Where We Stand 7th Edition The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region IDOT Planning Conference October 16, 2015

East-West Gateway 8-County Region St. Louis 15-County Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)

St. Louis and Our Peer Regions Population New York 20,092,883 2Los Angeles 13,262,220 3Chicago9,554,598 4Dallas 6,954,330 5Houston 6,490,180 6Philadelphia 6,051,170 7Washington, D.C. 6,033,737 8Miami 5,929,819 9Atlanta 5,614,323 10Boston 4,732,161 11San Francisco 4,594,060 12Phoenix 4,489,109 13Riverside 4,441,890 14Detroit 4,296,611 15Seattle 3,671,478 Peer Average3,497,725 16Minneapolis 3,495,176 17San Diego 3,263,431 18Tampa 2,915,582 19St. Louis 2,806,207 20Baltimore 2,785,874 21Denver 2,754,258 22Charlotte 2,380,314 23Pittsburgh 2,355,968 24Portland 2,348,247 25San Antonio 2,328,652 26Orlando 2,321,418 27Sacramento 2,244,397 28Cincinnati 2,149,449 29Kansas City 2,071,133 30Las Vegas 2,069,681 31Cleveland 2,063,598 32Columbus 1,994,536 33Indianapolis 1,971,274 34San Jose 1,952,872 35Austin 1,943,299 36Nashville 1,792,649 37Virginia Beach 1,716,624 38Providence 1,609,367 39Milwaukee 1,572,245 40Jacksonville 1,419,127 41Memphis 1,343,230 42Oklahoma City 1,336,767 43Louisville 1,269,702 44Richmond 1,260,029 45New Orleans 1,251,849 46Raleigh 1,242,974 47Hartford 1,214,295 48Salt Lake City 1,153,340 49Birmingham 1,143,772 50Buffalo 1,136,360 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates

Top 5 Reasons St. Louis is Better than Chicago 1.More adults with HS education; more with associate’s degree 2.Lower poverty rate, esp. for seniors 3.Lower congestion; lower commute time 4.Greater housing affordability, esp. for owners 5.Higher volunteer rate

Top 5 Reasons Chicago is Better than St. Louis 1.Lower rates of heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes (not age-adjusted) 2.Lower solo auto commute rate / higher walk and bike commuting 3.Lower VMT per capita / lower GHG emissions from household auto use 4.Fewer developed acres per capita 5.Better access to parks and grocery stores

Chicago 14-County Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) ILLINOIS WISCONSIN INDIANA

Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) in Illinois

Demographics Slow Population Growth Population Change Percent change, Champaign-Urbana2.3 2Bloomington2.3 3Cape Girardeau1.7 4Chicago1.0 5Quad Cities0.9 6Springfield0.7 7St. Louis0.7 8Effingham0.2 9Peoria0.2 10Carbondale0.1 11Quincy Mount Vernon Paducah 14Burlington 15Charleston Galesburg Kankakee Lincoln Jacksonville Rockford Fort Madison Decatur Centralia Macomb Danville Ottawa-Peru Taylorville Rochelle Freeport Pontiac Sterling Canton Dixon-3.6 Population Change Percent change, Austin13.2 2Raleigh10.0 3Houston9.6 4Orlando8.8 5San Antonio8.7 6Denver8.3 7Dallas8.2 8Charlotte7.4 9Nashville7.3 10Phoenix7.1 11Washington, D.C Seattle6.7 13Oklahoma City6.7 14Miami6.5 15San Jose6.3 16Atlanta6.2 17Las Vegas6.1 18Salt Lake City6.0 19San Francisco6.0 20Portland5.5 21Jacksonville5.5 22San Diego5.4 23New Orleans5.2 24Riverside5.1 25Columbus4.9 26Tampa4.7 27Sacramento4.4 28Indianapolis4.4 29Minneapolis4.4 30Richmond4.3 31Boston3.9 32Los Angeles3.4 United States3.3 33Kansas City3.1 34Baltimore2.8 35Louisville2.8 36New York2.7 37Virginia Beach2.4 38Cincinnati1.6 39Philadelphia1.4 40Birmingham1.4 41Memphis1.4 42Milwaukee1.0 43Chicago1.0 44St. Louis0.7 45Providence0.5 46Hartford0.2 47Buffalo0.1 48Detroit0.0 49Pittsburgh0.0 50Cleveland-0.7 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates 46 th 0.4% 39 th 1.2% Illinois Missouri

