Summary Session 2 Machine Studies 15/2/2012 Ralph Aβmann & Giulia Papotti Thanks to Frank Zimmermann LHC Performance Workshop, Chamonix, 6-10.2.2012 R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
Advertisements

Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
Sat/Sun 26/27 th March Sat 18h20: Stable beams. Fill #1653. Sun 10h02: Stable beams continued. vdM scans. Length calibrations. 16h59: Beam dump. Delivered.
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.) DayTimeMDEiCMP Tue06: GeV  4 TeV: Ramp for chromaticity - missed A 08:00Ramp down 10: GeV: Large.
Lot’s of time lost due to cryo problem in IR8. Major impact, therefore review of MD program… Start discussion here, please let us know your input. Will.
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
LHC Scrubbing Runs Overview H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, K. Li, L. Mether, A. Romano, G. Rumolo, M. Schenk, G. Arduini ABP information meeting 03/09/2015.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
LSWG day: Impedance and beam induced heating Nicolas Mounet *, Daria Atapovych, Nicolò Biancacci, Elias Métral, Tatiana Pieloni, Stefano Redaelli, Benoit.
LHC progress Report LHCC Wednesday 23 rd March 2011.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Evian 2014 historical perspective run 1: 2010: L peak >10 32 cm -2 s -1  2x10 32 cm -2 s : produce >1 fb -1  delivered.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC Collimation team:R. Assmann, R. Bruce, A. Rossi. Operation team:G.H. Hemelsoet, W. Venturini, V. Kain,
LHC Progress Friday 30 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
09:25 Operator dump fill #2178, integrated lumi 107/108/18 nb-1. Trip of RQ4.R6 (fire heaters discharged) just after the beam dump but the QPS gave no.
S. FartoukhLSWG Day, Monday 18th, ATS MDs for Run II S. Fartoukh for the ATS MD team  Reminder  Goal & overall strategy  Proposals for 2016/
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
Tue 23/8 – Wed 24/8 09:00 Start 90 m optics run – Preparation and verification of the collimation functions – Re-generation of functions for Transverse.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Beam Instability in High Energy Hadron Accelerators and its Challenge for SPPC Liu Yu Dong.
Ion Commissioning: Thursday & Friday
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
MD Planning Fri – Sat (26. – 27.8.)
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Wire, flat beams and beam-beam MDs in 2017
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
MD Report 24 June 2012 Machine coordinators: Barbara Holzer, Mike Lamont MD Coordinators: Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann MD#2 News & Plan.
Friday 07:00 Power glitch on the EDF network. Point 8 affected.
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
Summary of Week 11: 14 – 21 March
Summary of week 44 Aims of week 44 J. Wenninger & J. Uythoven
MD#4 Progress MD Coordinators: Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann
Scrubbing progress - 10/12/2012
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Summary of Week 26 Main aims: G. Arduini, B. Holzer, M. Lamont
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
Overall commissioning strategy for protons (estd. 2005)
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
IP8 aperture measurements (07:30-10:30)
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Another Immortal Fill….
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Presentation transcript:

Summary Session 2 Machine Studies 15/2/2012 Ralph Aβmann & Giulia Papotti Thanks to Frank Zimmermann LHC Performance Workshop, Chamonix, R. Assmann

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Scrubbing with 25ns beam (~40h) has lowered  max to 1.35 ! Again, we are not far from the threshold for 25ns beams, but further scrubbing is needed 3 Start of 25ns beams in LHC 25ns 25ns  max in the uncoated sections: results (25ns) 50ns 50ns 15/2/2012R. Assmann

Lessons and Remarks e-Cloud The operation with high intensity beams in the LHC reduces successfully the secondary emission yield of electrons from the vacuum pipes  Scrubbing works! No show-stopper from e-cloud problems for the LHC:  If the present level of machine conditioning was preserved, ‘ecloud- less’ operation of LHC with 50ns beams up to high intensities should be possible in 2012  2-3 days scrubbing with 25ns beams for 50ns operation – clean parts of LHC open to air and check conditioning of arcs  Scrubbing of arcs for 25ns operation: up to 2 weeks machine time (including also test ramps) Remarks:  More detailed time estimate of scrubbing for 25ns. Possible now?  Scheme with 12.5ns help for scrubbing? Not possible from injectors!?  Would special filling patterns allow more efficient scrubbing? R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Beam-Beam Highlight (W. Herr et al) R. Assmann 15/2/ ns, simulation ns, simulation 2008 MD data 2011

Lessons and Remarks Beam-Beam Beam-beam (bb) in LHC is a critical issue, so far under control, well understood and no surprises:  LHC allows very large bb tune shift: demonstrated bb parameter for two collisions points, a pileup of 35 per collision, lifetime above 30 hours. Well beyond nominal. Avoid noise and modulations.  Long-range bb effects behave like predicted. Provide sufficient separation through a sufficiently large crossing angle.  Luminosity leveling with transverse offsets routinely done ion IP2 and IP8 without detrimental effects. Remarks:  Prepare luminosity levelling with transverse offsets for IR1 and IR5, to be deployed in case of excessive pile-up.  Check the impact of the tilted crossing plane in IR8 on the symmetry of alternate crossing.  Study future possibilities for reduced crossing angle (approach the point where losses become limiting). R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

R. Assmann 15/2/2012 Example: TDI Heating (E. Metral et al) Observed Expected 10 W 100 W 1 kW Power Loss [W] Half Gap [mm] Heating: Resistive + trapped modes Outgassing Damage?

