BCAMT 2011, Burnaby LESSONS LEARNED FROM NOT TEACHING Peter Liljedahl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome Back to School!!! Mr. Sortina.
Advertisements

Unit 2 What should I do? (period one).
____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth.
Setting up Writer’s Workshop Lisa Harrison Writing Curriculum Support, ETO.
The Student’s Role in Formative Feedback Cycles Nicole Rigelman, Portland State University Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics Conference September 6,
+ Using Text-Based Challenges and Supports to Plan for Teaching through Text-Based Discussions Dr. Julie Coiro Chafee 615 EDC 423: Teaching Comprehension.
Assessment Early Years PE MPESA Fall Conference September 18-20, 2013.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM NOT TEACHING Peter Liljedahl.
Bolstad & Lin, NZCER, 2009 How do I make the most of my virtual classroom? Rachel Bolstad and Magdalene Lin September 2009.
building thinking classrooms
Classroom management Elizabeth Karakehagias
Assessing Students’ Skills in Science & Technology Hong Kong University – May 19 th 2006 Graham Orpwood York/Seneca Institute for Mathematics, Science.
Enhancing Student Learning Through Error Analysis
BACK-TO-SCHOOL NIGHT SANDY O’BRIEN 4 TH GRADE, ROOM D5 August 26, 2014.
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
Algebra 1 R. Jenkins, M.S., M.A..
Feedback underpinning your practice… “A teacher produced, literally, an all-singing, all- dancing lesson. There was music, comedy, costumes, games, thinking.
Peter Liljedahl. 2 The NEW curriculum – lessons learned from January BREAK Linking ACTIVITY to the CURRICULUM LUNCH Linking the CURRICULUM to ACTIVITY.
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Common Core Where have we been and where we are going…
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
ZUZANA STRAKOVÁ IAA FF PU Pre-service Trainees´ Conception of Themselves Based on the EPOSTL Criteria: a Case Study.
Curriculum Mapping Overview Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D Compiled and Presented to IUP undergraduate students.
What tests do they have to sit? Why are SATs important? How does the school prepare my child for SATs? How can I help my child?
Lack of Learning or Lack of Studying? An Inquiry into Low Exam Scores Katherine M. Sauer Metropolitan State College of Denver February.
Stretch and Challenge 7 strategies to help you to step back in the lesson from tomorrow morning.
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Technology in the classroom. UM weather Great way to begin a day or class –Links to 300 weather sites –Links to 700 web cams to view weather –Radar and.
Classroom Interactions in Science and Math # 05: Classroom Norms.
1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.
What do we know about effective classroom assessment? 3 rd Black Sea Conference, Batumi, September 2014 Gordon Stobart Emeritus Professor of Education.
Language of Math Using the Language of Content to increase confidence and competence.
Vocabulary: Figuring Out What Words Mean Essential Question: How can we help students assimilate new words into their vocabulary beyond the classroom?
Exit Outcome Program Outcome Grade Outcome Unit Outcome Lesson Outcome Design Down Teach Up.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
Steinbach – April 2015 NOW YOU TRY ONEHOMEWORKTAKING NOTES CONTEXTS.
Agenda: Introduction Quick activity Discussion on Manipulatives CRA…Concrete Representational, Abstract Some common, but powerful manilulatives Geoboard,
Study Skills. Overcoming Study Barriers  HUNGRY – Studying takes energy. Have a snack before you start studying. Have some healthy snacks available while.
PDS – April 2015 PROBLEM BASED LEARNING: BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS - Peter Liljedahl.
ABE 2015 THINKING, LEARNING, OR STUDENTING: THE VIEW FROM THE BACK OF THE CLASSROOM - Peter Liljedahl.
Student Note-Taking Effective Note-Taking for Students!
Vocab The Brain & Memory Test strategies OTHER Reminders (NOT QUESTIONS! LINK IS BROKE Go to reminder for
Farmer Jack Farmer Jack harvested 30,000 bushels of corn over a ten-year period. He wanted to make a table showing that he was a good farmer and that.
CONTEXT OF RESEARCH NOW YOU TRY ONEHOMEWORKTAKING NOTESREVIEWLECTUREGROUP WORKSTATIONS.
IF CURRICULUM CHANGE IS THE ANSWER, WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? P ETER L ILJEDAHL S IMON F RASER U NIVERSITY.
Burnaby 2016 BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS - Peter Liljedahl.
Cluster Cycle 3: Inference Strategy Meeting 6: using THIEVES to infer main idea and important details.
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21 st Century.
Excerpt from I Believe: Common Myths about Learning Mathematics Rita Barger, Ph.D. University of Missouri-Kansas City
How Might Classroom Climate Support Mathematical Discourse? Productive Struggle? Reasoning? Physical Space?
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
building thinking classrooms
Which of these statements is true?
building thinking classrooms
BUILDING THINKING CLASSROOMS
CONTEXT OF RESEARCH NOW YOU TRY ONE HOMEWORK TAKING NOTES REVIEW
Teaching in a Thinking Classroom
building thinking classrooms
Lessons Learned from not teaching
STUDENTING NOW YOU TRY ONE n=32 catching up on notes (n=0)
Teaching and Studenting: Observations from the Back of the Classroom
STUDENTING NOW YOU TRY ONE n=32 catching up on notes (n=0)
Studenting in the Mathematics Classroom: Gaming vs. Learning
NOW YOU TRY ONE HOMEWORK TAKING NOTES CONTEXTS.
CONTEXT OF RESEARCH NOW YOU TRY ONE HOMEWORK TAKING NOTES REVIEW
building thinking classrooms
THE HIDDEN CLASSROOM: A LOOK BEHIND THE FAÇADE OF LEARNING
building thinking classrooms
Presentation transcript:

