Preliminary Results for Individual Sites NEG/ECP Forest Mapping Group Brief background on approaches Preliminary Maps –Compared with ecological unit analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Deposition to Complex Terrain: Scaling Up to the Landscape K.C. Weathers, G.M. Lovett, S.E. Lindberg S.M. Simkin, D.N. Lewis, K. Schwarz Institute.
Advertisements

Joint Work Session Skagit County Planning Commission and Shoreline Advisory Committee May 22, 2012.
A brief introduction to statistical aspects of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program of the USDA Forest Service Ronald E. McRoberts Patrick D. Miles.
WOODSHED ANALYSIS Mad River Valley Towns Analysis by Marc Lapin, Chris Rodgers, & David Brynn Winter/Spring 2009.
A Career in Forestry? Opportunities in BC Resource Management.
WOODSHED ANALYSIS Addison County Five Towns Analysis by Marc Lapin, Chris Rodgers, & David Brynn Winter/Spring 2009.
Produced water brine and stream salinity James K. Otton Tracey Mercier.
Multi-scale assessment of the extent and effects of soil calcium depletion and forest harvesting in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Rakesh.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Green-Ampt Parameterization for Rainfall Excess Determination
Sensing Winter Soil Respiration Dynamics in Near-Real Time Alexandra Contosta 1, Elizabeth Burakowski 1,2, Ruth Varner 1, and Serita Frey 3 1 University.
ESRM 304 Final Exam Hints The exam will contain up to 7 sections of : Short Answers, Calculations, Definitions, Multiple Choice, and/or True and False.
Critical Load Development for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Elizabeth Waddell Air Resources Specialist Pacific West Region
o What were we looking at? o The Pit Crew studied soil patterns throughout the landscape.
Improving Restoration Using CVS-Designed Web-Based Tools 7 October 2009 M. Forbes Boyle University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
CARBON and HYDROLOGY (WP2) §The main purpose of the hydrological study is to quantify fluxes/stores of carbon (and nutrients) in water phase as it travels.
Forest Health Monitoring Presented By Allison Kanoti.
GIS Applications in Forest Resource Management: Wayne National Forest Impact Assessment and Monitoring of the 2003 Ice Storm Nicole I. Stump GIS Specialist.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
 Interactive programs with a User Interface  Available 24-7, on the national FIA Web site  Easy access to the national FIA database Generate Reports.
Results of forest soil inventory implemented in within the scope of the demonstration project BioSoil Soil stability in ecologically and socially.
Presented by MOBIL DATA COLLECTIONS ON GRAZING LAND.
Landscape Ecosystems and Native Plant Communities Where we’ve been and where we’re going.
An Overview of the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program.
Soil Analysis Presented by:. SKHLKMSS Geography Task Force.
Brigham Young University Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences.
Planning for Inventory & Monitoring Chip Scott National Inventory & Monitoring Applications Center (FIA-NIMAC) Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service.
1 The Yukon River Basin Assessment and Integrated Climate-Effects Monitoring Network.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
The diagram shows weather instruments A and B.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Discussion Topics – Delaware River Basin Pilot Project Synergistic opportunities between FIA/FHM/GC/USGS –Scaling – top down/bottom up – multi-tier approach.
Precision Irrigation and Fertigation
1 CHARGE The goal of the breakout groups is to –define and prioritize research questions to help guide the US Global Change Research Program, –determine.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
COOP Modernization: Building NOAA’S Environmental Real-time Observation Network (NERON) Tim Ross Integrated Surface Observing Systems NWS Office of Science.
Can Contamination Potential of Ground Water to Pesticides be Identified from Hydrogeological Parameters? Barnali Dixon University of South Florida Funded.
Chapter 4 – The Lithosphere Phosphorus Minerals “Ultimate” limiting nutrient given its origin Apatite only primary mineral (4.7)Ca 5 (PO 4 ) 3 OH + 4H.
1 Objectives 1. Why quantitative data? 2. Relationship to attributes and indicators 3. Accuracy and precision of qualitative and quantitative indicators.
Canopy Dynamics and Tree Well Size Does the canopy height and size of coniferous trees affect the size of the tree well at the snow surface? J. Kalin Puent.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
ICP Forests Progress Report ICP Forests Progress since 28th session of WGE Revision of the monitoring system Data quality assurance Database management.
Carbon Data Visualization Tool Prototype Description and Demonstration October 2, 2012.
Assessing pine bark beetle mortality in Southern CA Forests Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark Rosenberg Rich Walker Bill Stewart Visit.
Tropical plant trait evolution and the consequences for savanna-forest transitions William A. Hoffmann North Carolina State University This is not the.
Group Participants Rich F Martin L Pete M Pam P Bob M Chuck S Natasha D Caroline H.
USFS Hierarchy Finer Scale Units for Missouri ELTs=ESDs=HGM.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
Introduction Acid deposition (AD) from air pollution is a chronic stress on forest ecosystems in the northeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the U. S. The.
Extensive, Strategic Assessment of Southeast Alaska’s Vegetative Resources Willem van Hees, Bert Mead Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forest Inventory.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
Plan: 1)3 meter deep and a 10 meter deep holes at the undisturbed site. We have a location picked out and Yuri and I are planning to go there this week.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Environmental Modeling Weighting GIS Layers Weighting GIS Layers.
Forest Inventory Mapmaker Pat Miles NE FIA Users Group Meeting.
Corn Yield Comparison Between EPIC-View Simulated Yield And Observed Yield Monitor Data by Chad M. Boshart Oklahoma State University.
Comparison of Soils and Plants at Prairie Ridge: % C and % N Lori Skidmore.
Soil Management Randy L. Davis National Soils Program Leader USDA Forest Service March 30, 2006.
Warm Up 1.What are some different ways that water can become polluted? 2.List 2 things that wildfires need in order to occur. Time’s Up!
Objectives  To learn the basics of navigating web soil survey  Identify specific kinds of information that can be gained on web soil survey  Collect.
What is the difference between climate and temperature
Chemical Properties of Forest Soils in the Catskills Region
Section 4: Weather Analysis and Prediction
Section 4: Weather Analysis and Prediction
SOTER Soils and Terrain Digital Database
Evaluating the Ability to Derive Estimates of Biodiversity from Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger, Andrew Ouimette,
Big data for Global Change Ecology (Biogeography)
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Results for Individual Sites NEG/ECP Forest Mapping Group Brief background on approaches Preliminary Maps –Compared with ecological unit analysis –Incorporating FIA/FHM plots –CL nutrient N Forest Health Parameters

