P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February 2008 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

Experimental Particle Physics
Ken Bell – Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
Detectors & Measurements: How we do physics without seeing… Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction.
1 Analysis of Prompt Diphoton Production at the Large Hadron Collider. Andy Yen Mentor: Harvey Newman Co-Mentors: Marat Gataullin, Vladimir Litvine California.
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Sayfa 1 Introduction to B Physics in ATLAS Detector at LHC Ahmet BİNGÜL Department of Engineering Physics University of Gaziantep Feb 2010.
Laura Gilbert How We Study Particles. The basics of particle physics! Matter is all made up of particles… Fundamental particle: LEPTON Fundamental particles:
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
Experimental aspects of top quark physics Lecture #1 Regina Demina University of Rochester Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics Beijing, China.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
Fabiola Gianotti, Physics at LHC, Pisa, April 2002 PART 2.
J. Nielsen1 The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Jason Nielsen UC Santa Cruz VERTEX 2004 July 28, 2010.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
July CMS experiment at LHC Geoff Hall Imperial College London Geoff Hall.
Wednesday, Apr. 20, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #20 Wednesday, Apr. 20, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu The Standard Model Gauge Bosons Gauge.
Joseph Haley Joseph Haley Overview Review of the Standard Model and the Higgs boson Creating Higgs bosons The discovery of a “Higgs-like” particle.
Point 1 activities and perspectives Marzio Nessi ATLAS plenary 2 nd October 2004 Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Particle Physics Quiz EPPOG Hands on Particle Physics Masterclasses 2011.
Introduction to CERN David Barney, CERN Introduction to CERN Activities Intro to particle physics Accelerators – the LHC Detectors - CMS.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Detecting & observing particles
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons (e), muons (  ), neutrinos( ) in the ATLAS detector  Types.
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
Caroline Fletcher Advisor: Dan Karmgard.  Astrophysics  Compact Muon Solenoid.
Introduction to CERN Activities
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Searching for New Matter with the D0 Experiment Todd Adams Department of Physics Florida State University September 19, 2004.
Single Top Quark Production Mark Palenik Physics 564, Fall 2007.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
Top Quark Physics At TeVatron and LHC. Overview A Lightning Review of the Standard Model Introducing the Top Quark tt* Pair Production Single Top Production.
Low scale gravity black holes at LHC Enikő Regős ( CERN )
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Marcel Vreeswijk (Nikhef/UvA-IoP) First Results of ATLAS at the LHC -- The rediscovery of the Standard Model-- Contents: Intro: The Standard Model Elementairy.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Introduction to Particle Physics II Sinéad Farrington 19 th February 2015.
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Introduction to CERN Activities
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
How a Particle Detector works
Experimental Particle Physics
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Experimental Particle Physics
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Particles going through matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
Presentation transcript:

P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February

2 “seeing an object” = detecting light that has been reflected off the object's surface light = electromagnetic wave; “visible light”= those electromagnetic waves that our eyes can detect generalize meaning of seeing: seeing is to detect effect due to the presence of an object this method is used in electron microscope, as well as in “scattering experiments” in nuclear and particle physics P ARTICLE PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS

3 Introduction (Physics Motivations) The Standard Model of particle physics describes the electroweak and strong interaction precisely and no significant deviation has been observed. BUT the SM leaves several unexplained questions. -Find Higgs particle or exclude its existence in the region allowed by theory (< 1 TeV). -Search for new particle in the mass region of ~50 GeV to ~5 TeV. -Test the new theories like SUSY and the discovery of SUSY particles. -Look for any deviation from Standard Model and precision measurement. DETECTORS are our electronic eyes which LHC as an accelerator and collider produces scattering events and DETECTORS are our electronic eyes which are used to record and identify the useful events to answer our questions about fundamental particles and their interactions.

4 Introduction Particles are detected via their interactions with matter. A modern multi-purpose detector like CMS and ATLAS at the LHC typically consists of : 1- Tracker 2- Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) 3- Hadronic Calorimeter (HCAL) 4- Muon System A simplified layout 

5 What do the elementary particles in SM look like in Detectors? The elementary particles in the SM consists of quarks, leptons and gauge bosons. Some of them cannot be observed directly in the detector. Heavy particles like top quark, W-boson and Z-boson Decay promptly to lighter particles with a lifetime of 10^{-25} seconds. But other quarks except for top quark will fragment into colour singlet hadrons due to QCD confinement with a time scale of 10^{-24} seconds.

