SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Radio Astronomy Observatory June 13/14, 2005 EVLA Phase II Proposal Review EVLA Phase II Computing Development Bryan Butler (EVLA System Engineer.
Advertisements

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array.
The North America ALMA Science Center (NAASC) John Hibbard NA ARC Manager (NRAO/NAASC) National Research Council Canada ESO ALMA Community Meeting, Garching,
EVLA Computing Schedule, Staffing, Testing, Tracking.
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
Jim UlvestadEVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad Array Science Center Concept (Requirements) Staffing and Cost Plans.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
Portal and Proposal Submission Review of SSS Software Readiness for SRO, June 5, 2009 Bryan Butler EVLA Computing Division Head.
EVLA Computing Overview Gareth Hunt EVLA Advisory Committee 2002 June
EVLA Early Science: Shared Risk Observing EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
ALMA Operations and the North American ALMA Science Center Al Wootten NRAO.
ALMA Software B.E. Glendenning (NRAO). 2 ALMA “High Frequency VLA” in Chile Presently a European/North American Project –Japan is almost certainly joining.
Doug Tody E2E Perspective EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Software E2E Perspective.
Overall Data Processing Architecture Review EVLA Monitor and Control Interfaces July , 2002EVLA Data Processing PDR Bill Sahr.
N. RadziwillEVLA NSF Mid-Project Report May 11-12, 2006 NRAO End to End (e2e) Operations Division Nicole M. Radziwill.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Transition Operations Claire Chandler.
MWA Operations Management Plan (OMP, v. 3) Ron Remillard (MIT); MWA Project Meeting, June 6, 2011.
NRAO Users Committee Meeting May 20-21, National Radio Astronomy Observatory NRAO Users Committee Meeting – May 20-21, 2008 ALMA Operations Chris.
K. Y. LoEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, 2007 Charge to the Committee K. Y. Lo.
EVLA Transition to Science Operations: An Overview EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Bob Dickman AD, NM Operations.
Gustaaf van MoorselEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, 2006 EVLA Computing Software Overview.
EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2007May22EVLA SAGE Meeting2 Requirements and Goals of EVLA Software Maximize scientific throughput of the instrument At a.
The North American ALMA Science Center North America’s ALMA Regional Center The North American ALMA Science Center acts as the gateway to ALMA for North.
ALMA Week, 2004 March 3-5, in Garmisch, Germany ALMA Operations Plan: Progress Report Darrel Emerson (NRAO) David Silva (ESO) JAO Operations Group
2007Sep06 EAC Butler - Software Overview 1 Software Overview Bryan Butler.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Data Processing Progress.
Introduction to EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2006Dec05/06EVLA M&C Transition Software CDR2 EVLA Computing (Terse) History The original EVLA Phase I proposal.
Gustaaf van MoorselEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Computing Organization/Development.
EVLA Computing Software Overview. Gustaaf van MoorselEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Contents History Organization and staffing Staffing.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Observing with NRAO.
Mark McKinnon NSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Baseline Project Definition Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory NRAO and SKA Fred K. Y. Lo.
Community Activities Budget Justification, Proposal All costs are inflated at 2.5% / year. Costs in years 2 and 4 are higher to hold SITS. Direct Costs:Year.
Bryan ButlerEAC meeting 2003-Sep-091 Computing Issues: Scientific Requirements Bryan Butler EVLA Project Scientist for Software (starting 2003-Oct-01)
RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Software Requirements Michael P. Rupen EVLA Project Scientist for Software rev. 3may06.
N. RadziwillEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, 2006 NRAO End to End (e2e) Operations Division Nicole M. Radziwill.
UlvestadEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Future EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad.
Computing Division FY03 Budget and budget outlook for FY04 + CDF International Finance Committee April 4, 2003 Vicky White Head, Computing Division.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
Gustaaf van MoorselEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Computing End-to-end (E2e) software.
Computing Introduction Gareth Hunt EVLA System PDR 2001 December 04.
Overall Data Processing Architecture EVLA timeline and priorities.
Jim UlvestadEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad Array Science Center Concept Requirements Staffing and Cost Plans.
S.T.MyersEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Data Post-processing Overview Steven T. Myers AIPS++ Project Scientist.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
The North America ALMA Science Center
Bryan Butler EVLA Computing Division Head
EVLA Basic Operations Jim Ulvestad
EVLA Archive The EVLA Archive is the E2E Archive
Committee Charge Fred K.Y. Lo
EVLA Overall Software Design
First Light Science: Observing Strategies
EVLA Computing Software Overview.
Software Requirements
Shared Risk Observing Claire Chandler EVLA SSS Review, June 5, 2009
VLA to EVLA Transition Plan
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Science Advisory Group for EVLA
Software Requirements
Gustaaf van Moorsel September 9, 2003
Software Requirements
Shared Risk Science with the EVLA
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
NRAO End to End Integrated Operations
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009
Observatory Science Operations
EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad
Observatory Science Operations
EVLA Construction Status
Presentation transcript:

SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro

2 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 The need for an Array Science Center The VLA/VLBA currently supply users with raw visibilities, provide some assistance in obs prep and data reduction Expectations of users are much higher these days In 2000 the EVLA Phase I proposal assumed re-use of existing NRAO personnel in Socorro Operations and the Data Management Division (now E2E) to provide full support for users The NAASC will provide full support for ALMA users A similar Science Center is needed for EVLA/VLBA –The EVLA will be an extremely powerful instrument, and we need to provide the support required to ensure it meets its science potential –Users should have similar experiences using all NRAO telescopes How might we achieve these goals? –An Array Science Center to support EVLA/VLBA in Socorro –Or (more likely) an Integrated Science Center for ALMA/EVLA/VLBA (and GBT?) with expertise shared across the observatory

3 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Goals of the ASC (1) A draft plan for an Array Science Center to support the needs of EVLA and VLBA combines services from: –Socorro Scientific Services Division (EVLA and VLBA science support, user support, post-processing software support) –Socorro Operations (e.g., data analysts) –E2E (e.g., archiving, pipelines, algorithm development) –Science and Academic Affairs (postdoc and visitor programs) To address the realities of available resources we divide the primary ASC requirements into “core” functions and “full” functions The goals of the ASC are to provide: –(Full) support of proposal and observation preparation –Pipeline-calibrated data and reference images for at least 80% of EVLA and VLBA observations; science quality images for a well- defined set of standard observing modes and bands –Online archive of raw and pipeline-calibrated data plus reference images, available both from NRAO and via NVO or similar

4 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Goals of the ASC (2) …ASC goals continued: –Robust and portable post-processing data analysis package, including pipelines and algorithms needed for EVLA data –Computing hardware and software capabilities for visitors to produce scientific results for any observation –Expert scientific staff –Full page-charge support, and travel support for observing and data reduction, for eligible US-based investigators using EVLA or VLBA –At least one science symposium highlighting EVLA science per year –Two EVLA/VLBA postdocs per year –A visitor program equivalent to 2 FTEs per year –An instrumentation-renewal budget –A team to develop new cm-wavelength instrumentation both for NRAO telescopes and new community initiatives –An environment supportive of research for its scientific staff

5 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Commonalities with the NAASC Many of the goals of the ASC are clearly in common with the NAASC Some are already shared between EVLA and ALMA –EVLA and ALMA already share support of CASA (post- processing and algorithms) –Archive shared between EVLA and ALMA –Proposal submission, observation preparation Other potential commonality with the NAASC –Postdocs –Visitor program Distribution of instrument support across NRAO sites?

6 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Models for reduction of EVLA data At least initially, it is unlikely users will have the computing capabilities on their desktops to reduce EVLA data (cf. early VLA) Models for supporting reduction of EVLA data: –NRAO staff reduce all EVLA data –All observers come to Socorro to reduce data –Users access computing facilities remotely If NRAO is limited to providing the core functions of the science center, it will also: –Hold regular workshops for users specifically on using the EVLA and associated tools (separate from the Synthesis Imaging Workshops) –Combine workshops with annual science meeting or SIW

7 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Achieving the goals of the ASC Even the “core” functions are beyond what we have traditionally provided for users in the past; core Science Center includes 27 existing NRAO staff plus 12 new hires “Full” science center would require a further 23 FTEs Staffing costs of the ASC (salary and benefits only): –Current staff: $3.2M per annum (2007$) –Additional “core” staff: $1.0M per annum –Additional “full” staff: $1.9M per annum Note: above is distinct from Socorro Operations costs (which includes Array Operations and engineering support); “current” staff above is ~20% of full operations cost of VLA and VLBA

8 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 ASC staffing summary FunctionFTEs in Jan 2000Current FTEsASC/core FTEsASC/full FTEs Management/admin2246 EVLA science support7655 VLBA science support6344 User support services4366 Post-processing support10666 Algorithm development0133 Pipelines0122 Archiving (incl. NVO)0222 Computing maintenance0022 Software support/testing0222 Data services0139 EVLA/VLBA postdocs0006 Scientific visitors0002 Hardware development0005 New initiatives0002 Total:

9 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 Staffing timeline Where we are now: –1 postdoc starting in July (EVLA science support initially) –FY08 “core” needs: 1 scientist for VLBA science support, and 2 for algorithm development; “full” needs: 2 FTEs of visitors

10 SAGE meeting, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Operations vs Commissioning The staffing plan for the ASC aims at achieving appropriate staffing levels for EVLA Operations in 2011 It does not address the needs of EVLA commissioning –We requested 6 FTEs in FY07 for hardware/software commissioning and scientific acceptance tests –We were given 2 FTEs: one postdoc starting in July, one assistant scientist TBD We need more scientists to commission the WIDAR correlator in than the ramp up needed for operations; “expert” visitors over the next couple of years? Full EVLA functionality may not be available until several years after the construction project is complete Advice from SAGE is sought on priorities for observing modes at the start of operations