Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – Current BP & FIL grids not showing BP & FIL values in areas designated NB3 by LANDFIRE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Cereal Crops Guilherme Torres, Natasha Macnack, Bee Chim, Jeremiah Mullock, and William Raun Oklahoma State University,
Advertisements

CAALU National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Software Tool Stephen M. Ogle, Ph.D. Colorado State University Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory Fort Collins,
5/12/20151 Reducing Harvest Losses Combine Calibration John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist North Dakota State University.
Crop Residue Yield Variability in North Central Region Rajesh Chintala.
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
FIELD CROPS Top graphic from
North Central Feedstock Assessment Team: GIS Applications to Support Sustainable Biofuels Feedstock Production Michael C. Wimberly, Mirela Tulbure, Ross.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
ACRE UPDATE Estimates as of February 9, 2010 Ron Haugen/Dwight Aakre Farm Management Specialists.
Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Costs and Returns Update – 2010 Crop Alan Miller Farm.
Corn Outlook.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Integrating Cropland Management into.
Useful Tables. Soil Fertility and Crop Nutrient Management Goals Manage plant and animal materials to maintain or improve soil organic matter content.
Figure 4.1. Land use or cover in the North Central Region (NCR) of the United States. Created from the USDA NASS Cropland Data Layers (NASS 2009b). States.
Crops and Crop Production in North Dakota Joel Ransom.
Based on USDA-NASS Data Maps Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Bar Chart Bar Chart Bar Chart.
SPANISH INVENTORY - AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF MOST SIGNIFICANT PARAMETERS Antonio Ferreiro 1 and Juan José Rincón Technical.
Several examples on the preparation of SUAs commodities James Geehan, Statistician, FAO Rome.
Grain Production Trends in Southeastern Michigan Initial Findings from FSEP Grain Survey: 2006 Presenters: Karl Buck and Ann Vail.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
North American Croplands: US Updates 21 May 2015 Richard Massey; Dr. Teki Sankey.
Section:Plant & Soil Science Unit:Soil Management Lesson Title: Lesson 3: Fertilizer Recommendations and Fertilizer Adjustments Lab.
Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: Use of the USDA Crop Data Layer Presented.
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
Oct-03Learning to Use FOFEM 5: Advanced Lesson Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management Learning to Use FOFEM 5 Volume II:
Farm Leases Tim Eggers Field Ag Economist Southwest Iowa
Estimates of Biomass Burning Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Emissions from the GOES Imager Xiaoyang Zhang 1,2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Chris Schmidt 3 1 NOAA/NESDIS/Center.
Acreage Estimation ITEM CROPLAND DATA LAYERS - In Season Post Season Total CDL's2148 ESTIMATES PRODUCED State.
Corn, Soybeans and ? ? ? Crop rotations and the economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement Biologically Based Weed Management for Organic Farming Systems.
2012 Cost Estimates: Corn following Corn Source: Duffy, ISU Extension Economics, Dec Low YieldMedium YieldHigh Yield $738 $816 $888 $5.10 / bu.$4.94.
2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAMS Dr. Jody Campiche Dr. Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
Grain Foods Grains are used in many foods that we eat. Can you guess the name of the grain in it's raw form??? Get out a sheet of paper, as I show you.
Top Issues Land Values Cash Rental Rates Custom Rates Leasing Practices Crop-Share Leases Calculating a Cash Rent Lease Flexible Cash Leases Bio-economy.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 1:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Technical Refinements Large Fires Complex Identification Duplicates -- WF and Rx Fire QC Packets States,
Spatial Interpolation III
North American Croplands: Updates Richard Massey; Teki Sankey.
Agricultural Policy Effects on Land Allocation Allen M. Featherstone Terry L. Kastens Kansas State University.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 8/21/2014.
The ACRE Decision Bruce A. Babcock Iowa State University Presented at the North Dakota Corn Growers Association Annual Convention. Fargo, ND. February.
MODIS-based Cropland Classification in North America Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University.
1 Evaluating & Revising Business Goals. 2 Why do teams or businesses have goals?
Land Pools & Conversion Near-term: Update the GTAP land cover database Reduce the area of inaccessible forest Update area of ecosystem types using satellite-
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey.
What do you need to think about when drying grain?
Lecture 13. Table 1. Maximum Recommended Moisture Contents of Selected Clean, Sound Grains for Storage with Aeration
Plant Science Crop ID. Cotton Flower Cotton Leaf.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
Additions crop residues manures composts losses CO 2 (respiration of soil organisms) erosion soil organic matter Figure 3.1. Additions and losses of organic.
GDD accumulations and probabilities were calculated from PRISM daily tmin and tmax grids at 800-m resolution, time period GDD base temperature.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Agriculture Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Ankara, March 2016.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
The Lay of the Land in Agriculture
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Update on Cash Crops/Winter Cereals
Tackling Regional Climate Change By Leaf Albedo Bio-geoengineering
Current Feed Situation and Outlook
available soil water (inches)
Update on Cash Crops Coleman Research Group Presentation Aug. 20, 2015
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Biomass Yield and Nutrient Accumulation by Four Small Grain Species
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – Current BP & FIL grids not showing BP & FIL values in areas designated NB3 by LANDFIRE – National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) produces cropland data layer (CDL) for all CONUS – Michigan Tech Research institute developed fuel loading by crop type as an input to their studies on wildfire emissions

