C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Shanidze, B. Herold, Th. Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece Study of data filtering algorithms.
Advertisements

Lorenzo Perrone (University & INFN of Lecce) for the MACRO Collaboration TAUP 2001 Topics in Astroparticle and underground physics Laboratori Nazionali.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
M. Selvi – SN detection with LVD – NNN‘06 Supernova  detection with LVD Marco Selvi – INFN Bologna, Large Volume LNGS.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
X.-X. Li, H.-H. He, F.-R. Zhu, S.-Z. Chen on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Nanjing GRB Conference,Nanjing,
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Measurement of the UHECR energy spectrum from hybrid data of the Pierre Auger Observatory Presenter: Lorenzo Perrone Università del Salento and INFN Lecce.
ICARUS General Trigger Design Contributions from: M.Della Pietra, A.Di Cicco, P.Di Meo, G.Fiorillo, P.Parascandolo, R.Santorelli, P.Trattino B.Baboussinov,
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Multi-TeV  -ray Astronomy with GRAPES-3 Pravata K Mohanty On behalf of the GRAPE-3 collaboration Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Workshop.
1 水质契仑科夫探测器中的中子识别 张海兵 清华大学 , 南京 First Study of Neutron Tagging with a Water Cherenkov Detector.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
MaGe framework for Monte Carlo simulations MaGe is a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation package dedicated to experiments searching for 0 2  decay of.
LIGO G Z Update on Neutrino/ Gravity Wave Correlations With a Focus on SNEWS LIGO-I By Ken Ganezer, CSUDH Elementary Particles and Relativity.
Villa Olmo Search for neutrino bursts from gravitational collapse of stars at the Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope Yu.F. Novoseltsev,
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
POINT SOURCE ANALYSIS WITH 5-LINE DATA SUMMARY AWG PHONE CALL Juan Pablo Gómez-Gozález 20 th April
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
Measurement of the UHECR energy spectrum from hybrid data of the Pierre Auger Observatory Presenter: Lorenzo Perrone Università del Salento and INFN Lecce.
Gamma-Ray Bursts with the ANTARES neutrino telescope S. Escoffier CNRS/CPPM, Marseille.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1st Year Talk1 PEP Violation Analysis with NEMO3 and Calorimeter R&D for SuperNEMO Anastasia Freshville.
The KASCADE-Grande Experiment: an Overview Andrea Chiavassa Universita’ di Torino for the KASCADE-Grande Collaboration.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
of Neutrons produced by
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Monitoring VHE Extragalactic Sources with ARGO-YBJ detector
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Presentation transcript:

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar collapses with LVD: update to 2007 C. Vigorito on behalf of the LVD Collaboration University and INFN Torino, Italy

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico LVD: Detector & Performances Searching for SN neutrino Signal: Technique (Off-line, On-line) Data & Results Conclusions Today Topics

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico The LVD Detector A 1 kton scintillator detector for neutrino astronomy in the INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Ref. LVD Coll., Nuovo Cimento A105 (1992) 1793 LVD: array of 840 liquid scintillator counters (1.5 m 3 each) arranged in a compact and modular geometry. 3 Towers 35 Modules per tower 8 Tanks per module Total target: 1000 t of Scintillator 900 t of Fe (structure)

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Each counter is viewed on the top by three 15" PMTs (QE=10-15%) in 3 fold coincidence 1m 1.5m

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Trigger Mass Uptime

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico The LVD Trigger Optimized to the to Inverse Beta Decay Two detectable signals: the prompt e+ (Evis~ E -0.8 MeV) the delayed ( = 185  s)  (2.2 MeV ). Each PMT is discriminated at two different thresholds resulting in two possible levels of coincidence: High and Low E H ~ 4 MeV and E L <1 MeV active for 1 ms after the trigger

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Energy calibration: Using the atmospheric muon spectrum (30 days integration) and MC simulation Energy resolution: FWHM/E ~ 30% at 15 MeV. N-capture efficiency: 50% LVD Trigger Efficiency

