Figure 1. Estimated yearly natural production of all races of adult Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley. 1952 - 1966 and 1992 - 2003 numbers are from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPEARING STRIPED BASS CALIFORNIA 2013 Resources: CDFW (Ocean) section Diving, Spearfishing (a) No person may possess or use a spear within 100 yards.
Advertisements

Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers Clear Creek and Pete King Creek ( ) Jill Olson USFWS.
Applications of long term fish monitoring in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to salmonid restoration efforts Rick Wilder Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring.
Iron Gate Hatchery California Department of Fish and Game Anadromous Fish Hatcheries.
Supplementation with local, natural-origin broodstock may minimize negative fitness impacts in the wild Initial results of this study were published in.
ESCAPEMENT GOALS? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING ‘SCAPEMENT GOALS! Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Rachel C. Johnson Cramer Fish Sciences & University of California Davis The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: Can hatchery and natural.
PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh.
Genetic Population Structure of Chinook Salmon in the California Central Valley Scott M. Blankenship, Christophe Lemaire, John Carlos Garza Southwest Fisheries.
Fish Mercury Project Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DEVELOPING SAFE EATING GUIDELINES.
California Hydroelectric Background Information by Lon W. House, Ph.D June 5, 2003 California Energy Commission.
Figure 3. The percent of natural production during the doubling period ( ) in relation to the baseline period ( ). Data were unavailable.
California State Water Project & MWD Tours. The Issue…..  The vast majority of water in the State of California falls in the top 1/3 of the state (north.
A Climate Driven Model of the Water Resources of The Sacramento and San Joaquin Hydrologic Regions: Model Structure and Data Inputs Brian Joyce, Stockholm.
Sediment Removal as a Water Management Strategy 2014 Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June 13, 2014.
Stephanie Carlson 1 and William Satterthwaite 2 1 Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, UC Berkeley 2 NOAA-Fisheries, Santa Cruz Managing.
Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Environmental Factors Affecting Salmon Production Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division Dave Seiler.
Stanislaus River An overview…. History and Background One of largest tributaries to San Joaquin River Development of Basin began during the Gold Rush.
California Department of Fish and Game Input to the CVPIA (b)(2) Decision Process Russell J. Bellmer Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and.
California Steelhead – End of The Rainbow Katie Perry Steelhead Restoration & Management Program.
Implementation of the Biological Opinion for Russian River Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance National Marine Fisheries Service.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Stock Status of Steelhead In California Katie Perry, California Department of Fish and Game.
Method to Develop Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Bay-Delta Workshop Erin Ragazzi March 19, 2014.
AFRP Area of Coverage Paynes and Antelope Creek Antelope Creek: 123 square miles Fall-run Chinook, spring-run Chinook, steelhead. 32 miles.
Periodic Review of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Comments of The Bay Institute on.
By: Scott Rakes February 18, 2010 Endangered Species.
Comments on Proposed Methods to Develop Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Prepared for SWRCB March 19, 2014 Valerie.
Russian River Salmonids Sean White MCRRFC&WCID. Salmonid 101 Taxonomy Life cycle Ecology Run timing Distribution Population status Recovery Efforts Questions.
Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program 1 California Estuary Monitoring Workgroup, July U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lodi, CA.
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
NODOS Sacramento River Sediment Transport Characteristics- Implications for NODOS River Diversions to Sites Reservoir.
Species or RunONDJFMAMJJAS Fall Chinook Late fall Chinook Winter Chinook Spring Chinook Steelhead Delta smelt Figure 1. Comparison of the timing of life.
Is there evidence for stock segregation in Chinook salmon during ocean residence? Indicators of survival: reconstruction of juvenile size-at-emigration.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.
Deltakeeper Other Changes for the Program of Implementation (Issue 11) SWRCB D-1641 Workshop March 2005 Deltakeeper by Dan Bowman Odenweller Fishery Biologist.
1 December 19, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage Project Overview State of California Department of Water Resources U.S. Department of the Interior.
CVPIA §3406(b)(2) Water Operations on the Sacramento River Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2012.
Release Strategies to Improve Post-Release Performance of Hatchery Summer Steelhead in Northeast Oregon. Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
DeltaKeeper a project of WaterKeepers Northern California Dan B. Odenweller Fishery Biologist
California Anadromous Fish. There are 5 Native Species of Salmon in California Chinook Chum Pink Coho Sockeye.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Technical Memo #1 Estimation of Returns of Naturally Produced Coho to the Klamath River Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Brian Pyper Ian Courter.
VALLEY ECO CONNECTION Harmony School Natural Science Academy Spring, 201 Spring, 2011 Maureen McCorry
California Department of Fish and Game Klamath-Trinity Project Klamath Basin Chinook Salmon Spawning Escapement, Harvest and Age Composition Fish and Game.
Potential Effects of Mark-Selective Fisheries on Central Valley Salmon Brian Pyper and Steve Cramer Cramer Fish Sciences.
2012 Central Valley Salmon Sport Fishing Regulations California Department of Fish and Game California Fish and Game Commission March 7, 2012.
Estuaries Portal DRAFT Mock-up of Fish Content (This is content developed by several CEMW group members and has not been approved)
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Estimating Groundwater and Surface Water Interactions Using Groundwater Depth August 29, 2017 Kirk Klausmeyer SENIOR SPATIAL DATA SCIENTIST.
DRAFT revised Goal = 990,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Average
Aroon Melwani, Shira Bezalel, Jennifer Hunt, Letitia Grenier,
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
2011 CV Salmon Season.
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 1 November 2018
Steelhead stock status in Idaho 2008 update
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
California Department of Fish and Game
Brett Kormos, MR Melodie Palmer-Zwahlen, MR Alice Low, FB
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Estimated yearly natural production of all races of adult Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 495, Average = 511,462 Estimated number of all races of adult Chinook DRAFT Goal = 990,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 2. Estimated yearly natural production of adult fall-run Chinook salmon in the Central Valley, and in river escapements and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average =374, Average = 472,880 Estimated number of adult of fall-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 750,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 3. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of winter-run Chinook salmon in the Central Valley numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 55, Average = 6,284 Estimated number of adult winter-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 110,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available

