Problem and Context Survey Tool What the Future May Bring: Model Estimation Empirically Approaching Destination Choice Set Formation A. Horni, IVT, ETH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Routing System Stability draft-dimitri-grow-rss-01.txt IETF71 - Philadelphia.
Advertisements

Intelligent Agents Russell and Norvig: 2
Chapter 10 Decision Making © 2013 by Nelson Education.
Chapter 1 DECISION MODELING OVERVIEW. MGS 3100 Business Analysis Why is this class worth taking? –Knowledge of business analysis and MS Excel are core.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Modeling DECISION MODELING WITH MICROSOFT EXCEL Copyright 2001 Prentice Hall Publishers and Ardith E. Baker.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
MATSim Destination Choice for Shopping and Leisure Activities
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8527 – Introduction to Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition Objectives: Jensen’s Inequality (Special Case) EM Theorem.
1 Finding good models for model-based control and optimization Paul Van den Hof Okko Bosgra Delft Center for Systems and Control 17 July 2007 Delft Center.
Food Accessibility in Wisconsin: Comparison of Self-Report, Direct Observation, and Mapping Data ResultsKey Findings Results Conclusions Background Results.
Mo So A. Horni IVT ETH Zürich Juli 2012 Simulation einer Woche mit MATSim
PROVIDING DISTRIBUTED FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION USING A STATISTICAL NOWCAST SCHEME Neil I. Fox and Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri- Columbia.
CS 589 Information Risk Management 6 February 2007.
The Context of Forest Management & Economics, Modeling Fundamentals Lecture 1 (03/30/2015)
Ubiquitous Advertising: the Killer Application for the 21st Century Author: John Krumm Presenter: Anh P. Nguyen
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
Extracting Places and Activities from GPS Traces Using Hierarchical Conditional Random Fields Yong-Joong Kim Dept. of Computer Science Yonsei.
1 Preferred citation style for this presentation Axhausen, K.W. (2006) Next steps ?, MATSIM-T Developer Workshop, Castasegna, October 2006.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Simulation
Chap 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Business Statistics: A First Course 6 th Edition Chapter 1 Introduction.
Ness Shroff Dept. of ECE and CSE The Ohio State University Grand Challenges in Methodologies for Complex Networks.
Destination Choice Modeling of Discretionary Activities in Transport Microsimulations Andreas Horni.
Planning and Verification for Stochastic Processes with Asynchronous Events Håkan L. S. Younes Carnegie Mellon University.
Modeling & Simulation: An Introduction Some slides in this presentation have been copyrighted to Dr. Amr Elmougy.
An Agent-Based Cellular Automaton Cruising-For-Parking Simulation A. Horni, L. Montini, R. A. Waraich, K. W. Axhausen IVT ETH Zürich July 2012.
Stochastic Routing Routing Area Meeting IETF 82 (Taipei) Nov.15, 2011.
Modeling Destination Choice in MATSim Andreas Horni IVT ETH Zürich July 2011.
Keller and Ozment (1999)  Problems of driver turnover  Costs $3,000 to $12,000 per driver  Shipper effect  SCM impact  Tested solutions  Pay raise.
1 Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Random Utility Models: An Application of the Latent Market Segmentation Model to the demand for GM foods Dr.
The Annual Meeting of the RSAI – The Israeli Branch, Tel-Aviv University, January 10, 2010 Development and estimation of a semi- compensatory residential.
MGS3100_01.ppt/Aug 25, 2015/Page 1 Georgia State University - Confidential MGS 3100 Business Analysis Introduction - Why Business Analysis Aug 25 and 26,
Learning and Inferring Transportation Routines By: Lin Liao, Dieter Fox and Henry Kautz Best Paper award AAAI’04.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Tuomas Raivio and Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki.
Recognizing personalized flexible activity patterns Sergio A. Ordonez M. July 2015.
MATSim … Destination Choice Current State and Future Development MATSim User Meeting 2013, Zürich 1.
LANGUAGE MODELS FOR RELEVANCE FEEDBACK Lee Won Hee.
Issues in Estimation Data Generating Process:
7th International Forum on Tourism Statistics Stockholm, Sweden, 9-11 June 2004 NEW RESEARCH LINES ON TOURISM INFORMATION SYSTEMS: POTENTIAL DEMAND ANALYSES.
Preferred citation style Horni A. (2013) MATSim Issues … suitable for a car trip discussion, Group seminar VPL, IVT, Zurich, September 2013.
Location Choice Modeling for Shopping and Leisure Activities with MATSim: Utility Function Extension and Validation Results A. Horni IVT ETH Zurich.
Experimental Evaluation of Real-Time Information Services in Transit Systems from the Perspective of Users Antonio Mauttone Operations Research Department,
Location Choice Modeling for Shopping and Leisure Activities with MATSim: Status Update & Next Steps A. Horni IVT, ETH Zurich.
ANALYSIS TOOL TO PROCESS PASSIVELY- COLLECTED GPS DATA FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLE DEMAND MODELLING APPLICATIONS Bryce Sharman & Matthew Roorda University of.
OPERATING SYSTEMS CS 3530 Summer 2014 Systems and Models Chapter 03.
Repeated Game Modeling of Multicast Overlays Mike Afergan (MIT CSAIL/Akamai) Rahul Sami (University of Michigan) April 25, 2006.
Decision-Making I: Need Recognition & Search Chapter 11.
Experiences and Lessons from Conducting a Mixed Studies Systematic Review Presenter: Dale Forsdyke Supervisor: Professor Andy Smith.
◊MATSim Destination Choice ◊Upscaling Small- to Large-Scale Models ◊Research Avenues How to Improve MATSim Destination Choice For Discretionary Activities?
: High-Resolution Destination Choice in Agent-Based Demand Models A. Horni K. Nagel K.W. Axhausen destinations persons  00  nn  10  ij i j.
A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Formulation of Clustering Objectives Yevgeny Seldin Joint work with Naftali Tishby.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Optimization Techniques for Natural Resources SEFS 540 / ESRM 490 B Lecture 1 (3/30/2016)
STRUCTURAL MODELS Eva Hromádková, Applied Econometrics JEM007, IES Lecture 10.
MATSim Location Choice for Shopping and Leisure Activities: Ideas and Open Questions A. Horni IVT ETH Zürich September 2008.
CS4311 Spring 2011 Process Improvement Dr
A New Approach to Measure Preferences of Users in Built Environments: Integrating Cognitive Mapping and Utility Models Benedict Dellaert Erasmus University.
CS b659: Intelligent Robotics
Mathematical Modelling of Pedestrian Route Choices in Urban Areas Using Revealed Preference GPS Data Eka Hintaran ATKINS European Transport Conference.
Analytics and OR DP- summary.
Empirically Approaching Destination Choice Set Formation. A
Discrete Choice Models
© James D. Skrentny from notes by C. Dyer, et. al.
Optimization Techniques for Natural Resources SEFS 540 / ESRM 490 B
Clearing the Jungle of Stochastic Optimization
Overview of Models & Modeling Concepts
Discrete-Event System Simulation
John Lafferty, Chengxiang Zhai School of Computer Science
Introduction and History
Introduction to Decision Sciences
Introduction and History
Presentation transcript:

