WORLDWIDE AVIATION SAFETY COOPERATION COSCAP-North Asia Meeting Beijing, China November 2003 Presented by: Elizabeth Erickson Director, FAA Asia Pacific Region

Worldwide Cooperation Why the Asia Pacific Region is Important Why We Need To Take Action Worldwide Responses Comprehensive Data-Driven Industry/Government Collaboration Coordination of Efforts-using Resources Wisely Working Together

ASIA-PACIFIC REGIONAL SNAPSHOT Largest Population Centers Becoming Global Economic Centers BY 2020 The Region is Forecasted to be the Largest Air Travel Market

We Need to Continuously Improve Aviation Safety Airplanes in service 32,495 17,357 Boeing 11,693 Hull loss accidents per year 2002 2021 Business as usual Our goal Departures, Millions Hull loss accident rate

United States and Canada 0.5 Latin America and Caribbean 3.2 Regional Perspective of World Accident Experience Western-built transport hull loss accidents, by airline domicile, 1992 - 2001 Europe 0.9 JAA – 0.8 Non JAA - 3.0 C.I.S.1 United States and Canada 0.5 China 1.1 Asia (Excluding 2.6 China) Middle East 3.4 Africa 12.1 Latin America and Caribbean 3.2 Accidents per million departures Of the Boeing aircraft involved in major accidents over the preceding 10 years, about 83% of the accidents have been outside of the U.S. Oceania 0.0 World 1.3 1Insufficient fleet experience to generate reliable rate. The Boeing Company - 2002

Worldwide Airline Fatalities Classified by Accident Type 1993 - 2002 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 2131 2007 Number of Fatalities 420 339 231 226 192 Loss of control in flight Controlled flight into terrain Mid- air collision In- flight fire Fuel tank explosion Structure Landing Number of fatal accidents (109 total) 28 25 2 2 2 1 17

Worldwide Airline Hull Loss Accidents Classified by Accident Type 1993 - 2002 100 88 80 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Total Hull Losses = 198 Number of Hull Losses 40 29 27 20 8 7 7 Landing Controlled flight into terrain Controlled flight into terrain Loss of control in flight Loss of control in flight On- Ground Misc. Refused takeoff Fuel Exhaustion Number of Hull Loss fatalities (6,732 total) 192 2,007 2,129 3 29

Approach & Landing and CFIT Accidents by Operator Region 1993 - 2002

Worldwide Responses U.S: Safer Skies/Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) JAA: Joint Safety Strategy Initiative (JSSI) ICAO: Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP)

Worldwide Responses Asia Pacific: COSCAP Regional Safety Teams NARAST, SARAST, SEARAST Central and South America: Pan American Aviation Safety Team (PAAST) East Africa: African Airlines Safety Council, (AFRASCO) West Africa: Agence pour la Securite de la Navigation Aerienne en Afrique et a Madagascar (ASECNA)

U.S. Response: Safer Skies COMMERCIAL AVIATION GENERAL AVIATION Controlled Flight Into Terrain CABIN SAFETY Aeronautical Decisionmaking Loss of Control Loss of Control Passenger Interference Uncontained Engine Failures Weather Passenger Seat Belt Use Runway Incursion Controlled Flight Carry-on Baggage Into Terrain Approach and Landing . Child Restraint Survivability Weather Runway Incursions Turbulence HUMAN FACTORS IMPROVED DATA IN OPERATIONS & & ANALYSIS MAINTENANCE

U.S. Response:CAST Goals Reduce the U.S. commercial aviation fatal accident rate by 80% by 2007 Work together with airlines, JAA, ICAO, IATA, FSF, IFALPA, other international organizations and appropriate regulatory/ government authorities to reduce worldwide commercial aviation fatal accident rate

JSSI Controlled Flight Into Terrain Approach and Landing Loss of Control (including Design Related) Runway Safety Weather Occupant Safety and Survivability Future Aviation Safety Team

ICAO Response: GASP GASP Fundamentals: GASP Elements: Review Accident Causal Factors-Worldwide/ Regional Link with Existing Safety Groups Promote Safety Awareness Worldwide-Sharing Data GASP Elements: Intervention/Remedial Action Dissemination of Data Identification of Safety Initiatives Analysis Collection of Data/Information Objectives of GASP Reduce the number of accidents and fatalities irrespective of the volume of air traffic Achieve a significant decrease in world-wide accident rates

Cooperative Work/Plans Working Together CAST - JSSI - GASP Identifying Top Safety Priorities Using a Structured Data Based Approach Working on Teams Together Enabling Implementation of Key Interventions to Reduce the Fatal Accident Rate Importance of Data Gathering/Sharing EGPWS Annex 6 revision to require this Annex 11 – Minimum Safe Altitude Warning Systems New Part XIII: standard operating procedures

Asia Pacific ICAO Safety Groups COSCAP: (Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness Programme) Enhancing safety and efficiency South Asia, Southeast Asia, and North Asia PASO – Pacific Aviation Safety Office Three Sub-Regional Safety Groups under COSCAP: (South Asia, Southeast Asia, North Asia Regional Aviation Safety Teams)

Cooperation with Regional Safety Teams SARAST/SEARAST share information-potentially meet together Materials to Support Enhancements are Shared Between Teams Future: Share among all teams

Stay Focused on High Priority Areas – High Yield Safety Enhancements Comprehensive Data-Driven Industry/Government Collaboration Target Scarce Resources to High Priority Areas, Common in The World/Region Asia-Pacific: CFIT and Approach and Landing = Highest Safety Risk Areas Implement Enhancements with High Priority Safety Benefits to Reduce Risk Capitalize on Sharing Work – Avoiding Rework and Duplication

Summary The Time for Action is Now Safety Team Work is Yielding Results Commonalities Exist and Working Together will Eliminate Unnecessary Duplication of Effort