B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai * With some updates from ICAL Electronics meeting held on Jan 23 in Madurai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status REPORT on ICAL electronics
Advertisements

20/Oct./2000 CF IEEE NSS 2000 at Lyon,France 1 An MWPC Readout Chip for High Rate Environment Introduction ASIC Structure & Fabrication ASIC Evaluation.
JLab High Resolution TDC Hall D Electronics Review (7/03) - Ed Jastrzembski.
Electronics for large LAr TPC’s F. Pietropaolo (ICARUS Collaboration) CRYODET Workshop LNGS, March 2006.
The MAD chip: 4 channel preamplifier + discriminator.
January 28th, 2010Clermont Ferrand, Paul Scherrer Institut DRS Chip Developments Stefan Ritt.
E-link IP for FE ASICs VFAT3/GdSP ASIC design meeting 19/07/2011.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Status of the LHCb RPC detector Changes with respect to Note cm strips instead of 3 cm (cost optimization) All gaps same size (standardization)
Electronics for the INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana Tata Institute of Fundamental Research For INO collaboration.
ICAL Instrumentation Challenges &/ Opportunities B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
July 10, 2008 PHENIX RPC review C.Y. Chi 1 RPC Front End Electronics On chamber discriminator  The strips  The CMS discriminator chips  The discriminator.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Hotel Arasan Sapthagiri, Madurai January 23, 2011.
Tracking the tiniest particles
Regulated Cascode based Frontend ASIC Anusparsh for glass Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) readout in the ICAL detector V.B. Chandratre, Veena Salodia, Menka.
B.Satyanarayana, For INO Collaboration. B.Satyanarayana, INO INO-KEK Meeting January 28, 2009, TIFR, INDIA2 48.4m 16m 14.5m To study atmospheric neutrinos.
Naba K Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai For and on behalf of ICAL electronics team.
RENO Electronics - QBEE - 장 지 승 ( 전남대학교 ) RENO Collaboration Meeting,
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration. B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai Kamaraj University September 13-15,
Mathieu Goffe EUDET JRA1 meeting, DESY Wednesday 30 January 2008 IPHC, 23 rue du Loess BP 28, 67037, Strasbourg Cedex 02, France.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
Fast Waveform Digitizing in Radiation Detection using Switched Capacitor Arrays Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Status of INO detector R&D B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Calorimeter upgrade meeting - Wednesday, 11 December 2013 LHCb Calorimeter Upgrade : CROC board architecture overview ECAL-HCAL font-end crate  Short.
15th Dec, 2007DAE-SNP07 S.S.Upadhya1 Electronics and Data Acquisition system for prototype INO-ICAL detector A.Behere1, V.B.Chandratre1, S.D.Kalmani2,
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Dr. B.Satyanarayana ▪ Scientific Officer (G) Department of High Energy Physics ▪ Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road ▪ Colaba ▪ Mumbai.
20/10/2008A. Alici - ALICE TOF Festival1 Electronics and data acquisition of the ALICE TOF detector A.Alici University and INFN, Bologna.
ICAL Electronics: Requirements and Challenges B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
Commissioning of ICAL prototype detector electronics B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai. Architecture of front-end ASIC INO Collaboration Meeting VECC, Kolkata July 11-13, Amp_out 8:1 Analog Multiplexer.
ICAL electronics and DAQ schemes - 1 B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai For INO Collaboration.
Satyanarayana Bheesette Roll number: Supervisors Prof Raghava Varma, IIT Bombay Prof Naba Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai Department of Physics Indian Institute.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Serial Data Link on Advanced TCA Back Plane M. Nomachi and S. Ajimura Osaka University, Japan CAMAC – FASTBUS – VME / Compact PCI What ’ s next?
Status summary of RPC R&D for INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai Satyajit Jena, IIT Bombay, Powai For INO Collaboration.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
A. Ranieri / RPC-CMS Pre-loaded profile Synchronization & Control Board (SCB) The RPC electronics will consist of the FE board plus the Synchronization.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Towards a final design of LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
KLM Trigger Status Barrel KLM RPC Front-End Brandon Kunkler, Gerard Visser Belle II Trigger and Data Acquistion Workshop January 17, 2012.
Front-End Electronics for G-APDs Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
1 19 th January 2009 M. Mager - L. Musa Charge Readout Chip Development & System Level Considerations.
Juin 1st 2010 Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting1 PID meeting Electronics Integration.
INO prototype detector and data acquisition system Anita Behere, M.S.Bhatia, V.B.Chandratre, V.M.Datar, P.K.Mukhopadhyay Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration.
R & D Status report on INO Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India.
Eric Hazen1 Ethernet Readout With: E. Kearns, J. Raaf, S.X. Wu, others... Eric Hazen Boston University.
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
INO TRIDAS presentations
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
RPC Front End Electronics
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
PHENIX forward trigger review
Presentation transcript:

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai * With some updates from ICAL Electronics meeting held on Jan 23 in Madurai

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 Magnet coils RPC handling trolleys Total weight: 50Ktons 4000mm  2000mm  56mm low carbon iron sheets

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 RPC Iron absorber Gas, LV & HV

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Glass (bakelite) for electrodes  Special paint mixture for semi-resistive coating  Plastic honey-comb laminations as pick-up panel  Special plastic films for insulation  Avalanche (streamer) mode of operation  Gas: R134a+Iso-butane+SF 6 = (R134a+Iso-butane+Argon= )  Glass (bakelite) for electrodes  Special paint mixture for semi-resistive coating  Plastic honey-comb laminations as pick-up panel  Special plastic films for insulation  Avalanche (streamer) mode of operation  Gas: R134a+Iso-butane+SF 6 = (R134a+Iso-butane+Argon= )

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Information to record on trigger  Strip hit (1-bit resolution)  Timing (200ps) LC  Pulse profile or Time Over Threshold (for time-walk correction). TDC can measure TOT as well.  Rates  Individual strip background rates on surface ~300Hz  Underground rates differ: depth, rock radiation etc.  Muon event rate ~10Hz (The ‘blue’ book says ~2Hz)  On-line monitor  RPC parameters (High voltage, current)  Ambient parameters (T, P, RH)  D.C. power supplies, thresholds  Gas systems and magnet control and monitoring B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

Amp_out 8:1 Analog Multiplexer Channel-0 Channel-7 Output Buffer Regulated Cascode Transimpedance Amplifier Differential Amplifier Comparator LVDS output driver Regulated Cascode Transimpedance Amplifier Differential Amplifier Comparator LVDS output driver Common threshold LVDS_out0 LVDS_out7 Ch-0 Ch-7 V.B.Chandratre, Jan 24

 IC Service: Europractice (MPW), Belgium  Service agent: IMEC, Belgium  Foundry: austriamicrosystems  Process: AMSc35b4c3 (0.35 μ m CMOS)  Input dynamic range:18fC – 1.36pC  Input impedance: 45  Amplifier gain: 8mV/ μ A  3-dB Bandwidth: 274MHz  Rise time: 1.2ns  Comparator’s sensitivity: 2mV  LVDS drive: 4mA  Power per channel: < 20mW  Package: CLCC48(48-pin)  Chip area: 13mm 2 B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Separate chips for amplifier and discriminator  Helps better to support FE for glass and bakelite versions of RPC  Also helps trying out for example, different designs for comparator. For example: CFD  Does not matter much for the FE board – it is matter of one versus two ASIC chips onboard.  Alternative: Amplifier bypass option in the current ASIC (amp+comp) chip. B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

James Libby, Jan 24

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 Shift Register Clock IN Out “Time stretcher” GHz  MHz Waveform stored Inverter “Domino” ring chain (SCA) ns Stefan Ritt, Paul Scherrer Institute S.S.Upadhya, Jan 24 Also ANUSMRITI ASIC: 500MHz Transient Waveform Sampler V.B.Chandratre et al (BARC)

 ASIC (3-stage interpolation technique) – Pooja  The new approach is to mix and match ASIC+FPGA techniques/architectures  To be delivered in about 6 months  FPGA (Vernier technique) – Hari  FPGA (Differential delay line technique) – Sudeshna  The FPGA efforts will continue  Some issues (delay matching, routing etc.) to be solved  Good and bad of an FPGA solution  FPGA is a lesser travelled path (only used in CKM experiment, Fermilab) B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 V.B.Chandratre & Sudeshna, Jan 24

