Conclusions Buenos Aires, – December 5 th, 2004 CDM Methodologies and Project Design Workshop for CDM Project Developers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paulo Manso CDM EB September, 2011 Proceeder for Submission & Approval Standardized Baselines.
Advertisements

BASELINE STANDARD UNFCCC secretariat workshop
T HE W ORLD B ANK C ARBON F INANCE U NIT UNFCCC W ORKSHOP : S TANDARDS FOR BASELINE SCENARIO IDENTIFICATION AND BASELINE EMISSION CALCULATIONS M ARCH 2011.
TÜV NORD Calibration regarding project assessment requirements 7th CDM Joint Coordination Workshop 2011 Bonn,
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Verónica Colerio, Standard Setting Unit Standardized Baselines in the CDM: Decisions and Way Forward.
The CDM Policy Dialogue Margaret Mukahanana-Sangarwe Member, High-level Panel on the CDM Policy Dialogue FIRST SDM JOINT COORDINATION WORKSHOP Bonn, Germany,
Wrap-up session for Module 2.1 (Additionality) Presenters: UNFCCC secretariat, MP member, PD Forum, and TÜV SÜD 1 st Sustainable Development Mechanisms.
Presentation title 1st Sustainable Development Mechanisms Joint Coordination Workshop Module 2.4 Materiality Bonn, Germany, 24–25 March 2012 Marsha Cheddi.
. CDM Project Cycle Calibration Melanie Eddis ERM Certification and Verification Services (ERM CVS) CDM Coordination Meeting UNFCCC, Bonn March 2012.
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Programme Modalities and procedures for direct communication with stakeholders 3/CMP 6, para. 21,
T HE W ORLD B ANK C ARBON F INANCE U NIT Standardised Baselines Framework March 24-25, Bonn.
Piloting standardised CDM methodologies in LDCs Sarah Love, Economic Advisor Climate and Environment Department, DFID 24 March
1 Rajesh Kumar Sethi Chair of the CDM Executive Board Clean Development Mechanism 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop on means.
UNFCCC Secretariat SDM programme Wrap-up Session: Key Issues Identified and Proposals discussed Practitioners’ workshop on Standardized baselines Bonn,
Ideas on NAMA development and implementation Carolyn Neufeld KfW Carbon Fund.
The New Market Mechanism Emissions Trading – Developments in China & Europe Workshop 25 th April 2012 Dr Luke Redmond
Baselines and Additionality Executive Board decisions so far Steve Thorne SouthSouthNorth COP 9 5 th December 2003.
Joint Implementation & Gas Flaring Reduction Projects Alexandrina Platonova-Oquab Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.
Ort, Datum Autor UNFCCC General and cross-cutting issues - summary of the discussions - Workshop on emissions projection Bonn, Germany 6-8 September 2004.
Accreditation of Independent entities under JI - Status of JISC work Georg B ø rsting UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation, 9-10 March 2006.
Learning from the CDM First UNFCCC workshop on Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol May 2004 Moscow, Russian Federation John Shaibu KILANI.
CDM National Authorities : an Example Prepared for the National Workshop on Capacity Development for Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) March 2003,
PDD Preparation Cairo, June 14 th -15 th, 2004 TIMS/EEAA CD4CDM- Third National Workshop (Phase II) UNEP RISO / APEXPDD Preparation Process and Format.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Implementation of standardized baselines guidelines and procedures: Possible Barriers and Challenges, from the DNA perspective Ms.Tsendsuren Batsuuri,
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment CD for CDM - Phase 1 - First National Workshop, Egypt December SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGICAL.
Practical Experience with Small-scale Projects: Issues and Suggestions Johannes Heister, Lasse Ringius Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank Bonn, 9-10 March.
Kai-Uwe B. Schmidt Maria Netto Cooperative Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol.
Host Country Committee Work Program for the period Discussion during HCC Meeting, February 15/ Washington, D.C. Juan Pedro Searle Solar.
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. CDM Project Cycle Anna.
Review of CDM methodology development process Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee on Carbon Finance Washington DC, 15 February 2005 Lasse Ringius.
1 Summary National Workshop Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Baselines and Additionality Executive Board decisions so far Steve Thorne SouthSouthNorth Accra, Ghana 7 th and 8 th November 2005.
Sudhir Sharma, URC 5th June 2014 Bonn, Germany Overview of NAMAs listed in UNFCCC Registry - Expressed support needs Sudhir Sharma Senior Climate Change.
1 Basics of CDM Development Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Baseline Setting and Monitoring: Sectoral Approaches Joint Implementation Expert Workshop, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 9 March.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment CD for CDM - Phase 1 - First Regional Workshop, Tunis January Cross-cutting issues to.
REPARIS, Vienna, March 14, 2006 | | Seite 1 Bridging the gap between IFRS and regulatory accounting by Ludger Hanenberg, BaFin REPARIS Workshops.
Guatemala: El Canada Hydroelectric Project Meth Panel decision on its proposed baseline methodologies May 2003.
1 PDD and PIN preparation Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Regional perspectives under the Clean Development Mechanism Jose Domingos Gonzalez Miguez, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil.
LDC Workshop Bali Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry Agenda Items for COP and COP/MOP.
Kai-Uwe B. Schmidt Maria Netto Cooperative Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol.
Overview of Two CDM Guidebooks Side Event: CD4CDM Project COP 10, Buenos Aires December 11, 2004 Sami Kamel, UNEP RISOE Centre, Denmark.
TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE PCF.
The Role of Designated Operational Entities in the CDM High-Level Roundtable on CDM Reform World Bank Carbon Finance Business Washington, D.C., October.
Steps for Submission of New Baseline Methodologies National Workshop on Baseline Methodologies CD4CDM Project (Phase II) 31 March – 1 April 2004 Sami Mostafa.
GEF & UNFCCC Cooperation: COP 17 Action Items GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 30 October to 1 November 2012 Arusha, Tanzania.
Session 4.2. Criteria for baseline setting and monitoring Dealing with methodological matters in the ERUPT programme Zsolt Lengyel SenterNovem Carboncredits.nl.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Use and Conceptualization of Power Sector Baselines: Methodology and Case Study from El Salvador Lasse.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
JISC work on Small Scale JI Projects UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn 9 th March 2006 By: Fatou Ndeye Gaye and Evgeny Sokolov.
Conservativeness in baselines WB workshop for CDM project developers Buenos Aires, 5 December 2004 Lambert Schneider.
Private & Confidential 33 ASSET MANAGEMENT 33 Asset Management - Ensuring Predictability 12 March 2011, Bonn.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Update on Methodological Issues Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee Köln, May 2006.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Host Country Institutional Issues Miriam Hinostroza UNEP.
NAMA for promoting use of Biogas Sudhir Sharma, Senior Advisor, Climate Change Second Capacity Building Workshop on LCD and NAMAs Da Son, Hai Phong, Vietnam,
1 CDM institutional framework Maria Netto UNFCCC secretariat Addis Ababa 21 October 2003
Baseline approaches and methodologies: interpretation of Para 48(a)-(c) M&P Buenos Aires, – December 5 th, 2004 Johannes Heister – World Bank, Carbon Finance.
Clean Development Mechanism
Implementation Subprogramme
Perspective on consolidated methodologies & additionality tool
CDM Methods and project design: Baselines
Baseline setting and monitoring under JI compared to the CDM approach
Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26
Small-Scale Projects Under JI
LNG Workshop Bilbao, March 13th 2009 GLE.
Work Accomplished by JISC
Presentation transcript:

