FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Group on Earth bservations Discussion Paper on a Framework Dr. Ghassem Asrar August 1, 2003.
Advertisements

Washington, DC 1 AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum April 22, 2008 Dr. Chet Koblinsky Director, NOAA Climate Program.
U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere/NOAA.
NASA AGENCY REPORT Dr. Eric J. Lindstrom Physical Oceanography Program Scientist Earth Science Division Science Mission Directorate MARCH 12, 2007.
Shaping of Public Environmental Policy: User Community Impact Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Office of the Federal Coordinator.
Jerry L. Miller, Ph.D. Assistant Director for Ocean Sciences White House Office of Science and Technology Policy MARACOOS Washington, DC
USGS Realignment, Science Planning, and FY 2012 Budget Matthew C. Larsen Associate Director Climate and Land Use Change U.S. Department of the Interior.
U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System Gregory W. Withee Co-chair, Interagency Working Group on Earth Observations NOAA Science Advisory Board November.
Copernicus Programme of the EU Synergies with WMO, RA VI and EUMETNET
ADM-10/26/ Architecture and Data Management for the U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System (IEOS) First Steps Kathy Fontaine, NASA USGEO ADM Vice.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS contributions to unified space weather.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Moving Forward: NOAA & Earth Observation Systems Mr. Timothy R.E. Keeney Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Oceanographic.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
Weather, Water, Climate Services Supporting Sustainable Development Jerry Lengoasa Deputy Director General Oslo, May 2014 World Meteorological.
FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations.
1 THE NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM Sixth Symposium on Space Weather Session 1: Space Weather Agency Updates AMS Annual Meeting January 12, 2009 Mr. Samuel.
+ 3D Elevation Program May 8, 2013 The National Map.
CEOS WGISS Preliminary Workshop on Data Access and Integration: Global and Regional SDI and Client Perspectives 8-9 May 2000, Canberra ESCAP Regional Space.
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
High Performing Communities. Goal To develop a program or legislation to assist communities across America in a transformation into – low-carbon producing.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Landsat 8 Data Policy April 14, 2006 Jay Feuquay Land Remote Sensing.
UNCLASS1 USGEO Observation Assessment and Planning and Earth Observation Policy Phil DeCola Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE OF U.S. LAND IMAGING Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations Committee on Environment.
Plan Development Workshop NOAA Coastal Services Center Charleston, SC November 2-5, 2009 Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Earth Observations to Benefit Societies A Briefing on the Activities of the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Timothy Stryker U.S. Geological.
REDUCING DISASTER RISK THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF EARTH OBSERVATIONS Helen M. Wood Chair, U.S. Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction August.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Center for Satellite Applications and Research External Review Alfred M.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
1 Requirements Gathering, Validation, and Concept Studies GOES Users’ Conference Boulder, CO October 1-3, 2002.
The Saguaro Digital Library for Natural Asset Management Dr. Sudha RamSudha Ram Advanced Database Research Group Dept. of MIS The University of Arizona.
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
1 Attachment B Attachment B The National Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Relevant Law and Policy Prof. Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz 19 October 2004.
High Data Volume Transfer Issues at NOAA Christopher D. Elvidge Earth Observation Group National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Geophysical.
GSFC GOES-R Notional End-To-End Architectures Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas December 9 – 13, 2002 Miami, Florida Sandra Alba Cauffman.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
NOAA 101 Sarah Schoedinger NOAA, Office of Education November 2, 2006 An overview of the agency for the NOAA/NSTA Symposium on the Ocean’s Role in Weather.
Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
FGDC Coordination Group Meeting 11 May 2010 Roger L. Parsons, IWG-OCM Co-chair (NOAA) Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act Congressional Reports Update.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Future of Land Remote Sensing: Time to Think Again Pecora 16 “Global Priorities in Land Remote Sensing”
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
UNCLASS1 Dr. Gene Whitney Assistant Director for Environment Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President WISP Meeting - July.
J. Eric Madsen International Relations Specialist National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) July, 2006 Global Earth Observation System of.
90 th Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society Dr. Jane Lubchenco Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere & NOAA Administrator.
Satellites enabling the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Michael Inggs, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town,
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration SERVIR Gulf of Mexico Project NASA’s SERVIR Gulf of Mexico Project An Overview.
VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator Space Enterprise Council, U.S.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
1 US National Spatial Data Infrastructure: Common Standards and System Interoperability GITA-JAPAN 14 th Conference 5 November 2003 Alan R. Stevens, PhD.
1 Symposium on the 50 th Anniversary of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Dr. Jack Hayes Director, Office of Science and Technology NOAA National.
Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming Decade Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming.
Sustainable Beaches: Weather Impacts VADM Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. US Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere NOAA Administrator.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, VA July 20, 2012 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Organizational Overview.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Marine Science in Alaska: 2005 Symposium Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.) Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans & Atmosphere.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
Associate Director for Research, Education and Marine Operations
Update on US Activities
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
David M. Kennedy, Senior Advisor for the Arctic Region, NOAA
NATIONAL LANDSAT POLICY Executive Office of the President
Presentation transcript:

