Parkland Dedication Code Amendment Randy Scott, Park Development Coordinator City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department Marilyn Lamensdorf, Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Advertisements

Seekonk Board of Assessors
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
PARKS: Major Policy Topics  Park development guidelines  Joint use of park and recreation facilities  Park accessibility  Park acquisition priorities.
2013 Annual Amendment City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services Planning Commission Public Hearing March 20, 2013.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
SDHC City Linkage Fee Stakeholders Meeting November 19,
Indian Trail Town Council Town Council January 12, 2010.
KEC Policy Forums - September 26, 2007 Kansas Energy Council Public Forum on Draft Policy Recommendations Liz Brosius KEC Director.
City and County Vision, Code and Initiatives Ashley Koehler, City of Driggs Brittany Skelton, City of Victor Jason Boal / Kristin Rader, Teton County Teton.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
Community Gardens. Purpose To promote the local food initiative within the City of Berkeley’s Climate Action Plan. To adopt definition of community gardens.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
Introduction to the City Auditor’s Office and Recommendation to Revise Oil Production Tax Presentation to the Wrigley Neighborhood Association February.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
1 A Framework for Comprehensive Planning City of Sunset Valley.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS AND REVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
Taxpayer’s Guide CRAVEN COUNTY’S 2016 REVALUATION.
City of Palm Coast Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) City Council Meeting Presentation December 7, 2010.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Timeline History NOV 2007 Community process began MAY 2009Draft Recreation and Open Space Element released JUL 2010 Funding for the environmental review.
Annexation 480 CHELSEA ROSE ANNEXATION PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING AUGUST 11 TH, 2015.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Centre Region Council of Governments. 150 Square Miles 83,000 Population *Includes Students.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
1 BCC Work Session Local Code of Ethics & Specific Project Expenditure Report Presented by Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney December 2, 2008.
USF System Campus Master Plan Updates October 20, 2015 St. Petersburg.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Youth commission Quality of life Committee Youth Commission Dallas City Council November 3, 2015.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Revision to the Historic Preservation Tax Exemptions and Economic Development Incentives.
Department of Public Works Recommended Residential Impact Fee Distribution Methodology Change October 26, 2015.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
Planning & Community Development Department Lower Hastings Ranch Moratorium Extension City Council January 25, 2016.
Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared on October 10 th, 2013.
Enhanced Wireless Funding through HB 361 Shawn S. Smith Interim Ohio Coordinator.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
April 26, 2016 PRESENTER: Doug Green, Vice President.
Planning Commission Work Session February 19, 2015.
City Council Meeting October 15, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of Element.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
Community Comments MCA Purpose & History 2015 Performance & Activities 2016 Draft Budget 2016 Delegate Election.
ITEM 6.a AT GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE City Council – August 25, 2009.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.02Public Facilities.
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE & PLANNING DIVISION: Hampton City Council July 13, 2011 Briefing Amendments to Chapter 35 of the Hampton City Code.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
C APITAL I MPROVEMENTS P LAN C ITY M ANAGER R ECOMMENDATION October 28, 2014 FY 2016 – FY 2020.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 JENNIFER MACARTHY BUTTE COUNTY ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Butte County Regional Economic Development Strategy.
Park Planning for the City of San Diego Robin Shifflet April 22, 2016 City of San Diego Planning Department.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Inclusionary Zoning Housing Committee August 1, 2016.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS AND REVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES AND THE 2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
Large scale development groundwater balance
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
Tax Abatement Bonds Presentation City of Marshall, Minnesota
Impact Fee Advisory Committee November 10, 2016
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
PRO Plan Update Chapter 1
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Code Amendments to SMC 19A Planning Commission Meeting
CIP Amendment – Property Acquisition
Continuum of Care Metropolitan Homelessness Commission
PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council June 6, 2006
CIP Amendment – Property Acquisition
Review of Planning Department November 19, 2018
Establish New Park Space in the Central District & Appropriate Funds to Acquire a Portion of an Existing Parking Lot for Conversion to Park Space March.
Public Hearing – Proposed Amendment to Schedule of Taxes, Fees & Charges to Increase RIF by 5% & Amendment to PMC 4.17 to Add New Pocket Park Classification.
Presentation transcript:

Parkland Dedication Code Amendment Randy Scott, Park Development Coordinator City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department Marilyn Lamensdorf, Principal Planner City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department Presented to Austin City Council September 17, 2015

Council Actions to Date  August 14, 2014: Council directed the City Manager to conduct a comprehensive review and make recommendations for revisions to the existing Parkland Dedication Ordinance  November 19, 2014: Staff submitted Parkland Dedication Fee Methodology Report to Mayor and Council  December 11, 2014: Council passed a resolution adopting the proposed fee methodology and initiated a parkland dedication code amendment  August 6, 2015: City Council set public hearing for September 17, 2015

What is Parkland Dedication  Parkland dedication is a local government requirement imposed on subdivision developers or builders, mandating that they dedicate land for a park and/or pay a fee to be used by the government entity to acquire and develop park facilities.  The philosophy is that new development generates a need for additional park amenities; the people responsible for creating that need should bare the cost of providing the new amenities.

Background  Austin’s fee ranks among the lowest in the country

Background  $650 per unit does not cover costs of land and development

Background  Austin parkland acres are not keeping pace with city’s growth

Elected Officials can either:  Increase taxes to pay for new demand  Do nothing and lower Austin’s quality of life  Development pays for itself Three Ways to Pay for Growth

Proposed Code Amendment  Land requirement = current level of service of 9.4 acres per 1,000 residents  Establishes a formula for a fee in-lieu of land  Establishes a formula for a fee for parkland development  Fee becomes part of the City’s Annual Fee Schedule  Increases flexibility for meeting parkland dedication by allowing a combination of land, fees and amenities on public and private lands

Stakeholder Input Stakeholder roundtables and public meetings:  October 24, 2014, at Zilker Botanical Gardens roundtable.  November 10, 2014, Land and Facilities Committee of the Parks and Recreation Board.  November 18, 2014, Parks and Recreation Board.  December 5, 2014, at PARD Annex Building roundtable.  January 21, 2015, RECA monthly membership meeting  May 27, 2015, Open Space Environmental and Sustainability Committee, OSES  June 23, 2015, Planning Commission public hearing  August 28, 2015, at Zilker Botanical Gardens roundtable

Stakeholder Input Participants Included :  Real Estate Council of Austin;  Greater Austin Builders Association;  Downtown Austin Alliance;  Austin Board of Realtors;  Austin Neighborhood Council (ANC) Executive Board;  Private Developers: DR Horton, Benchmark, PSW, Peloton Land, Newcastle Homes; Brookfield Residential;  Engineers: Bury and Partners, Pape Dawson, Thrower Design;  Austin Contractors and Engineers Association

Benefits The Benefits of this code amendment include:  Sound defensible methodology  Meets Imagine Austin goals of increased recreation and open space  Existing level of parkland maintained as city grows  Existing level of park amenities maintained as city grows  More parks throughout the city  More flexibility in meeting the parkland dedication requirements  Specific language clarifying the parkland dedication code process  Formula Included in Ordinance  Fee included in the annual fee schedule

Parks that benefitted from PLD Funds Tom Lasseter/ South Lamar Neighborhood Park

Armadillo Neighborhood Park

Copperfield Neighborhood Park

Next Steps  September 17, 2015: Council considers code amendment  October 1, 2015: Council adopts new Fee Schedule  October – December 2015: Educational campaign for internal and external stakeholders  January 1, 2016: New park fees go into effect ( grace period gives developers more time to incorporate new fees into project pro-formas)

Staff contact information: Randy Scott, Park Development Coordinator Phone: Ricardo Soliz, Division Manager Phone: Marilyn Lamensdorf, Principal Planner Phone: Discussion