan Bergin, Ronan Reilly and Des Traynor Department of Computer.
Psychology 3.3 Managing stress. Psychology Learning outcomes Understand the following three studies on managing stress: Cognitive (Meichenbaum, D. (1972)
Factors affecting usage of language learning strategies
Method Introduction Results Discussion The Effect of Self-Esteem, Marital Status, and Gender on Trait Anxiety and Stress Emily B Gale University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Motivating Language Learners’ Project University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Changes in Perceptions: Motivation, Teaching Styles, Engagement Maya Sugita.
+ How To Reduce Test Anxiety By Nicole Clark. + What is Test Anxiety? Test anxiety is a form of an anxiety disorder Anxiety is a normal emotion that everyone.
The possible effects of target language learning prior to secondary dual language school studies by Anna Várkuti 10th Summer School of Psycholinguistics.
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
INTERNATIONAL POSTURE, PERFECTIONISM AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANXIETY OKON Effiong Qatar University 28/02/2015.
Foreign Language Anxiety in the Classroom Tien-hui Yu 余天蕙 Seton Hall University.
Business and Management Research
Using the SILL to Record the Language Learning Strategy Use: Suggestions for the Greek EFL Population Dr. Vassilia Kazamia-Christou Aristotle University.
Reducing Anxiety Christine Velardi. The Power of Positive Recollections: Reducing Test Anxiety and Enhancing College Student Efficacy and Performance.
DR. SAFAA. Introduction It is clear, however, that learning a second language is a difficult time-consuming process. when students first enter the language.
Context and the Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Urge to Drink Tracey A. Garcia & Lindsay S. Ham Florida International University Introduction 
THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY AND TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENCE ON COMPUTER-RELATED TECHNOSTRESS: A SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY PERSPECTIVE Qin Shu, Qiang Tu.
Abstract Key words: Educational reform, science exams, anxiety reaction. In spring 2011, students in Georgia’s schools passed final exams in science for.
Chapter 6 Hagger & Chatzisarantis Emotion and Anxiety in Sport.
N97C0004 Betty Exploration of The Attitudes of Freshman Foreign Language Students Toward Using Computers A Turkish State University.
GRADING POLICIES IN SECONDARY CLASSROOMS THAT ENCOURAGE AND REWARD LEARNING BECKY PISCITELLA JADE ZATEK.
Background: As students complete their clerkships throughout their M3 year they gain in clinical experience and confidence, which may translate into improved.
Developing a Tool to Measure Health Worker Motivation in District Hospitals in Kenya Patrick Mbindyo, Duane Blaauw, Lucy Gilson, Mike English.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
English Language Learners’ (ELLs) Attitudes toward Computers Sei-Hwa Jung University of Maryland MICCA 2005.
1 Self-Regulation and Ability Predictors of Academic Success during College Anastasia Kitsantas, Faye Huie, and Adam Winsler George Mason University.
Mindfulness and Anxiety: Comparing Meditation and Coloring as Stress- Reducing Activities Victoria Cheske Gennifer Durham Daniel McMaster Dimitrios Kritikos.
Self-assessment Accuracy: the influence of gender and year in medical school self assessment Elhadi H. Aburawi, Sami Shaban, Margaret El Zubeir, Khalifa.
Presenter: Kuo, Szu-Wei
The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college Advisor: Min-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei- Chi Lu Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of feedback.
The Effect of Motivational Orientations on Language Learning Strategies: Turkish EFL Learners as a Case Study Kader Bas, University of Klagenfurt, Austria.
Annie Chang Instructor: Dr.Yang. Learning Strategy, Learning Style and English Achievement 1. Introduction 2. Learning strategy 3. Learning style 4. The.
A study of Taiwanese 7 th grader’ foreign language anxiety, beliefs about language learning and its relationship with their English achievement NA2C0009.
GLoCALL Chai University, Conference, November 12-14, 2015 Effects of Observing Model Video Presentation on Japanese EFL Learners’ Oral Performance.
Developing an oral communication strategy inventory Yasuo Nakatani The Modern Language Journal 90,ii, 2006.
Do we summarize in our daily lives? YES! Like?. -You have had experience summarizing in reading courses. -In future translation courses, you will read,
Chiraz Ouerfelli Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities Tunis Situating Strategy Use: The Interplay of Language Learning Strategies and Individual.
Personal Control over Development: Effects on the Perception and Emotional Evaluation of Personal Development in Adulthood.
EXPLORATION OF EFL GRADUATE STUDENTS’ ANXIETY IN IN-CLASS DISCUSSIONS, ACMC AND SCMC DISCUSSIONS By Jasmine Lee.
Measuring Students’ Readiness for L2 Group Work in a University in Japan Kumiko Fushino Temple University, Japan Campus, Graduate College of Education.
Online students’ perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: July 11, 2007 C. Y. Lee & E. L. Witta (2001).
 1,001 adolescent boys (47%) and girls (53%)  Fairly diverse: 58% Caucasian; 23% African American,12% Hispanic, 2% Asian, 5% Other  Age Range:
Evaluating learning gain in a SAC: Case studies of six low proficiency students Presenter: Ellie Law HASALD Presentation 2 Dec 2010.
Listening to highly anxious EFL learners
◦ th and 11 th grade high school students (54% girls) ◦ 63% Caucasian; 24% African-American; 13% Hispanic; remaining were Asian or “other” ◦ Mean.
Introduction There has been a shift within the field of language learning and teaching recently with major emphasis being put on learners and learning.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Adviser: Associ. Prof. Dr. Eva Salazar-Liu Presenter: Nai-yi, Chang 張乃懿 Student ID:
Evaluation and Assessment Evaluation is a broad term which involves the systematic way of gathering reliable and relevant information for the purpose.
KUMUTHA RAMAN P62352 Successful English Language Learning Inventory (SELL-In)
Control Group (n = 34) Assessment 1Assessment 2 Weekly Horse Interaction Group (n = 15) Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Daily Horse Interaction Group (n = 6)
SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING INVENTORY NAME: PRISHEELA MUNIANDY Prof. Dr. MOHAMED AMIN BIN EMBI.
Nur Dalila Mohd Arshad P  Beliefs influence the use of language leaming strategies both inside or outside the classroom (Nyikos and Oxford, 1993;
Theories of Language Acquisition
Presenter: Chen-Yo Chi Advisor: Dr. Chin-Ling Lee Date: June 1, 2009
Curriculum’s Effect on Foreign Language Anxiety
Presentation by: Nora, Katherine, Carmen, and Shadia
Critical Analysis of Ochoa
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
5th International Conference on ELT in China, May 2007 Motivation and motivating Chinese students in the language classroom – Transition to UK Higher.
English Language Writing Apprehension of University English Major Students – A survey carried out in Kunming University of Science and Technology. 昆明理工大学.
An Empirical Study of Learning Strategy Use by Differently Proficient Students in a Web-based Environment Wang Zhiru.
Identifying ELL anxieties in the tertiary-level EFL classroom
Presentation transcript:

