Planning into Practice Michigan Technology Planning Workshops The Process of Technology Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AUSD Mathematics Summit Presentation to the Board of Education November 25, 2008.
Advertisements

Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Creating Successful Proposals for Educational Technology Projects Educational Technology Integration.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
How Do We Know It’s Working? Creating Evaluations for Technology Projects and Evaluations (part I)
Campus Improvement Plans
Research has shown that healthy students are better learners. How can you develop a healthy school community using a Comprehensive School Health Approach?
Central Office Administrator Development and Evaluation Adaptations for Central Office Administrators.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Planning into Practice Planning into Practice Resources for Planning, Implementing and Integrating Instructional Technology Professional Development for.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Program Evaluation Tools and Strategies for Instructional Technology.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Technology Leadership
Creating Successful Proposals For Curriculum and Technology Projects.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Planning into Practice Michigan Technology Planning Workshops Putting It All Together -- Goals, Actions, and Evaluation.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Lessons Learned from District Tech Audits Sun Associates
Strategic Improvement Planning A Continuous Improvement Model 1.
Planning into Practice for RESD Reviewers Helping Districts Create Effective Technology Plans.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
MassCUE Evaluators Day 1 – January 11, Greetings! zLogistics and Locations yWiFi SSID and Password yBathrooms, etc. zTeams yWho are you? yTeam members?
Evaluating Your Technology Initiative How do you know it’s working? The MassCUE Evaluators Program Let us know you’re here!
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Community Energy Strategic Planning Sarah Zaleski March 30, 2012 INSERT SEVERAL PROGRAM-RELATED PICTURES.
LEADING LEARNING CONFERENCE 5 June Leading Learning 1November 2005Management of complex change. The Knoster model. Leading Learning 2April/May 2006Developing.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Kevin Croff Educational Leadership Portfolio March 2005.
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment Documenting the Impact of Instructional Technology Initiatives.
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Evaluating 1:1 Initiatives and Other Technology Initiatives The MassCUE Evaluators Program.
Prepared by Joseph D. Cantara- Counsultant 1 Curriculum Mapping: A Road Map for The Common Core Standards: Session #2 The work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs: Presented.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO STRATEGIC PLANNING Mitch Everton Saturday, November 23 4:15-5:30.
STAKEHOLDER FORUMS NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2013 Local Control Accountability Plan.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
MassCUE4You Individual Technology Evaluation for Districts Let us know you’re here!
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Data for Decision-Making Assessing the impact of technology implementation and professional development.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Cathy Duquette, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, CPHQ November 5, 2012.
Module 6.0: Communication Protocol DIT Installation Series Trainer Name Date.
Questions to be discussed: How can the research framework be further improved? What additional priority research questions should be included or how should.
The Club Leadership Plan. Purpose The Club Leadership Plan helps clubs increase their ability to meet their goals in each Avenue of Service.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Chicago Public Schools
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Lecturette 1: Leveraging Change through Strategic Planning
Lecturette 1: Leveraging Change through Strategic Planning
Presentation transcript:

Planning into Practice Michigan Technology Planning Workshops The Process of Technology Planning

zJeff Sun zMaureen Yoder zhttp:// Sun Associates

Achievements and Challenges zWhere are you from? zTeam members? zRecent achievement in technology integration zSuspected challenges in technology planning

Objectives for this Session zTo gain a basic understanding of the value of technology planning in a school or district zTo identify the basic components of a sound technology plan zTo develop school and district processes for on-going technology planning zOthers? yParticular challenges you anticipate in the planning process?

Focus on Curriculum zTechnology’s value is in supporting your goals for curriculum and instruction zCurriculum, not the technology itself, must drive your planning process

What is “Strategic”? zWhat makes something strategic? zDriven by Vision zHas Goals zStep-by-Step zOrganized by time

Why Plan Strategically? zTo provide the Big Picture for technology integration zTo articulate the district’s vision for technology integration zTo create a strategic framework for implementing goals zTo provide a basis for funding requests

To Facilitate Change!

Planning for Change

The Role of Stakeholders zThe planning committee should be composed of your stakeholders (pg 28) your zWho are the stakeholders in your district? yTeachers yStudents yParents yCommunity Members yProcess People yOthers?

Parties to the Planning Process zWhat do we know about change and building consensus for change? yAdopter types?

y“Innovators” as committee members? yPositional power? zThe planning committee must be composed of your stakeholders yThink about stakeholders through the lens of adopter types yThink about roles, types, and positions

Technology Plan Elements zhttp://techplan.edzone.net/tptemplate.html zYou need to address Michigan’s required elements zThe elements are themes which must be reflected in the plan document zHow you structure and evidence those themes is up to you

Classic Format zExecutive Summary zVision zCurrent Status zGoals by Focus Area yCurriculum yProfessional Development yCommunity Engagement zInfrastructure zAction Plans by Focus Area yCurriculum yProfessional Development yCommunity Engagement zRoles and Responsibilities zBudget/Funding zEvaluation zAppendices

Linkages

The Committee’s Work zThe work typically takes three months minimum (pg 29) zMuch of the time is spent gathering information and input outside of committee meetings zReflection time is a must zThe work needs “outside eyes”

Supporting the Committee zChange occurs from the bottom up and top down yHow does district leadership support this committee? xDedicated time xSubstitutes for teacher members xIncentives for all

Structuring Time zMeetings yVariety of full-day, part-day, and after-school zClear roles and responsibilities for members zEmphasize the “representative” duty yThis is the point of being a stakeholder yBuild in time for representation

Next… zWhat are we really shooting for? The New Yorker, 2/22 and 3/1/99

But First… zTeam Time - Planning to Plan yCommittee composition? (pg 28) yTimeline (pg 29) yGetting organized for the work