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL Background – We can use these crop fuel loading estimates to estimate a fuel model for each crop type based on fine fuel loading estimate – The resulting fuel model can then be used to estimate BP and FIL – Final result is updated BP/FIL grids that incorporate agricultural lands that have been incorrectly classified NB3 by LANDFIRE

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Create Fuel Model Map of NB3 Areas – Extract areas classified as NB3 in LANDFIRE FBFM40 fuel model layer

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Create Fuel Model Map of NB3 Areas – Determine Crop type in areas designated NB3

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Create Fuel Model Map of NB3 Areas – Assign Fuel Model to Crop Type based on fine fuel loading figures described in CDL research (representative fuel models based on Scott & Burgan FBFM 40 fine fuel loading) Yield (bu/A) Bushel weight (lbs/bu) Yield (lbs/A) Moisture content (ratio) Dry matter (ratio) Grain dry matter yield (lbs/A) Residue: grain ratio Residue dry matter yield (lbs DM/A) Tons/A Fuel Load (Moisture Content) Fuel Load (Dry Matter) Fuel Bed Depth(ft) Representative FM To calculate crop residue yield, multiply crop grain yield (bu/A) and dry matter content (ratio) and residue:grain ratio. Barley GR5 Wheat GR7 Soybeans GR2 Sorghum GR7 Rye GR4 Oats GR3 Corn GR7

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Create Fuel Model Map of NB3 Areas – Fuel Models applied to NB3 Areas based on fine fuel loading and substituted in for NB3 pixels

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Remove NB3 Areas From Burn Probability (BP) and Fire Intensity Level (FIL) Grids

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Extrapolate Burn Probability and Fire Intensity values based on smallest geographically significant area – Agriculture occurs in areas where the fuel model classification is not geographically similar in non- agricultural areas Example: GR7 Fuel model assigned to Wheat Crop Type which has wide distribution across the US.

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Example: GR7 Fuel model assigned to Wheat Crop Type which has wide geographic distribution across the US.

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Example: GR7 Fuel model distribution in LANDFIRE FBFM40 layer. The distribution is limited to NE MT, ND, SD, NE, MN

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Extrapolate Burn Probability and Fire Intensity values based on smallest geographically significant area – In GR2 & GR3 fuel model datasets the geographic distribution of the fuel model pixels was wide enough to use matching or geographically similar Fire Planning Units (FPU) as a geographic unit to summarize mean BP & FIL values – In GR4, GR5, GR7 fuel model datasets the geographic distribution of the fuel model pixels was not wide enough to use FPU as a summary unit, so the mean national BP&FIL values for each fuel model was used.

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Assign representative BP & FIL values to cropland designated NB3 based on existing FBFM BP &FIL values

Supplementing Existing BP & FIL Data with Crop BP &FIL for DOI Lands Methods: Add BP& FIL created for Agricultural areas to existing BP & FIL grids to create final product