The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
Advertisements

IMO Symposium on a Sustainable Maritime
BAT and BEP for Dioxins & Furans Barbados Country Presentation by Thérèse N. Yarde Environmental Protection Department Ministry of Housing, Lands and the.
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Alternative energy for shipping in Nordic waters
Convert Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Diesel and Light Olefins
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Swed Gov’t summary HRO/ Background and Approach Present situation EU plans to implement new specifications for petrol and diesel for the years.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
SECA 1st of January 2015.
World Ports Climate Conference “ Big Steps - Small Footprint: The Challenge for Shipping ” 9 July 2008, Rotterdam Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
1 Air Quality Regulation in California Critical Issues in Greenhouse Gases, Stationary Sources & Mobil Source Emissions January 12, 2007 Jim Flanagan.
WAVESPEC Limited A Braemar Seascope Plc. Group Company October 2005 Factors involved in selecting a propulsion system for your LNG shipping project Presentation.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Revision of MARPOL Annex VI: The Distillate Option Paris 24 May 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Clean Fuels for Ships Practical Solution for MARPOL Annex VI and GHG Emissions Reduction MARTECMA Seminar 21 January 2008 Athens Dragos Rauta - INTERTANKO.
Tanker performance Instituto Iberoamericano de Derecho Maritimo XII Congress/XX Anniversary Seville 14 November 2007 Manager.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Air Emissions from Ships. Society is driving the requirement for ships to reduce harmful air emissions from engine exhausts.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
INTERTANKO Asian Panel Tokyo 18 September 2007
AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 Keith.
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
LNG - LOOKING AHEAD. High speed liner service in US Domestic Trade Washington to Alaska Florida to Puerto Rico Logistics based operations in Alaska, Hawaii.
Fossil Fuels, Ethanol, and Biodiesel By: Emma Wellman, Vishal Garg, and Tom Barch Seeking a responsible solution to global warming by decreasing greenhouse.
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009.
The Wilhelmsen Premier Marine Fuels - Bunker Seminar- Autumn 2009 Is it possible to ban the use of heavy fuel oil as bunkers? Possible consequences of.
Clean Cities / 1 COALITION NAME Propane Overview Presenter Title Date.
Title: Coal Cowboy Duration: 00:12:51 Link: engr
Environment and Reduction of Emissions The Application in Ships
MACINTOSH 5.0. A form of energy produced by an atomic reaction, capable of producing an alternative source of electrical power to that supplied by coal,
Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia 1 – 5 July 2013 Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Mitigation of primary PM emissions Overview of existing technical and non- technical emissions mitigation techniques M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International.
VICS Empty Miles Time Is UP! Production growth will eventually stop and production will peak. Production is already past its peak in 54 of the 65 largest.
Leading the way; making a difference Sustainability of the Oil Transportation Industry China Oil Transportation Safety Conference Nanjing September 2012.
P o r t m e t r o v a n c o u v e r.c o m Darrell Desjardin Director Environmental Programs Environmental Programs November Electrifying the Port.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
IBC 2009 APRIL 23, 2009 FACING THE CHALLENGES TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
1 Energy Security and Sustainable Mobility: Possible? Jatin Nathwani Professor and Ontario Research Chair in Public Policy and Sustainable Energy Management.
The Product Tanker Market and Phase-Out Implications by Manager Research and Projects 4th Annual Combined Chemical & Product.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
INTERTANKO and the tanker Industry WMU Oslo 24 September 2007 Manager Research and Projects.
Dr. Haakon-Elizabeth Lindstad and Professor Gunnar. S. Eskeland
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
The INTERTANKO options to meet marine environmental challenges by Manager Research and Projects Global Forum Strategic Planning.
Reduction of harmful emissions from ships by Manager Research and Projects Lausanne 12 September 2008
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
Why LNG? Fuelling Operations Feb 2016 Tom Strang SVP Maritime Affairs Carnival Corp & plc.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
Leading the way; making a difference LATIN AMERICAN PANEL November 5, 2014 TANKER MARKET JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION USING HYDROGEN FROM PLASMATRON FUEL CONVERTERS
Air Emissions from Ships: The Changing Landscape Bryan Wood-Thomas EEB Clean Air Seminar World Shipping Council 20 November 2008.
Leading the way; making a difference Tanker market key driving forces European Panel - Copenhagen - 8 October Erik Ranheim Senior Manager Research & Projects.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Tim Wilkins Helsinki 7th March 2006
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
SSS & MoS FOCAL POINTS MEETING
DNVPS - INTERTANKO seminar
INTERTANKO is the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners INTERTANKO has been the voice of independent tanker owners since 1970, ensuring.
International Shipping - Carrier of World Trade
Tanker shipping key driving forces
Bill Box Senior Manager Communications & External Relations INTERTANKO
Sustaining the Industry’s Safety and Environmental Performance
Cleaner production Assessment in Dairy Processing
Presentation transcript:

The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager Research and Projects CMAC NATIONAL MEETING Ottawa 5 November 2007 ‘

Shipping and the environment

INTERTANKO for safe transportation, cleaner seas and free competition Accidental oil pollution into the sea Source: ITOPF/Fearnleys 1000 ts spilt bntonne-m