Approaches for Calculating Critical Loads 1.Site specific approach –Data from individual sites Soil pits Forest inventories Air quality stations 2.Ecological unit approach –GIS layers/regional models

An Important Difference… The site-specific approach –Heterogeneous forest ecosystem –Multiple data sources –Multiple ways to calculate critical load

An Important Difference… Multiple data sources DepositionStand CompositionTree Chemistry Site dataDominant speciesSite data ClimCalc2-3 speciesTree Chem. DB HRDMForest types

An Important Difference… Multiple data sources Soil DataMineral Weathering Dominant soilPROFILE (site) 2-3 soil typesPROFILE (reg.) Depth, bulk density, texture Substrate type/Clay content

Vermont Sites Type of Site# SitesSite Level None Vegetation surveys, Soil surveys, Additional research sites Level 3 Sites (Many data are unavailable) Intensive studiesLevel 2 Sites (Some data are unavailable) Level 1 Sites (All data are available)

Vermont Sites Intensive Research SitesAdditional Research Sites NRCS Soil Survey Sites Private Timberlands Vegetation Survey Sites

Incorporating FIA and FHM Sites Advantages –Much better coverage –Forest health parameters Disadvantages –Primarily vegetation data –Limited in the approach we are able to use

Vermont Sites with FIA and FHM Plots Intensive Research SitesAdditional Research Sites NRCS Soil Survey Sites Private Timberlands Vegetation Survey SitesFIA and FHM Plots

New England FIA and FHM Plots New England FIA Sites Forested FIA plots used in the FMG critical load calculations. Inclusion is based on availability of digitized soil surveys. State VTNHMACT RIME #sites Total# ,620 Counties shaded red do not have digitized county soil maps available and will not be included in this analysis.

Where we’re going from here (next steps) Complete calculations for the rest of New England (and NY) Adjustments to the Ecological Unit analysis Further comparisons between the approaches Forest Health Surface water