Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S. www.FCRR.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Language, Learning And Literacy (L3)
Teacher Evaluation Model
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
INTERVENTION: CLOSING THE ACADEMIC GAP BEFORE KINDERGARTEN Kathy Petersen Bonnie VanAusdal Brittney Nelson.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research Georgia March, 2004.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
PROCESS TO PROGRESS Reading First at MCS. 8 Critical Reading First Elements 1. Systematic and explicit instruction using an approved Scientifically Based.
FCRR Reports: Reviews of Pre-K Reading Programs Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research February, 2005 Tampa, Florida.
Supporting Leadership of Effective Reading Programs Stephen M. Nettles, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Florida Center for Reading Research: Mission & Projects Dr. Marcia L. Grek Council of Language Arts Supervisors, May 2003.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Effective Reading Interventions: Characteristics, Resources, and Implications for Educators Elissa Arndt, M.S., CCC-SLP Elizabeth Crawford, M.S., CCC-SLP.
1 Lodi Unified School District High Priority Schools Grant (HPSGP) Review of Progress for Live Oak, Needham, and Washington Elementary Schools Mary Camezon,
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
Staff Development in a Pre-K Literacy Project Belinda Biscoe and Priscilla Griffith (Debra Corey, Susan Kimmel) University of Oklahoma
Small Group Instruction Prepared by Andrea Hnatiuk.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Grade 6.
FCRR Reports: A Resource for Selecting Reading Programs
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Writing Workshop with ELLs in mainstream first grade classes An Effective pedagogical practice for Few Good teachers? A Qualitative Study Jayne Sherman.
Long Beach Unified School Distcit
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
The State of the School’s Reading First Program Fall, 2005.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
Reading Instruction: Moving forward in our practices
Model Demonstration Projects
Supplemental and Intervention Reading Programs
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Developing and sustaining a district and school literacy team
Presentation transcript:

Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.

Purpose of the RF Site Visits The purpose is to gather information on three important areas of Florida’s multi- faceted Reading First Evaluation Plan: 1.schools’ progress in implementing important features of their districts’ RF plan, 2.district and school support for professional development and 3.teacher use of new knowledge and skills in teaching reading.

First Steps An appropriate observation instrument was selected. Randomly selected schools in 17 districts were notified in late January about the dates and general process of the site visits. Site visit reviewers with expertise in reading were selected from across Florida. Reviewer training was developed to ensure quality collection of data.

First Steps cont. In February, the review team attended a 2 day reviewer training with follow-up. District RF Directors worked to ensure that school schedules would accommodate the site visit schedule and process.

2004 Site Visit Observation Instrument

ICE-R The ICE- R instrument was developed to collect data on: statewide reading initiatives, students’ opportunities to learn, dimensions of reading content observed in classroom instruction, and the extent to which instruction addresses the five components of reading.

ICE Data… …tells the researcher –What is being taught –How it is being taught –How well it is being taught –What is being used

Coding Categories Four Dimensions for Descriptive Data –Dimension A: Main Instructional Category –Dimension B: Instructional Subcategory –Dimension C: Student Grouping –Dimension D: Materials

Dimension A Categories 1.Phonological Awareness 2.Alphabetic Knowledge 3.Phonics 4.Concepts of Print 5.Spelling 6. Oral Language 7. Fluency 8. Text Reading 9. Comprehension 10. Writing/ language arts

Coding Categories (cont.) Additional Coding Categories –Instructional focus –Student Engagement –Instructional Quality

Site Visit Process Site visit team met with principal to identify the randomly selected classrooms to be visited. Team members observed for 45 minutes in four classrooms, one per K-3 grade level. Another team member did informal walk- throughs in other K-3 classrooms.

Site Visit Process Interviews were conducted with the principal and reading coach. A teacher focus group was conducted with school-selected K-3 teachers. At close of the site visit, a short debriefing was held with the principal. A written report was mailed to the principal and district RF director.

Site Visit Reports Summarize observational data Provide a snapshot that, when used with other data, can provide valuable information for grant implementation Do not provide school ratings Contribute to the overall RF evaluation for Florida

Site Visit Report Format Introduction School Initiatives School Focus Support for Reading Professional Development Reading First Coach The Reading Block Benefits and Challenges

Report Format cont. Informal observations Content emphasis Instructional quality Student engagement

2004 Site Visits 132 classrooms in K-3 were visited. Average number of students per classroom was 19. Average length of observation was 46 minutes. Average length of the reading block in observed classrooms was 100 minutes.

2004 Site Visit Data: Challenges and Benefits as Identified by Principals RF Coach (100%) Resources (56%) Assessments (53%) Professional Development (53%) Reading Focus (38%) ChallengesBenefits Assessments (53%) Scheduling Reading Block (29%) Lack of resources (26%) Resistant teachers (24%)

2004 Site Visit Data: Challenges and Benefits as Identified by Teachers Managing the 90 minute block (67%) Assessments (63%) Implementation (58%) Inadequate resources (36%) Reading First Coach (94%) Classroom resources (73%) Professional Development (52%) Assessments (48%) Student reading improvement (42%) ChallengesBenefits

2004 Site Visit Data: Challenges and Benefits as Identified by Coaches Professional Development (53%) Assessments (50%) Teacher openness to coach (41%) Resources (29%) ChallengesBenefits Assessments (56%) Lack of time to provide professional development (50%) Resistant teachers (38%) Lack of time to accomplish tasks (32%)

2004 Site Visit Data: RF Benefits Identified by Principals, Teachers and Coaches Assessments Resources Professional development

2004 Site Visit Data: RF Challenges Identified by Principals and Teachers Assessments Inadequate Resources The 90 minute reading block –Scheduling –Managing

2004 Site Visit Data: Informal Observations Teachers leading small reading groups Literacy centers Paraprofessionals working with students Opportunities for students to read Word walls Computer based reading programs Core Reading Programs in use Classroom libraries

2004 Site Visit Data Content Emphasis Overall the average percentage of time during the observations dedicated to instructional activities as opposed to non- instructional was 88%.

2004 Site Visit Data Student Engagement Overall the average student engagement rating during observations was 2.7 on a three point scale. High student engagement is described as when almost all students are actively engaged in a learning activity.

2004 Site Visit Data Instructional Quality Overall the average instructional quality rating during observations was 3 on a four point scale. Examples of teacher characteristics that would qualify as high quality (4) include: using explicit, direct language; modeling examples for students; providing immediate, corrective feedback to students; and scaffolding tasks and materials to meet student needs.

2004 Site Visit Data: Instructional Emphasis for Kindergarten

2004 Site Visit Data: Instructional Emphasis for First Grade

2004 Site Visit Data: Instructional Emphasis for Second Grade

2004 Site Visit Data Instructional Emphasis for Third Grade

Comprehension

Preparation for 2005 Site Visits Concentrate on implementing high quality instruction: Using Core Reading Program Differentiating instruction Using data to drive instruction Using data to drive professional development

Preparation cont. Examine what teachers are doing differently for students who are “in the red.” intensity of instruction resources differentiating instruction organizing instruction

Preparation cont. Conduct informal classroom walkthroughs regularly. Principal, AP, RF Coach District personnel Regional RF Coordinator (See Core Reading Program for walkthrough checklists)

Preparation cont. The reading coach and principal should: identify early implementers who can model for other teachers. identify resistors who would benefit from observing other teachers. participate in grade level team meetings to help teachers focus on student reading needs.

Success = Pressure + Support

Success