Shipping and the environment ~60,000 ships (above 400 GT) 7,507,000,000 ts goods / year average distance 4,400 miles >90% of total world trade Consumes 9% of world oil CO 2 emission share < 1/2 oil consumption share Simple infrastructure Economics of scale: One VLCC = 8,000 tank trucks 1 ltr of fuel on a modern Very Large Crude Carrier moves 1 tonne of cargo > 2,800 km but

Trends – Co2 emission, energy use, global trade Source: Fearnleys/INTERTANKO Index

Shipping and the environment Fuelled by the dirtiest part of the barrel resulting in emission of : SOx NOx uncombusted hydrocarbon Heavy metals Soot

Reducing harmful emissions from ships Onboard abatement technology –Scrubbers, filters, separators, catalysts SECAs/NECAs –Sulphur/Nitrogen Emission Control Areas Type and quality of fuel –Heavy fuel oil = a blending of refinery residues and distillate (up to 30% dist.) –Distillates = gasoil and diesel

The world is moving away from HFO Oil consumption by product - % share Source: INTERTANKO/BP Review % share mbd

Refineries are moving away from HFO The new line at Neste’s Porvoo refinery will use residue oil to produce 1 m ts per year sulphur-free, clean motor fuels, particularly diesel fuel. The fuel will meet the latest environmental requirements in Europe and N America. The refinery will be capable of considerably increasing the refining of very profitable products, such as sulphur-free diesel fuel.

Refineries are moving away from HFO ……..company’s early commitment in the mid- 1990s to making cleaner fuels, and by being proactive about finding the technology needed to achieve this.

Refineries are moving away from HFO Residue upgrading benefits both the refinery and the community: “Enhance financial performance Eliminate high sulphur fuel projects Replace obsolete utility faculties Meet future product specifications Reduce total refinery emission Provide cost-effective H 2 production based on converting residue Produce power for refinery use and export Increase feedstock flexibility – chance to use low-cost crude oils. Secure or even expand and business opportunities” Dr. Joachim Wolff: license and service manager for liquid and gas gasification for Shell Global Solutions. PhD from university of Dresden in thermodynamics. Piete Zuideveld: departmental manager of the gasification and hydrogen manufacturing technical department in Shell Global Solutions. Working for Shell for 27 years and has experience in gasification, gas treating, gas to liquids and gas business development. Source: en/knowledge_centre/pres_speeches_papers/2006/r efinery_residuals_ html Enhance financial performance reduce emission more business opportunities

Shipping needs INTERTANKO seeks Significant reduction of harmful emission Long-term, predictable and solid IMO standards A feasible, realistic and sustainable solution No unilateral nor regional regulations

Why not scrubbers? Still under testing (2 ship limited scale) Large Expensive Difficult (impossible?) to install CO 2 emission (buffering effect) Leaves hazardous waste Waste disposal – no-one wants it Tonnes of seawater need to be processed/added We are involved in transportation – not waste treatment

Why not SECAs? Air pollution knows no borders Most ships operate close to shore International shipping needs global regulations Switching fuels – a safety problem More SECAs on the way- and more problems Sulphur Emission Control Areas, the Baltic and the North Sea LSFO availability “..refineries have a clear incentive for further conversion of its entire residual streams to distillate products compared to residue desulphurisation to produce more LSFO” (CONCAWE) May 2006 Nov 2007 SE C AS Confusions, Complexities, Criminalisation ?

Why switching to distillates? A simple solution : 1. Significant global reduction of emission SO x, %, PM, %, NOx, - 15%, No heavy metals, Less soot 2. A more healthy environment for crew and dockworkers 3. No onboard waste 4. Reduces overall fuel consumption (and CO 2 ) 5. Better and easier control or monitoring of ships Cleaner, Simpler and more Efficient ships

Why switching to distillates?..continue: 6. Fewer engine breakdowns and potential pollution accidents 7. Less pollution when spilled 8. Provides opportunity for the development of more efficient engines (w. less emission) 9. Applies to all ships and all current engines 10. No safety problem in connection with switching fuels Cleaner, Simpler and more Efficient ships

Switching to distillates CO2 balance +CO 2 emission when continuing to burn HFO: buffering from scrubbers higher fuel consumption NOx control running of scrubbers heating of HFO burning handling of waste running of abatement equipment +CO 2 emission when burning distillates: conversion of HFO to distillates - which may be balanced by increased power production construction of conversion plants handling of waste from conversion plants less fuel consumption

Status IMO Group of Experts – report end 2007 Basic data needed Status quo- fleet, emission Costs - investment in refinery upgrading, scrubbers Costs to the environment and society – pollution, health Council’s conclusion –2008 U.S. considers own legislation if the IMO does not deliver IMO Group of Experts will provide figures and need input

INTERTANKO: a long-term practicable measure to reduce emission necessary Shipping is energy efficient - but burning the dirtiest part of the barrel causes pollution The oil industry is moving towards cleaner fuels There are 10 good reasons for switching to distillates Large investments necessary over a prolonged period - no matter the solution The costs involved are the costs to the society which will mainly be the impact on the environment (cost effect of increased freight will be marginal) Cleaner shipping

Bunker price $/tonne