Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network

Advertisements

GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.

Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.

Satellite Cloud and Aerosol climate records for the ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI) Caroline Poulsen, Gareth Thomas, Richard Siddans, Don Grainger,

 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.

GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST th December, Imperial.

CERES-GERB meeting, Boulder, 3/2004 Validation of GERB unfiltered radiances S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.

Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.

Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.

MODIS CLOUD RETRIEVAL: A presentation based on this document.

Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.

Satellite basics Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service

Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.

CERES-GERB Joint Science Teams The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) experiment GERB Status Imperial College London J E Harries (GERB.

Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)

GERB2-GERB 1 transition: discussion item J E Russell Imperial College, London

Meteorolojik Uzaktan Algılamaya Giriş Erdem Erdi Uzaktan Algılama Şube Müdürlüğü 7-8 Mayıs 2012, İzmir.

Meteosat MVIRI surface radiation dataset

Direct LW radiative effect of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 24, 16 Dec 2005, Imperial.

1 Introduction into the Solar Channels Description of characteristics and content of the channels: Ch01: 0.6  Ch02: 0.8  Ch03: 1.6  Contact person:

EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.

1 Introduction into the Absorption Channels Description of characteristics and content of the WV channels: Ch05: 6.2  Ch06: 7.3  Contact person: Veronika.

EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.

AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.

Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,

USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.

Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.

On the application of CERES SW ADMs Cédric Bertrand.

GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005.

Direct LW radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 25, 24 Oct 2006, UK Met.

MSG, GERB calibration and data status May ‘07 J E Russell Imperial College, London

Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.

Atmospheric turbulence identification to aid aviation safety USING MODIS.

Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.

Dust Longwave Forcing from GERB and SEVIRI Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 26, 03 May 2007, RAL, Abingdon Thanks.

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Cloud Model for operational Retrievals from MSG SEVIRI PM2, RAL, 17 Feb 2009 Non-linear Simulations.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Cloud Forcing Studies using CERES and GERB(-like) data Joanna Futyan, Jacqui Russell and John Harries GIST 22 RMIB, Brussels,

Radiative Atmospheric Divergence using ARM Mobile Facility, GERB data and AMMA stations –led by Tony Slingo, ESSC, Reading University, UK Links the ARM.

R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Estimating the radiative effect of mineral dust over ocean The radiance to flux problem Dust retrieval quality Applying.

RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.

GERB science meeting, Oct 2006 The bias in OLR over west Africa in the Met Office Unified Model: detection, attribution, and future plans Jonathan Taylor.

H 2 O retrieval from S5 NIR K. Weigel, M. Reuter, S. Noël, H. Bovensmann, and J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics

METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT

CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Inter-comparisons of monthly mean (and monthly time-step mean) GERB clear sky fluxes Joanna Futyan, Richard Allan and Jacqui.

Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Deriving clear-sky fluxes for GERB Jo Futyan Gist 21, CERES-GERB meeting 02/04/04 Boulder, Colorado.

Clouds Ice cloud detection using the 8.7  m channel: areas of ice clouds (in particular thin cirrus) are red (positive difference), clear ground and water.

Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.

GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.

Initial results from RADAGAST Nazim Bharmal Tony Slingo, Gary Robinson, Jeff Settle, Helen White ESSC, University of Reading GIST 26 3 rd May 2007.

Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison South Africa, April 2006.

Developing a Dust Retrieval Algorithm Jeff Massey aka “El Jeffe”

Rob Roebeling CloudNET meeting 18 – 19 October 2004, Delft METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES.

AOS 340 Project #3 Results. High Spectral Resolution Radiance: tau=0.1.

Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,

Summary Remote Sensing Seminar Summary Remote Sensing Seminar Lectures in Maratea Paul Menzel NOAA/NESDIS/ORA May 2003.

GIST, Abingdon, 5/2007 GERB 1/GERB 2 and GERB/CERES comparisons S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.

NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.

NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.

Validation status overivew

Validation status overivew

TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models

DCC method implementation in FY3/MERSI and FY2

Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.

