Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Funding Monitoring in 2006 – the Programs role in a West Coast Partnership November 16, 2005.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

11 Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish-Wit Project #: Aja DeCoteau, CRITFC Watershed Department Manager.

Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)

Upper Willamette River Recovery Planning WITHIN OUR REACH New Partnerships for a Healthier Willamette December

Using the Open Standards to Advance Puget Sound Recovery Kari Stiles, PhD Puget Sound Partnership Conservation Measures Partnership Oct 7-9, 2014.

Columbia River Toxics Reduction Working Group 2012 Regional Roundtable: Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center.

Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.

Cedar River Instream Flow Management Balancing Certainty and Flexibility.

Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)

Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)

Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.

Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.

8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

BUILDING STRONG SM 1 Columbia River Salmon and Federal Columbia River Power System Rock Peters Senior Program Manager.

2010 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Yakima River Basin Study June 16, 2010 Joel Hubble, Technical Projects Biologist Columbia-Cascades Area.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Integration and Collaboration A Simple Networked Information System.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.

Salmon Recovery Status Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Linda Byers September 14, 2005.

Lecture 8: Introduction to Stock Assessment

PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.

PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.

Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

Fiscal Year 2004 April 10, FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004 EnactedBudgetBudget COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Land.

Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.

Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.

Climate Change Impacts in the Interior Columbia Basin.

Draft HCP Review Primer.  Manages 2.6 million acres of aquatic lands for the benefit of all citizens of the state - a unique, distinct role among governments.

Government Management Accountability & Performance Program Natural Resources Cabinet Presentation October 6 th, 2010 A Healthy Puget Sound By 2020.

Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Oregon Steelhead Status, Recovery Planning and Monitoring Kevin Goodson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting.

Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.

Establishing a Network of Intensively Monitored Watersheds in the Pacific Northwest PNAMP Effectiveness Monitoring Workgroup April 7, 2005.

October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.

Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.

BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

ODFW Framework Fish Habitat Distribution Data Development April 29, 2015.

Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.

Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.

Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.

North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

Five basic objectives of ISTM

Blaine D. Ebberts Presented at the NPCC Science to Policy Exchange

Recommendations from the SMC Bioassessment Workgroup

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan 2011 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Central Washington University Ellensburg,

North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019

Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected and

Presentation transcript:

Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board May 4, 2012

ISTM Goals I.Develop an integrated status and trends monitoring design for ESA-listed salmon and steelhead and their ecosystems. II.Demonstrate utility of approach and design using Lower Columbia River Recovery Domain as demonstration area.

Why the Lower Columbia? ESA listed chum, coho, Chinook salmon, steelhead, and bull trout Draft recovery plans need integrated & coordinated monitoring Multi-jurisdictional (OR, WA, COE, NOAA, USGS, USFS, YN, CTWSR)

Project Partners

Five Objectives of ISTM 1.Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives 2.Determine adequacy of existing programs, potential efficiencies, existing gaps 3.Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols, and analytical tools 4.Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for monitoring including priorities and range of budgets 5.Recommendations for implementation, data management, reporting, and adaptive management

Fish Component Progress and Successes Completed Objectives 1 and 2 Policy-level commitment and involvement – Committed to the overall process – Development of priority management questions – Review of methods and results Additional agencies expressing interest in using process and tools in other areas

Habitat Component Progress and Successes Nearing completion of Objectives 1 and 2 In process of reviewing existing monitoring programs, the attributes they measure, spatial coverage, and current ability to share data Policy-level commitment and involvement – Committed to the overall process – Development of priority management questions Additional programs added to expand scope Integration with stormwater status and trends monitoring efforts

Tool and Process Development Scoring process for VSP parameters and special cases Scoring of existing monitoring programs based on how well programs meet precision and bias goals Tool for developing appropriate sample frame Master Sample Designer website in development

Successes and Challenges Applicability of process and tools for use in other areas Additional funding to expand process to integrate stormwater status and trends monitoring efforts Alignment between Oregon and Washington will provide greater efficiencies Review of existing programs can shed light on need for improvement Successes Difficult to maintain momentum Complex processes take time Limited staff availability among agencies Challenges