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby LESSONS LEARNED FROM NOT TEACHING Peter Liljedahl

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Quadruple Entendre Lessons Learned from 1.NOT teaching in my 8-12 classroom. 2.being in a classroom but NOT as the teacher. 3.teaching in a way that is often considered as NOT teaching. 4.NOT teaching while taking 5 months to travel Europe.

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby STUDENTS DON’T THINK! (sort of)

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby More Specifically 20% of students are “successful” at mathematics far fewer than this think of themselves as “successful” – why? –their culminating experience (Calculus) overpowers them universities have been saying for years that the students are not prepared enough

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby An Example You ask students to try an example: I don’t know how to do this mimic your examples ask a question about “what if...” which anticipates something you have yet to teach. Only the last of these is “thinking”

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Who is Thinking? Students who treat mathematics as a sense making activity. The ones trying to build connections to past and future ideas. 2-3 students per class.

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Is this a New Idea? Explicitly – YES I have found no research or commentary on this. Implicitly – NO almost every movement in the last 20 years has tried to get at an ‘itch’ without knowing where to scratch –curriculum revisions –NCTM movement and AUS and UK equivalents –numeracy movements –Singapore math –21 st century learning movement –both sides of the math wars –back to basics movement BUT they didn’t know it! It was “AN IDEA WITHOUT A NAME”

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby So what are students doing? NOT LEARNING waiting mimicking memorizing asking to be spoon fed Students are gaming the classroom the course grading criteria you GAMING

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Gaming you may want them to think they want to get an A, or a B, or a pass, or to do no homework, etc. in essence, students are playing a game with an objective that is not yours

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby What to do about it? DE(CON)STRUCTION of teaching: the way we answer questions the way we give notes the way we give homework the nature of tasks the way we assess the way we review the way we summarize the organization of a lesson the student work space –the way we structure student work –the physical organization of the room we are changing the rules of the game

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Structure Student Work Space Our research has shown that if you change the student work space we change the way they work: –random groups –non-permanent, vertical, big, work surfaces –chaotic desk arrangement –no front of the classroom THEY CAN’T HIDE

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Answering Questions Our research has shown that students only ask three types of questions: 1.proximity question 2.stop thinking question 3.keep thinking question STOP ANSWERING THE FIRST TWO TYPES OF QUESTIONS!

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Give Notes Our research has shown that notes are not meaningful: –usually a copy of what’s in the text –it is a SENSE MADE exercise rather than a SENSE MAKING exercise –replaces learning NOW with the drive to ensure they have material to maybe learn LATER Meaningful notes: –what is interesting –what can’t be found elsewhere –what had meaning

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Give Notes Our research has shown that students don’t need to TAKE notes: –about 3 students per class will be uncomfortable without notes –1 of these will be paralysed by it GIVE STUDENTS THE NOTES

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Assess Our research has shown that: –teachers are the main consumers and benefactors of assessment –that students use the way we assess as the main feedback on how to game the class –students can learn from assessment what their “score” is but not what they know or don’t know –certain learning outcomes are over represented – and its NOT the ones we see as the most important –that we don’t evaluate the skills that we, ourselves, see as most valuable –thinking is almost never evaluated – hence not valued

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Assess Instead: –use assessment as a way to help students navigate their learning (make them the consumers) –collect data rather than collect points –evaluate the skills that you think are important

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Give Homework Our research has shown that students do homework for the wrong reasons: –they mimic –they copy –they cheat –they don’t do it –they get HELP (not the good kind) Why? –because its worth marks –they think they know it –because they aren’t using it for self-assessment

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby The Way We Give Homework Our research has shown that if you structure homework so as to help students to use it to self-assess their learning against specific learning outcomes: –they do it the right way –they are aware of what they know and don’t know –they opt out

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby Build a Culture of Thinking Students are creatures of habit: demand thinking expect that they own their learning enable them to own their own learning never let up

BCAMT 2011, Burnaby THANK YOU!