1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and 2006 3Reading - 2006 NECAP 4Mathematics - 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery Education ThinkLink Assessment. Founded by Vanderbilt University Acquired in March 2006 by Discovery Education Specializes in Predictive Assessment.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
The 8-Step Continuous Improvement Model
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
Aligning Curriculum Standards, Instructional Practices and Assessment.
Gilbert Public Schools District Report Card 2012/2013 Presented by Brandie Harris and Barb VeNard.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Analyzing Access For ELL Scores Tracy M. Klingbiel Nash Rocky Mount School District October 11, 2010.
A professional development seminar presented by: Michele Mailhot and Susan Smith March 21, 2012
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
The DATA WISE Process and Data- Driven Dialogue Presented by: Lori DeForest (315)
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Charles A. Lindbergh Elementary School Kenmore-Town of Tonawanda UFSD A Business First Math Award Winning School 2010 Top 10% in all of WNY.
Copyright ©2006. Battelle for Kids. Understanding & Using Value-Added Analysis.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,
Comparison PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS.
Using the 2007 NECAP Reports February, 2008 New England Common Assessment Program.
Demystifying Statewide Assessment for Students with Disabilities September 19, 2007 Central Elementary School.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
AYP Changes for Percent Meeting Standard Elementary uniform bar (3-5)
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
Using the 2009 NECAP Reports February 2010 New England Common Assessment Program.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
HANOVER HIGH SCHOOL GRADE 11 NECAP SCORES
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
1 New England Common Assessment Program Guide to Using the 2005 NECAP Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation March/April 2006.
Virginia State University Summer Data Institute: Digging into Data to Identify the Learner-Centered Problem Presented by: Justina O. Osa, Ed.D.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,
NECAP Presentation Dunn’s Corners School Westerly, RI February 24, 2010.
Swampscott Elementary Schools MCAS Results Grade 3 ELA Performance Level Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
North Kingstown School Committee March 11, 2014 MH 3/11/2014.
GISD: Genesee County’s Regional Educational Service Agency GENESEE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT LISA A. HAGEL SUPERINTENDENT OCTOBER 20, 2011 Understanding.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Helping your Child Prepare for Testing
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update
Reading Inventory Expectations
January 17, 2017 Board Workshop
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Scaled Leadership Vision 20/20 Continues: Assessing Key Elements in the 5E Mathematics Classroom Silvia Aday, District instructional supervisor David galarce,
CMSD Fall Data Check In November 3, 2017.
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
Presented by: Chesley Taylor
Presentation transcript:

1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics NECAP 5Writing NECAP 62005/2006 Comparison 7Reading - Cohort Comparison 8Mathematics - Cohort Comparison Fun with Data slides from RI (slides 8-12) 9Fun with Student Level Reports 10Fun with Released Support Materials 11Fun with Grade Level Summaries 12Fun with Disaggregated Results 13Fun with School Level Summary Data

2 New Hampshire Results

3

4

5

6 A comparison of the percent of students in grades 3-8 scoring Proficient or Above (levels 3&4) and Substantially Below Proficient (Level 1) in the 2005 and 2006 NECAP assessment for Reading, Mathematics, and Writing. Comparison of 2005 and 2006 NECAP Results

7 New Hampshire Results A cohort comparison of students scoring Proficient or above in one grade last year compared to those same student in the follow grade this year.

8 New Hampshire Results A cohort comparison of students scoring Proficient or above in one grade last year compared to those same student in the follow grade this year.

9 Review to be sure you have a student report for every student tested in October, Prepare a letter to provide your interpretation of the results for your school and/or district. Be sure teachers are prepared and comfortable discussing individual student results with families, including any instructional interventions. Use your district data file to analyze growth between students you had last year and this year. Fun with Student Level Reports!

10 Fun with Released Support Materials! Build practice tests Share writing samples as models Mock scoring sessions to calibrate teacher judgments Compare released items (GLE and DOK) with classroom instruction and assessments and student work. Map instruction and scaffolding practices to items based on student performance.

11 Review last year’s grade level summary report with this year’s. If gains were made, identify what strategies, interventions, and programs may have worked. If no progress was made, hypothesize why and what can be done at the school or district level to help students make progress. Identify where your results differ from the district and state results. Hypothesize why they may differ. Fun with Grade Level Summaries!

12 Compare last year’s Disaggregated Report with this year’s Highlight in yellow, groups that had significant positive increases Highlight in blue, groups that remained stable or had decreases Establish cross-grade and content groups to hypothesize what the school can do to close gaps and maintain increases Access to rigorous curriculum? Professional development in a specific area? Adequate support programs? Adequate family involvement? Fun with Disaggregated Results!

13 Are there consistent patterns of achievement across grades? Across content areas? Compare results to last year’s school summary Highlight in yellow, areas where there has been significant growth. Highlight in blue, areas where there has been no growth or decline. Establish cross-grade and content groups to hypothesize what the school can do to close gaps and maintain increases Develop a school/district plan to address areas of weakness and continue areas of growth Fun with School Level Summary Data!