6 What do the elementary particles in SM look like in Detectors? Some particles are seen like neutrinos and LSP (no EM or HD int.). LSP

7 Detector Requirements The fact that we do not know what we will find at the LHC means that our detectors should be ready anything. For Example, suppose that Higgs particle exists but we do not know exactly its mass. However, we know for any mass how it will decay: ► If Higgs is light ( Higgs Mass < 150 GeV/c^{2}): One of the good ways to H   detect its present is through its decay to two photons (H   )  The detector should have an excellent Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) to detect and extract this signal. ► If Higgs is heavy: One of the promising channels to detect Higgs is via its decay to two Z-bosons with the subsequent decay of Z-bosons to Muon-AntiMuon ( H  ZZ  4µ ). Therefore, the detector should be able to detect muons properties precisely and a Muon System with high quality is needed.

8 Detector Requirements ► For SUSY, one of the best signatures is missing energy in the detector (LSP). Any imbalance in the momentum and energy of the all final particles is considered as Missing Energy which is coming from LSP or Neutrinos. So a full Coverage on space is needed to detect all particles (or hermetic detector is required). ► To measure the momenta of Charged particles and reconstruct vertices and also to differentiate between Photons and Electrons a high quality tracker is needed. ► Excellent vertex position measurement. ► Fast Response ( around ns). Since the bunch crossing at the LHC occurs each 25 ns.

9 Detector Requirements

10 Detector Requirements Excellent Vertex Position Measurement is Necessary  For B-jet and Tau Identification. e.g. for Top (BR(t  Wb)~0.99) study. For a b-jet of 60 GeV, the decay length:

D ETECTOR REQUIREMENTS : RADIATION LEVEL 11

12 x y z q p proton Some definitions Barrel Endcap

13 Reaction Rate

14 Trigger Trigger of interesting events at the LHC is much more complicated than at e + e - machines  interaction rate: ≈ 10 9 events/s  max. record rate: ≈ 100 events/s  event size ≈ 1 MByte  1000 TByte/year of data ~ 1.5 million CDs  trigger rejection ≈ 10 7  collision rate is 25 ns  trigger decision takes ≈ a few µs  store massive amount of data in front-end pipelines while special trigger processors perform calculations Trigger = device making decision on whether to record an event Trigger has to decide fast which events not to record, without rejecting the “good events”

15 Trigger Design There are several means to design a trigger such as: particle identification, Multiplicity, Kinematics, Event Topology …. Modern detectors can trigger on: Muons by muon system, electron/photon as Electromagnetic objects, Jets and Missing Energy as Hadronic objects and a Combination of them. Trigger Conditions are dependent on the Collider Phenomenology. according to collider phenomenology we know that what particle may be detected in what kinematical region. Modern detectors like ATLAS and CMS at the LHC have three levels of trigger: Level-1 : Event rate  10^{9} Hz to ~ 10^{5} Hz Level-2 : ~10^{3} Hz Level-3 : 10^{2} Hz

16 Momentum Measurement, Magnet The momentum measurement of charged particles in the detector is based on the bending of their trajectories.

17 Momentum Measurement Consider a charged particle in solenoidal magnetic field, the radius of the curvature: The curvature of the trajectory (s): The charge of particle is also measurable. Resolution : Hence, the momentum resolution degrade linearly with increasing Pt. Improvement for higher magnetic field and L. The effect of multiple scattering should be considered.

18 ATLAS and CMS ATLASCMS length  46 m  22 m diameter  25 m  15 m weight  7000 t  t

19 CMS detector momentum resolution

20 A little about Calorimetry

21 Introduction

22 The main principle of particle detection: Interaction with matter. Introduction

23 Introduction When a high energy electron or photon strikes on a thick absorber (such as Lead), a cascade of secondary electrons and photons via Bremsstrahlung and pair production, respectively, is initiated. With increasing the depth The number of secondary particles is increased The mean energy of particles decreased This multiplication continues until the energy of particles fall below the critical energy, after this Photons and Electrons start the Ionization and Excitation processes. Need to be familiar with e/photon interactions with matter.

24 Showering

25 The dominant process of energy loss by an electron above ~1 GeV when passing through matter is: Bremsstrahlung or Braking Radiation. (a free electron can not radiate a photon) The energy loss per unit of distance: Charged particle interaction It is very small for Muons w.r.t Electrons Below ~1 GeV: Excitation, Ionization, Vibration

26 Charged particle interaction

27 Charged particle interaction Transverse shower development:

28 Study of these properties are helpful to choose the detector material.

29 Photon interaction with matter

30 Photon interaction with matter

31 Summary of photon interaction with matter

32 Z (Al) = 13 Z (Fe) = 26 Z (Pb) = 82 For higher Z-material multiplication continues due to the smaller critical energy.

33

34 A Simple Model for EM Shower

35

36 Energy Resolution of a Calorimeter

37 Energy Resolution of CMS ECAL

38

39 No slide Thanks for your attention