Diodes qualification: Results and plans for LHC and spares MSC Technical Meeting on 2013-12-12 F. Savary, on behalf of the diode working group, with special.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
Advertisements

1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
ELECTRO THERMAL SIMULATIONS OF THE SHUNTED 13KA LHC INTERCONNECTIONS Daniel Molnar, Arjan Verweij and Erwin Bielert.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
Status of SMACC-QA 1.Recently resolved issues 2.Update from QC teams 3.Statistics S56 and S67 4.Auditors findings 5.4th Splice Review – 22/24 July Ranko.
11 T Dipole informal coil and assembly readiness review Long coil and fabrication tooling development status and plans September 22 nd, 2013 – F. Savary.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Jean-Philippe Tock (TE-MSC) On behalf of the SMACC project.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
1 HER Arc RF seals M. Sullivan MAC Review Oct , 2006 Status of HER Arc RF Seals M. Sullivan For the PEP-II team Machine Advisory Committee Review.
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
TE/MPE/EE J. Mourao T/MPE/EE 1 November 2012 LHC Machine Local protection Redundant Power supply (DQLPUR) & interface Module (DQLIM) progress status.
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
1 CSCM-7TeV Powering Implementation and ELQA Third LHC Splice Review November 2012 M. Bajko, M. Bernardini, B. Bordini, k. Brodzinski, J. Casas-Cubillos,
Baby MIND coil modules assembly the aluminium folded strip solution 1 Alexey, Philippe, Gabriella, Helder, Herman Baby Mind Magnet CERN June.
CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan.
TE/MPE/EE Short ‘Halfway’ Update ELQA – LS1 Activities MPE/The Electrical Engineering section Knud, on behalf of TE/MPE/EE – 20 September LSC Reminder:
LHC Magnets/Splices Consolidation (20 minutes) Francesco Bertinelli 7 June, slides  Status of LHC: electrical connections  Description of shunt.
MP3 recommendations from June 2013-Feb 2014 Arjan Verweij on behalf of the MP A. Verweij, LSC meeting 7/2/2014 One of the tasks of the MP3 is.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review SUMMARY C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
Special interventions Status of production and QC Nicolas Bourcey TE-MSC-MDT Fourth LHC Splice Review November 2013.
11 T Dipole Project CERN Status M. Karppinen 11 T Management meeting 1 July 2013.
LHC magnet protection diodes status and recommendations for LS1 October 10 th, 2012 F. Savary on behalf of the diode working group (TE-MSC and MPE Groups.
Third LHC Splice Review Geneva – 12 to 14 November 2012 Diodes Status F. Savary.
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
Jean-Philippe Tock (TE-MSC) On behalf of the SMACC project.
ABTEF Meeting, V. Namora Quality Assurance in the Superconducting Magnets and Circuits Consolidation (SMACC) project.
Daniel Molnar Diode simulations and measurements.
P. P. Granieri 1,2, M. Breschi 3, M. Casali 3, L. Bottura 1 1 CERN, Geneva, CH 2 EPFL-LPAP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, CH 3 University.
Status of the Spanish contribution to CTF3 L. García-Tabarés, F. ToralCERN, 17/9/2006.
MSC Technical Meeting 29 August 2013 Overheated QBBI.A21L6 F. Savary with contributions from N. Dalexandro, H. Prin, C. Scheuerlein, P. Voisin.
LMC 1 (Pre Chamonix) DN200 relief valve position DN200 relief valve position On top wherever possible. Open W bellows for MLI protection. On top wherever.
Rapid Change Technology The following is a presentation to aid Technicians in the replacement of the Rapid Change Technology Block.
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons learned March 17 th, 2005 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Jos Vlogaert.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
Cold Diode Project TE/MPE - TM
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
D1 and D2 powering and protection
Service channels between Tracker and PP1
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
HO Corrector Magnets: decapole test and future plans
LEP cryostat Procurement strategy and plans
First Internal LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Giorgio on behalf of ELQA team
Giorgio on behalf of ELQA team
LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review (I) INTRODUCTION
Tracker Outer Barrel COOLING Antti Onnela, CERN.
MPE main activities planned for LS2
HO Corrector Magnets: decapole test and future plans
Functional specification for the consolidated LHC dipole diode insulation system and consolidation strategy C. Scheuerlein on behalf of the LHC dipole.
Dipole diode lead resistance measurement
Testing and installation of prototype diode insulation system in MB2950 Florian Meuter, 3rd Meeting on Diode Consolidation during LS2,
Consolidation of the dipole diode insulation Technical aspects
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Update on development of consolidated insulation system and procedures C. Scheuerlein, 4th DISMAC meeting,
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
3 issues identified in review
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Shortening the long RQF/RQD busbar segments in points 1 and 5
Presentation transcript:

Diodes qualification: Results and plans for LHC and spares MSC Technical Meeting on F. Savary, on behalf of the diode working group, with special contributions from M. Bajko, M. Bednarek, Z. Charifoulline, K. Dahlerup-Petersen, G. D’Angelo, G. Dib, C. Giloux, L. Grand Clement, R. Moron Ballester, V. Roger, A. Verweij, G. Willering

Outlook Reminder Why worry about the protection diode? Description of the diode stacks Quadrupole diode stacks Dipole diode stacks COMSOL analyses + Measurements in SM18 Measurements in the LHC machine Plan for spares – New production and tests Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares2

Why worry about the protection diode? Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares3 Quadrupole diode lead resistance during a 5 kA in the LHC machine (first half of 2011): there is a sudden jump of resistance, peculiar and permanent, which could not be explained with the expected behavior of the diode stack Step in  t<50 ms D16R5 a Courtesy A. Verweij.

Quad. Diode: key parts, and contacts Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares4 Diode bus bar Nickel plated everywhere SSS bus bar Silver plated over 40 mm Connection plate Nickel plated everywhere R BB-CP < 2 µΩ R HS-BB < 2 µΩ R Diode-HS < 5 µΩ

Dip. Diode: key parts, and contacts Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares5 Lower diode bus bar R Half-moon < 2 µΩ R HS-BB < 2 µΩ Diode box, He content:  5 liter R Diode-HS < 5 µΩ Voltage taps on the diode ‘press pack’ Upper Heat Sink Lower Heat Sink Bolted contacts with 4 M6 + helicoil, 4 spring washers, 10 Nm Diode compressed by a stack of spring washers to 40 kN All copper parts Ni-plated, 2-3 µm

Diode to heat sink behavior R Diode-HS : has typical behavior, confirmed by production data, tests in Bloc 4, and more recent 4.2 K in SM18 Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares6 Diodes from S34 All resistances go up at 5 or 10 kA Most of the resistances go down at 13 kA Except for all 16 quad diode resistance (4 stacks measured at the same time). R max up to 43 µΩ at 5 and 10 kA MQB0112 Courtesy V. Roger, G. Willering

Quad. connection plates Connection plate Made of Cu ETP Ni-plated Two screws per contact – M5 Three spring washers – CuBe Screws made of St. Steel A4-70 (R p0.2 = 700 N/mm 2 ) Thread lock (Loctite) Bus bars Magnet side: Ag-plated Diode side: Ni-plated Tightening torque 8 Nm 12 Nm) Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares7 Original design

Quad. connection plates – Behavior Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares8 Original design Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Quad. connection plates Connection plate Made of Cu ETP Ni-plated Two screws per contact – M5 Three spring washers – CuBe Screws made of St. Steel A4-70 (R p0.2 = 700 N/mm 2 ) Thread lock (Loctite) Bus bars Magnet side: Ag-plated Diode side: Ni-plated Tightening torque 8 Nm 12 Nm) EDMS: Connection plate Made of Cu OFE (higher RRR) Ag-plated Two studs per contact M5, screwed in a back plate (made of Inconel 718) Made of Inconel 718, of much higher yield limit (1100 N/mm 2 ), preload increased with same M5 Tightening torque 12 Nm 20 Nm) Add washer plate to distribute better contact pressure Two spring washers – Inconel 718 Thread lock (Loctite orapi 303) Bus bars Magnet side: Ag-plated Diode side: Ni-plated Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares9 New design vs. Original design

Quad. connection plates – Behavior Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares10 Original design New design - Stable Due to higher resistance of Cu at RT Courtesy V. Roger et al. Thermal cycle

In addition … Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares11 Shims To (re)center the diode stack... needed for the installation of the back plates New parts (cross) For electrical insulation of each pair of bus bars one w.r.t. each other, especially at the bottom Courtesy L. Grand Clement

