Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.
Advertisements

Donor Performance Assessment Framework – results and lessons learnt on transparency and mutual accountability - Rwanda - John Bosco Ndaruhutse External.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Third Roundtable on Managing for Development Results Mutual Accountability and PartnershipsBreakout Session 4 Monitoring the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.
Capacity Development for Cooperation Effectiveness in Latin America and the Caribbean OAS Subregional Workshop for Cooperation Effectiveness: Caribbean.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Ongoing Work of the Joint Venture on Managing for Development Results (JV MfDR) Stefan Schmitz, Senior Policy Advisor Aid Effectiveness OECD Development.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
1 Development Cooperation Policies Trade Union Development Cooperation Network February 2009.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
Elaine Ireland Policy Adviser: Global Health Global Health Policy Forum 9 th September 2010 Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector: A civil society perspective.
Eduardo González Aid Quality Division DCD-OECD 9 May, 2011 Update in THE ROAD TO BUSAN.
1 Lal Shanker Ghimire Joint Secretary FACD, Ministry of Finance Joint Evaluation in Nepal: Experience Sharing from the Paris Declaration Evaluation.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Key findings Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop Seoul, March 2014.
UNCTAD ICT and E-Business Branch 9/17/2015 / 1 Joint UNCTAD-ITU-UNESCAP Workshop Information Society Measurements in Asia-Pacific Bangkok, July 2006.
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores República de Colombia.
The International Framework of Aid and Development Effectiveness Karin Fällman, Sida 13 February 2014.
1 Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS.
Global Partnership and Aid Lee, Kye Woo KDI School of Public Policy and Management.
Lessons from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme & Aid Effectiveness.
Gender and Development Effectiveness. Entry points for Tanzania? DPG Main, 8 May 2012 Anna Collins-Falk, Representative, UN Women on behalf of DPG Gender.
Overview Outcomes from Busan HLF 4 Faye Lee, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Cooperation.
13 January 2011 Country Launch – 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Role of Donors.
State Chancellery of the Republic of Moldova2011 Survey1 Monitoring the Paris Declaration.
Findings from the gender equality module of the 2011 Paris Declaration Survey: Towards HLF-4 Jenny Hedman DAC Network on Gender Equality 28 July 2011.
CSO Development Effectiveness and Promotion of an Enabling Environment
Statistics and cooperation: Rome, 24 November 2005 Statistics to Inform Development Policy: the Role of PARIS21 Presentation by Antoine Simonpietri, PARIS21.
IHP+: introduction and ministerial review Action for Global Health Conference Strengthening Accountability to Achieve the Health MDGs Madrid, 7 th June.
Measuring, Managing and Evaluating Gender Equality: The Role of Statistics and Indicators Stockholm, Sweden 20 November, 2008 Summing Up and Looking Forward.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results- Terence D. Jones UNDP Third International Roundtable Managing for Development Results.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
Module 7: Be Contextually Relevant - Harmonized Support Supporting change through Capacity Development.
What enables effective international climate finance in the context of development co-operation? Results from an OECD Survey* Presentation by Stephanie.
AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.
International Development on Aid Effectiveness Presenter Said Muhammed Jama Aid Coordination Expert Ministry of National Planning and Development.
AID COOPERATION FRAMEWORK IN TANZANIA Presentation by Ministry of Finance DPG INDUCTION 21ST OCTOBER 2013.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
Task Team on South South Cooperation General overview Name Position Meeting.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
Embracing the Paris Principles and AAA to Curb Corruption and Enhance Development Performance Mitchell O’Brien Governance Specialist Team Lead – Parliament.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
PARIS21 Involvement at HLF4 on Aid Effectiveness Board meeting OECD Conference Centre 27 April 2011.
1. Background to CSO Development Effectiveness 2. What is the Open Forum process 3. International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness 5. GLOBAL.
Launch of the 2008 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration. Christian SHINGIRO External Finance Unit.
“AID EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH Challenges and opportunities Marielle Hart Action for Global Health.
1 Evaluation Utilization: the case of the Paris Evaluation (Phase 1) and its use in the Accra HLF3 process Paris Evaluation Phase 2 Planning Meeting, Feb.
Roundtable 3: Enriching the Paris Declaration Democratic Ownership: Alignment, Co-operation and Harmonisation.
6th annual CONCORD report monitoring EU performance on aid quantity and quality. Produced by AidWatch, a pan- European network of aid experts working on.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
GERT DANIELSEN PROGRAMME SPECIALIST, UNDP 11 MAY 2009 Effective Aid? From Paris to Accra to Doha and Beyond.
Viet Nam Partnership Document (VPD) Hanoi, November 7, 2012 MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT CAO MANH CUONG DGG- FERD/MPI AEF NATIONAL COORDINATOR.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
The Global Partnership
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Integrated Planning System
Vincent Grimaud, Head of Unit
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Session 4: SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
The Road to Busan: Ensuring Citizens Drive Their Own Development
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Global Gender Statistics Programme
HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS
(Further) Improving Development Cooperation
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011