FUTURE OF LAND IMAGING U.S. Land Imaging Needs & Long-Term Continuity Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI-IWG) U.S. Group on Earth Observations Committee on Environment and Natural Resources National Science and Technology Council National Science and Technology Council Executive Office of the President Executive Office of the President Washington, DC

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, AGENDA Background – –Land Imaging Policy History – –OSTP Memoranda What is Land Imaging ? – –Moderate Resolution Imagery is … – –Moderate Resolution Imagery is Important because … The National Science and Technology Council Study Process – –Scope and Charter of the FLI-IWG – –Assumptions – –Needs Analysis -- What are the Societal Benefits ? – –Options for Meeting U.S. Land Imaging Needs – –Governance Options How You Can Become Involved

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, Since 1972, the U.S. has flown Landsat – for Agriculture, Forestry, Mapping, Geology, and a variety of other scientific and operational uses Since 1972, the U.S. has flown Landsat – for Agriculture, Forestry, Mapping, Geology, and a variety of other scientific and operational uses In 1979, the U.S. attempted, but failed, to commercialize Landsat In 1979, the U.S. attempted, but failed, to commercialize Landsat In 1992, the U.S. Congress established The Land Remote Sensing Policy Act In 1992, the U.S. Congress established The Land Remote Sensing Policy Act –Suspended commercialization attempts and authorized Landsat 7 –Adopted the Landsat Data Availability Policy International Open Skies Treaty International Open Skies Treaty Non-Discriminatory User Access Non-Discriminatory User Access –Provided for Commercial Licensing, Advanced Technology, and Applications Research Programs In 2003, the U.S. attempted, but failed, to establish a Public-Private Partnership for Landsat Data Continuity In 2003, the U.S. attempted, but failed, to establish a Public-Private Partnership for Landsat Data Continuity BACKGROUND Land Imaging Policy History

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, In August 2004, OSTP modified Landsat Strategy In August 2004, OSTP modified Landsat Strategy –Validated the importance of Landsat-type Imagery to U.S. economic, environmental, and national security interests –Transitioned Landsat to a sustained operational program –Placed a Landsat-type instrument on the National Polar Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) In December 2005, OSTP revised the Strategy In December 2005, OSTP revised the Strategy –Removed Landsat from NPOESS due to design complexities –Authorized construction of a new Landsat “free-flyer” satellite –Initiated a Long-Term Continuity Study to identify Future Needs and Options for U.S. Land Imaging –Established the Future of Land Imaging Interagency Working Group (FLI IWG) BACKGROUND OSTP Memoranda

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, The characteristics of satellite imaging required to obtain: – –Accurate spectral and spatial information – –Frequent synoptic views of the Earth – –Precise geo-referenced data for mapping and monitoring – –Scaleable geospatial information across global, hemispheric, continental, regional, and local geographies Data calibrated to a national standard over time -- for measuring real physical changes to the Earth Information about: – –Earth’s geology, hydrology, climatology, biology, and other natural system sciences – –The habitability, sustainability, and quality of life on our planet – –Society’s physical, economic, and social infrastructure – –Ways to mitigate and respond to human-caused and natural disasters WHAT IS LAND IMAGING ? Moderate Resolution Imagery is …

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, WHAT IS LAND IMAGING ? Moderate Resolution Imagery is Important because … Land Imaging directly benefits Society Land Imaging directly benefits Society –Agriculture and Forestry –Land Use Planning and Management –Water Resource Management –Emergency / Disaster Management –Coastal Zone Management –Ecological Forecasting –National / Homeland Security –Transportation Management and Infrastructure Planning

