E C A T. Vision and Strategy Q UESTION: If transit was thought of as a rider-centric service, how would the structure of our current system change? A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGH POINT Sounding Board/Steering Committee Meeting Service Recommendations January 13, 2015.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Transit Development Plan GMTA’s Guide for Future Growth Vision and Strategies October 20, 2011.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
June 1, Ride On Montgomery County  More than 80 Routes  Over 77,000 Trips per Weekday  Fleet includes 250 Large buses 100 Contractor buses.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
MOBILITY AND EMERGING TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF OLDER ADULTS (SENIORS) 1.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
Public transport framework plan for Buffalo City July, BUFFALO CITY MUNICIPALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT FRAMEWORK PLAN PRESENTATION August 2008.
APTS – Fourth Day Miscellaneous Topics. Fleet Management Fixed Route versus Paratransit Operations versus Maintenance.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
Managing Director/CEO
MTA Efforts to “Mind the Gaps” Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility Matters Conference | May 7,
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Creating Enormously Wireless Urban Transit Systems An overview of Red Ball Internet TRAX: Advanced GPS Tracking, Fleet Maintenance and On-Board Connectivity.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Be Involved: Correcting Issues & Advocating for Improvements Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
WMATA BRT Marketing and Branding Presentation Rapid Transit Steering Committee April 30, 2013 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Butte Silver Bow Transportation Development Plan Update Lisa Ballard, P.E. Barb Beck Kimberly Brown 1.
Public Transportation at the State Level Regulation and Coordination By Moaz Yusuf Ahmad.
Implementing Quality and Efficiency in Transit Planning Mike Summerlin Former Chairperson Raleigh Transit Authority.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
Kern Regional Transit Workshop Kern Council of Governments Marilyn Beardslee Senior Planner.
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
Kickoff Meeting for Imperial Valley College/San Diego State University Transit Shuttle Analysis September 14 th, 2015 c.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Downtown Shuttle (D-Link) Interlocal Agreement Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.
Tradeoffs involved in public transportation (example: buses) Number of buses serving a route must be determined a.A large number of buses serving a route.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Update to Dublin Chamber of Commerce Network Direct Paddy Doherty Thursday 18 th November 2010.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Wake Transit Update #waketransit.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
CEE 970 Colloquium Final Presentation Khalid Aljuhani Veronica Asare-Yeboah Ethan Frost Issam Kayssi Hannah Silber.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
Selkirk Transit March 2,  2014 Year End Operations  System Enhancements & Accomplishments  2014 Priorities Outline.
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW PAST AND PRESENT YOUR VALUES FOR TRANSIT NETWORK CONCEPTS.
Development of Public Transport in Oman Bader Al Nadabi GM Corporate Services, Mwasalat 1.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
The FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION IN DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Presentation transcript:

E C A T

Vision and Strategy Q UESTION: If transit was thought of as a rider-centric service, how would the structure of our current system change? A NSWER: It would be Fast… Reliable …Comfortable…with Good Frequencies. P REMISE: A rider-centric model would encourage a more diverse population to become transit dependent… In other words, transit would become their first choice for mobility.

Observations Today the ECAT system is discouraging at worst & inconvenient at best. Characterized generally by long waits and long trips… We have what some may call a Peanut Butter Spread approach to transit… Same level of service spread thinly throughout the area. This approach is not necessarily conducive to building and maintaining ridership.

Recommendations Build on the 2008 ECAT Citizens Advisory Committee thoughts… If we cannot rethink WHY and HOW we do what we do…there will continue to be little support. This is not about thinking out of the box… THERE SHOULD BE NO BOX.

Consider the Following If we agree that an IMPORTANT ELEMENT of a successful transit system is that it should be fast… that leads to the following SHORTER TRIP TIMES. If we agree on the PEANUT BUTTER SPREAD approach, the same service thinly spread across the system is NOT SATISFYING. then let’s develop MORE DEPTH OF SERVICE. Focus first on providing a quality service by CONNECTING MAJOR SEGMENTS of the community. The current headway of 60 minutes is a nonstarter if we want transit to be a first choice for mobility. GOAL: IMPROVE FREQUENCIES to minutes max within the city urban core, minutes max headway in the urban fringe, 60 minutes max headway in the outlying areas.

Consider the Following FOCUS ON BETTER DESIGN. Better bus shelters. Better bus shelter locations. Brand the buses. SUSPEND BILLBOARD ADVERTISING. Advertising should be about the system, less about local ads. Create a color scheme. REMOVE BENCHES where there are no stops. Standardize bus signs. INCORPORATE TECHNOLOGY: Investigate POSH technology for rider notification. Go Green compressed natural gas. TEAMING possibilities: school buses; county/city vehicles; private sector fleets.

So how does this all work? As with any concept, it ALWAYS looks better on paper than when you go operational. That said… some of this can be done Immediately.

Part of the Human Transport Network. Route 41Route 41ARoute 42

Part of the Human Transport Network. Route 41Route 41ARoute 42

Part of the Human Transport Network. Route 41Route 41ARoute 42

Vision and Strategy Most transit systems collect on average 20% from the fare box to cover operating expenses. We do a better job! Improved service can lead to increased ridership. Clearly, marketing will help. To get folks acquired with the improved service, consider: No Money Mondays… Ticketless Tuesdays or Thursdays… or how about Fareless Fridays … Create an Ambassador Program where transit advocates speak to business groups and neighborhood associations about the value of the transit system. Final Thought: What is it going to cost!

Part of the Human Transport Network. Fast… Reliable … Comfortable… Good Frequencies seem to be hallmarks of successful systems.

E C A T