René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Advertisements

The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Philosophy 024: Big Ideas Prof. Robert DiSalle Talbot College 408, x85763 Office Hours: Monday and Wednesday.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Lecture 2 (Think, pp. 14 – 34) Descartes and the Problem of Knowledge: I. Some historical and intellectual background II. What is knowledge? III. Descartes’
Descartes’ Meditations
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Skepticism.
Descartes’ Meditations
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Descartes
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang

Learning Outcomes 1. Background 2. Descartes’ project in the Meditations 3. Descartes’ method 4. “Cogito, ergo sum” 5. The appearance/reality gap

Background Biography Meditations on First Philosophy (1647) Rene Descartes

Background Historical context o Scientific revolution o Expansion of human knowledge

Descartes’ project in the Meditations

Descartes project Background Knowledge = justified true belief Foundationalism o Definition o Example1, Example 2 Example1Example 2

x y z I know that x + y = 90 degrees Z = 90 x + y + 90 = 180 x + y = 90 x + y + z = 180 FOUNDATIONAL BELIEFS

C3 is 3 C2 = 1 C1 = 2 A2 and B2 are combo of 2 and 3 A1 = 1 B1 = 3 B2 = 2A1 = 3 B3 = 1A3 = 2 Ken Puzzle

Descartes project Problem of doubtful beliefs Descartes’ question o What can serve as a foundation for scientific truths? Aim of Meditations Published in 1647

Descartes’ method

What scares Descartes “It is now some years since I detected how many were the false beliefs that I had from my earliest youth admitted as true, and how doubtful was everything I had since constructed on this basis.”

Descartes’ method “If in doubt, throw it out” Method of “Cartesian doubt” o What it is o Its aim o Methodological NOT genuine doubt

Are there any beliefs that cannot be doubted that can serve as a foundation for scientific knowledge? Descartes’ method

Candidate #1: Beliefs derived from senses Senses are deceptive The dream argument

Descartes’ method Descartes’ Dream Argument (P1) I often have perceptions when I am dreaming like the ones I have now. (P2) There is no definite signs to distinguish between dream experience and waking experience. Therefore, (C) It is possible that I am dreaming right now and that my perceptions are false.

Descartes’ method Candidate #2: Beliefs derived from reason Evil demon argument

Descartes’ method Descartes’ Evil Demon Argument (P1) It is possible that an evil demon is deceiving me when I reason to conclusions. Therefore, (C) It is possible that the conclusions I derive from reason are false.

Descartes seems to have shown that there are no indubitable beliefs that can serve as a foundation for science. Descartes’ method

What this means Wrong interpretation Right interpretation o No solid foundation for knowledge o Beliefs from science no better than beliefs from faith o Skepticism (???)

“Cogito ergo sum”

“Cogito, ergo sum” Translation The passage “Let [the evil demon] deceive me as much as he will, he can never cause me to be nothing so long as I think that I am something. So that after having reflected well and carefully examined all things, we must come to the conclusion that this proposition; I am, I exist, is necessarily truth each time that I pronounce it or that I mentally conceive of it.”

“Cogito, ergo sum” Descartes’ reasoning (P1) Even if we assume that there is a deceiver, from the very fact that I am deceived it follows that I exist. (P2) More generally, whenever I think (e.g., feel, sense, imagine, reason), it is affirmed I exist. (P3) I think. Therefore, (C) I exist.

“Cogito, ergo sum” Others things that cannot be doubted o Experience claims vs. Reality claims o Experience claims cannot be doubted

The appearance/reality gap

How can we know that objects as they appear to us is how objects really are?

The appearance/reality gap Clear and distinct ideas “Myself as an existing thing” is clear and distinct Ideas and perceptions that are clear and distinct are true I have a clear and distinct idea of perfection

The appearance/reality gap Descartes’ argument for God (P1) The idea of perfection must have a cause. (P2) I am an imperfect being. (P3) It is impossible for an imperfect being to be the source of the idea of perfection. So, (P4) I cannot be the source of the idea of perfection. Therefore, (C) The source of the idea of perfection must be a Perfect Being (God).

The appearance/reality gap Descartes’ argument bridging the gap (P1) God, who is perfect, cannot be a deceiver. So, (P2) God would not mislead me when I perceive something clearly and distinctly. Therefore, (C) Whenever I perceive something clearly and distinctly, it must be true.

The appearance/reality gap Part of Descartes’ legacy How can we know that objects as they appear to us is how objects really are?