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, Led by the National Science and Technology Council, with representatives from: – –National Aeronautics and Space Administration – –U.S. Department of the Interior / U.S. Geological Survey – –U.S. Department of Agriculture – –U.S. Department of Defense – –National Geospatial Intelligence Agency – –National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Conduct Fact-Finding and Needs Assessment – –Why does the U.S. need Moderate-Resolution Land Images ? – –What are the Options for acquiring these Capabilities or Data ? – –How should U.S. Land Imaging be managed ? Produce “a long-term plan… in accord with the goals and objectives of the U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System.” Report in early 2007 with 2 nd and 3 rd Qtr 2006 Interim Reports THE NSTC STUDY PROCESS Scope and Charter of the FLI-IWG

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, THE NSTC STUDY PROCESS Assumptions Continuity of the U.S. Land Data Record will be maintained Continuity of the U.S. Land Data Record will be maintained … but Landsat will not constrain future U.S. Land Imaging capabilities and designs … but Landsat will not constrain future U.S. Land Imaging capabilities and designs Alternatives should meet the Landsat Data Continuity Standard while addressing additional U.S. needs Alternatives should meet the Landsat Data Continuity Standard while addressing additional U.S. needs –Greater spatial or spectral resolution –Greater frequency of coverage and “steerable” imaging –Multi-purpose Imaging Systems (Radar, Radar hybrids, Hyperspectral)

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, The FLI-IWG will inventory and assess the societal benefit of Land Imaging and how it can best be met The FLI-IWG will inventory and assess the societal benefit of Land Imaging and how it can best be met Societal Benefits are a core feature of the International Global Earth Observing System of Systems and the U.S. Integrated Earth Observing System Societal Benefits are a core feature of the International Global Earth Observing System of Systems and the U.S. Integrated Earth Observing System –Weather –Natural Disasters –Ocean Resources –Climate Variability and Change –Agriculture and Forestry There are other Societal Benefits not captured by GEOSS and IEOS that are important to meeting U.S. economic and national security interests There are other Societal Benefits not captured by GEOSS and IEOS that are important to meeting U.S. economic and national security interests –Land Use Planning and Management –Public Lands Conservation / Management –National Security Operations –Transportation Planning / Management The Vitality and Competitiveness of the U.S. Aerospace Industry is also a Primary Consideration The Vitality and Competitiveness of the U.S. Aerospace Industry is also a Primary Consideration THE NSTC STUDY PROCESS Needs Analysis – What are the Societal Benefits ? –Human Health and Well-Being –Ecological Forecasting –Water Resource Management –Energy Resource Management –Property Valuation –Flood Plain Assessment –Foreign Agricultural Assessment –Infrastructure Planning / Management

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, Government- Owned Satellite Government- Owned Satellite Public-Private Partnership Public-Private Partnership International Partnership International Partnership Commercial Program Commercial Program A Combination of these Options A Combination of these Options THE NSTC STUDY PROCESS Options for Meeting U.S. Land Imaging Needs The U.S. Government owns and operates a U.S. satellite and maintains an archive and distribution capability. The U.S. Government shares responsibility with the private sector. Costs are shared in proportion to the value of the data. The U.S. Government shares capabilities and data with foreign partners. The U.S. acquires all data from the private sector which retains rights to U.S. Land Imaging data. A primary solution may be complemented or supplemented by a secondary solution.

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, Single Agency Single Agency Multiple Agency Multiple Agency Integrated Program Office Integrated Program Office U.S. National Commission U.S. National Commission No U.S. Government Manager No U.S. Government Manager THE NSTC STUDY PROCESS Governance Options A single U.S. Federal Agency is responsible for all aspects of Land Imaging. Two or more Federal Agencies are responsible for all aspects of Land Imaging. An IPO reporting to multiple Federal Agencies is responsible for all aspects of Land Imaging. A U.S. National Commission manages the U.S. Land Imaging Program, assigning responsibility for Land Imaging. The U.S. acquires all Land Imaging data commercially or from international sources. No U.S. Federal Agency is assigned responsibility.

Future of Land Imaging – Interagency Working Group April 20, We need your input ! You can view Future of Land Imaging information at And your views and opinions to HOW YOU CAN BECOME INVOLVED