Figure 4. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of late-fall-run Chinook salmon in the Central Valley – 2003 numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( )are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 34, Average = 19,223 Estimated number of adult late-fall Chinook DRAFT Goal = 68,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available

Figure 5. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of spring-run Chinook salmon in the Central Valley and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 34, Average =15,762 Estimated number of adult spring-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 68,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available

Figure 6. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Sacramento River fall-run Chinook salmon and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 116, Average = 73,973 Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook, DRAFT Goal = 230,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Hatchery escapement only,

Figure 7. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Sacramento River late-fall-run Chinook salmon numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Note that the doubling goal in the Final Restoration Plan is not double the arithmetic mean as calculated in CHINOOKPROD Average = 34, Average = 18,686 Estimated number of adult late-fall-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 44,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available Goal = 69,022 (Doubling the mean calculated in CHINOOKPROD) 1996 = 107, 1997 = 0

Figure 8. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Sacramento River spring-run Chinook salmon numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 29, Average = 583 Estimated number of adult spring-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 59,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available

Figure 9. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 54, Average = 6,284 Estimated number of adult winter-run Chinook DRAFT Goal = 110,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Data not available

Figure 10. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Clear Creek fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1961, , 1979 and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 3, Average = 6,962 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 7,100 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 11. Estimated yearly adult natural production, and in river adult escapements of Cottonwood Creek fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1952, , and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 2,995 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 5,900 (Final Restoration Plan) Average = 3,

Figure 12. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Cow Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1952, 1961, 1963, , , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 2,370 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 4,600 (Final Restoration Plan) Average = 0

Figure 13. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Battle Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Coleman National Fish Hatchery on the creek. Hatchery proportion = Average = 5, Average = 23,278 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook The high adult escapement numbers compared to production estimates indicates a hatchery contribution to the in-river numbers. Goal = 10,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 14. Estimated yearly natural production calculated from hatchery returns (in river returns were not available), and hatchery returns of Battle Creek adult late-fall-run Chinook salmon numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). = data was not available for , , 1984 and Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Goal = 550 (Final Restoration Plan) Coleman National Fish Hatchery on the creek. Hatchery proportion = Average = Average = 644 DRAFT Estimated number of adult late-fall-run Chinook The high adult escapement numbers compared to production estimates indicates a hatchery contribution to the in-river numbers.

