“Putting a Luster on a Good Testing Program” Barbara Showers, PhD Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction Methods Results Conclusions and Implications 1.
Advertisements

“Scoring an Oral Simulation Exam” Elizabeth A. Witt, Ph.D. American Board of Emergency Medicine Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September.
CAPA California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Presented by Contra Costa SELPA with information provided by California Department of Education.
2007 Annual Conference “ Windows and Continuous CBT: a Brief Overview ” George T Gray, EdD ACT, Inc.
“Find without a calculator” “Find without a calculator” The prime factors of 484 and use these to find the square root or 484  Kevin McMenamin (Access.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Statistical Project Monitoring Section B 1.
Item Writing Techniques KNR 279. TYPES OF QUESTIONS Closed ended  Checking yes/no, multiple choice, etc.  Puts answers in categories  Easy to score.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
“You Can’t Always Get What You Want: Accountability and Limits in Score Reports to Boards” Troy Elliott Association of Social Work Boards 2006 Annual ConferenceAlexandria,
You’ve Been Shown: Now It’s Your Turn to Ask! CLEAR 2004Kansas City, Missouri Responding to Your Questions About Testing.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Jan/Feb 2008CAPA Train-the-Trainer Workshop1 CAPA Training CAPA Examiners.
Presentations Topic – as per syllabus –As noted last class if you have a better idea talk to me –I want you to do a good presentation that engages the.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
A FTER M ASSAGE S CHOOL Steps for getting Licensed.
History of CABMET Study Group Started in 2004 for the May test We found it better to have expert presenters talk about areas they know best Run by the.
The Internet Writer’s Handbook 2/e Cross References Writing for the Web.
Technical Issues Two concerns Validity Reliability
1 INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHER CERTIFICATION Bridget D. Stephens Department of State Health Services August 2011.
College-Level Examination Program ® (CLEP ® ) College-Level Examination Program ® (CLEP ® ) CLEP: What Every Test Administrator Needs to Know.
Kaizen–What Can I Do To Improve My Program? F. Jay Breyer, Ph.D. Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination Program Update Bilingual.
1 Assessment Overview Ohio Department of Education Center for Curriculum & Assessment.
IBM Software Group Lotus Certification Update Barbara Bowen, Manager, WW Professional Certification Programs Bill McCook, Manager, Exam Development September.
“Who Are We Regulating? Working with Volunteers, Making Rules, Discipline” Steven K. Bryant, PhD Founder and Past President, Applied Measurement Professionals,
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska “Problems and Priorities in Pretesting Pondered” Beth Noeller Grady Barnhill Carol O’Byrne.
Sterling Practices in Design & Scoring of Performance-Based Exams #156 F. Jay Breyer Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference.
Question Types Developed by: Eric Shepherd. Question Types  Objective: To provide information on how question types can be used within computerized assessments.
Student assessment AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
“DATA” Providing Program Accountability, Curriculum Improvement and “DATA” For Your Program Of Study NOCTI Overview November 10, 2010 Lana Ford
Licensing and Certification of Geologists– Implications for Education Presented by Jonathan H. Goodwin, PhD. Illinois LPG # CPG # 5173.
Presented By Dr / Said Said Elshama  Distinguish between validity and reliability.  Describe different evidences of validity.  Describe methods of.
Official Rules of Competition for Long Range Disciplines Rulebook #13 Updated December 2015 J.B. & M.A.W. International Benchrest Shooters.
RELIABILITY BY DONNA MARGARET. WHAT IS RELIABILITY?  Does this test consistently measure what it’s supposed to measure?  The more similar the scores,
Which list of numbers is ordered from least to greatest? 10 –3, , 1, 10, , 1, 10, 10 2, 10 – , 10 –3, 1, 10, , 10 –3,
Adding Luster to a Good (National) Testing Program—Technology Considerations I. Leon Smith, PhD Professional Examination Service 475 Riverside Drive New.
Leadership Conference Welcome to September Why purchase IEP Power Tools? Creates progress reports quickly & efficiently Provides a powerful solution.
Margaret Spong UK Technical Group for the Islamic Finance Qualification.
2009 STAR CAPA Train-the-Trainer Workshop || Slide 1 January 2009 CAPA Training CAPA Examiners.
Welcome Parents! FCAT Information Session. O Next Generation Sunshine State Standards O Released Test Items O Sample Test.
Aviation Ground Handling Trailblazer Assessment Activity consultation Aviation ground operative Aviation ground specialist Aviation operations manager.
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
Biology End-of-Course Exam: 2013 Strategies to Writing Conclusions.
ImplementationStabilizationOptimizationMaintenance Partner CustomerMicrosoft External Resources On Site Team Advisory Services Educational Programs.
PLA Advisory Board February 18, 2014 Ross GarmilNan Travers.
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
The Goldilocks Dilemma: Too Hard, Too Easy, or Just Right? Developing Pre/Posttest Questions to Evaluate Training Courses Christine M Allegra, PhD, LCSW.
Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
Graduate Student Academic Services would like to present
Document Development Cycle
Introduction to the Validation Phase
Student Affairs Performance Appraisal Training 2017
12.2 Conduct Procurements The process of obtaining seller responses, selecting a seller and awarding the contract The team applies selection criteria.
Concept of Test Validity
Assignment Writing Help Online for Mechanical Engineering Subject
Delivering structured project solutions with a flexible methodology
Understanding the PreACT
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
RPO Manual 2018 Admin Workgroup members Patrick Flanagan July 26, 2018.
History of CABMET Study Group
Expectations and Quality Control for Ph.D. Students
Training for Examination Committee Members
Illinois State Board of Education Assessment & Accountability
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

