Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness Framework Associate Executive Director, AWSA
“Educating and Empowering the Next Generation of Leaders”
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Overview for Teachers. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Templates -Assessment Literacy-
Becoming a World Class Leader: Leading Through Transition June 2012.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Van Hise Elementary School Improvement Plan (SIP) UPDATE October 29, 2013.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
International Parent Education Seminar Kay Sammons John SanGiovanni.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Inspire the learner; ignite the potential! Welcome! Forest Lake Area School District Staff District In-Service Tuesday, August 26, 2003.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
State Teacher Evaluation Model Professional PracticeStudent Growth Planning and Preparation 12.5% Instruction 12.5% Classroom Environment 12.5% Professional.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Becoming a World Class Leader: Fostering Effective Teaching and Learning for Each and Every Child Leadership I and II April 2012.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Becoming a World-Class Leader August 15, 2011 Linda Wise Chief Academic Officer.
Becoming a World Class Leader: Leading Through Transition June 2012.
 Becoming a World-Class Leader: Eliminating Gaps and Raising Achievement September Leadership I and II.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
REPORT OF THE PROVINCIAL GRADE 3, 6, AND 9 ASSESSMENTS.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
COLLABORATIONS TeachersPrincipals Central Office Staff UnionsCommunity.
Engaging All Students in Exemplary Instruction for Exemplary results using Formative Assessment Leadership I and II November 2010 Leadership I and II November.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Competencies for the 21 st Century LEMA VISION MISSION & STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLO)
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Engaging All Students in “Presumed Competence” for Exemplary Results.
Becoming a World Class Leader: A Focus on Teacher Evaluation and EEA June Leadership.
Rappahannock County Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Fall 2017 Data Summit Welcome!.
State Teacher Evaluation Model
New Prospect Elementary School
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Presentation transcript:

Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality

Linda Wise Deputy Superintendent

Thank You for your Leadership

A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way. -John D. Maxwell

Are You a Leader?

Our Vision & Mission Vision Every student is inspired to learn and empowered to excel Mission We cultivate a vibrant learning community that prepares students to thrive in a dynamic world

Goal 1 STUDENTS Every student achieves academic excellence in an inspiring, engaging, and supportive environment.

Goal 2 STAFF Every staff member is engaged, supported, and successful.

Goal 3 FAMILIES & COMMUNITY Families and the community are engaged and supported as partners in education.

Goal 4 ORGANIZATION Schools are supported by world-class organizational practices.

Teaching to the future, and testing to the past.

Juliann Dibble Director Professional and Organizational Development

The HCPSS Framework for Teacher Evaluation

The Framework for Teacher Evaluation

Supports for Observers and Teachers

The HCPSS Staff Hub

Teachscape Reflect and Focus

The HCPSS Framework for Teacher Evaluation

Dr. Clarissa Evans Executive Director School Improvement and Curricular Programs

HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Model Charlotte Danielson’s Framework For Teaching and Learning Professional Practice (50%) Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 12.5% Domain 3 Instruction 12.5% Domain 2 Classroom Environment 12.5% Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities 12.5% Literacy Reading Writing Speaking and Listening Differentiation Mathematical Practices Overarching Habits Reasoning and Explaining Modeling and Using Tools Seeing Structure and Generalizing Differentiation Creative Problem Solving in Support of MD STEM Standards of Practice Understanding Challenges Generation of Ideas Preparation for Action Application of Technology Differentiation Content Assessments Performance-Based Tasks Differentiation Qualitative Measures Quantitative Measures: Student Learning Objectives and MSA Domain 5 Student Growth (50%) Student Learning Objectives for teachers of grades 4-8 assessed areas – 30%; for others two SLOs from different areas 25%, 25% Student Learning Objectives for high school teachers of state-assessed courses – one 25% SLO; one two-part SLO that is 10% student performance on state assessment and 15% other teacher-selected data points in alignment with course curriculum Maryland School Assessments (for teachers grades 4-8 who are teachers of record for mathematics and/or English Language Arts) 20%

Scoring of Teacher Evaluations Professional Practice Distinguished 12 points Proficient 9 points Basic 6 points Unsatisfactory 3 points Student Growth Full Attainment 12 points Partial Attainment8 points Insufficient4 points Attainment

Cut Scores Highly Effective: 10.0 and above Effective: at least 7 and less than 10.0 Ineffective: less than 7

Scoring of Teacher Evaluations

Sample: Teacher Evaluation Teacher: Non MSA-Assessed Course Domain #1: Proficient Domain #2: Basic Domain #3: Proficient Domain #4: Proficient SLO #1 (25%): Full Attainment SLO #2 (25%): Partial Attainment Score = out of Rating = Effective

Sample: Teacher Evaluation Teacher: MSA-Assessed Course Domain #1: Proficient Domain #2: Proficient Domain #3: Proficient Domain #4: Proficient SLO #1 (30%): Full Attainment MSA (20%): Full Attainment Score = 10.5 out of Rating = Highly Effective

Sample: Teacher Evaluation Teacher: HSA-Assessed Course Domain #1: Basic Domain #2: Basic Domain #3: Unsatisfactory Domain #4: Proficient SLO #1 (15%): Insufficient Attainment HSA (10%): Partial Attainment SLO #2 (25%): Partial Attainment Score = 6.4 out of Rating = Ineffective

Dr. Clarissa Evans Executive Director School Improvement and Curricular Programs

Patricia Daley Executive Director Special Education and Students Services

Safe School Modules

Naviance

Presuming Competence

Frank Eastham Executive Director School Improvement and Administration

Our Vision & Mission Vision Every student is inspired to learn and empowered to excel Mission We cultivate a vibrant learning community that prepares students to thrive in a dynamic world

Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality

ES Auditorium MS HS ES Auditorium MS HS