Investigating English majors’ affective and meta-affective strategy use and test anxiety Jakub Bielak Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań/Kalisz, Poland State University of Applied Sciences, Konin, Poland Situating Strategy Use: The Interplay of Language Learning Strategies and Individual Learner Differences October 2015 Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Austria

Overview Language anxiety and test anxiety: definitions and literature overview The relation between strategy use and anxiety Research project design preliminary results discussion, conclusions and recommendations

Language and test anxiety “[A] distinct complex of self-perceptions, beliefs, feelings and behaviours related to classroom language learning arising from the uniqueness of the language learning process” (Horwitz et al., 1986, p. 128). Research on language anxiety indicates: A relationship between higher levels of language anxiety and lower language achievement (e.g., Dewaele, 2007; Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993; Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986; Woodrow, 2006) Anxiety interferes with cognitive processing at the input, processing and output stages (MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994; Onwuegbuzie et al., 2000). The Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS; Horwitz et al. 1986) takes test anxiety to be one of the correlates of foreign language anxiety (in addition to communication apprehension and fear of negative evaluation). Only 2 items out of over 30 make reference to test anxiety: Item 8: I am usually at ease during tests in my language class. Item 21: The more I study for a language test, the more confused I get. Test anxiety is a performance anxiety related to the fear of failure (Gordon & Sarason 1955) and can be investigated both as a trait and state phenomenon. Its manifestations are excessive worry, tension, irrelevant and chaotic thinking and such physiological reactions as fast heartbeat or excessive perspiration (Spielberger et al. 1976; Spielberger & Vagg 1995).

Affect, anxiety and strategies Motivation and strategy use are related (Oxford and Nyikos 1989; Wharton 2000). Language anxiety correlates negatively with the use of social, cognitive and metacognitive strategies (MacIntyre and Noels 1996). Language anxiety correlates negatively with communication strategies and positively with socioaffective strategies (Mihaljević Djigunović 2000). Affective strategies (aimed at anxiety reduction) are not related to language anxiety (Kondo and Ying-Ling 2004). Language anxiety is weakly negatively related to cognitive, metacognitive and social strategies (Pawlak 2011).

