 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  802-388-3141 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

July 19, Horizon West Area 28,000 Gross Acres Six (6) Planned Villages / Communities Includes one (1) Town Center ~41,000 Planned Households.
GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study STEERING COMMITTEE 7 February 15, 2006.
GIS in Connecticut Education and Training Working Group.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Pre-Application Presentation To Village of Glendale Planning Commission February 2, 2015 Village Gate Subdivision.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Matt Boeck Story County GIS Coordinator Ray Willis GIS Coordinator, Polk County Assessor’s Office.
SCENARIO 360 Testing Out C. David Wickliffe GIS Specialist Rockingham Planning Commission Commission Meeting April 12, 2006.
Essex, Vermont, Discovers the Power of 3D Analysis Presented By: Tewfik Mohammed Hesham M. Tewfik By: Gary Smith Web Address:
Public Health Workgroup Current Infrastructure Sub-State Assets & Sample GIS MAPS September 13, 2006 Sections IV – VI Draft Report to Full PHWG D. Michael.
SLU Rural District Reform Act 205 SLH Mission Implement Act 205 SLH 2005 Engage Community & County Leadership in Reform Dialogue Support County.
Growing Smart:Chapter 40R A New Tool for Communities Presented by Sarah B. Young Deputy Director for Policy January 7, 2005 Jane Wallis Gumble, Director.
R IDGEFIELD P IONEER & 45 TH S UB -A REA P LAN E. D. Hovee & Company, LLC BergerABAM Stakeholder Meeting #1 June 1, 2015.
Georgetown Planning Board State of the Town April 6, 2009.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
Town of Westport Planning & Zoning Commission Amendment #621 Residential Coverage Regulations September 30, 2010.
CorPlan: Place Based Scenario Planning Tool
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Linda Vista Estates Rezoning and Subdivision Policy Issue Discussion April 23, 2008.
Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis Nov 5, 2007 New techniques - for an old friend.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Land Use Scenarios Status. Encompass 2040 Scenarios Scenario 1: Continues similar development patterns of the past with no new zoning initiatives Scenario.
June 30, 2015 Land Use Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
THE VALUE OF GIS IN THE HIGH COUNTRY Advisory Committee Retreat September 12, 2015 High Country Council of Governments.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners August 18, 2008 Workshop Off-Premise Sign Existing Regulations & Proposed Changes Workshop Off-Premise Sign.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Visualization Techniques Useful For Planning - Ensley Township-
Board of County Commissioners Airport Industrial Park at Orlando (AIPO) Development of Regional Impact Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment Transmittal.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Alachua County Plat Review Process September 9, 2008.
Community Development Department City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) & Zoning Map Amendments City Council (2nd Reading) May 6, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING May 20, 2008.
Calais Planned Unit Development (PUD) Central Vermont RPC Chris Walsh & Daniel Currier.
Community Development Department City Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) & Zoning Map Amendments Planning & Land Development Regulation Board.
MCE: Criteria Development and the Boolean Approach Exercise 2-7.
Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Maryland-National Capital.
Alachua County Plat Review – Greenbrier Subdivision February 24, 2009.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
Clark County 20-Year Comprehensive Management Plan Update Unified Development Code : Title 40 Updates Community Planning PC WS ~ March 17, 2016.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Canyons Village Management Association Workforce Housing
District #2 Downtown Commercial Core April 30, 2015
2017 Zoning Update New Sewickley Township.
AERIAL/LOCATION MAP N Old Kings Rd. Town Center Blvd. 10 Peylo Place
Southeast Madera County Development
Planning Commission November 4, 2010
RSL and LR1 – Supersize! The Grand Bargain was that Single Family became Multifamily and the development capacity “give” was generally one floor. But in.
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
PA LS Burnt Store Area Plan
5. Zonal Analysis 5.1 Definition of a zone 5.2 Zonal statistics
Comprehensive Plan Update Work Session #4b – Land Use
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
12B: Scott County CDA Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Code Amendment City Council June 18, 2018 Laura.
Presentation transcript:

 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis August 8, 2006

Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis August 8, 2006

Community Build-Out Analysis  Development started in 1999 as a part of the Community Planning Tools Demonstration Project funded by Sen. Leahy’s Office and administered by the Center for Rural Studies at UVM.  Center for Rural Studies has provided additional funding to improve the program over the past 5 years.  Operates as an extension to the ESRI GIS program ArcView 3.2

What is a Build-Out?  A build-out analysis predicts the maximum potential for development based on town policies and zoning bylaws as well as environmental or geographic constraints to development.  WHY? A planning tool to assess the consequences of existing and proposed planning and zoning practices.

Existing zoning

Build-out under existing zoning  Existing residential – 611  Potential development with no development in wetlands, floodplain, or forest districts

DRAFT zoning  Low density district changed from 5 acre to 10 acre  Forest District changed to Conservation to include hilltops and steep slopes

Build-out under draft zoning  Potential residential development – 1546  vs. current zoning of 3263 units

Build-Out Status All parcel/zoning combinations are symbolized with a build-out result No existing house and under the minimum lot size ( 1 unit added) Under the minimum lot size Density removed using a layer Density allowed but houses must be relocated off of layer Density reduced using a layer and fewer houses shown

Compare build-out results - spatial  Development density changes  Polygon symbology changes  Existing zoning  Draft zoning

Compare build-out results – export to spreadsheet  Draft zoning  Existing zoning residential units – 3263  Draft zoning Residential units –1546  Existing zoning

Methodology – Data Needs  Uses existing town GIS data  Zoning  Tax Parcels  E911 Structures or grand list  Natural Resource Information  Data must be current or updated for accuracy

Methodology – Basic Steps A. Construct a table of each parcel’s acreage by zoning district B. Determine existing parcels that are fully developed C. Calculate potential new development allowed in each zone

Resulting Summary Table by Zone

Methodology – Next Level Change minimum lot size of ASRR district to 5 acres from 10 acres

Methodology – Compare Tables Potential units in the ASRR district increase from 181 to 617

Methodology – Com/Industrial Village/ Commercial Area Min Lot Size.33 ac (14,520 sq ft) Lot Coverage 75% Max Building Hgt 35 ft Sq Ft / Parking Sp 200 Existing Development

C/I Summary Table by Zone

Methodology – Location Constraints Define constraint layers Choose to use or remove the layer area from density calculation Choose to allow structures in the layer area or restrict placement of potential development Adjust density of layer area to less than 100%

Methodology – Location Constraints Floodplain Layer Restrict house locations in floodplain by removing layer – maintain overall density

Next Steps for CBOA 1. Continue to use the program with communities. 2. Work to improve the currency/accuracy of town data. 3. Improve the program with new ideas from users.  Mixed use districts  Time horizon – growth model  PUD w/ open space – conservation planning  Subdivision lot lines 4. Issues – move to ArcGIS or Web-based 5. Funding partners

Acknowledgements Thanks to the Vermont USDA and Senator Leahy’s staff for originally supporting the Community Planning Tools Demonstration Project and to the Center for Rural Studies at UVM for continuing to provide development support. In addition, we want to recognize the important land use decisions that are made by the volunteer boards and commissions in each of our communities. We sincerely hope that these tools will be an asset to their efforts.