Procurement challenges Material (un)availability for the fasteners made of Inconel 718, even though not exotic! Contractor Youparts-DE, …and Fdb-Mechanik-CH Issues during manufacture due to the hardness of the material The contractor is not the manufacturer, and the manufacturer has subcontracted to its daughter company in SL, … + lack of QC Mitigation actions were launched: other contracts were placed with two other firms Bold King (UK), delivery expected next week, 540 threaded plates (back plate) Coudray (F), for 1000 studs and 500 threaded plates. This firm may become a fall back solution Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares12 Courtesy R. Moron Ballester

Consolidation status Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares13 Consolidated assembly Original design 180 done out of 391, i.e. 46% SMACC START Courtesy L. Grand Clement

NCR’s regarding insulation sleeves Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares14 Missing cutouts (QBQI.30R7) Wrong angular position Insulation after consolidation Wrong position - glued Courtesy L. Grand Clement

Other NCR’s Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares15 QBQI.30R7: bare copper in lieu of silver coated bb (magnet side) Nickel coated bb in lieu of silver coated bb (magnet side) Contact resistance HS to BB > 2 µΩ QBQI.21R8 (A: µΩ / D: 4.75 µΩ) QBQI.21L8 (A: 3.67 µΩ) Resolution: extraction of the diode, and contact redone Courtesy L. Grand Clement Contact resistance diode to HS > 15 µΩ in QBQI.31R6 (A: 19 µΩ) The diode stack was replaced

Dipole diode ½-moon – RT From coordination of LHC cryodipoles ( dipcoor.web.cern.ch/lhc-dipcoor/new_reports/dioderepairs.html) dipcoor.web.cern.ch/lhc-dipcoor/new_reports/dioderepairs.html Following CERN, after delivery from Cold Mass Assembler, before installation 255 magnets from the 3 CMAs Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares16

Dipole diode ½-moon – RT CMA series 2000, data to be checked, also for the other 2 CMA’s series 1000 and 3000 Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares17

Dip. diode ½-moon – cold Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares18 Measured for the first time in SM18 in Feb Are stable at cold / high current R < 2 µΩ required R < 1 µΩ measured Courtesy V. Roger et al.

In addition … COMSOL simulations were carried out to determine hot spot temperatures in the MB and MQ diode leads Measurements were cold in SM18 Measurements are being carried out, in the framework of SMACC, in the LHC machine, to determine the actual resistance of the diode leads in the dipole circuits RT Done in S67 On-going in S56 The remaining 6 sectors will be done early next year Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares19

Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares20 Rc [  ] T hot [K] Current12 kA Decay time constant104 s RRR (all copper parts) 80 Cooling to heliumNone (adiabatic) R HM =2,5,10,15 , no cooling T MAX over all volume T MAX of contact area COMSOL simulations – ½ moon Courtesy Z. Charifoulline, A. Verweij

Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares21 Rc [  ] T hot [K] Current12 kA Decay time constant104 s RRR (all copper parts) 80 Cooling to heliumNone (adiabatic) R HS-BB =2,20,30,50,70,100 , no cooling T MAX over all volume T MAX over Bus Bar COMSOL simulations – BB to HS Courtesy Z. Charifoulline, A. Verweij

Cold tests in SM18 – Feb Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares22 Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Measurements in the LHC machine Measurement procedure, see EDMS , without opening the diode container The measured magnet is powered via the I-taps of the neighboring magnets of the same line. The test current is limited to 10 A. Measurements through the voltage taps (D20 and P10 connectors) of the measured magnet are then carried out, in both conducting (10 A), and reverse (1.5 A) modes Copper contributions are subtracted Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares23 MBB dipole Courtesy M. Bednarek MBB dipole MBA dipole

Results from S67 ‘as recorded’, … Question: where is the high contact resistance? Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares24 Courtesy M. Bednarek

… Compared to S23, and Frascati Beware that the measuring conditions, and the quantities measured are different Notwithstanding the above, the ‘signature’ is comparable S23 is special ‘after CSCM’ Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares25 Courtesy M. Bednarek, G. Willering,

Another view on these data … Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares26 Courtesy M. Bednarek, V. Roger Let’s look at the production data of the 30 ‘worst’ diode stacks!