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico 150 days - Sampling: 2 hours -Variable Detector Configuration (trigger mass) - Basic cuts on muon rejection and noisy counter applied  H =90%  H =95% Background Rate Stability

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Trigger E>7 MeV sampled every 2 minutes compared with the mean local background over 40 minutes /50 days considered LVD rate is poissonian at level of ~15% sbb

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Performed by processing the trigger sequence in the range MeV: on-line for prompt alert purpose and off-line to check data. Search for SN Burst Ref. Fulgione, Mengotti & Panaro, NIM A368 (1996) 512 Second step: check of  burst consistency check by: topological distribution in the detector (Uniform) energy spectrum (Fermi-Dirac) time distribution of delayed pulses (N-capture with  T=185  s) For a selected cluster the imitation frequency FIM is calculated taking into account the rate of background events f bk. FIM< 1 y -1 (Alert if FIM< 0.01 y -1 ) First step: statistical analysis of all possible clusters (m≥2,  t<200 s) initiated by each single pulse.

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Data: 846 days (Feb.2005-May 2007) 14.2 million of events Mean Rate 0.2 Hz Multiplicity and cluster duration have been checked: data (different color markers) compared with expectations (solid color lines) from Poissonian fluctuations of the background is shown. Good agreement for different cluster multiplicities and durations. Results

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico All detected clusters are shown in the Multiplicity (m) vs Duration (  t) scatter plot. The sensitivity of LVD at the alert level of 1 event per 100 years is shown. No alert in the LVD standalone mode is found. 2 candidates are selected at the FIM<1 event/year

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Candidate 1 Fim=0.46/y N. of Trigger 52 Background rate=6.1 ev/min Duration s Candidate 2 Fim=0.48/y N. of Trigger 65 Background rate=8.9 ev/min Duration s Energy Spectrum Time distribution of delaied pulse Topology (internal & external counter contributions) Fine structure compatible with fluctuation of background events

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Total 4919 days Upper Limit to SN event in the Milky Way 0.17 /year (90% c.l.) RUNSince:To: Uptime [days] Duty Cycle Mass [tonn] PUBLISHED RUN 1Jun 6 th ‘92May 31 st ’ %31023 rd ICRC 1993 RUN 2Aug 4 th ‘93Mar 11 th ’ %39024 th ICRC 1995 RUN 3Mar 11 th ‘95Apr 30 th ’ %40025 th ICRC 1997 RUN 4Apr 30 th ‘97Mar 15 th ‘ %41526 th ICRC 1999 RUN 5Mar 16 th ‘99Dec 11 th ‘ %58027 th ICRC 2001 RUN 6Dec 12 th ‘00Mar 24 th ’ %84228 th ICRC 2003 RUN 7Mar 25 th ’03Feb 4 th ‘05666>99%88129 th ICRC 2005 RUN 8Feb 5 th ‘05May 31 st ‘07846>99%93630 th ICRC 2007

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico The SN On-line Monitor SNM algorithm can generate alarm at fixed selection rate: 1/day SN Monitor Check (active since Jul. 2005) 1/month SNEWS Alert Different approach: study of the cluster multiplicity (m) in fixed time windows  t=20 s starting at t o (and t o +10 s) / fbk rate in the MeV range

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Cluster selected on-line in 688 days at different threshold Observed rate of alert (fits of the delay distributions) 1.24 day month -1 Ref. On-line recognition of supernova neutrino bursts in the LVD detector submitted to Astroparticle Physics, LVD COLLABORATION

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Conclusions No SN candidates have been found over 4919 days : the upper limit to to SN event in the Galaxy at 90% c.l. is 0.18 event/year over almost 2 years. The on-line monitor keeps LVD connected to SNEWS: the reliability of the alert selection has been checked on real alert data over almost 2 years. Since 2001 LVD is running in the final configuration: 1 kton and 99.5% of uptime. Monitoring the galaxy since 1992: ~5000 days of data acquisition with an average duty cycle of 93%.

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico

C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico INTERNAL COUNTERS (M=475 t) T 1 T 3 T 2 TOP VIEW FRONT VIEW EXTERNAL COUNTERS (M=525 t ) Upper Shield