Technology in the Science Classroom Beth Serva Lan Li Bowling Green State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Apprenticeship and Workplace Mathematics Meeting the Needs of Today’s Students.
-Program Overview Kellogg Middle School.
The Great Bean Race Unit Portfolio Presentation Joseph Jacobs.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Title 4 Effects of a student designed multimedia project on 8th graders attitude and performance.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Definition of Synthesis “Synthesizing is the process whereby a student merges new information with prior knowledge to form a new idea, perspective, or.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Scientific Method Film Canister Lab.
The Impact of Project Based Learning on High School Biology SOL Scores Rhiannon Brownell April 1, 2008 ECI 637 ECI 637 Instructor: Martha Maurno, M.S.
Assessment.  Understand why we need to assess  The role of assessment in teaching. Lecture’s objective.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Teacher- Parent Communication Students benefit greatly when there is a strong partnership between teachers and parents. Please feel free to contact us.
 Prototype for Course on Web Security ETEC 550.  Huge topic covering both system/network architecture and programming techniques.  Identified lack.
RESPONDENT BACKGROUND DISTRIBUTION Data from 31 survey respondents Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains from Conducting Collaborative Research Projects.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Unit Portfolio Presentation Kate Yaun Kathy Kellner.
Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Podcasts Mico e-Learning Workshop.
The 5 E’s Science Lesson Inquiry-Based Instruction.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Agenda Introduction: Objectives and Purpose 2. Homework 3. Science Fair: Video Contract Calendar 4. Scientific Methods 5. Investigation:
Using Peer Reviewed Research to Teach Reading, Critical Thinking and Information Literacy in Student Success Courses Dr. Christine Harrington Middlesex.
Vectors Unit Portfolio Presentation Hanadi Fateyerji.
Unit Presentation on Properties Of Matter By Helen Odita.
Lecture 1 Why We Need to Assess? Brown, 2004 p. 1-5 Prepared by: Dr. Reem Aldegether Dr. Njwan Hamdan.
Friction, Gravity, Sports: Physical Science in Action Unit Portfolio Presentation Mia Hamza.
The Plenary The National Literacy Strategy The Plenary.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Grade 9 – Physical & Life Science 2013/2014 Introduction.
Computer Networking Unit portfolio presentation Huma Ghani.
Removing the Mask of Inquiry Presented by the Delaware Valley Science Fairs Barbara Lorenzon Director of Education Dick Close.
 4. Set collaborative working arrangement to enable students to share their knowledge and skills and to build on one another’s strengths.
Unit 3: Looking at Student Work Learning Objectives Become aware of key components of quality classroom assessment aligned with on CCSS-ELA Literacy in.
What is Science? Science is  A way of learning about the natural world through observations and logical reasoning.  This information can grow and change.
The Effect of on By:. Purpose The purpose of this project was to.
Notes: Scientific Method. What is Science? the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.
Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No and Any opinions, findings, and conclusions.
The 5 E Instructional Model. Concepts of Science Science Content Process Skills of Science.
DO NOW: Get out your planners please 9/8/15. CORNELL NOTES 9/8/15.
A Relevant and Descriptive Title Your Name and Your Partner’s Name Mrs. Ouellette, Honors Biology Licking Heights High School A Relevant and Descriptive.
Assessing the Efficacy of Whether a Graphing Activity in Which Students Connect Biological Concepts to Themselves in a Biology of Women Course Improves.
Physical Science and You Chapter One: Studying Physics and Chemistry Chapter Two: Experiments and Variables Chapter Three: Key Concepts in Physical Science.
Cornell Notes The Cornell Way. VIDEO  = &PlayerKey=AQ~~,AAABVjfVIhE~,_RxIEUn5Y_WASjlNVFNwvedK.
ED 557 August 6, The brain seeks patterns, connections, & relationships between & among prior & new learning. (Gregory & Chatman,2001) The ability.
Graphic Organizers EDUC 307. Graphic Organizers  Graphic organizers are mental maps that represent key skills like sequencing, comparing and contrasting,
Writing a Formal Lab Report Mrs. Storer Chemistry.
The Impact of Brain Based Learning and Traditional Teaching Methods on the Learning Styles of Students Name: Keerstin L. Harrington Course: EDUC 8751 Data-Driven.
ED 557 August 6, Amount of homework should increase as students get older. Minimal parent involvement. Identify purpose of homework Provide.
Governor’s Teacher Network Pathway 1 – Professional Development Pathway 2 – Instructional Resources.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Transition Metals Unit Portfolio Presentation Chemistry team.
WELCOME TO Ms. Adam’s 8TH GRADE ADVANCED SCIENCE CLASS
Inquiry-Based Instruction
STEM Fair Information Date of School STEM fair November 30th, 2017
FLIPPED CLASSROOM ACTIVITY CONSTRUCTOR – USING EXISTING CONTENT
FLIPPED CLASSROOM ACTIVITY CONSTRUCTOR – USING EXISTING CONTENT
A Relevant and Descriptive Title
Infuse Learning: A Free Student Response System
Curriculum Structures
Science Fair Board Set Up and Example Experiment
Ms. Bruscino Eight Grade Science Harrison Group Room 301
Project-based Learning and Learner Autonomy
The Impact of Social Media
Scientific Method The 8-Step Process to Scientific Investigations.
Modifying science tasks
The Impact of Project Based Learning on High School Biology SOL Scores
Exploring the Instructional Shifts Inherent in the 2020 CAS
Presentation transcript:

Technology in the Science Classroom Beth Serva Lan Li Bowling Green State University

Abstract The purpose of this experiment is to see if students who watch video labs prior to taking a unit assessment will improve their scores on the unit assessment. Two classes participated in the study Class A (control group) and Class B (experimental group). All students in both classes will have the same teacher throughout the study, participating in the same activities and lectures. Students will take the same assessment at the end of each unit and scores will be assessed. (I will add the conclusion here when it is made)

Technology in the Science Classroom Videos in the science classroom allow students to experience the lab again seeing the lab done with correct procedures and correct results but give students time to connect lecture concepts to the lab.

Advantages of Technology in the Science Classroom Students can see the lab done in real time to help them develop necessary skills and content (Quinones 2010). Videos allow students who are absent to have the same experience as their classmates. Combining methods have increased assessment scores of students almost 40% (Johnson-Glenberg, Birchfield, & Usyal, 2009). Videos allow students to revisit the lab throughout the unit and review for the final.

Problem Statement Many students complete labs but struggle connecting the lecture to the labs. Technology is becoming more prominent in numerous classes but the use of videos for labs is just beginning to grow in popularity, thus research is limited on this topic.

Purpose of Current Study The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the use of video labs in a science classroom.

Research Question Does watching videos of science labs increase students understanding of the key concepts in Miss Serva’s Physical Science class at Elyria High School during the school year?

Participants Fifty-two participants at Elyria High School participated in the study. All of the students were freshman in Miss Serva’s class. The majority of Elyria High School is a low-income urban student.

Procedure Fifty two students were randomly assigned to Miss Serva’s class by the counselors at the beginning of the year. Both classes were conducted normal. Students in Class B (experimental class) were not asked to do anything different. Each class participated in the same activities, listened to the same lecture and performed the same labs.

Procedure Continued Students in Class B watched videos of the lab prior to taking the unit assessment at the end of each unit. Both classes took the same unit test at the end of each assessment. Class scores were analyzed upon completion of the unit test.

Results-Forces and Motion Assessment An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare students test scores on their Force and Motion Assessment when watching a lab video to help them review for their unit assessment compared to not watching a lab video. There was a significant difference in the scores for the control class (M=29.08, SD=11.26) and experimental(M=34.70, SD=5.52) conditions; t(32)=2.0369, p = These results suggest that when students watch lab videos prior to taking the unit assessment their scores increased significantly.

Results-Chemistry Assessment An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare students test scores on their Chemistry Assessment when watching a lab video to help them review for their unit assessment compared to not watching a lab video. There was a significant difference in the scores for the control class (M=27.04, SD=9.72) and experimental class (M=34.37, SD=8.67) conditions; t(44)=2.01, p = These results suggest that when students watch lab videos prior to taking the unit assessment their scores increased significantly.

Conclusion Results are shown that the class that watched the lab videos prior to taking the unit assessment had an increase in scores on their unit assessment. Thus watching lab videos prior to the assessment helps students to review main ideas and key concepts.

Limitations It is assumed that all students will complete the same assignments throughout the class. The teacher will be the same throughout the entire course of study so the same content should be addressed but some minimal changes could occur. Students in each class could vary in learning levels

References Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D., Usyal, S. (2009). SMALLab: virtual geology studies using embodied learning with motion, sound, and graphics. Educational Media International, 46(4), doi: / Quinones, D. (2010). Digital media (including video!) Resources for the STEM classroom and collection. Knowledge Quest, 39(2),