RESEARCH QUESTIONS The pilot study aimed to address this neglected area; it investigated the interplay of strategy use and test anxiety. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis was used. Research questions: Is there a relationship between general strategy use as well as the use of different types of strategies and test anxiety (TA; both trait and state)? Does affective and meta-affective strategy instruction result in greater strategy use? Are high- and low-TA learners equally responsive to affective and meta-affective strategy instruction in terms of strategy use? Does affective and meta-affective strategy instruction reduce TA (state)?

PARTICIPANTS / THE TEST 41 year-2 Polish college students of English 6 males, 39 females 11.6 years of instruction in English, ranging from 4 to 19 years Self-assessed proficiency (2-5): general 3.78, speaking 3.57 At the end of every year the students take the final EFL exam, which has a very important speaking component: General oral proficiency exam A 10-minute interview with 2 or 3 examiners during which topics covered throughout the year are discussed Analytic scoring used with focus on pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary and communicative efficiency/fluency

DATA COLLECTION Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL; Oxford 1990) It focuses on memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective and social strategies Used in original form (English) Cronbach’s alpha (whole SILL) =.91 (first administration) and.93 (second administration) Cronbach’s alpha (affective strategies; 6 items) =.43 (first administration) and.67 (second administration) In addition to the affective strategies mentioned in SILL, the participants listed (in Polish) other strategies they used to „get rid of stress/anxiety related to speaking English and to foster positive emotions.”

DATA COLLECTION (2) An additional affective and meta-affective strategy survey created by the present authors for measuring the use of strategies in relation to an actual oral exam 4-point Likert scale, 7 items Example items (they all concerned strategy use in relation to the EFL exam, immediately before and some time before the exam, as well as during and immediately after it):  “I tried to notice the emotions (such as stress, anxiety, self- confidence, etc.) I experienced.”  “I tried to somehow plan my emotions.”  “I gained access to resources (e.g. relaxing music, Internet sites about relaxation) which favorably influence emotions.” Cronbach’s alpha =.68 There was one open-ended question requesting the listing of additional strategies employed before, during and after the EFL exam “in order to experience favorable emotions (low level of stress/anxiety, self-confidence, self-efficacy, etc.).”

DATA COLLECTION (3) Reactions to Tests (RTT; Sarason 1984) – one of the standard TA scales currently used in psychology (Zeidner 1989) It views TA as being composed of tension, worry, test- irrelevant thinking and bodily reactions. 4-point Likert scale, 40 items, 10 for each component Example items corresponding to the four components of TA:  “I feel distressed and uneasy before oral tests/exams.”  “During a difficult oral test/exam, I worry whether I will pass it.”  “Irrelevant bits of information pop into my head during an oral test/exam.”  “My heart beats faster when the oral test/exam begins.” Translated into Polish and slightly modified to focus on oral language tests Cronbach’s alpha =.95

DATA COLLECTION (4) Anxometers (adapted from MacIntyre & Gardner 1991) for measuring state anxiety A think-aloud instrument called the thought-listing technique, which is often used in TA research (Bruch 1978). Instruction adapted from Blankstein et al. (1989, p. 273), translated into Polish.

PROCEDURE Elicited imitation Training / instructions TimeProcedure Time 1 (7 weeks before the EFL exam) SILL (first administration), RTT Weeks between Time 1 and Time 2 Affective and meta-affective strategy instruction Time 2 (the day of the EFL exam) EFL exam (interview) SILL (second administration), anxometers, thought-listing, affective and meta-affective survey EFL exam (announcement of grade and scores)

AFFECTIVE AND META-AFFECTIVE STRATEGY INSTRUCTION Done during several regularly scheduled university lectures (all sessions except one; all participants together) and classes (one session; participants divided into 3 groups) Done by the present researchers Based mostly on Gregersen and MacIntyre (2014) and on a TED talk (online video) by Cuddy (2012) Emotion-focused and cognition-focused (Zeidner 1998) including elements of behavioral and cognitive therapy/ interventions Systematic desensitization (Wolpe 1958) (“unlearning” anxiety) Relaxation  Autogenic relaxation  Progressive muscle relaxation training Cognitive restructuring

RESULTS: Test anxiety and strategy use TA (RTT) (n = 41): M = 2.37 The TA scores are very similar to those obtained in earlier studies (Bielak, Mystkowska-Wiertelak, Pawlak 2013) Strategy use (SILL) (whole sample, n = 41) Strategy type Time 1 M (SD) Time 2 M (SD) All types3.20 (0.49)3.42 (0.53) Memory2.85 (0.61)3.18 (0.64) Cognitive3.35 (0.57)3.53 (0.54) Compensation3.38 (0.55)3.50 (0.73) Metacognitive3.43 (0.72)3.62 (0.69) Affective2.70 (0.54)2.98 (0.71) Social3.32 (0.82)3.56 (0.73)

