Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Advertisements

International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference Fuel Tank Inerting Modeling Ivor Thomas Consultant to FAA
Inerting Systems for Commercial Airplane Fuel Tanks
William Cavage & Robert Morrison AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Presented by Phil Jones & Brian Greenawalt Shaw Aero Devices
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Energy Efficient Steam Systems. Steam Systems Steam systems most widely used type of process heating Advantages of steam: –Heat carrying capacity of steam.
Jet-A Vaporization In an Experimental Tank Part II: Experimental Results at Atmospheric and Sub-Atmospheric Pressures Robert Ian Ochs Rutgers, The State.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
Limiting Oxygen Concentration of Aviation Fuels Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Limiting Oxygen Concentration of Aviation Fuels Steve Summer Project.
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
Flammability Characteristics of JP-8 Fuel Vapors Existing Within a Typical Aircraft Fuel Tank Steven M. Summer Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engg.
State of the Art of Fuel Tank Ullage Oxygen Concentration Measurement William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
HMT 1C 24-1 u Chapter 24 –Fixed Facility Incident Consideration Haz Mat Incident Considerations.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Lithium Ion Battery Cells – Risks and Hazards ICAO FAA Fire Safety LiCoO2.432Wh LiCoO2.
Class C Cargo Compartment ULD Suppression Agent Penetration Test
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues Robert J. Shuter Rapporteur WG 3.
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Fire Safety Branch September FRM: Nitrogen System Validation Federal Aviation Administration AAR-440 Fire Safety.
Enhancing Aircraft Survivability through Implementation of Lightweight On-Board Inert Gas Generating Systems (OBIGGS) IHSS – Montreal, Canada September.
Fuel Tank Inerting Joint Airbus/FAA, A320 Flight Tests
June 13th-14th, 2002 International Systems Fire Protection Working Group CAA House - London, UK Modeling of Inert Gas Distribution in Commercial Transport.
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Inerting Background Inerting refers to rendering the ullage (air above fuel) unable to propagate a reaction given flammable conditions and ignition source.
22nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference June 24th-26th, 2002 Adams Mark Hotel - St. Louis, MS Modeling Inert Gas Distribution.
Flight Testing of the FAA OBIGGS On the NASA 747 SCA
________________________________________________________ Inerting System Testing AAR-422 Fire Safety R&D December 11th-12th, 2000 International Aircraft.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer.
Scott Can THERMCAT Catalytic Gas Infrared Explosion Proof Heaters PTAC Green Toolbox September 29-30, 2003 Peter Howie Scott-Can Industries Ltd.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
John Reinhardt FAA Fire Safety Section, AAR-422. BULK LOAD FIRESCONTAINERIZED FIRES FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS FIRE AEROSOL CAN EXPLOSION SIMULATION “Minimum Performance.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 FAA Inerting System Flight Testing on an Airbus A320 William Cavage AAR-440.
FAA R&D Efforts Leading to Fuel Tank Inerting
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. Atlantic City, NJ By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Federal Aviation Administration Handheld Advisory Circular Update Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International.
Evaporative Emission Standards for Boats
Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement, FAA, WJ Hughes Technical Center Point of Contact :Doug Ingerson Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration November 17-18, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Lithium Batteries Fuel Cells
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
Overview Background Harmonization Goals
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Full-Scale Ground-Based Inerting ___________________________________ AAR-422 Fire Safety R&D July 17-18, 2001 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection.
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
6/13/02IASFPWG – London, UK Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London,
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration February 10-12, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
OBIGGS Sizing Data for Transport Canada Trade Study William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
March 26-27, 2003 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phoenix, Az Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center-Wing Fuel Tank During a Typical.
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
FAA R&D Efforts on Flammability Ivor Thomas Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor to the FAA, Fuel System Design August 14th 2002
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 Preliminary Results of FAA Fuel Tank Inerting Flight Testing on the NASA.
Federal Aviation Administration Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A 0 Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A Federal Aviation Administration International.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Fuel Cell Fire Test Plan Systems Working Group Meeting Harry Webster, FAA Fire Safety Team April.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 11, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Low Fuel Load Flammability Work International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada February.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.
Federal Aviation Administration CAA Training Videos Development Richard Hill Program Manager, Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Nitrogen Inerting Requirements – A Lit. Review International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Trident Environmental and Engineering, Inc.
FUEL TANK SAFETY LEVEL 1.
FAA R&D Efforts on Flammability
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues
Presentation transcript:

Flammability Reduction Methods: Compliance Options Federal Aviation Administration Flammability Reduction Methods: Compliance Options AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration

Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System No model – no need for flight testing Disadvantages: Weight Fuel displacement Interference with maintenance Haz. Mat. When out of tank Certification issues: Foam pedigree Voiding Durability Interference in tank

Inerting with Stored CO2 Advantages: ? Disadvantages: Must be stored on aircraft Certification issues: Needed O2 concentration not known Fuel solubility Effect on pumps

Inerting with Exhaust Gas Advantages: Already produced on aircraft Disadvantages: How to obtain Certification issues: Needed O2 concentration unknown Contaminants unknown

Catalytic Inerting Advantages: Possible weight Less power from aircraft environmental Disadvantages: ? Certification issues: Needed O2 concentration not known Fuel solubility Effect on pumps

Rapid Ventilation Advantages: Cost Weight Disadvantages: Loss of fuel Environmental Need for in-tank monitoring Certification issues: Tank flammability verification

Misting Fuel Vapor Advantages: Possible weight savings Possible lower cost Disadvantages: Loss of fuel Environmental Safety issues Certification issues: Post crash implications Failure modes In-tank hydrocarbon measurements

Nitrogen Inerting Cryogenic Nitrogen High Pressure Stored Nitrogen Ground Based Nitrogen Two Flow Nitrogen Full Time On Demand Nitrogen

Cryogenic Nitrogen Stored: Too heavy Manufactured: Developing technology

High Pressure Stored Nitrogen Too Heavy

Ground Based Nitrogen Logistics Manpower

Two Flow Nitrogen Present system of Choice

Full Time On Demand Nitrogen Advantages: Less power from aircraft Environmental Disadvantages: Weight Vent valve