Jonathan Nabe Southern Illinois University Carbondale NASIG Annual Conference June 3, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VIVA’s View of the Big Deal, Cost Sharing, and Cooperative Collection Management; Why sometimes having just one key is not enough. Museum of Innocence:
Advertisements

IMPACT OF JOURNAL CANCELLATIONS ON INTERLIBRARY LOAN DEMAND Rachel Fleming, Serials Librarian, Western Carolina University Kristin Calvert, Electronic.
Bloomsbury Conference on E-Publishing, June 2007 Subscription and Open Access Business Models in Journals Publishing Martin Richardson Managing Director.
Library-IT Task Force Presentation 1 PM, February 19, 2009 Graduate School Conference Room.
“ W HEN THE G OING G ETS T OUGH, THE T OUGH R ENEGOTIATE THEIR C ONSORTIAL J OURNAL D EALS ” Emma Cryer, Duke Medical Center Library Christie Degener,
Beth Bernhardt Assistant Dean for Collection Management and Scholarly Communications UNC Greensboro Pay Per View or Déjà vu.
Swets Blackwell Consortia and Multiple Site Services for E-Journals Acquisitions Working with Libraries and Publishers.
Global Economic Crisis: Impact on Academic Libraries Greg Anderson.
Session #3: When titles change publisher: Issues & Impacts ICOLC #—Montreal, Canada Diane Costello and Joan Emmet April 23, 2007.
Town Hall Presentation. What a 31.5% Cut Means to SIUC The proposed reduction is about $32 million for SIU Carbondale, resulting in a state funding level.
Facing the Serials Crisis Changing budget allocations in a time of uncertainty Larry Schmidt University of Wyoming ASEE Annual Conference 2004 Session.
Shifting Approaches to Collection Development: Should We Bother Selecting Journals at All? David F. Kohl Dean and University Librarian University of Cincinnati,
Kevin Engel, Rebecca Stuhr, Cecilia Knight Grinnell College Libraries March 18, 2011, ILA-ACRL Annual Spring Conference On Being Essential Making Connections.
E-journals: opportunities and challenges Bharati Banerjee.
Elsevier Renewal 2013 University Library Committee January 23, 2013 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly Communication.
Articles on Demand: Library Perspectives ALA Annual Conference June 30, 2014 Susie Bossenga, Northeastern Illinois University.
Trends in Online Publishing New Pricing Models for 2003 as Online Dominates Print John Ben DeVette Asst. Vice President EBSCO Information Services November.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Richard Gedye Journals Sales and Marketing Director
North American Serials Interest Group June 3, 2011 David C. Fowler.
Electronic Journal Deals concerns and issues (or Beware the “Big Deal”) Linda Norbury Aston University USTLG Meeting 12 June 2001, Aston University.
Next year’s model: a provisional library view Tony Kidd, Glasgow University Library.
UKSG Walking Away from the Bg Deal 1 Walking away from the “Big Deal:” Consequences and Achievements Nancy J. Gibbs Duke University
Where's the evidence? The role of usage statistics in collection management Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Research & Evaluation Birmingham City University.
Electronic books at Aston University Amanda Poulton Information Specialist (Engineering and Life Sciences) Frances Hall Information Specialist (Engineering.
Experiences on the Ground: usage stats as a practical tool in the Library Jill Taylor-Roe Newcastle University Library UKSG Usage Statistics Training Seminar.
Duke University Press Vendor Relations Session ICOLC Spring 2008 Meeting April 15, 2008 Donna Blagdan, Journals Marketing Manager Kim Steinle, Library.
ACS PUBLICATIONS Over a Century of Essential Chemistry on Your Desktop H I G H Q U A L I T Y. H I G H I M P A C T. A C S P U B L I C A T I O N S Robert.
ICOLC Meeting, Charlottesville, VA April 17, 2009 The Global Economic Crisis, Libraries and Publishers Reed Elfenbein, VP/Director of Sales and Marketing.
In the Beginning… There was Interlibrary Loan! 20 Years of Making the Virtual a Reality ILL Community Forum July 11, 2014 Kathy Perry VIVA Director.
The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.
Usage versus Cost Analytics for Selection Management and Informed Purchase Decisions MTA Budapest, October 2012.
Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.
THE STATUS OF KRESGE LIBRARY. The Three Things All University Libraries Must Do They must pay for information to have it They must catalog the information.
The University of Oregon Serials Cancellation Project Collection Evaluation During the Economic Crisis: Case Studies in Academia David C. Fowler,
Beware Publishers Bearing Gifts Why the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities DAVID BALL Bournemouth University (Chair, Procurement for Libraries)
Tilburg University Libraries, Publishers and Licensing Practical experiences and Fundamental issues Hans Geleijnse Librarian Tilburg University The Netherlands.
JSTOR’s Perspective Carol MacAdam NASIG 2011, June 3 Collaborating for Sustainable Scholarship: Models that Serve Librarians, Publishers and Scholars.
P. Gargiulo 11 June CASPUR/CIBER Paola Gargiulo, Bordeaux
OhioLINK – Reluctant but Successful – depending on your definition Orderly Retreat (Reduction) from the Electronic Journal Big Deal ICOLC Meeting Philadelphia,
Licensing Evolution ICOLC October 2006 – Rome Lorraine Estelle.
Informed decisions for Selection Support in Libraries 20th Pan-helenic Conference of Academic Libraries Thessaloniki, 14/11/2011 Núria Sauri Electronic.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Presented By: Joanna Kilpatrick Associate Account Manager Date: May 14, 2008.
Overview for Faculty. How We Got Here Inflationary Pressures (LJ, 2009 & Ebsco) % increase since 2005 by discipline: 31-58% 2010 annual inflation estimate.
Wiley-Blackwell: Update for the Consortium Community Reed Elfenbein, VP/Director of Global Sales and Marketing Christopher McKenzie, VP/Director of Institutional.
Supporting further and higher education UK LOCKSS Pilot Programme Hazel Woodward Cranfield University & JISC.
CDL and Portico Ivy Anderson California Digital Library ICOLC Spring 2006 Philadelphia.
1 News from the battlefield: Spain Núria Comellas (CBUC) ICOLC 11th Fall Meeting Paris, October 26 th 2009.
SELL 12th Meeting 2012 – 15-16th June, Thessaloniki COUNTRY REPORT - Italy.
CALIFORNIA DIGITAL LIBRARY LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY PARTNERSHIP FOR SHARED CONTENT ACQUISITON & MANAGEMENT Cate L. Hutton CDL Director for.
RCM BUDGET REVIEW George A. Smathers Libraries Judith C. Russell March 26,
Steven A. Knowlton, Collection Development Librarian (assisted by James R. Rodgers and Matthew J. Jabaily) ASERL Fall 2015 Membership Meeting, New Orleans.
Kluwer Online Pricing Models CAUL – Industry Think Tank Sydney, 23 May 2002 Peter Coebergh.
Journey to Publisher PDA Janis Tyhurst Senior Science Subject Specialist and Business Librarian.
ELSEVIER – SPRINGER – WILEY Science Selectors Team Leah Solla, Science Team Leader BIG 3 BIG DEALS.
University of Regina Library Acquisitions Budget Challenges Colleen Murphy, Acting University Librarian Barbara Nelke, Head Library Technical Services.
Let the Patron Drive: Purchase on Demand of E-books Jonathan Nabe Andrea Imre Southern Illinois University Carbondale NASIG, June 4, 2010.
Issues in Scholarly Communication: Do they affect you? Andrea Imre, Julie Arendt, Howard Carter, Joseph Ripp Morris Library.
3.2 Alliance overview John F. Helmer Executive Director Council Meeting November 2008.
ANKOS Anatolian University Libraries Consortium
Leaving the Big Deal, revisited
Breaking the Big Deal ASERL Jonathan Nabe October 25, 2016
Ebooks in academic libraries: management and access issues
Leaving the Big Deal: Consequences and Next Steps
Jonathan Nabe and Andrea Imre
Slaying the Dragon with the Long Tail: University of Memphis Libraries’ decision to break the Big Deal with Elsevier Steven A. Knowlton, formerly Collection.
Fewer Cooks at SIU-Carbondale
Consortia in Czech and Slovak Republic
The Big“gest” Deal Renewal
swimming instead of drowning in data: Usage statistics SIUC
Presentation transcript:

Jonathan Nabe Southern Illinois University Carbondale NASIG Annual Conference June 3, 2011

 Perceived value  Anticipated reaction

 SIU is a system, with a Law School, Medical School, Dental School, and a sister campus, SIU Edwardsville  Morris Library is an ARL library, with a collection of 2.8 million volumes and a budget of $5.3 million

 Lost access  ILL requests  University reaction and response  Budget  Collection management

 Springer, 2009 (GWLA, 2005-) Began as a Kluwer package  Wiley, 2010 (GWLA, 2001-) With a nod to Blackwell STM (CARLI)  Elsevier, 2010 (SIU System, 2003-) With a fond remembrance of the Academic Press Freedom Collection

 Springer:1100 titles  Wiley:597 titles  Elsevier:242 titles

 10,000 downloads from 1100 non- subscribed titles in year prior to departure  82% of titles received fewer than 1 per month (900 of 1100 )  36% of titles received none (400 of 1100)

 11,254 downloads from 597 nonsubscribed titles in year prior to departure  62% of titles received fewer than 1 per month (370 of 597)  10% of titles received none (57 of 597)

 19,452 downloads from 242 titles in year prior to departure  28% of titles received fewer than 1 per month (68 of 242)  2 titles received none

 One year of data  We do keep archival access  Only one year of lost access

 From top 25% of nonsubscribed titles (=125)  27% had ILL request in post- departure 12 month period (34 of 125)  9% had more than one request (11 of 125)  Total of 71 requests, compared to 7770 downloads the previous year  Demand is 0.9% of downloads

 From top 25% of nonsubscribed titles (=61)  38% had ILL request in post-departure 12 month period (23 of 61)  20% had more than one request (12 of 61)  Total of 46 requests, compared to 15,017 downloads the previous year  Demand is 0.3% of downloads

 Download statistics are not an accurate indicator of demand  Incidental use, repeated use, linking methods, convenience, etc.  Don’t fear the downloads

 Result: three complaints so far  Due to University-wide grasp of budget situation?

 Response is minimal, manageable  Leaving presents an educational opportunity  Effective response: downloads/cost per download; alternatives even more painful

 $290,000 annually (including the cuts made as part of the cancellation project) (Over half of our FY10 mono budget)

 Flexibility to cancel by need, not by contract  Flexibility to swap - by design, not by contract  Protection of non-Big Deal publishers  Protection of the mono funds  Result: a collection that reflects the needs of the University community

 Issues: Content fees increased or added Loss of price cap Adjusted subscription price for titles Pressure for new multiyear deal Enforcement of ceased license terms

GWLA license included LOCKSS clause Springer declined to participate SIUC challenged this decision, with support of Legal Counsel, and eventually, GWLA and ICOLC Springer reversed its decision, and is now a LOCKSS compliant publisher

 Questions: How will base price be determined? Is there a penalty for leaving? Is a multiyear deal desirable? Are there license issues to be addressed?

You can do it! Jonathan Nabe Collection Development Librarian, SIUC