Giving Your Vitae a JOLT Michelle Pilati Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry Professor of Mechanical Engineering University of Memphis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Advertisements

Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor Copernicus Publications | April 2014.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 10, 2011 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Learning the Language of the Review Process Patricia.
Publishers of original thinking. What kinds of academic writing are there? There are many kinds of writing that originates from academia. In my view there.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
ASV Education and Career Development Workshop Put down the pipette and pick up the pen: Getting your work published The third part of the story... The.
Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.
ROLE OF THE REVIEWER ESSA KAZIM. ROLE OF THE REVIEWER Refereeing or peer-review has the advantages of: –Identification of suitable scientific material.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 11: Addressing Reviews/Revisions.
On manuscript preparation and journal submission: Case of MTL and JRME Shuk-kwan S. Leung National Sun Yat-sen University June 20th,
Student Research Conference 2011 Submitting a Research Conference Proposal.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 13: Submission for Publication.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 10: Faculty/Peer Reviews.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Statistics Education Research Journal Publishing in the Statistics Education Research Journal Robert C. delMas University of Minnesota Co-Editor Statistics.
Writing a Good Journal Paper Cecilia Wong Professor of Spatial Planning and Director of Centre for Urban Policy Studies The University of Manchester
Academic Writing for Publication and Academic English at National Research Tomsk State University November 2014/February 2015.
Writing and Reviewing Papers for Medical Physics
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Writing a research paper in science/physics education The first episode! Apisit Tongchai.
Give Your Online Teaching a JOLT Michelle Pilati, PhD Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Preparing papers for International Journals Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh 20 April 2005.
Presented at Innovations, March 6, 2012 How to Get your Idea Published Dr. Deborah L. Floyd Editor-in-Chief, Community College Journal of Research & Practice,
The Annotated Bibliography
Publishing your work Güliz Ger Bilkent Üniversitesi.
Ginny Smith Managing Editor: Planning and Urban Studies Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
2011 NASPA Annual Conference  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  March 12–16, 2011 Publishing in NASPA's Scholarly Journals: NASPA Journal About Women in Higher.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.
June 2013 Melodie Cook, Editor, JALT Journal. Overview Conference Proceedings The Language Teacher JALT Journal.
Online Editorial Management On-line Management of Scholarly Journals Mahmoud Saghaei.
Research Methods and Techniques Lecture 8 Technical Writing 1 © 2004, J S Sventek, University of Glasgow.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
AERA Annual Meeting, April 16, 2012 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Ethical Issues and Understanding the Review Process.
THE REVIEW PROCESS –HOW TO EFFECTIVELY REVISE A PAPER David Smallbone Professor of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, SBRC, Kingston University Associate.
REVIEWING MANUSCRIPTS TIPS FOR REVIEWING MANUSCRIPTS IN PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS Bruce Lubotsky Levin, DrPH, MPH Associate Professor & Head Dept. of Community.
Managing the process Toward graduation Yijia Jing Mar 13, 2007 Chinese Politics and Diplomacy Program.
FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.
Microsoft Innovative Teacher Awards READ THIS CAREFULLY The following slides provide you with guidelines for the content of your Innovative Teacher Awards.
Intensive Course in Research Writing: Session 1 (27 June 2011)
Natasha Floersch Journal Manager American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
April, 2012 How to publish your college’s big ideas and innovations Dr. Deborah L. Floyd Editor-in-Chief, Community College Journal of Research & Practice,
Scientific Writing Scientific Papers – Original Research Articles “A scientific paper is a written and published report describing original research.
Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication.
Faculty Advisor: Dr. Tama Hasson Co-Editors-in-Chief: Peter Nauka Leslie Chang.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
The “TO DO” List for Research Papers Revise materials and methods- should fit what actually happened. Groups may need to change “process.” Ex: the group.
1 Oxford Professional Education Group Ltd Mastering Metrics An Introduction.
CPD 3 - Advanced Publishing Skills 1 - How to Get Published and to Continue to Get Published in Leading Academic Journals Professor Tarani Chandola with.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
Journal of International Marketing
GETTING PUBLISHED IN URBAN LIBRARY JOURNAL
A Journal of the International Reading Association Becky Groothuis
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
Writing for Publication: It’s Easier Than You Think
The employability network stars
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
The Annotated Bibliography
Student Research Conference 2019
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Presentation transcript:

Giving Your Vitae a JOLT Michelle Pilati Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry Professor of Mechanical Engineering University of Memphis

What IS JOLT? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Peer-reviewed online journal Published quarterly Papers of interest to the online learning community

A Brief History Conceived in New Orleans – 2003 Formal Board Approval at MIC in 2004 First Issue Online – July 2005 Eight issues published to date

Growth Trends

JOLT's Mission The objectives of MERLOT JOLT are to: Enable faculty to use technology effectively in teaching and learning by learning from a community of researchers and scholars; Enable academic programs to design and deploy academic technology to optimize teaching and learning; Build a community around the research and scholarly use of multimedia educational resources.

