SCT 2010 1 The analysis of case cohort design in the presence of competing risks Melania Pintilie, Yan Bai, Lingsong Yun and David C. Hodgson Ontario Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing the Time to Response in Antidepressant Clinical Trials Roy N. Tamura, Ph.D. Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indiana 2001 Purdue University.
Advertisements

Cox Model With Intermitten and Error-Prone Covariate Observation Yury Gubman PhD thesis in Statistics Supervisors: Prof. David Zucker, Prof. Orly Manor.
April 25 Exam April 27 (bring calculator with exp) Cox-Regression
the Cox proportional hazards model (Cox Regression Model)
Biostatistics 760 Random Thoughts. Upcoming Classes Bios 761: Advanced Probability and Statistical Inference Bios 763: Generalized Linear Model Theory.
NACC National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Time Dependent Exposure in Case-Control Studies Roger Higdon, PhD Senior Biostatistician NACC, University.
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model Mai Zhou Department of Statistics University of Kentucky.
Analysis of Complex Survey Data
An extension of the compound covariate prediction under the Cox proportional hazard models Emura, Chen & Chen [ 2012, PLoS ONE 7(10) ] Takeshi Emura (NCU)
90% survival rate Stage 1 68% Survival rate Stage 2 59% survival rate Stage 3 5% If spread to brain Stage 4 Ages 0 to 19 is 0.7% Ages 20 to 34 is 7.1%
Description of fracture with endocrine therapy use in older breast cancer survivors in a population-based setting Taryn Becker 123, Geoff Anderson 123,
Prevention Strategies: Emerging Trends and Issues Kimberly E. Davis, Ph.D. July 17, 2010 Center for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Development.
HSTAT1101: 27. oktober 2004 Odd Aalen
Comprehensive Project By Melissa Joy.  Background Information on Probability  Intro to Fay’s Formula  Notation  Overview of the method behind Fay’s.
Statistical decision making. Frequentist statistics frequency interpretation of probabilityfrequency interpretation of probability: any given experiment.
Overview of All SEER-Medicare Publications Through 2012 Mark D. Danese, MHS, PhD July 24, 2012.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
Cardiovascular Morbidity Following Modern Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Age- and Sex- Specific Estimates of Risk in the Doxorubicin Era. D. Hodgson 1,
Virus and Cancer.
Essentials of survival analysis How to practice evidence based oncology European School of Oncology July 2004 Antwerp, Belgium Dr. Iztok Hozo Professor.
1 Survival Analysis Biomedical Applications Halifax SAS User Group April 29/2011.
Dr Laura Bonnett Department of Biostatistics. UNDERSTANDING SURVIVAL ANALYSIS.
On ranking in survival analysis: Bounds on the concordance index
1 Testing and developing statistical models for adoption studies of genetic and environmental influences of premature death Introduction and summary Paper.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Estimation of Various Population Parameters Point Estimation and Confidence Intervals Dr. M. H. Rahbar Professor of Biostatistics Department of Epidemiology.
1 Active learning based survival regression for censored data Bhanukiran Vinzamuri Yan Li Chandan K.
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 11. Analysis of Cohort Study Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
D:/rg/folien/ms/ms-USA ppt F 1 Assessment of prediction error of risk prediction models Thomas Gerds and Martin Schumacher Institute of Medical.
1 Nonparametric Methods II Henry Horng-Shing Lu Institute of Statistics National Chiao Tung University
Faculty Research Interest Seminar Series Graduate School of Public Health, UNIVERSITY of PITTSBURGH Methodological Research and Collaboration Lan Kong.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
Validation / citations. Validation u Expert review of model structure u Expert review of basic code implementation u Reproduce original inputs u Correctly.
Modeling Cure Rates Using the Survival Distribution of the General Population Wei Hou 1, Keith Muller 1, Michael Milano 2, Paul Okunieff 1, Myron Chang.
HSRP 734: Advanced Statistical Methods July 31, 2008.
Epidemiologic design from a sampling perspective Epidemiology II Lecture April 14, 2005 David Jacobs.
Case Control Study Dr. Ashry Gad Mohamed MB, ChB, MPH, Dr.P.H. Prof. Of Epidemiology.
Survival Analysis 1 Always be contented, be grateful, be understanding and be compassionate.
Introduction Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Strategies in Two-Stage Randomizations with Censored Data Zhiguo Li and Susan Murphy Institute for Social.
Parametric Conditional Frailty Models for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in the LIPID Study Dr Jisheng Cui Deakin University, Melbourne.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. Adult Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in the Eastern Part of Libya Dr. M.Mangoush, R. Nafo, S.Kardah, M.Letaiwish, S.Kardah, F.Bodabous, S.Ebkhatra.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: AMD in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Chew EY, Clemons TE, Agrón E, et al;
Nonparametric Methods II 1 Henry Horng-Shing Lu Institute of Statistics National Chiao Tung University
Breast cancer affects 1 in 8 women during their lives. 1 Population Statistics.
Some survival basics Developments from the Kaplan-Meier method October
Hazlina Hamdan 31 March Modelling survival prediction in medical data By Hazlina Hamdan Dr. Jon Garibaldi.
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute 4733 Bethesda Ave., Suite #510 Bethesda, MD Phone: Fax: Comparison of.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
1 Borgan and Henderson: Event History Methodology Lancaster, September 2006 Session 8.1: Cohort sampling for the Cox model.
Overview of Incidence Data at the Virginia Cancer Registry Carolyn Halbert M.A.,.M.P.H. Statistical Analysis Coordinator Virginia Cancer Registry.
Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC Website:
Md Shah Jalalur Rahman Shahi
Bootstrap and Model Validation
Interpretation of effect estimates in competing risks survival models: A simulated analysis of organ-specific progression-free survival in a randomised.
Biostatistics 760 Random Thoughts.
Figure 1. An example of an original simulation film used during the 1960s to 1990s to plan radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with field borders marked.
The Role of Statistics in Clinical Trials
Meta-analysis of joint longitudinal and event-time outcomes
Biostatistics 760 Random Thoughts.
Sample Size Planning of Clinical Trials, Introduction
Quantifying uncertainty using the bootstrap
A population-based study of cardiac morbidity among Hodgkin lymphoma patients with preexisting heart disease by Sten Myrehaug, Melania Pintilie, Lingsong.
Relationship Between Tumor Size and Survival in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)
If we can reduce our desire,
NEMO English Seminar Dynamic predictions using flexible joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data Jessica Barrett University of Cambridge, U.K.
South Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention & Control Program
Logical Inference on Treatment Efficacy When Subgroups Exist
Planning and analyzing clinical trials with competing risks: Recommendations for choosing appropriate statistical methodology Presented by Misun Yu.
Presentation transcript:

SCT The analysis of case cohort design in the presence of competing risks Melania Pintilie, Yan Bai, Lingsong Yun and David C. Hodgson Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, ICES, Princess Margaret Hospital

SCT Hodgkin’s disease Hodgkin’s disease is a type of cancer which affects the young adults (median age=37). 5 year survival 84% in USA Treatment: Radiation and/or chemotherapy Treatment may be cardiotoxic. Aim: Study the incidence of cardiac events

SCT HD cohort In Ontario over 16 year period ( ) ~3000 HD ~300 cardiac events ~ 600 die without a cardiac event Time to event analysis the number of events determines the power of the study To study the cardiac events a large amount of information is needed to be collected –Treatment –Cardiac history –Risk factors The presence of competing risks

SCT Outline Case-cohort definition and analysis Competing risks PsL for case-cohort with competing risks Prediction for a case-cohort study Simulations and results

SCT Case-cohort Select randomly a subcohort from the source cohort. This set contains some cases –1/3 of the Subcohort=1108, 105 cardiac events Add to this all the rest of the cases –204 cardiac events Take advantage of all 309 cardiac events, but collect detail information only on =1312 instead of ~3000.

SCT Analysis of case-cohort, pseudolikelihood Prentice RL. A Case-Cohort Design for Epidemiologic Cohort Studies and Disease Prevention Trials. Biometrika 73: 1-11, The cases which are not part of the subcohort participate in the PsL only at the time of the event.

SCT Presence of competing risks Among the 1108 in the subcohort 198 patients died before having a cardiac event. These are competing risks. Fine JP and Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: , 1999.

SCT Fine and Gray - modelling the hazard of the subdistribution time J=1J=3 J=2 J=6J=4 J=5 R1R1 R3R3 R4R4 R6R6 w 32 w 42 w 62 w 65 w 32 >w 42 >w62

SCT The analysis of case-cohort in the presence of competing risks Jackknife variance

SCT Prediction, where Using the subcohort only

SCT Simulations To verify that –The estimated coefficient is correct –The predicted probabilities are correct –The type I error is correct

SCT Description of the simulations The parameters The covariate The distribution of time The censor time

SCT Description of simulations Source cohort N=1200 Subcohort = 1/3 of the source cohort, n=400 Case-cohort: 400+the rest of cases Obtain: –Coefficients –Predicted probabilities at 1,2,3,4,5 years Repeated 2000 times

SCT Coefficients

SCT Predicted probabilities

SCT To verify the type I error Source cohort N=120 Subcohort = 1/3 of the source cohort, n=40 Case-cohort: 40+the rest of cases Repeated 2000 times Type I error = , close to 0.05

SCT Thank you

SCT References 1.Prentice RL. A Case-Cohort Design for Epidemiologic Cohort Studies and Disease Prevention Trials. Biometrika 73: 1-11, Fine JP and Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: , Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, and Izumi S. Analysis of case- cohort designs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52: , Borgan O, Goldstein L, and Langholz B. Methods for the analysis of sampled cohort data in the Cox proportional hazards model. Annals of Statistics 23: , Barlow WE. Robust Variance-Estimation for the Case-Cohort Design. Biometrics 50: , Self SG and Prentice RL. Asymptotic-Distribution Theory and Efficiency Results for Case Cohort Studies. Annals of Statistics 16: 64-81, 1988.

SCT Therneau TM and Li HZ. Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs. Lifetime Data Analysis 5: , Sorensen P and Andersen PK. Competing risks analysis of the case- cohort design. Biometrika 87: 49-59, Crowder MJ. Classical competing risks. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Tibshirani RJ and Efron B. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, Lag R, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Altekruse SF, Lewis DR, Clegg L, Eisner MP, Reichman M, and Edwards BK. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. 12.Myrehaug S, Pintilie M, Tsang R, Mackenzie R, Crump M, Chen ZL, Sun A, and Hodgson DC. Cardiac morbidity following modern treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma: Supra-additive cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and radiation therapy. Leukemia & Lymphoma 49: , 2008.

SCT

SCT