Problem and Context Survey Tool What the Future May Bring: Model Estimation Empirically Approaching Destination Choice Set Formation A. Horni, IVT, ETH Zürich

Destination choice in MATSim Utility maximizing approach

Robustness of Estimated Parameters Thesis Schuessler (2010): Route choice Pellegrini et al. (1997): Shopping destination choice Problem for operational model

The Deterministic Approach r observed rtrt cs real (t) if any! threshold r t  = f(r t ) cs formation criteria (exogenous) To date: specification of exogenous factors for destination choice set formation rather ad hoc and more like a proof of concept.

The Probabilistic Approach cs formation criteria Speed-ups e.g. → convergence to deterministic approch endogenous! But: combinatorial complexity Conclusion in the words of Pagliara and Timmermans (2010): „Even though the inclusion of latent stochastic thresholds and the simultaneous estimation of thresholds and utility functions represents an important step forward in discrete choice analysis, forecasting results still depend on the researchers’ specification of the choice set.“

Decision Horizon: e.g., Grocery Shopping meat for dinner vegetables for dinner dinner for cat → relevant choice between and … and not in cs immediately prior to choice! choice set immediately prior to choice context!

Decision Horizon – Generation of PS Habitual „decisions“/ Routine response behavior preferred set of stores → relevant for transport planning extensive decisions impulsive decisions non-compensatory decision behavior → rule-based learning process e.g. grocery shopping

Decision Horizon: Sets Involved in the Decision Process (a First Step) Unawareness set Awareness set = cs(t –  t) Inept set (-) (Inert set (0)) cs(t) Narayana and Markin 1975 Evoked set (+) (Inert set (0))

Purely Statistical Approach vs. Behavior-Based Approach Homo oeconomicus → universal choice set Thresholds where parameters stabilize Lacking research Computationally infeasible Not explicative inconsistent productive? Behavior-based criteria for cs formation Lacking research

Allora, … EmpiricalMethodologial Decison horizon Statistical vs. behavioral model Preferred set - characteristics - frequencies Sets involved in decision process Core area within STP Reasons for NOT visiting a store Trip chaining Model estimation MATSim model Providing a research (survey) tool

Survey „Tool“ Web-based Google street view Grocery shopping 300 stores, partly manually collected future: attributes of stores

Web-based Survey Overview

Web-Survey – Google Maps & Street View Street View

Model Estimation Observed choice Awareness set? Preferred set Choice set Requirements: 1. Easy to survey and generate in op. models 2. Actually plays a well defined role in decision process „New“ model

Concluding Remarks Empirical basis TTB for time-geography Input to discussion on decision horizon and extent of behavioral basis of discrete choice models (vs. purely statistical) Survey tool Pretest - Game-like traits appreciated → less fatigue - Dominance of closest Coop or Migros (not deliberated)