JOLT's Mission JOLT welcomes papers on all aspects of the use of online multimedia educational resources for learning and teaching. Topics may include, but are not limited to: learning theory and the use of multimedia to improve student learning; instructional design theory and application; online learning and teaching initiatives; use of technology in education; innovative learning and teaching practices.

Types of Papers JOLT seeks Research Papers: Full-length papers concerned with the scholarly use of multimedia educational resources in learning and teaching. These papers discuss the literature on the scholarly use of multimedia resources in teaching. They show applications in actual online teaching situations, and include some measure of the learning impact on students.

Types of Papers JOLT seeks Theoretical/Conceptual Papers: These papers present non-empirical work related to the scholarly use of multimedia resources in teaching and learning in order to determine major issues of importance for future research, to understand these issues in relation to theory and application, to find the frontier of research on a problem, to relate a problem to existing theory, or to put a conceptualized problem in the context of previous research.

Types of Papers JOLT seeks Position Papers: Describe a problem or an issue with a suggested solution or direction. These papers should support the position with both a logical argument and a review of the theory and/or the research literature. Case Studies: Case studies highlight a particular instructional challenge and setting in which multimedia resources were used to address that challenge. Instructional Design Notes: Brief papers that describe a new online learning object and may include a MERLOT peer review or suggestions for use in the classroom.

Guidelines for Authors Electronic submission Microsoft Word 6000 words maximum APA Style Elements

Submission Deadlines February 28 th for June Issue May 31 st for September Issue August 31 st for December Issue November 30 th for March Issue

Peer Review Process Currently two reviewers assigned to each manuscript Blind Reviews Reviewers use a set of criteria developed by JOLT Editorial Board

Peer Review Process Reviewers asked to make general comments and specific revision recommendations Reviewers asked for a publication recommendation Editors use reviews to make final publication decision

Peer Review Criteria The paper is appropriate for JOLT. The paper is both useful and relevant to online learning and teaching. The paper has theoretical or pedagogical value. The paper adds significantly to the literature of online learning and teaching.

Peer Review Criteria The paper follows the JOLT Guidelines for Authors. The material in the paper is current. The paper is well organized and its conclusions well supported.

Peer Review Criteria The paper provides adequate documentation. The included links and media files enhance the paper. The paper makes good use of the electronic medium. The illustrations, figures, and tables are necessary and adequate.

Types of Review Recommendations Accept without revision Accept with minor revision; does not require reconsideration by peer reviewer Major revision needed; must revise and resubmit for reconsideration by peer reviewer Not suitable for publication in JOLT

Review Summary Sent to author of each paper Summarizes the blind reviews Includes a rating on each review criterion and comments from each reviewer Editors also provide a summary of “required revisions” for publication

Manuscript Revision Process Review Summary typically sent to authors within two months of submission deadline Once conditional acceptance is received, one month is allotted for final revisions The process moves very quickly due to the use of online submission and reviews

Suggestions for Potential Authors Review articles from previous issues for style, approach, appropriate topics etc. Follow JOLT Guidelines Use APA Style for citations, etc. Look over Review Criteria Avoid “first person” (e.g. “I”, “We”, “our”…) Provide a Conclusion section Submit manuscript before deadline passes!

JOLT Special Issue – June 2008 Next Generation Learning/Course Management Systems Open source vs commercial environments Faculty/Student/IDS/IT perspectives Social Knowledge and the L/CMS A 'Second Life': the role of Virtual Worlds in new learning environments

JOLT Special Issue – June 2008 Next Generation Learning/Course Management Systems Best practices in teaching within the L/CMS Engaging learners: features of the L/CMS that contribute to meaningful learning New options in creating synchronous e- learning

JOLT Special Issue – June 2008 Next Generation Learning/Course Management Systems Next Generation "smart" system features for the L/CMS e-Portfolio thinking as L/CMS The place of reusability in the closed course shell Web 2.0, Personal Learning Environments and the L/CMS

Questions??