Population Change

Demographics Strong Domestic Outmigration Net Domestic Migration Percent of 2010 population, Cape Girardeau0.2 2Paducah-0.5 3Springfield-0.6 4Quincy-0.6 5Quad Cities-0.7 6Burlington-0.9 7Galesburg-1.1 8Effingham-1.3 9Bloomington St. Louis Charleston Mount Vernon Peoria Carbondale Lincoln Jacksonville Canton Fort Madison Taylorville Ottawa-Peru Sterling Freeport Centralia Chicago Champaign-Urbana Danville Decatur Kankakee Macomb Rochelle Pontiac Dixon Rockford-3.9 Net Domestic Migration Percent of 2010 population, Austin7.4 2Raleigh4.9 3San Antonio4.4 4Denver4.1 5Nashville3.8 6Charlotte3.8 7Orlando3.4 8Houston3.2 9Oklahoma City3.0 10Dallas2.9 11Phoenix2.8 12Tampa2.7 13Jacksonville2.3 14New Orleans2.2 15Portland2.2 16Las Vegas1.8 17Seattle1.8 18Atlanta1.5 19Richmond1.3 20San Francisco1.1 21Columbus1.1 22Indianapolis0.9 23Riverside0.9 24Sacramento0.7 25Louisville0.6 26Miami0.4 27Washington, D.C.0.3 Peer Average0.2 28Pittsburgh0.2 29San Diego0.1 30Minneapolis0.0 31Salt Lake City Kansas City Boston Baltimore Birmingham San Jose Cincinnati Buffalo 39Philadelphia Providence St. Louis Milwaukee Virginia Beach Los Angeles Memphis Cleveland Detroit Hartford Chicago New York-2.7 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates 39 th -0.7% 50 th -2.5% Illinois Missouri

Net International Migration Changing Demographics International Migration Net International Migration Percent of 2010 population, Miami4.7 2San Jose3.8 3Washington, D.C.3.1 4New York3.1 5Orlando3.0 6San Francisco2.6 7Boston2.6 8Seattle2.2 9Houston2.2 10Los Angeles2.1 11San Diego2.0 12Hartford1.9 13Tampa1.6 14Dallas1.5 15Las Vegas1.5 16Austin1.5 17Raleigh1.5 18Baltimore1.5 19Atlanta1.4 20Minneapolis1.4 21Virginia Beach1.4 22Sacramento1.4 23Philadelphia1.3 24Providence1.3 United States1.3 25Richmond1.3 26Jacksonville1.2 27Salt Lake City1.2 28Chicago1.1 29Buffalo1.1 30New Orleans1.1 31Columbus1.1 32Charlotte1.0 33Detroit1.0 34Phoenix1.0 35Portland1.0 36Nashville1.0 37Denver1.0 38San Antonio1.0 39Indianapolis0.9 40Oklahoma City0.9 41Riverside0.8 42Cleveland0.8 43Louisville0.8 44Kansas City0.7 45Cincinnati0.7 46St. Louis0.6 47Milwaukee0.6 48Memphis0.6 49Pittsburgh0.5 50Birmingham0.4 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Immigrant Population Percent of total population, Miami38.8 2San Jose37.5 3Los Angeles33.4 4San Francisco29.7 5New York28.5 6San Diego23.7 7Houston22.6 8Washington, D.C Las Vegas Riverside Sacramento Chicago Dallas Seattle Boston Orlando Austin Phoenix Atlanta13.3 United States Providence Hartford Portland Tampa Denver Salt Lake City San Antonio Raleigh Philadelphia Minneapolis9.7 30Charlotte9.7 31Detroit9.3 32Baltimore9.2 33Oklahoma City8.4 34Jacksonville8.2 35Nashville7.5 36New Orleans7.4 37Columbus7.1 38Milwaukee7.0 39Richmond6.7 40Kansas City6.5 41Indianapolis6.5 42Virginia Beach6.3 43Buffalo6.0 44Cleveland5.5 45Memphis5.1 46Louisville4.9 47Cincinnati4.4 48St. Louis4.4 49Pittsburgh3.8 50Birmingham3.8 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates 19 th 1.0% 37 th 0.6% Immigrant Population 3.7% 44 th 13.9% 11 th Illinois Missouri