ABI Visible/Near-IR Bands

Eumetsat conference 2004, Praha

Richard Allan, Tony Slingo ESSC, Reading University

Effect of GSICS calibration on CM SAF‘s cloud products

Presentation transcript:

Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4 May 2007

MSG1 -> MSG2 transition New GERB instrument but also new SEVIRI imager Are the SEVIRI scene identifications consistent? –GERB unfiltering –GERB SW ADM selection –GERB LW angular modelling –GERB scene identification –GERB dust flag and AOD retrieval Are the GERB-likes (SEVIRI NB-to-BB) consistent? –RGP GERB geolocation –GERB unfiltering –GERB resolution enhancement –use of GERB-like data for monthly means

Structure of the talk Intercomparison of level 1.5 SEVIRI data –reflectance for visible channels –BT and radiance for thermal channels Intercomparison of GERB scene identification –cloud fraction, –cloud optical depth –cloud phase –clear sky reflectance –LW anisotropic factor –dust flag and AOD retrieval Intercomparison of the GERB-like BB quantities –solar and thermal radiances –solar and thermal fluxes Conclusions

The MSG1 and MSG2 data look very similar... “natural color”“air mass”

Visible bands spectral response and effective central wavelength for MSG-1 and MSG-2 MSG  s =0.639µm MSG2  s =0.640µm MSG  s =0.809µm MSG2  s =0.807µm MSG  s =1.635µm MSG2  s =1.635µm

0.6 µm reflectance intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

0.6 µm reflectance intercomparison – saturations for MSG2 Max 0.6 µm reflectance at nadir and d=1 A.U. is MSG1 : MSG2 : Software fix: accept saturation if SZA<20 °

0.8 µm reflectance intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

1.6 µm reflectance intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

6.2 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

7.3 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

8.7 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

9.7 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

10.8 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

12 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

13.4 µm brightness temperature intercomparison ratio MSG2/MSG1

Spectral radiance comparison ratio MSG2/MSG1 WV 6.2 : WV 7.3 : IR 8.7 : IR 9.7 : IR 10.8 : IR 12.0 : IR 13.4 : > in general MSG-2 is close or a bit lower than MSG-1, CO2 is significantly lower

Summary for level 1.5 MSG-2/MSG-1 intercomparison visible 0.6µm and 0.8µm channels : 1 to 2% higher reflectance near IR channel (1.6µm): very close thermal channels: very close or a bit lower except the CO2 channel (13.4µm) which is significantly colder (0.5% in BT, 2.5% in radiance) 0.6µm is often saturated over thick cloud residual stripes in the WV 6.2µm channel

Intercomparison of scene identification surface type is exactly the same (same rectification grid) cloud fraction cloud optical depth cloud phase clear sky reflectance images LW angular modeling Helen Brindley 's dust flag Aerosol retrieval with Ignatov look-up-table for the 0.6µm, 0.8µm and 1.6µm channels

Cloud fraction

Cloud optical depth (log)

Cloud phase (0=pure water 1=pure ice)

Clear sky reflectance intercomparison (ratio to model) VIS 0.6VIS 0.8

LW ADM due to the change in NB radiances F=  L / R( ,L 6.2, L 10.8, L 12,L 13.4 ) F MSG1' /F MSG1 Ratio of the flux for a same BB radiance L but for simulated differences between MSG1 and MSG2 NB radiances in the 6.2µm, 10.8µm, 12µm, 13.4µm channels Small increase of the anisotropy (0.2%).

MSG2 MSG1 Dust Flag

AOD in 0.6 µm channel

AOD in 0.8 µm channel

AOD in 1.6 µm channel

Summary for scene identification cloud fraction very similar cloud optical depth slightly higher (2%) due to the 0.6µm and 0.8µm reflectances cloud phase very similar LW angular modelling close, small difference in the “good direction” (increase of the limb-darkening). dust flag may differ in some semi-transparent situations AOD 2% higher at 0.6µm, 0.6% higher at 0.8 µm and 1.6% lower at 1.6 µm. Ratio of AOD does not correspond to ratio in reflectance.

Intercomparison of broadband quantities GERB-like BB radiances (NB->BB) –reflected solar –emitted thermal GERB-like BB fluxes (NB->BB + ADMs) –reflected solar –emitted thermal

GERB-like Reflected Solar Radiance

GERB-like Emitted Thermal Radiance

GERB-like Reflected Solar Flux ratio MSG2/MSG1

GERB-like Emitted Thermal Flux ratio MSG2/MSG1

Summary for the broadband products solar radiance MSG2/MSG1 = thermal radiance MSG2/MSG1 = solar flux MSG2/MSG1 = thermal flux MSG2/MSG1 =

Conclusions and future work start of GERB-1 processing with SEVIRI on MSG2 good consistency with MSG1, most of the differences are explained by the level 1.5 SEVIRI data intercomparison, GERB-like radiances and fluxes are a bit closer to the actual GERB products To be done: analysis of the influence of the SEVIRI radiance definition (change from spectral radiance to effective radiance in April 2008).