Power Distribution System R&D at SLAC Christopher Nantista ILC08 Chicago, Illinois November 18, 2008...........

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Chapter 2 Waveguide Components & Applications
ILC Waveguide Production Industrialization Study Marc Ross AWLC14 May 15, 2014 Fermilab.
April SCRF Meeting FNAL08 S.Fukuda 1 HLRF Summary and Work Assignment S. FUKUDA KEK.
KCS Ongoing R&D Christopher Nantista SLAC LCWS11 Granada, Spain September 29, …… …… …… … ….
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
RF Synchronisation Issues
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Technology Meeting July 28, 2010 REPORT.
Christopher Nantista SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
SPIE Conference - Photonics Applications in Industry and Research, Warsaw, 30 August, The RF Power Coupler Development Program at LAL-Orsay and.
US-ILC Waveguide Industrialization Study
Christopher Nantista Chris Adolphsen SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
November LCWS08 S. Fukuda 1 KEK HLRF Status and S1- global S. FUKUDA KEK.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Chris Adolphsen 10/03/09 MLI and HLRF Summary. Vladimir Kashikhin.
High Power RF Systems, Control and Distribution in the HINS Alfred Moretti, Brian Chase, Chris Jensen and Peter Prieto Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Vladimir Kashikhin. FLASH Cavity Gradient Stability Comparison of beam-off measurements of pulse-to-pulse cavity gradient jitter during the flattop.
Status of KEK STF-HLRF S. Fukuda KEK. October 1 HLRF KOM S.Fukuda 2 Stuffs of HLRF&LLRF(RF group in KEK Linac team) Leader S. Fukuda Modulator M. Akemoto,
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
1 SPL Collaboration Meeting dec 08 - WG1 Introduction First SPL Collaboration Meeting Working Group 1 High Power RF Distribution System Introduction.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
Power Distribution System (PDS) Design and R&D Status Christopher Nantista SLAC SCRF Fermilab April 24, 2008.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Summery of the power coupler session at the LCWS13 workshop E. Kako W.-D. Möller H. Hayano A. Yamamoto All members of SCRF WG November 14, 2013.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
Detail plan of S1-Global H. Hayano (KEK),
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Vector Control Algorithm for Efficient Fan-out RF Power Distribution Yoon W. Kang SNS/ORNL Fifth CW.
HLRF R&D Towards the TDR Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Webex meeting June 29, 2011.
Summary of Relative RF Distribution Costs with Gradient Considerations (Work in Progress) Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
Preparation procedure and RF processining of cERL-ML power coupler at KEK Hiroshi Sakai, Takaaki Furuya, Masato Sato, Kenji Shinoe, Kensei Umemori, Kazuhiro.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
RFQ coupler S. Kazakov 07/28/2015. Requirements: Coupler requirements Expected problems: Heating (loop, ceramic window, etc.) Multipactor Solutions: Appropriate.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
Waveguide Heat Loads Christopher Nantista SLAC Main Linac – KOM Fermilab September 28, 2007 W.K.H. Panofsky
Christopher Nantista SLAC Project X Workshop November 12, 2007 Fermilab.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
ILC High Power Distribution
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
NC Accelerator Structures
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Presentation transcript:

Power Distribution System R&D at SLAC Christopher Nantista ILC08 Chicago, Illinois November 18,

TUNNEL PENETRATION KLYSTRON (10 MW, ms) MODULATOR (120 kV, 130 A) 3-dB HYBRIDS LLRF WR770WR m quad QUAD 9 CAVITIES 3 CRYOMODULES 9 CAVITIES4 CAVITIES LOADS VARIABLE TAP-OFFS (VTO’s) Layout of ACD High-Power RF Power Distribution System (PDS) fewer types of splitters (2 vs. 9) – simplicity, cost reduction power division adjustable by pairs – improved gradient/power efficiency permits elimination of (most) circulators – cost and transmission loss reduction 2 level splitting with VTO’s and hybrids BENEFITS OVER LINEAR BCD:

circulator load VTO window turned for visibility load phase shifter hybrid purge inlet bi-directional coupler flex guide COMPONENTS (by vendor): SLAC – VTO’s & hybrids S.P.A. Ferrite – isolators, loads, phase shifters & directional couplers Mega – mitered bends, straights & semi-flex guides Ibfm – modified pillbox windows Pacific Rubber & Packing – Mark VI Gask-O-Seal waveguide gaskets Modular 2-Cavity PDS Unit for NML Pressurized to 2 bar abs. (14.5 psig)

RF PDS Unit The first (of 4) 2-cavity units of our RF power distribution system for Fermilab’s first NML cryomodule is delivered. The other three are complete and about to be high- power tested and shipped. When installed, the front wall of the 80/20  frame will be removed, and the U-bends reversed to go under the remaining wall.

Cold Test of PDS Unit S 11 = dB (0.005%) S 21 = dB (50.72%) S 31 = dB (23.35%) S 41 = dB (23.57%) VTO set for 3 rd cavity pair (~3 dB).