Correlations (Pearson) between trait TA and strategy use 14 All strategies MemoryCognitCompenMetacogAffectiveSocial Trait TA.29.31* *.14 * p <.05

Correlations (Pearson) between state TA and strategy use 15 All strategies MemoryCognitCompenMetacogAffectiveSocial State TA (oral exam).18.35* *.06 * p <.05 Affective and meta-affective.12

Strategy use before and after the intervention Dependent-samples t tests (n = 41) Strategy type Time 1 M (SD) Time 2 M (SD) tp All types3.20 (0.49)3.42 (0.53) Memory2.85 (0.61)3.18 (0.64) Cognitive3.35 (0.57)3.53 (0.54) Compensation3.38 (0.55)3.50 (0.73) Metacognitive3.43 (0.72)3.62 (0.69) Affective2.70 (0.54)2.98 (0.71) Social3.32 (0.82)3.56 (0.73)

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants The lowest and the highest tertiles according to trait TA (RTT) Strategy type Low-anxiety (n = 14)High-anxiety (n = 14) Time 1 M (SD) Time 2 M (SD) Time 1 M (SD) Time 2 M (SD) All types 3.15 (0.65)3.31 (0.61)3.32 (0.33)3.57 (0.44) Memory 2.64 (0.75)2.87 (0.70)2.91 (0.48)3.39 (0.54) Cognitive 3.42 (0.78)3.56 (0.67)3.44 (0.35)3.57 (0.46) Compensation 3.34 (0.57)3.48 (0.70)3.57 (0.61)3.58 (0.84) Metacognitive 3.35 (0.86)3.54 (0.78)3.61 (0.58)3.86 (0.54) Affective 2.55 (0.65)2.55 (0.79)2.92 (0.49)3.21 (0.44) Social 3.36 (0.95)3.59 (0.88)3.40 (0.69)3.73 (0.60)

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (2) All strategies

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (3) All strategies used by low-TA participants

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (4) All strategies used by high-TA participants

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (5) Memory strategies

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (6) Cognitive strategies

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (7) Social strategies

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (8) Affective strategies

Strategy use before and after the intervention by low-TA and high-TA participants (9) A series of one-way and RM ANOVAs revealed: No significant differences between groups at Time 1 For all strategies together and almost all strategy types (except for affective strategies): no significant effects for either Group or interaction between Time and Group For the above: significant effects for Time only For affective strategies: significant effects for Time (F(1) = 14.20, p <.05) and interaction of Time and Group (F(2) = 4.77, p <.05), and no significant effect for Group (F(2) = 3.21, p =.052)  RM ANOVAs for groups showed significant effects for Time for the medium-TA group only  One-way ANOVA at Time 2 showed significant differences between the three groups (F(2) = 5.50, p <.05), with post-hoc test showing the following significant differences: Low-TA < High-TA Low-TA < Medium-TA For all the significant differences, effect sizes were large or very large

DISCUSSION Is there a relationship between general strategy use as well as the use of different types of strategies and TA (both trait and state)? No, when it comes to general strategy use (all strategies) and trait and state TA Yes, when it comes to memory and affective strategies: The more anxious one is, the more often affective (and meta- affective) and memory strategies are used, although it was not captured by the additional survey concerning the use of affective and meta-affective strategies during the EFL exam. Does affective and meta-affective strategy instruction result in greater strategy use? Preliminary answer: perhaps yes, both in terms of all strategies and affective strategies However, there was no control group (must be included in the research proper) and there were significant improvements in the use of all strategy types except for compensation strategies. 26

DISCUSSION (2) Are high- and low-TA learners equally responsive to affective and meta-affective strategy instruction in terms of strategy use? No, high-anxiety learners are more likely than low-anxiety ones to increase the use of affective and meta-affective strategies in response to affective and meta-affective strategy instruction. Does affective and meta-affective strategy instruction reduce TA (state)? State anxiety was not really investigated in the pilot; it will be investigated more thoroughly in the research proper (2 administrations of anxometers and thought-listing). 27

LIMITATIONS AND DIRECTIONS Investigate state anxiety accompanying the EFL test at both Time 2 and Time 1. Use an additional tool (e.g. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]; Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983) to measure state anxiety. In addition to RTT, use FLCAS. Include a control group in the study design. Offer more extensive treatment (strategy instruction). 28

Thank you for your attention! Questions, comments? Please reach us at