GLM Val Tool Overview Monte Bateman. Introduction GLM is an optical instrument Closest analog is LIS Have several ground-based, 24x7 networks; all are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office Lightning Detection Systems Roger Carter, Spectrum Manager, UK Met Office ITU/WMO SEMINAR ON USE OF RADIO SPECTRUM FOR METEOROLOGY.
Advertisements

MTG Lightning Imager Proxy Data Zagreb, Croatia 9 April 2014 Jochen Grandell Presentation to the Convection Working Group.
Cell Tracking Algorithm (R3) Dan Cecil, UAH
Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
A Microwave Retrieval Algorithm of Above-Cloud Electric Fields Michael J. Peterson The University of Utah Chuntao Liu Texas A & M University – Corpus Christi.
Cloud Flash Evaluation Issues and Progress Report Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL Al Nierow, FAA Dennis Boccippio, NASA/MSFC.
Vaisala TLS200, Technological Advancements for VHF total lightning mapping / Nikki Hembury and Ron Holle - Vaisala / Southern Thunder Conference 2011.
Atmospheric Electricity and Lightning Research at UAH Large Group (>25) includes scientists, engineers and students. Capabilities include: Instrument.
Advances in Lightning Detection Kerry Anderson Canadian Forest Service Edmonton, Alberta Kerry Anderson Canadian Forest Service Edmonton, Alberta.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Lightning Detection Application Team Steve Goodman (NOAA/NESDIS) Richard Blakeslee (NASA-MSFC), William.
Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) 1 Near uniform spatial resolution of approximately 10 km. Coverage up to 52 deg latitude % flash detection day.
Météorage Lightning data for flood monitoring Marc Bonnet V.P. International October, 2011 Météorage Lightning data for flood monitoring Marc Bonnet V.P.
Inter-comparison of Lightning Trends from Ground-based Networks during Severe Weather: Applications toward GLM Lawrence D. Carey 1*, Chris J. Schultz 1,
1 Comparative Lightning Characteristics of a Tornadic and Non-Tornadic Oklahoma Thunderstorm on April , 2006 Amanda Sheffield Purdue University.
Chapter 14 Simulation. Monte Carlo Process Statistical Analysis of Simulation Results Verification of the Simulation Model Computer Simulation with Excel.
Lightning The LDAR II Network Nicholas W. S. Demetriades, Ronald L. Holle and Martin J. Murphy Vaisala, Inc., Tucson, Arizona HEAT Project - First Planning.
Proxy Data and VHF/Optical Comparisons Monte Bateman GLM Proxy Data Designer.
1 Steven Goodman, 2 Richard Blakeslee, 2 William Koshak, and 3 Douglas Mach with contributions from the GOES-R GLM AWG and Science Team 1 GOES-R Program.
The Canadian Lightning Detection Network (CLDN). Novel Approaches for Performance Measurement & Network Management. Meteorological Service of Canada D.
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
David Hotz and Anthony Cavallucci National Weather Service, Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Tennessee Geoffrey Stano ENSCO/SPoRT, Huntsville, Alabama Tony Reavley.
WWLLN (World Wide Lightning Location Network) By Prof. Robert Holzworth, Director of WWLLN, University of Washington.
THE GOES-R GLM LIGHTNING JUMP ALGORITHM (LJA): RESEARCH TO OPERATIONAL ALGORITHM Elise V. Schultz 1, C. J. Schultz 1,2, L. D. Carey 1, D. J. Cecil 2, G.
Ken Cummins 1, with help from: Richard J. Blakeslee 2, Lawrence D. Carey 3, Jeff C. Bailey 3, Monte Bateman 4, Steven J. Goodman 5 1 University of Arizona,
Characteristics and Activity of Storms Associated with TLEs Production during Eurosprite campaigns: Statistics and Case Studies S. Soula 1, O. van der.
VI-5475(SamCalValNotes) 1 SAM (Sun and Aureole Measurement) Calibration Prepared for MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting Dennis Villanucci, Andrew LePage.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Lightning Application Team Steve Goodman (NOAA, GOES-R System Program) Richard Blakeslee (NASA-MSFC) Monte.
Aviation-Lightning Introduction Since there are few surface-based radar and/or other meteorological observations covering most of the oceans, convective.
Vaisala Total Lightning Network Update / Nikki Hembury / Southern Thunder Conference 2011.
GLM Science Meeting September 29-30, Update on GLM Cluster/Filter Algorithm Testing Douglas Mach, UAHuntsville Monte Bateman, USRA GLM AWG/R3 Science.
SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF GOES-R GEOSTATIONARY LIGHTNING MAPPER (GLM) DETECTION ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE Loren Sadewa Clark, Tom Dixon, Pete Armstrong, Ruth.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Lally School of Management & Technology MGMT 6070 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Term Project Presentation.
Replacing Steam Preconditioning An ECA STC/IPC Designed Experiment Pathfinder Status Report Bill Russell Raytheon Professional Services LLC September 25,
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
MODIS OCEAN QA Browse Imagery (MQABI Browse Tool) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Sept 4, 2003
 Rapidly developing convection is a known source of CIT  Satellite derived cloud top infrared (IR) cooling rate, overshooting tops (OT)/enhanced-V and.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
Douglas Mach Science and Technology Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Huntsville, AL, USA GOES-R GLM Post Launch Product Tests (PLPTs)
Vaisala TLS200 VHF total lightning mapping for safety and nowcasting applications Nick Demetriades 1, Ron Holle 2, and Nikki Hembury 2 Vaisala Inc. 1 Helsinki,
2015 GLM Annual Science Team Meeting: Cal/Val Tools Developers Forum 9-11 September, 2015 DATA MANAGEMENT For GLM Cal/Val Activities Helen Conover Information.
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
Using ArcGIS to Study the Correlation between Lightning Strike Density and Terrain Elevation Alex DeCaria and Michael Babij Department of Earth Sciences.
Prostate Cancer CAD Michael Feldman, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Pathology University Pennsylvania.
Lightning activity Prepared by Morris Cohen and Benjamin Cotts Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME.
Geoffrey Stano – ENSCO / SPoRT David Hotz and Anthony Cavalluci– WFO Morristown, TN Tony Reavley – Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security of.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
GLM Lightning Val Plans Monte Bateman, Doug Mach, Rich Blakeslee, Bill Koshak & Steve Goodman.
SLHC Local Support Requirements Summary M. Gilchriese November 4, 2008.
Comparison of WTLN and OKLMA Data William H. Beasley 1, Stephanie Weiss 1, Stan Heckman 2 1. School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Norman, OK
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
1 Geostationary Lightning Mapper for GOES-R and Beyond Steven Goodman, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Richard Blakeslee and William Koshak, NASA/MSFC
Early Evaluation and Operational Applications of Total Lightning in AWIPS-2 Al Cope NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Mount Holly, NJ
GOES-R GLM Lightning-Aviation Applications GOES-R GLM instrument will provide unique total lightning data products on the location and intensity of thunderstorms.
Photo by Chuck Doswell Ground Flash Fraction Retrieval Algorithm GLM Science Meeting December 1-3, 2010, Huntsville, AL Dr. William Koshak, NASA/MSFC/VP61.
GLM Annual Science Team Meeting Cal/Val Tools Developers Forum 9-11 September 2015 GLM PLT & Cal/Val Status William Koshak, NASA/MSFC.
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
Validation of Cloud Top Temperature with CLOUDNET cloud radar data during the BBC2 Period Erwin Wolters (D. Donovan Presenting)
Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology.
Further Progress on a Framework for the Statistical Analysis of Large Radar and Lightning Datasets Timothy J. Lang and Steven A. Rutledge Colorado State.
NPI-NILU tasks (Ola Engelsen) •Further development of fast simulation tool for UV radiation (Fastrt) •Applications of fast simulation tool for quality.
 Prior R3 (Schultz et al MWR, Gatlin and Goodman 2010 JTECH, Schultz et al WF) explored the feasibility of thunderstorm cell-oriented lightning-trending.
EUM/ Issue Jochen Grandell 25 September 2013 Presentation to the GLM Science Team (webex) Meteosat Third Generation Lightning Imager (MTG-LI) --- Status.
1. Session Goals 2 __________________________________________ FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK Understand use of the terms climatology and variability.
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06 Cloud Lightning from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) Ronald L. Holle, Nicholas Demetriades, and.
1 Pre-launch Algorithms and Risk Reduction in Support of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper for GOES-R and Beyond Steven Goodman, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Richard.
Andrea Schumacher1, M. DeMaria2, and R. DeMaria1
Long Range Lightning Detection Estimated Median Location Accuracy
Use of Lightning Data for Electricity Transmission Operations
Ross Lazear SUNY Albany
Presentation transcript:

GLM Val Tool Overview Monte Bateman

Introduction GLM is an optical instrument Closest analog is LIS Have several ground-based, 24x7 networks; all are RF sensors Comparison between RF & optical characteristics of lightning?

Tool to Validate the GLM System Compare with any other available lightning data Model after RTMM Display multiple data sets Calculate, plot & track all statistics Show trending Flag problems

How to Validate GLM? “Game Changer” Optical sensor; ground-based network are RF == different physics LIS on TRMM (maybe); LIS on ISS (maybe) Range/FOV: WWLLN has the range, but uniformly low DE ~10% DE: NLDN/GLD360 has the range, but mainly sees ground flashes DE: LMA has the DE, but is range-limited

Statistics: FDE Flash detection efficiency Measure against what? WWLLN is global, but only about 10% DE NLDN sees about 80% of ground, 15% of cloud ENTLN? more later... LMA best DE, but range-limited LMA probably the best candidate for FDE

Statistics: FLA Flash location accuracy Same questions GLM pixels are (on average) 9km x 9km LMA has accuracy to a few hundred meters LMA looks at different physics -- won't agree on what a flash is, let alone where it is NLDN (GLD360?) probably the best candidate for FLA

Statistics: FTA Flash time accuracy GLM integrates 2ms frames LMA has timing accuracy to 100 ns, but again, different physics LMA may work, but NLDN probably the best candidate for FTA

Val Tool Map

Comparison Study: WWLLN & ENTLN Needed to fully characterize other networks Compared with LIS, the best analog for GLM Groups to strokes Comparison methodology -- time/space window selection Groups to strokes -- ended up being flash comparisons

WWLLN Timeline Plot

ENTLN Timeline Plot

WWLLN Map

ENTLN Map