Centralized vs. Decentralized – Revisiting the Concept for the National Fingerprint File SEARCH Membership Meeting Washington, DC July 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Compliance Responsibilities: National Service Criminal History Checks Corporation for National and Community Service Office of Grants Management, Washington,
Advertisements

Criminal Background Checks for Applicants Accepted to Health Professions Schools Robert F. Sabalis, PhD Associate Vice President Student Affairs and Programs.
Business Plan and Outstanding Issues for Illinois Justice Network Portal IIJIS Technical Committee Meeting January 16, 2004.
Illinois Justice Network Portal Implementation Board Meeting February 11, 2004.
IIJIS Privacy Policy Meeting June 2, 2004 Bureau of Identification Data Quality.
Access is defined as physical access: The ability to receive, view, or discuss the Criminal History Record Information (CHRI) regardless of retrieval method.
Pinal County, Arizona November 10, 2003 Pinal County, Arizona November 10, 2003.
1 Nevada Offense Code (NOC) Governance Model Presented by Scott Sosebee and Julie Butler Department of Public Safety and Administrative Office of the Courts.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIVACY, TECHNOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION THE ROLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND STATE CRIMINAL HISTORY REPOSITORIES Washington,
Introduction to Applicant Livescan processing for DPW.
Implementation concepts for consideration by the Florida Public School Districts Jessica Lunsford Act, F.S.
Department of Labor HSPD-12
Governor’s Commission on Volunteerism & Community Service volunteerflorida.org AmeriCorps Background Check101  NATIONAL SERVICE CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK.
Florida Department of Law Enforcement FLORIDA - AN OPEN RECORD STATE FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 119 CREATED FLORIDA’S PUBLIC RECORD ACT.
Automatic Finger Print Identification System with Multi biometric Options A smart presentation On AFIS System.
C. L. Wilson Manager, Image Group Biometrics Overview of the PATRIOT Act.
2007 Annual Conference “ Criminal Background Checks – Challenges & Utility” Jill Dougherty Nancy Swetnam.
Criminal History Reviews Under Senate Bill 9 Holly Claghorn, Senior Attorney Texas Association of School Boards September 10, 2008.
NONCRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY USE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION
Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) Modernization Project Department Of Emergency Services and Public Protection Division of State Police.
Databases Chapter 11.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Criminal Justice Information System Central Repository.
July 9, National Software Reference Library Douglas White Information Technology Laboratory July 2004.
INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM 1 INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM FINGERPRINT PROCESSES.
Dedication, Pride, Service Department of Public Safety Records & Technology Division Records Bureau NCJIS Advisory Committee Update January 28, 2010 Julie.
Chapter 10: Authentication Guide to Computer Network Security.
TDEx and N-DEx Connecting Criminal Justice Agencies across Texas and the Nation TCJIUG Austin, May 2006.
LOCAL AGENCY MUST STILL RUN A FILE CHECK (QHW) TO DETERMINE WARRANTS/HOLDS II. If name is not on CCH, prints are compared to all fingerprints in AFIS for.
DIRECT CERTIFICATION Patricia Winders Director’s Conference July 29, 2015.
AUTHORIZATION STEPS Fingerprinting Authorizations Responsibilities School Bus Driver Inservice
1 National Fingerprint-based Applicant Check Study (N-FACS) Gary L. Williams Project Manager Programs Development Section Gary S. Barron Project.
CJ328 Unit 3-Review Things you should know Fingerprints contain unique, individual characteristics Galton details are level two details or individual characteristics.
The Initiative For School Empowerment and Excellence (i.4.see) “Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.”
Rapid ID System User Training August To use the Rapid ID System Operators must be CJIS Certified Each operator must login to Windows using a unique.
Larry Hornak Co-Director, CITeR, West Virginia University NSF I/UCRC 2003 Annual Meeting Washington, DC, January Research in Emerging Areas: Defense.
© 2009 EPCOR. All Rights Reserved The Risks and Rewards of Remote Deposit Services 2009 Treasury Management Conference September 10, 2009 Omaha, Nebraska.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
REPORT OF THE BJS/SEARCH NATIONAL TASK FORCE ON PRIVACY, TECHNOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION May 31, 2000 Washington, DC Presented by Robert R.
National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council
Biometrics Authentication Technology
3.2 Notes Crime Scene Reconstruction, Forensic Databases.
Department of Public Safety Records & Technology Division Records Bureau NCJIS Advisory Committee Meeting October 6, 2011 Julie Butler, Records Bureau.
TECHNICAL SEMINAR PRESENTATION BIOMETRICS:THE MAGIC OF IDENTIFICATION.
Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) Updates Strategies: Excellence for Health Care Providers November 5, 2015.
SOR Fingerprints “The Submission Process”. Objectives Registration Prints SOR Termination/Mail-In Registrations Charge Field (Reason Fingerprinted) Image.
REPORT OF THE FBI CJIS DIVISION SEARCH Meeting January 23, 2004.
HIPAA Summit Practical Approaches to Sticky Payer Issues April 26, 2002 Bob Perlitz, AVP, HIPAA Compliance Officer.
SECRETARIAT OF POLICE1 Presentation to Select Committee on Security and Constitutional Affairs on the Criminal Procedures (Forensic) Amendment Act 28 July.
Texas DPS AFIS Update Texas Homeland Security Conference San Antonio April 27, 2011.
Ghost Credit Cards in eProcurement Jeremy Williams NC State University Technology Support Analyst Purchasing Department.
JUVENILE JUSTICE Juvenile Records Sealing and Restricted Access 2016.
Fingerprint Analysis What is a Fingerprint? Orangutan A fingerprint is the impression left upon any surface with which the finger comes in contact under.
October 5, Central Repository - Responsibilities Law Enforcement Prosecutor Courts Collection and Dissemination 2,500,000+ Tenprints 20,000+ Latent.
Brady Act Requirements In November 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 (Brady Act), Public Law , was signed into law requiring.
Criminal Justice Information System
Project Team kick-off meeting
Loann Garcia Livescan Coordinator
HB4034 – Duplicate Batch Process
Record Review and Challenge
AFIS and CODIS Duyen & Ladaysha.
CBCC Enrollment Process
Automated Fingerprint Identification System upgrade project
SEARCH Annual Meeting “Washington Scene”
CJIS-Central Repository
The WSP Notice of Arrest
Making a Match.
Fingerprint Based Criminal History Records
The Central Post Office And Continuing Disclosure
Care Provider Background Screening Clearinghouse
Presentation transcript:

Centralized vs. Decentralized – Revisiting the Concept for the National Fingerprint File SEARCH Membership Meeting Washington, DC July 2005

Why Now? Events leading to the re-examination of the NFF concept –Goal of 100% of Texas Offenders Indexed in III –Changes at the FBI –Proposed policy change in submission to the FBI –Examination of NFF statutory requirements

Texas Submissions To FBI Pre – 1998 The Goal The Exception The Reality Result – Only 30% of Texas arrests submitted to FBI

Texas Submissions To FBI Post – 1998 NIST/ EFTS Result –100% of Texas arrests submitted to FBI Hardcopy fingerprint cards are converted to NIST and forwarded to AFIS Livescan submission go directly to AFIS

Filling the Pre – 1998 Gaps Texas CCH Arrest data is extracted into NIST Type 2 record formatted and indexed by SID and DOA Pre-1998 arrest cards are scanned in NIST Type 4 format and indexed by SID and DOA Image data and arrest data are merged together to produce NIST / EFTS record Result –100% of Texas offenders eligible to be indexed in III

Does That Account For All Texas Arrest Data? No Non-criterion Offenses –The FBI has traditionally accepted only “criterion” offenses. –Starting in May 2005, the FBI began retaining non-criteria offenses from some states.

Non-Criterion Offenses

Does That Account For All Texas Arrest Data? No Non-criterion Offenses –The FBI has traditionally accepted only “criterion” offenses. –Starting in May 2005, the FBI began retaining non-criteria offenses from some states. Arrests for which the original fingerprint card no longer exists –In the past, if DPS identified a fingerprint against an existing record, the subsequent arrest card would be microfilmed and then destroyed. –Subsequent re-arrest fingerprint cards were not available for backfile scanning. –Texas DPS proposal for submission of arrest data.

Texas DPS proposal for submission of arrest data Texas DPS is drafting an APB proposal to allow for the submission of arrest data to the FBI without an accompanying fingerprint card. The proposal would require that: –the subject of the arrest submission was biometrically identified by the state submitting the arrest –the record the subject was identified with has been identified at the FBI and contains an FNU.

DPS Proposal Texas CCH SID – TX DOA – 01/01/1997 Fingerprint Image Retained on 1 st Submission DOA – 01/01/1997 DOA – 02/01/1997 DOA – 03/01/1997 DOA – 04/01/1997 SID – TX DOA – 01/01/1997 DOA – 01/01/1997 DOA – 02/01/1997 DOA – 03/01/1997 DOA – 04/01/1997 $.A Message containing FBI # 1235X FBI – 1235X SID – TX DOA – 02/01/1997 DOA – 03/01/1997 DOA – 04/01/1997

What Does All This Have To Do With NFF? If the APB and FBI endorse this concept for the enhanced updating of III, that decision could also serve as a catalyst to re-examine the current decentralized NFF concept. This new update concept would support a centralized NFF concept that produces the same major benefit of the current decentralized NFF (enhanced access to CHRI), while allowing the criminal and non- criminal justices communities to realize the benefits of a centralized CHRI database.

Advantages of a Centralized Database Faster III returns - FBI will not have to wait on NFF states to supply records for responses to inquiries. Greater Non-Criminal Justice Use - Non-CJ users like NICS will be able to have more information with which to make adjudication decisions. Enhanced Homeland Security Use – A centralized file will allow for data mining that can be used in the war on terrorism. Enhanced Quality Control – With a central repository, all fingerprints would be verified twice – once at the state level and once at the FBI. This double verification process will aid in lowering the number of miss identifications. Enhanced Database Quality – IAFIS will have the opportunity to update the quality of the images it stores through an assessment of the images received from the states. Currently, for NFF states, images are only updated based upon the quality determinations made by a dissimilar state AFIS system.

It is important to realize that the current version of NFF is just that - a version of an implementation of the National Fingerprint File. USC 42 and 28 CFR define NFF in the same manner: "National Fingerprint File" means a database of fingerprints, or other uniquely personal identifying information, relating to an arrested or charged individual maintained by the FBI to provide positive identification of record subjects indexed in the III System. NFF Definition

Questions Can NFF be a hybrid of decentralized and centralized databases? Does a centralized NFF implementation fulfill Compact Council requirements for NFF participation? Would this allow states to get rid of their state AFIS?