Effect from Ti Coating? R. Assmann 15/2/2012 Observed Power Loss [W] Ti Thickness [  m]

Lessons and Remarks Heating & Impedance RF induced heating observed in several hardware pieces around the LHC ring:  VMTSA (RF bellows with long RF fingers): No impedance problem but heating due to loss of RF contact. Task force. Review all contacts.  TDI (injection protection): Higher than expected heating. Effect from Ti coating? Close only when needed! Add copper coating?  MKI (injection kicker): Heating as expected. Improve cooling?  ALFA (detectors): Only install for low intensity physics? Cooling? Remarks:  Establish the safe maximum intensity for 2012, e.g. during scrubbing.  Add temperature monitoring to the most exposed LHC hardware.  Define the constraints on LHC bunch length to be respected, if any.  Consider replacing long protection devices by several shorter objects, like LHC collimators (avoid issues/damage from thermal expansion of very long jaws). R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

R. Assmann Dynamic range of up to 10 5 with integration time of a few minutes

Lessons and Remarks BI The CERN Beam Instrumentation group operates a high number of distributed/individual instrumentation for the LHC. Overall very good performance in 2011 – MD time vital:  for a better understanding of these systems  to test improvements before making them operational Main Objectives for 2012  BPM: Make the LSS BPMs more reliable  BCT: Finalise dI/dt electronics  LDM: Should be fully automatic with improved fixed display  Wire scanner: Introduce automatic gain & filter settings  BSRT: Achieve 10 times faster bunch-by-bunch measurement  BGI: Provide independent continuous emittance measurement Remarks:  The emittance measurement at 3.5TeV should be a priority. R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

16 What have we learned from Quench Tests? Quench Limits - Chamonix  14R2 quench test (2010)  Wire scanner quench test  Dispersion suppressor quench tests (protons and ions)  Injection quench events We measure BLM signals and lost beam intensity. Monte Carlo simulations allows to conclude about Quench Limits [mJ/cm3]. BLM electronic limit MB,MQ MBRB UFOs MQ MB, MQ, injection DS test ion test (to avoid confusion master/applied thr) 15/2/2012 R.Assmann

17 What have we learned from Quench Tests? Quench Limits - Chamonix /2/2012 R.Assmann

Lessons and Remarks Quench Margin Experimental basis (is considered limited):  10 quenches during scheduled quench tests  3 quench events from irregular injection  3 MD’s in 2011 tests where no quench was achieved (lower limits) Quench tests led to BLM threshold optimiz. (max. factor 5) Beam-induced quenches no issue for 2012 operation. Learn from quenches. Additional quench tests in 2012: UFO quench limit and steady-state. Panel to prioritize requests. Remarks:  Must avoid massive quenches in Decide whether ~4 proposed quenches are acceptable. Try to schedule tests at the end of  Study use of laboratory tests for understanding quench margins instead of LHC beam time.  Management will take final decision on these tests. R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Session Program G. Rumolo: LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25, 50 & 75 ns) W. Herr: Observations of beam-beam effects in MDs in 2011 E. Metral: Beam-induced heating/bunch length/RF and lessons for 2012 R. Jones: Lessons in beam diagnostics M. Sapinski: Quench margins S. Fartoukh: First demonstration with beam of the Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) R. Assmann 15/2/2012

R. Assmann20 Telescopic principle (×4) demonstrated in IR1

Lessons and Remarks ATS For the LHC:  The nominal  * (55 cm) or below (40 cm) is within reach (from the optics point of view)! For the ATS & HL-LHC  So far so good … still a lot of work for 10 cm (local coupling,  - beating, phase-beating corr. at 40 cm, tune knobs & Q-feed-back,…) 2012 plans:  Prepare clean, then safe 40 cm pre-squeezed optics (no X-angle)  Approach, reach & measure the 10 cm   with pilot beam.  If time permits, flat pre-squeezed/squeezed optics Remarks:  Define  * strategy for IR2 and IR8 with an ATS optics.  Perform the planned beam tests to establish the chromatic limits of the standard optics and the  * after which ATS is needed.  Prepare the ATS optics as backup for the 2012 run? R. Assmann 15/2/2012

Conclusion Six highlight topics from the 2011 MD’s were discussed (other topics in other sessions, not discussed here: RF, collimation, aperture,  *, …). Results very reassuring for immediate and far LHC future:  e-cloud is under control: Scrubbing works, short scrubbing runs OK, 50ns operation in 2012 without e-cloud effects, 25ns in reach.  Beam-beam is under control: routine operation with brightness beyond nominal, long-range bb as expected, levelling operational.  Impedance is under control: Routine operation with very high currents, heating effects worrisome but understandable, 2012 OK.  Beam instrumentation works very well: Stringent MD program to calibrate and improve the many systems.  Beam loss and quenches under control: No quenches expected in MD data to extrapolate to future running at 6.5/7 TeV.  Optics under control: Many ATS lessons.  * of 30cm reached. Nominal optics in reach. Upgrade optics path is prepared. LHC not at its limit in 2012  bright future & MD’s ahead… R. Assmann 15/2/2012