Overview 1.Monitoring and the 2011 Survey - Why? What? How? 2.What do the findings tell us? 3.Some notes on the process 4.What next?

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Why? What? How? 2005: Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness Five principles, 56 commitments... and agreement to monitor progress against targets established for indicators of progress measured at the country level

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Why? What? How?  Aims of the Survey 1.Stimulate dialogue at the country level: Identify opportunities and bottlenecks to make aid more effective Foster a shared understanding Track progress over time 2.At the global level: Monitor implementation of the PD, supporting political accountability Evidence and learning – a key input to HLF-4

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Why? What? How?  What is being monitored? –Progress towards agreed targets using standard indicators –Efforts in other areas not captured by the indicators e.g. elements of the Accra Agenda for Action Qualitative observations on opportunities and challenges at the country level Complementary evidence through optional modules (gender equality; inclusive ownership) Monitoring the Fragile States Principles

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Why? What? How?  How is progress monitored? –Three successive Surveys 2006 Baseline Survey (the state of play in 2005) 2008 Survey (stock-taking, informing HLF-3) 2011 Survey (were the 2010 targets met?) –A country-led process Managed by national co-ordinators in partner countries, with support from donors Dialogue with a broad range of stakeholders Global co-ordination and support (OECD, UNDP and World Bank)

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Why? What? How?  Increasing Survey coverage % of global core aid covered by the Survey (est.) 34 partner countries 36% of global aid 55 partner countries 58% of global aid 76 partner countries 76% of global aid  Broader stakeholder participation (emerging donors, civil society, parliamentarians more involved in some countries)

Have the 2010 targets been met? (Preliminary 2010 aggregates, 32 baseline countries) 2010 Target 2005 Baseline 75% 50% 54% 38% 19% 40% 7% 50% 38% 47% 25% 85% % 66% 40% 66% 100% 44% % 43% 20% 41% 44% 43% % 46% 22% 44% 48% 50% >87% 49% 87% 51% 89%

Findings beyond the 12 indicators  More participatory approaches in development strategies, but challenges for civil society activity in some countries  Technical co-operation better co-ordinated, but further efforts needed to ensure support for capacity development is demand-driven  Improved country systems in 1/3 of countries, but a decline observed in others  Donors are not making systematic use of country systems where these are more reliable  Transparency – some promising initiatives, but work in progress  Efforts to enhance medium-term predictability of aid limited  Limited efforts to reduce the fragmentation of aid

Looking beyond the headlines  Significant variations across countries and donors on many indicators and issues  Particular challenges in fragile states and situations  There may also be variations across donor types, regions and groups of partner countries –Analysis of these trends is ongoing

Some notes on the process  Report on Progress since Paris –Evidence from the Surveys... –... and other relevant and credible evidence –Country chapters – detailed analysis of progress and challenges in each partner country  These findings are provisional –Data validation and verification is ongoing –Findings are still subject to change –Final Report available September 2011

What next? July 2011 Validation of data at country level First drafts of country chapters July/August Additional analysis / refine findings Finalise global report and country chapters September Launch of Report on Progress since Paris Full Survey dataset available on OECD.Stat 29 November – 1 December HLF-4, Busan, Korea

 Draft Report on Progress since Paris (room document for discussion)  Survey website: Further information