Phases of S 31 and S 41 initially within 1.7° (1.5 mm) of each other (adjustable with phase shifter). Module through phase error = ~-6.7° (easily absorbed in next modules phase shifters). 2.36% of power missing (expect ~3% from meas. and est. component losses) Pair power division between cavity feeds equal to within 1%. Slightly more than ½ power sent through to allow for downstream losses. POWER: PHASE: SPACING: Feed spacing measures ~1.3827m, 1 mm short (semi-flex guides can absorb). Module length measures ~2.7674m, exact to measurement resolution. Measurement Analysis

High Power Test of PDS Unit The CM1-UNIT 3 Assembly (~3 dB) was high power tested, 3 bar and then 2 bar press. Power was stepped up to  1.5 MW, 1.2 ms (our maximum pulse width) so each feed saw at least 360 kW (~10% more than needed for 35 MV/m, 9 mA acceleration at ILC). In addition to the reflected signal near the klystron, power was interlocked to missing energy signals comparing the system input to each feeds forward dir. cplr. signal to protect against breakdowns downstream of the circulators. We ran both as shown and then again with the test loads replaced with shorts for worst case full reflection. The phase shifters were moved at full power to shift the standing wave.

Phase shifter test at high power w/ shorts. 200 steps = 1 turn = 1 mm. High Power Test Data ~24 hour stability test at 1.5 MW, 1.2 ms, shorted. Dips represent discontinuities in operation (we can’t run unmanned). The temperature of the circulator is fairly stable at the ~86° F spec. We detected no rf breakdowns during PDS high power testing.

nC n = P c / P i  n =1/2 sin -1  C n 11/415.00° 21/317.63° 31/222.50° ° nC n = P c / P i  n =1/2 sin -1  C n ° ° ° ° nC n = P c / P i  n =1/2 sin -1  C n ° ° ° ° Nominal: Accounting for estimated transmission losses: Accounting for transmission losses and tailoring gradients: T = ~0.986 G 1 = 26.6 MV/m G 2 = 31.1 MV/m G 3 = 30.6 MV/m G 4 = 22.5 MV/m T = ~0.986 Setting the VTO Couplings lower gradient limit in each cavity pair The couplings of the VTO (variable tap-off) is mechanically adjusted by rotation of its central section. The four VTO’s along an 8-cavity cryomodule should be set as follows, in order of power flow. rotatable flanges unit transmission efficiency

8” 7.207” 8.793” 8” 7.207” 8.793” 8” with beam (need circulators) without circulators (no beam) 1.586” = g /8 8” 7.207” 8.793” 8” Running w/ Beam or w/o Circulators Because the first NML cryomodules have cavity spacing m (6 0 ), rather than m ( ), the cavities must be fed with the same phase for synchronism with the relativistic beam. The hybrid introduces a  /2 phase difference, which must be removed by asymmetric feeds. This destroys the hybrid reflection cancellation, so we need to retain circulators here for beam operation. However, we’d like to test circulatorless operation, e.g. cavity field stability, even if without beam. Our U-bends are designed to allow operation in either mode by a simple reconfiguration. rearrange pieces

Cavity Simulation Without Circulators Simulated cavity field “flat-tops” with imperfect isolation between hybrid-coupled cavities at coupling phases 0 and  /2. Pairs of colors represent the pair of cavities. Omitting circulators can result in higher inter-cavity coupling. To get a feel for the effect on field stability, numerical simulations were done. Identical, perfect cavities and a lossless, symmetric hybrid coupling network with equal coupling but imperfect port isolation were assumed Achievable hybrid port isolation: -42—48 dB (based on 4 SLAC and 1 MEGA hybrid measured) → transient gradient variation < ~0.001%  = 0  =  /2

reflection: dB Alumina:  = 9.37 tan  = → t = 1.525” Dielectric Plug Window r=0.500” t=1.525” transmission: dB (99.89%) heating: 0.11%  650kW  1.6ms  5Hz=5.72 W E pk (720kW) = 338 kV/mH pk (650kW) = 2.72 kA/m 1.553” (39.45mm) ceramic 0.44” Cu plating WR650 flange aluminum holder dB dB -36 dB 1.3 GHz Minimum: GHz We’ve developed a simple, cheaper, more compact substitute for the pillbox window. RF DESIGN MECHANICAL DESIGN Ceramic blocks with rounded edges are ground to the design thickness and then thickly plated around the edge with copper and placed in shrink-fit holder flanges. The gaskets seal to the copper and lock it in place dB dB transmission loss: 0.1–0.3% COLD TEST

circulator plug window turned for visibility load phase shifter tee purge inlet bi-directional coupler flex guide VTO U-bend PDS Unit for NML Cryomodule 2 Planned Changes: replace pillbox window with ceramic plug window replace hybrid with shunt tee replace double E-plane bends with single U-bend (eliminate flange joint) 2 nd cryomodule also has wrong cavity spacing for circulatorless beam operation We’ll also explore making VTO fabrication more economical.

E e (extracted) E t (transmitted) Tailoring Power Distribution with Spacers and 3 dB Hybrids If  1 and  2 are changed in opposite senses by half the desired , the coupled and through phases are unaffected as the amplitudes are adjusted. 3 dB 2 equal amplitude inputs

 L/4 (2 U-bends) ± ” ± ” ± ” ± 0.000” - ± ”.00881”/degree in thickness of spacers Nominal Set (2 each) ”0.2072” ”0.7357” ”0.8285”1.0000” T = 1.000” ±  L/4 Adjust for system losses and for specific desired relative power levels. Insert between flanges and connect with single set of long bolts or threaded rods. Half Spacer Thickness Difference (inch) Coupling (Tapoff Fraction) spacer thicknesses

Configuration With Cavity Pair Power Tailoring Requires circulators, 7 different hybrids, and 7 different waveguide connections. Requires circulators, 8 3dB hybrids, and 8 waveguide T’s. Requires 8 3dB hybrids, 4 waveguide T’s, and pairing of like cavities. Configuration With Fixed Cavity Power Configuration With Individual Cavity Power Tailoring replaces VTO (& phase shifters?)