B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 VME is the ICAL’s backend standard  Global services (trigger, clock etc.), calibration  Data collector modules  Computer and data archival  On-line DAQ software  On-line data quality monitors  Networking and security issues  Remote access protocols to detector sub-systems and data  Voice and video communications B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 Drawings courtesy: Gary Drake

Address Data Addr. Modifier Address Decoder Data Router FPGA Front Panel Out Front Panel In Piggy Brd Data Piggy Board ID LVDS I/O Piggy Board Conn Interrupt Gen And Handler 256 Deep FIFO Int1, Int2 Interrupt Ctrl VMEBUSVMEBUS B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 M.Saraf, Jan 24

VME Interface Logic (FPGA) VME Data Transceiver Data Bus VME Addr Transceiver Address Bus JTAG FPGA Configuration Logic On board logic analyser port VME Contro l Signals Buffer AM, DS, WR, SYSRST, IACK.. Buffer VME BUSVME BUS LVDS Tx OUT LVDS Rx IN Data Interface for V1495s piggy boards OE DIR OE DIR DATCK, IACKOUT, IRQs, BERR Front panel LEDs Board Address B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Insitu trigger generation  Autonomous; shares data bus with readout system  Distributed architecture  For ICAL, trigger system is based only on topology of the event; no other measurement data is used  Huge bank of combinatorial circuits  Programmability is the game, FPGAs, ASICs are the players B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

S.Dasgupta, Jan 24

 High voltage for RPCs  Voltage: 10kV (nominal for Glass, less for Bakelite)  Current: 6mA (approx., 200nA per chamber)  Ramp up/down, on/off, monitoring  Low voltage for electronics  Voltages and current budgets still not available  Commercial and/or semi-commercial solutions  Buy supplies, design distribution( and control)?  DC-DC and DC-HVDC converters; cost considerations B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 S.Saha, Jan 24

 RPC to front-end boards – the toughest!  Integration with pickup panel fabrication  Front-end boards to RPC-DAQ board  LVDS signals (any alternatives?, prefer differential)  Channel address  Analog pulse  Power  RPC-DAQ boards to trigger sub-systems  Four pairs, Copper, multi-line, flat cable?  RPC-DAQ boards to back-end  Master trigger  Central clock  Data cable (Ethernet: copper/fibre, …) B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Power requirement and thermal management  If 50mW/channel → 200KW/detector  Magnet power (500KW?)  Front-end positioning; use absorber to good use!  Do we need forced, water cooled ventilation?  UPS, generator power requirements  High voltage supplies, critical controls, computers on UPS  Suggested cavern conditions  Temperature: 20±2 o C  Relative humidity: 50±5% B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Chip fabrication  Board design, fabrication, assembly and testing  Cabling and interconnects  Crates and mechanics  Slow control and monitoring  Control and monitoring systems for gas systems and magnet  Industries (both public and private) are looking forward to work with INO B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011 Krishnamurthy, Jan 24

 VECC, IITM, BARC groups will send reports on their work and future plans shortly.  ICAL Electronics Report needs these inputs and will be finalised soon.  ASIC and FPGA based TDC designs is the priority.  Pilot RPC-DAQ (without TDC chip) board will be developed and tested on the RPC detector stack.  VME interface development will naturally lead to development of data concentrator module  Several technical issues including many interconnects etc. to be addressed immediately  Interaction with industrial houses and figure out areas in which we can benefit by their expertise and abilities B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011

 Assuming 8 channel grouping for Trigger and TDC in each RPC  TDC:512nsec range & 100ps resolution, 16Hit  Start-Stop delay: Pulse width format  16x2x16x16+16x16(Channel identity)=8192bits+256 (worst case)  Pickup strip Hit pattern (128 bits)  Event arrival time up to 100psec resolution (50bit)  RPC identity (16 bit)  Event identity(32bit)  Packet information(16bit)  Event data per RPC  Worst case = =8690 bits  Typical case = =1010 bits  Total data  266Mb[16hit TDC] or 31Mb[1 Hit TDC] per event [ All data] or 20% data = 6Mb per event [Non-zero data]  Assuming 500Hz trigger rate, Total data = 133 Gbps or 15.5 Gbps 0r 3.1Gbps B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai INO Collaboration Meeting, Madurai January 23-26, 2011