Another view on these data … Generally, the higher the resistance at cold, the higher the R at RT MDB0273 was excellent ‘as produced’ Either it has degraded, or another contact is responsible for the higher R Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares27 Entire production, Frascati, R cold, 10 th 13 kA decay S67 R DIODE-HS + R HS-BB + R HM, RT, Low current MDB0273 Anode side Courtesy V. Roger

Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares28

Why can we feel confident? If any of the resistances approaches 14 µΩ, it is still ok at 12 kA, 104 s, adiabatic conditions, RRR = 80, worst-case conditions (ref. to COMSOL simulations) For the moment, the highest resistance over 3 contacts found in S67 is 14 µΩ, i.e. ok All the half-moon resistances were below 2 µΩ at the installation of the diode stacks in the magnets. Measurements data are available. The ½-moon assembly is robust and stable (4 x M6 on thick flange) There will be other opportunities with diode leads showing higher R (other than MDB0273 in S67) for which we may decide to open the diode container, and to carry out local measurements … hopefully showing that the higher R is located at the diode to heat sink contact Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares29

Other considerations The CSCM that will be done in 3 sectors before the end of LS1 will hopefully confirm safe operation for these sectors. The other sectors may be done before LS2 The two diode leads in S23 that showed resistance higher than 12 µΩ were localized in the same diode stack and on diode to heat sink contacts. This diode stack has been removed and will be retested in SM18 (R DIODE-HS = 22 and 25 µΩ) … we will learn from this test S23 is special, as it will show higher resistances due to CSCM already done in Feb We know that all diode to HS resistances are changing during high current runs, and expect that the high resistances are localized there Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares30

Spare diode stacks Contract with Prodtek AB (SE), now finished, after a series of difficulties (due to other commitments of the contractor) For sets of parts, heat sink, bus bars, flanges, helicoils, tie rods, … for 30 dipole stacks, and 10 quadrupole stacks Diodes (‘press packs’) are from DYNEX (UK); 270 units were bought, and there are about 180 left, all Ni-coated Assembly of the diode CERN – MPE A new specification will be edited for another IT for 60 sets of parts, to be defined how many dipole stacks and how many quadrupole stacks, and up to MSC to decide whether finished/tested stacks are needed, or whether sets of parts can be stored till the moment they are needed Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares31 Courtesy K. Dahlerup-Petersen

New production – What’s ‘new’? On the 40 sets of parts delivered: Silver coating on all contact surfaces (4 µm thick), except that of the diode (press pack) that remains Ni-coated No EB welding nearby the half-moon, only one remaining Varnish applied on the G10 insulation parts to avoid absortion of humidity … and electrical failure What will be changed for the new contract (the additional 60 sets): Avoid machined insulation parts (G10), consider instead molded parts (not porous) Insulation U-shapes shall also be redesigned to avoid cutting fibers in the angles during machining (otherwise cracking occurs) Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares32 Courtesy K. Dahlerup-Petersen

Test results – 4 dip. d. stacks - New SES37 / Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares33 Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Test in SM18 – MDA0001 Diode to heat sink: Max 5 10 th 13 kA decay Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares34 Look at the scale! Heat sink to bus bar: Max 2 µΩ throughout the test Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Test results – 4 quad. d. stacks - New SES38 / Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares35 Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Test in SM18 – MQB2006 Diode to heat sink: Max 5 10 th 13 kA decay Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares36 Heat sink to bus bar: Max 2 µΩ throughout the test Look at the scale! Courtesy V. Roger et al.

Status on warm / cold testing WhenStack IDNote Total # ‘spare’ Sept. 2013MDB 2005, MDB 2006, MDB 2007, et MDB 2008 Certified4 MDB Sept. 2013MQA 0423Certified, and installed in a magnet- Oct. 2013MDA 2001, MDA 2002, and MDA 2003 Certified, and MDA 2001 installed in 3097 at BBI.A20R2 2 MDA Nov. 2013MQB 2006, MQB 2007, and MQB 2008 Certified3 MQB To come2 MQA ready for cold testing To come4 MQB ready for cold testing To come8 MDA ready for cold testing, and 4 ready for warm testing To come4 MDB ready for cold testing, and 4 ready for warm testing Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares37

Conclusions Consolidation of the unstable bolted assembly of the connection plates in the quadrupoles progressing well (close to 50% done) Difficulties with the procurement of the fasteners made of Inconel now overcome A few other minor NCR’s were discovered, and resolved Further investigations on-going for the dipole diode leads COMSOL simulations were done to determine operation limits (also for the quads) cold, warm, both in SM18, and in LHC The dipole diode leads are safe. The new test results coming soon, should confirm this New production finished, assembly work finished with MPE, and testing on-going at both MPE and MSC New IT will be launched in early 2014 for 60 sets of parts Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares38

Diodes qualification: results and plans for LHC and spares39 Courtesy G. Willering