Conclusions Buenos Aires, – December 5 th, 2004 CDM Methodologies and Project Design Workshop for CDM Project Developers

General observations Project and methodology developers appreciate the opportunity for discussions of methodologies and projects among themselves and with representatives of CDM regulatory bodies. Bottom-up approach for methodologies has achieved some results. An increasing number of methodologies and projects are developed in non-Annex I countries. Cost of writing PDDs is coming down thanks to guidance. The introduction of the feedback loop in the methodology review process is a good step, but was not considered as enough. Participants find that more interaction with the Meth Panel and EB is needed. Participants requested more transparency; more feedback should be given to project and methodology developers. In particular, the Meth Panel’s recommendations on methodologies should contain more details and the basis for the Panel’s decisions. There is a feeling that the regulatory process is in a situation of crisis. Good progress has been made, but not fast enough in some cases. There is still a bottleneck in the processing of new methodologies. Participants suggested to involve the private sector more in the regulatory process and find solutions to the financing gap under which the CDM has been suffering. The level of understanding has increased but needs to be raised further. DNAs and DOEs can and should actively contribute to improving the understanding of CDM projects and methodologies.

Observations on methodologies Many definitions need still to be clarified, e.g. what is a similar technology. The calculation concept of build and operation margin for power sector emission factors in the consolidated methodology ACM0002 was questioned. The issue of conservativeness in relation to uncertainty and accuracy in methodologies needs to be further discussed. Participants called for more broadly applicable methodologies, but also realized that methodologies should consider national circumstances. Participants expressed satisfaction that they now have guidance on additionality (Additionality Tool) but some questioned whether the notion of additionality in the Marrakesh Accord had been correctly implemented in this guidance. Options for streamlining and simplification should be actively explored further.

Good practice in drafting PDDs and new methodologies Project and methodology developers should check the CDM glossary often to stay current and stay as closely within the provided guidance as possible. Desk reviewers and Meth Panel look for –clear drafting in PDD and methodology submissions –methodological elements that are concrete and require as little – subjective – interpretation as possible.

Issues requiring further guidance The guidance on national and sectoral policies was appreciated, but a lack of consistency with regard to approved methodologies was noted. The EB should clarify whether approved methodologies can be interpreted consistent with the guidance on national and sectoral policies. Guidance regarding the Monitoring Plan now required by the PDD may be needed. Guidance on bundling of small-scale and and micro-projects may be needed? Multi- actor micro-projects may require a different set of methodologies. Guidance on how to address supply constrains and different service levels in baseline and project case, e.g. in energy efficiency projects, may be needed. Participants noted that there is still no clarity on unilateral CDM projects. Participants noted that, despite the simplified methodologies, the financial viability of small-scale projects is often still problematic. Can a financial mechanism be used or developed to support small-scale projects?

Next steps The proceedings of the workshop will be made available on the World Bank CFB website. Participants would appreciate the organization of another similar workshop. The World Bank’s Carbon Finance Business would be willing to convene it, possibly in the margin of the Carbon Expo in Cologne in May 2005 or of the sessions of the UNFCCC subsidiary bodies in Bonn in June Another opportunity for interaction is presented in context of by the Point Carbon conference “Carbon Market Insight” in Amsterdam in March 2005.