Running a User Study Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Usability Test Process: Steps, tips, and more! Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie For Digital Rhetoric.
Advertisements

Managing Classroom Disruptive Student Behavior
Running a User Study Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
NCI Interviewer Training “… Each person can take you into a new part of the world. For the person who is willing to ask and listen the world will always.
6.811 / PPAT: Principles and Practice of Assistive Technology Wednesday, 16 October 2013 Prof. Rob Miller Today: User Testing.
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
SEVEN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT USABILITY TESTING Usability Testing 101.
Deciding How to Measure Usability How to conduct successful user requirements activity?
CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory 1 C yLab U sable P rivacy and S ecurity Laboratory Laboratory.
Skill Building Practice: Adding excitement to the adventure of communication.
1 Usability Testing Roles CSSE 376 Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 23, 2006.
Energy Information Administration Usability Testing Colleen Blessing.
Interviewer Training Overview: P riorities for L ocal A IDS C ontrol E fforts.
An evaluation framework
Saul Greenberg Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of.
From Controlled to Natural Settings
ISE554 The WWW 3.4 Evaluation Methods. Evaluating Interfaces with Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs.
James Tam Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of ethics.
Focus Groups Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Damian Gordon.  Summary and Relevance of topic paper  Definition of Usability Testing ◦ Formal vs. Informal methods of testing  Testing Basics ◦ Five.
1 MTN-003 Training General Interviewing Techniques Some specific tips for administering the Screening interviewer-administered CRFs SSP Section 14.
Preparing a User Test Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Ethics in Business Research
Scenario testing Tor Stålhane. Scenario testing – 1 There are two types of scenario testing. Type 1 – scenarios used as to define input/output sequences.
An introduction to  Interviewing  Presenting  Recording  Editing.
Overview of the research process. Purpose of research  Research with us since early days (why?)  Main reasons: Explain why things are the way they are.
Running Subjects A Darren Parker Presentation. Life as a Subject Good Experiences as a subject? Bad Experiences as a subject?
Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of UI designs?
3461P Crash Course Lesson on Usability Testing The extreme, extreme basics...
Welcome! While we wait for everyone to be seated and for the bell to ring, please fill out the information sheet and review the other handouts. We will.
Selecting, recruiting and informing users Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
What is Usability? Usability Is a measure of how easy it is to use something: –How easy will the use of the software be for a typical user to understand,
Preparing a User Test Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Usability Testing Chapter 6. Reliability Can you repeat the test?
Usability testing: A reality check for Plain Talk A brief overview October 7, 2008 Dana Howard Botka Manager, Customer Communications, L&I Plain Talk Coordinator,
1 ISE 412 Usability Testing Purpose of usability testing:  evaluate users’ experience with the interface  identify specific problems in the interface.
Facilitation  The TAB Facilitation Process and Techniques.
Selecting, recruiting and informing users Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Slide B-1 Case 1 You have just received surprising information that requires your group to take a new approach right away. You know the group members are.
Check whether these things are on your desk. If not, please raise your hand. –Pen –Receipt –“Summary of the experiment” Fill in the receipt following the.
Chapter 24 Final preparations for evaluation. Completing preparations Geez, I thought we were all ready… This chapter dots the i’s and crosses the t’s.
Step 5 Training Session: Interview Techniques. Questions Generate useful information Generate useful information Focus on reasons or motives Focus on.
Policies/Procedures of Mrs. Bryant's Classroom Gary E. Cobb MS.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
Time Management If you cannot manage yourself for effectiveness, you cannot expect to manage others” (Peter Drucker).
ROOM CHAIR PROCEDURES. 1.BEFORE ROUND 1 BEGINS BEFORE THE ROOM CHAIR MEETING 1.Sign in and choose your event.( Events are on a first-come basis. All rooms.
Meetings Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing. Warren Bennis, Ph.D. “On Becoming a Leader”
22C:082:001 Human-Computer Interaction. Fall Copyright © 2013 Juan Pablo Hourcade. 1 Group Project Phase Four.
Is Context-Aware Computing Taking Control Away from the User? Three Levels of Interactivity Examined Louise Barkhuus and Anind Dey The IT University of.
Procedures to followNumbers you need Information to know Your Farm Name Here 1.Communicate* 2.Search 3.Reunite 4.Communicate* *Communication is to all.
1 Chapter 2 Organization Create Consistent Organizational Patterns.
Usability Evaluation or, “I can’t figure this out...do I still get the donuts?”
Chapter 24 Final preparations for the evaluation.
Classic Connections: Innovative Methods for Making Education Work.
Welcome to Tutor Certification and Introduction to Tutoring Facilitator: Christie Bogle.
Agenda/Announcements 1.Finish watching the movie 2.Human Memory Textbook Questions Who cannot watch the movie: Karina Lily Candy Friday! Will your class.
Updated September 2012 JCQ Information for Invigilators 2012/ 2013 MID CHESHIRE COLLEGE.
Exam Information for students
User Interface Evaluation
Data Collection Interview
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Usability Evaluation.
Unit 1 Task.
From Controlled to Natural Settings
If you have a smartphone or tablet please download this app.
OSSLT Overview and Format
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Bulloch Information Session
Classroom Procedures CHAMPS.
Presentation transcript:

Running a User Study Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine

Pilot Test A pilot test is extremely valuable for detecting problems in the planned user test. These problems may be harmless, but they may also render test results unusable. 2-5 pilot subjects are sufficient. Some of them should be people who are very much willing to criticize the experiment (e.g., good friends, colleagues). At least one of them should be a real test subject. Pilot test should be run two days before the actual study at the latest (and there are many good reasons to do them far earlier). Pilot test should include all procedures.

Problems that are frequently uncovered in pilot tests Subjects take considerably longer/shorter than expected. Task instructions are not well understood by subjects Subjects cannot carry out a task since some necessary functionality has not been explained to them Subjects use procedures for solving a task that are different from the one that the experimenters wanted to test Subjects overwrite each others’ data files Experimenters overwrite data of previous experiments Software crashes Experimenters forget to do certain things Some materials are missing Users have troubles finding parking, the building entrance, the usability lab, etc.

Welcome, Briefing, Instruction and Training Welcome -Make participants feel comfortable / reduce anxiety -Bridge time until everyone has arrived -Let them show their ID (“for security/tax purposes”), and announce this beforehand -Ask them to switch their cell phones off. Briefing -Inform about purpose of the experiment (as far as this is possible) -Emphasize that it will help develop a better product -Encourage criticism and praise -Emphasize that the product is being tested and not the user -Emphasize that the people they will see are not the developers -Show them the lab (or movies or pictures of it) -Have them sign legal forms -Let them fill in a pre-questionnaire (e.g., demographics, pre-test) Instruction and Training -Instruction through video, or through instructor who follows a written script -Subsequent training tasks allow users to practice what they learned and to understand it better. -Guided training tasks: task description contains (partial) instructions on how to carry out a task, which subjects are asked to follow

Conducting the Test Setup -(Bring subjects to test computers) -Verify initial settings and materials, start recording devices. -Ask them to begin (and to let you know when they are done) -Enter users in logbook/timesheet (e.g., who used which computer) During the test -Inform users about timeouts -Answer questions generically; avoid biasing participants -If applicable, remind them to think aloud if they become silent -Watch test users and take notes, or monitor users from a distance -Record unusual occurrences in logbook/timesheet -If applicable: remind users occasionally to think aloud -If applicable: make sure users don’t influence each other After the test -Post-questionnaire (e.g., opinions on software, test procedures; post-test) -Payment, escort -Prepare test station for new test subjects

At any time Be organized! Follow checklists!

Unexpected events A participant does not arrive in time A participant forgot(?) his or her ID A participant refuses to sign the informed consent form or the non-disclosure agreement A participant refuses to be videotaped A participant does not want to switch off his/her cell phone A participant is called away in the middle of the test A participant’s cell phone rings continuously A participant does not have the required qualifications A participant becomes confrontational with other participants or with the experimenters A participant takes over the group Software freezes, computer breaks down, etc. Outside interference (construction noise, vacuums, …)