“Putting a Luster on a Good Testing Program” Barbara Showers, PhD Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Low-Tech Indicators of Potential Exam Problems Frequent Score Adjustments Pass Rate Changes “I Can’t Find it on Your Web Site”

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Frequent Score Adjustments Indicators Regular grade adjustments on practical or oral exams before release or on appeal Increasing numbers of multiple-keyed or omitted multiple choice questions

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Frequent Score Adjustments Practical/Oral Issues Are examiners unclear on the criteria? Are examiners given too much flexibility? Are the criteria themselves solid (one correct answer)?

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Frequent Score Adjustments Practical/Oral Solutions Clarify scoring criteria Reduce flexibility – checklists Develop a bank of pre-approved questions with correct answers Train new examiners/board members Pair new examiners with experienced ones Use multiple examiners

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Frequent Score Adjustments Multiple Choice Issues Questions are out of date Questions are ambiguous

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Frequent Score Adjustments Multiple Choice Solutions Multiple question sources and writers Committee review before use Update on a regular schedule Allow candidate comments after exam If sufficient volume, run item analysis statistics – ID problems Don’t keep the multi-keyed or omits in the test – reflects poorly on quality

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Changes Indicators Gradual pass rate increase over time, or Pass rates swing up or down in short time

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Changes Issues Reasonable Explanations for Pass Rate Change Exam content change Exam cut score change Candidate qualifications change

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Changes Issues If no reasonable explanation, consider Security breach Standard setting issues – are the forms equivalent in difficulty?

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Change Issues What is a “reasonable” pass rate? Example: WI Hearing Instrument Specialist Exam Audiologist Pass Rate = 70% Apprentice Pass Rate = 38%

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Changes Solutions Security solutions Multiple forms New content as often as possible Avoid repeating highly memorable scenarios

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Pass Rate Changes Solutions Unexplained Variations Equate forms if possible If statistical equating is not possible, use at least subject matter expert ratings of difficulty to create similar forms Define and document the passing performance standard and use the definition over time for consistency

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona “I can’t find it on your web site.” Put the luster on your testing program by polishing your web site

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Polishing the Web Site Is the candidate bulletin prominent? How deeply buried is the fee information?

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Polishing the Web Site How to apply What to expect in content and administration Study resources Links to other relevant sites

Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September Phoenix, Arizona Speaker Contact Information Barbara Showers, PhD Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing P.O. Box 8935 Madison, WI , fax