Figure 15. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Paynes Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , , , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 167 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 330 (Final Restoration Plan) Average =

Figure 16. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Antelope Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1952, 1959, 1961, , 1987,1990, 1991, and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 364 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 720 (Final Restoration Plan) Average = 0

Figure 17. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Deer Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1955, 1961, , 1995, 1996, and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = Average = 1,051 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 1,500 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 18. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Deer Creek adult spring-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , , 1977, 1979, 1984, and , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 3, Average = 2,997 DRAFT Estimated number of adult spring-run Chinook Goal = 6,500 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 19. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Mill Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1990, , and and 1992 – 2003 numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers (1967 – 1991) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 2, Average = 2,716 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 4,200 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 20. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Mill Creek adult spring-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , , 1976, 1979, and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 2, Average = 1,282 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 4,400 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 21. Estimated yearly natural production of miscellaneous creeks adult fall-run Chinook salmon above RBDD. = data was not available for 1952, , , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 553 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Miscellaneous creeks above RBDD include Spring Gulch, China Gulch, Olney, Ash, Stillwater, and Inks creeks (Mills and Fisher). Bear Creek numbers are included in the Mills and Fisher numbers, but not sited as one of the miscellaneous creeks. Goal = 1,100 (Final Restoration Plan) Average =

Figure 22. Estimated yearly natural production of miscellaneous creeks adult fall-run Chinook salmon below RBDD. = data was not available for , 1970, 1978, 1979, and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 498 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Miscellaneous creeks between RBDD and Princeton Ferry include Salt, Craig, Dye, Toomes, Thomes, Coyote, Stoney, and Singer Creek. These creeks are not included in Mills and Fisher, but listed in Grand Tab. Goal = not set (Final Restoration Plan) Average =

Figure 23. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Butte Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , , 1973, 1977, , 1984, 1986,1987, , and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers (1967 – 1991) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = Average = 2,140 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 1,500 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 24. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Butte Creek adult spring-run Chinook salmon and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). = data was not available for , and Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 1, Average = 11,266 DRAFT Estimated number of adult spring-run Chinook The Butte Creek is one of the tributaries where restoration work has been conducted since Goal = 2,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 25. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Big Chico Creek adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , , and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 242 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 800 (Final Restoration Plan) Average =

Figure 26. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Big Chico Creek adult spring-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , 1970, 1972, , , , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Goal = has not been set. Mills and Fisher did not list this run; data was from Grand Tab only Average = 144 DRAFT Estimated number of adult spring-run Chinook Average =

Figure 27. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Feather River adult fall-run Chinook salmon. In-river escapements were not available for 1990 and and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Feather River State Fish Hatchery on the river. Hatchery proportion = Average = 84, Average = 131,161 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 170,000 (Final Restoration Plan) Hatchery escapement only

Figure 28. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Yuba River adult fall-run Chinook salmon baseline numbers are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). = data was not available for Average = 33, Average = 44,087 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 66,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 29. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Bear River adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , and Numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004) Average = 637 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 450 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 30. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of American River adult fall-run Chinook salmon , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Nimbus State Fish Hatchery on the river. Hatchery proportion = Average =81, Average = 147,151 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 160,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 31. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Mokelumne River adult fall-run Chinook salmon. In river escapement numbers were not available for – 1966 and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Mokelumne River State Fish Hatchery on the river. Hatchery proportion = Average = 4, Average = 8,836 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 9,300 (Final Restoration Plan) Hatchery escapement only

Figure 32. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Cosumnes River adult fall-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for 1952, 1959, 1961, , 1982, 1986, 1987, , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 1,697 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 3,300 (Final Restoration Plan) Average=

Figure 33. Estimated yearly natural production of Calaveras River adult winter-run Chinook salmon. = data was not available for , 1977, 1979 – 1983, and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) were not available Average = 780 DRAFT Estimated number of adult winter-run Chinook Goal = 2,200 (Final Restoration Plan) Average = 0

Figure 34. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Stanislaus River adult fall-run Chinook salmon – 1966, and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). = data was not available for Average = 10, Average = 7,750 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 22,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 35. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Tuolumne River adult fall-run Chinook salmon , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 19, Average = 10,977 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 38,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 36. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of Merced River adult fall-run Chinook salmon , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). = data was not available for , and Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994). Merced River State Fish Hatchery on the river. Hatchery proportion = Average = 9, Average = 9,684 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = 18,000 (Final Restoration Plan)

Figure 37. Estimated yearly natural production, and in river escapements of San Joaquin System adult fall-run Chinook salmon. The San Joaquin System is the sum of the Stanislaus, Tuolumne, and Merced Rivers , and numbers are from CDFG Grand Tab (February 5, 2004). Baseline numbers ( ) are from Mills and Fisher (CDFG, 1994) Average = 38, Average = 28,410 DRAFT Estimated number of adult fall-run Chinook Goal = has not been set