St. Louis MSA 8 th largest percent 65+ (14.4%) 10 th lowest percent 18 to 34 (22.5%) Changing Demographics Age Distribution Seniors Population aged 65 and over as percent of total population, Tampa18.4 2Pittsburgh18.0 3Miami16.7 4Buffalo16.4 5Cleveland16.2 6Providence15.5 7Hartford15.4 8St. Louis14.4 9Detroit Philadelphia Birmingham14.2 United States Boston Louisville New York Jacksonville Phoenix San Francisco Baltimore Sacramento Milwaukee Orlando Cincinnati New Orleans Richmond Kansas City Las Vegas Portland Virginia Beach Chicago Oklahoma City San Diego Indianapolis Los Angeles Charlotte Seattle San Jose Minneapolis San Antonio Nashville Columbus Memphis Riverside Denver Washington, D.C Atlanta Raleigh Dallas9.9 48Houston9.5 49Salt Lake City9.3 50Austin9.2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Young Adults Population aged as percent of total population, Austin27.6 2San Diego27.3 3Virginia Beach26.9 4Salt Lake City26.5 5Los Angeles25.6 6Oklahoma City25.5 7Orlando25.0 8San Antonio25.0 9Riverside Columbus Seattle Washington, D.C Houston Boston Nashville New Orleans Denver Dallas Sacramento San Francisco Chicago Las Vegas New York San Jose Baltimore Phoenix Minneapolis Richmond23.5 United States Memphis Philadelphia Portland Raleigh Atlanta Providence Milwaukee Jacksonville Indianapolis Buffalo Kansas City Charlotte St. Louis Hartford Birmingham Cincinnati Louisville Miami Pittsburgh Detroit Tampa Cleveland20.8 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Source: Missouri Census Data Center

Changing Demographics Age Distribution St. Louis MSA, 2014 St. Louis MSA, Predicted 2045 Male Female

Land Use Developed Land per Capita Developed acres per capita, Birmingham0.36 United States0.36 2Kansas City0.36 3Oklahoma City0.34 4Memphis0.33 5Nashville0.30 6St. Louis0.30 7Charlotte0.30 8Richmond0.29 9Pittsburgh Jacksonville Indianapolis San Antonio Minneapolis Columbus Atlanta Cincinnati Austin Cleveland Louisville Raleigh Orlando Detroit New Orleans Hartford Houston Tampa Virginia Beach Portland Riverside Dallas Milwaukee Seattle Phoenix Providence Buffalo Denver Salt Lake City Sacramento Baltimore Chicago Boston Philadelphia Washington, D.C San Diego San Jose Miami Las Vegas San Francisco New York Los Angeles0.09 Sources: National Land Cover Database; U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Developed in 2001 Developed between Developed between Undeveloped

Land Use Developed Land per Capita Developed acres per capita, Birmingham0.36 United States0.36 2Kansas City0.36 3Oklahoma City0.34 4Memphis0.33 5Nashville0.30 6St. Louis0.30 7Charlotte0.30 8Richmond0.29 9Pittsburgh Jacksonville Indianapolis San Antonio Minneapolis Columbus Atlanta Cincinnati Austin Cleveland Louisville Raleigh Orlando Detroit New Orleans Hartford Houston Tampa Virginia Beach Portland Riverside Dallas Milwaukee Seattle Phoenix Providence Buffalo Denver Salt Lake City Sacramento Baltimore Chicago Boston Philadelphia Washington, D.C San Diego San Jose Miami Las Vegas San Francisco New York Los Angeles0.09 Sources: National Land Cover Database; U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Developed in 2001 Developed between Developed between Undeveloped

Land Use Developed Land per Capita Developed acres per capita, Birmingham0.36 United States0.36 2Kansas City0.36 3Oklahoma City0.34 4Memphis0.33 5Nashville0.30 6St. Louis0.30 7Charlotte0.30 8Richmond0.29 9Pittsburgh Jacksonville Indianapolis San Antonio Minneapolis Columbus Atlanta Cincinnati Austin Cleveland Louisville Raleigh Orlando Detroit New Orleans Hartford Houston Tampa Virginia Beach Portland Riverside Dallas Milwaukee Seattle Phoenix Providence Buffalo Denver Salt Lake City Sacramento Baltimore Chicago Boston Philadelphia Washington, D.C San Diego San Jose Miami Las Vegas San Francisco New York Los Angeles0.09 Sources: National Land Cover Database; U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Change in Developed Land per Capita Percent change in developed acres per capita, Detroit3.8 2Cleveland3.2 3Buffalo2.9 4Pittsburgh1.9 5Providence1.8 6Chicago1.6 7St. Louis0.9 8Virginia Beach0.3 9Milwaukee0.2 10Hartford0.0 11Philadelphia Memphis New York Cincinnati Phoenix Boston Birmingham Baltimore Orlando Los Angeles Jacksonville Minneapolis Tampa Columbus-2.4 United States Kansas City Richmond Indianapolis Louisville Miami Oklahoma City Sacramento Riverside San Diego Salt Lake City Dallas Houston San Francisco Atlanta Nashville Seattle Washington D.C Portland San Jose San Antonio Denver Las Vegas Charlotte Austin Raleigh New Orleans-13.6 Sources: National Land Cover Database; U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates

Education Educational Attainment No High School Diploma or Equivalent Percent of adults aged 25 and older, Los Angeles21.4 2Riverside20.4 3Houston18.0 4San Antonio15.8 5Dallas15.6 6Las Vegas15.5 7Miami15.3 8New Orleans15.2 9Providence New York Memphis San Diego San Jose Phoenix13.5 United States Oklahoma City Charlotte Birmingham Chicago Orlando Richmond San Francisco Atlanta Nashville Louisville Tampa Sacramento Austin Detroit Indianapolis Cleveland Baltimore Philadelphia Cincinnati Hartford Milwaukee Raleigh Columbus Denver9.9 39Salt Lake City9.8 40Jacksonville9.7 41Buffalo9.6 42Washington, D.C Virginia Beach9.3 44Portland9.2 45St. Louis9.1 46Kansas City8.8 47Boston8.8 48Seattle8.3 49Pittsburgh7.5 50Minneapolis7.0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Bachelor's Degree or Higher Percent of adults aged 25 and older, Washington, D.C San Jose46.7 3San Francisco45.2 4Boston44.8 5Raleigh43.7 6Austin41.5 7Denver40.3 8Seattle39.4 9Minneapolis New York Baltimore Hartford Atlanta Chicago Portland Philadelphia San Diego Columbus Kansas City Milwaukee Dallas St. Louis Richmond Nashville Pittsburgh Charlotte Los Angeles Salt Lake City Cincinnati Houston Sacramento Indianapolis Buffalo Cleveland Providence29.6 United States Virginia Beach Orlando Miami Phoenix Detroit Birmingham Jacksonville Oklahoma City Tampa New Orleans Louisville San Antonio Memphis Las Vegas Riverside20.1 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Racial Disparity Disparity in Unemployment Rate Ratio of black to white unemployment rate, Milwaukee3.5 2Cleveland3.4 3Minneapolis3.2 4Chicago3.1 5San Francisco3.1 6Hartford2.9 7Pittsburgh2.9 8St. Louis2.8 9Memphis2.8 10Buffalo2.8 11Indianapolis2.7 12Detroit2.7 13Washington, D.C Houston2.5 14Kansas City2.5 16Richmond2.5 17San Antonio2.5 18Virginia Beach2.4 19Cincinnati2.4 20Louisville2.4 21Charlotte2.3 United States2.2 22Baltimore2.2 23Las Vegas2.2 24Jacksonville2.2 25Birmingham2.2 26Atlanta2.2 27Dallas2.2 28Los Angeles2.2 29Boston2.2 30Raleigh2.2 31Oklahoma City2.2 32Miami2.1 33Philadelphia2.1 34New Orleans2.1 35Columbus2.1 36New York2.1 37Sacramento2.1 38Denver2.0 39Tampa2.0 40Portland1.9 41San Diego1.8 42Nashville1.8 43Seattle1.8 44Orlando1.7 45Riverside1.7 46Austin1.6 47Phoenix1.6 48Providence1.5 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Disparity in Infant Mortality Ratio of black to white infant deaths per 1,000 live births, Minneapolis3.5 2Chicago3.5 3Milwaukee3.3 4St. Louis3.3 5Cleveland3.2 6Phoenix3.2 7Los Angeles3.2 8Philadelphia3.1 9Pittsburgh3.1 10New Orleans3.0 11Orlando3.0 12Boston3.0 13Las Vegas2.8 14Richmond2.8 15Columbus2.7 16Memphis2.7 17Sacramento2.6 18Seattle2.6 19Dallas2.5 20Washington, D.C Portland2.5 22Denver2.5 23Buffalo2.4 24Raleigh2.4 25Miami2.3 26Tampa2.3 27Detroit2.2 28Baltimore2.2 29San Antonio2.2 United States2.2 30Birmingham2.2 31Indianapolis2.1 32Cincinnati2.1 33Kansas City2.1 34Jacksonville2.1 35San Francisco2.1 36New York1.9 37Louisville1.9 38Charlotte1.9 39Nashville1.9 40Riverside1.9 41Virginia Beach1.9 42San Diego1.8 43Houston1.8 44Austin1.5 45Atlanta1.5 46Oklahoma City1.5 47Providence1.4 Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Disparity in Poverty Rate Ratio of black to white poverty rate, Minneapolis4.9 2Milwaukee4.5 3Chicago4.2 4Buffalo4.1 5St. Louis3.6 6San Francisco3.5 7Memphis3.5 8Cleveland3.5 9Denver3.3 10Hartford3.3 11Pittsburgh3.2 12Houston3.2 13New Orleans3.2 14Philadelphia3.2 15Cincinnati3.1 16Dallas3.1 17Richmond3.0 18Virginia Beach3.0 19Detroit3.0 20Kansas City3.0 21Indianapolis2.9 22San Antonio2.9 23Baltimore2.9 24Portland2.8 25Columbus2.8 26New York2.8 27Seattle2.8 28Boston2.7 29Raleigh2.7 30Las Vegas2.7 31Oklahoma City2.6 32Washington, D.C Orlando2.6 34Providence2.6 35Jacksonville2.6 36Sacramento2.6 37Charlotte2.6 United States2.5 38Louisville2.5 39Riverside2.5 40Miami2.4 41Tampa2.4 42Los Angeles2.4 43Atlanta2.3 44Birmingham2.3 45Austin2.3 46Nashville2.1 47Phoenix2.1 48San Diego1.8 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Economy Chicago St. Louis Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics

Economy Change in Employment Percent change, Austin19.2 2Houston13.6 3San Antonio12.6 4Nashville10.3 5San Jose9.3 6Dallas9.3 7Raleigh8.3 8Denver8.2 9New Orleans7.3 10Oklahoma City7.1 11Salt Lake City6.4 12San Francisco6.0 13Columbus5.4 14Seattle4.7 15Indianapolis4.3 16Boston4.2 17Charlotte4.2 18Washington, D.C New York3.3 20Portland3.1 21Minneapolis2.5 22Orlando2.5 23Louisville2.5 24San Diego2.1 25Baltimore2.1 26Atlanta1.7 27Richmond1.3 28Pittsburgh1.3 29Kansas City1.1 30Buffalo1.1 United States0.8 31Miami0.1 32Riverside Cincinnati Hartford Los Angeles Philadelphia 37Chicago Jacksonville Tampa Milwaukee St. Louis Virginia Beach Providence Sacramento Detroit Cleveland Phoenix Birmingham Memphis Las Vegas-4.8 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics Change in Employment Percent change, Bloomington(0.7) 2Burlington(1.2) 3Kankakee(1.7) 4Sterling(1.8) 5Effingham(2.0) 6Quad Cities(2.5) 7Carbondale(2.6) 8Chicago(2.7) 9Mount Vernon(2.9) 10Champaign-Urbana(3.2) 11Galesburg(3.3) 12St. Louis(3.4) 13Cape Girardeau(3.5) 14Springfield(3.6) 15Quincy(3.7) 16Peoria(3.7) 17Taylorville(3.8) 18Macomb(5.5) 19Canton(5.8) 20Jacksonville(5.9) 21Paducah(6.1) 22Ottawa-Peru(6.3) 23Dixon(6.4) 24Lincoln(7.5) 25Danville(8.0) 26Centralia(8.2) 27Fort Madison(8.3) 28Decatur(8.6) 29Rockford(8.7) 30Freeport(9.6) 31Charleston(10.5) 32Pontiac(12.5) 33Rochelle(14.9) Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis 44 th -2.3% 39 th -1.8% Illinois Missouri

Economy Change in Unemployment Rate Percentage point change, Las Vegas3.3 2Los Angeles2.8 3Miami2.7 4Phoenix2.6 5Baltimore2.5 6Memphis2.5 7Virginia Beach2.4 8Birmingham2.4 9Atlanta2.4 10New Orleans2.4 11Richmond2.3 12Riverside2.3 13Jacksonville2.3 14Chicago2.1 15Providence2.1 16Washington, D.C Orlando2.0 18New York2.0 19Hartford2.0 20San Diego1.9 21Philadelphia1.8 22Sacramento1.8 23Tampa1.7 24Indianapolis1.6 United States1.5 25Seattle1.5 26Portland1.4 27Buffalo1.4 28Detroit1.3 29Raleigh1.3 30Pittsburgh1.2 31Salt Lake City1.2 32Nashville1.1 33Charlotte1.0 34Denver1.0 35St. Louis1.0 36Boston1.0 37Milwaukee0.9 38San Francisco0.8 39Louisville0.8 40Dallas0.7 41Cleveland0.7 42Houston0.7 43San Antonio0.6 44San Jose0.6 45Kansas City0.5 46Austin0.5 47Cincinnati0.4 48Columbus0.0 49Oklahoma City Minneapolis-0.4 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics

Environment Air Quality Number of days air quality index exceeded 100 for ozone, average 1Riverside98.3 2Los Angeles53.7 3Sacramento30.7 4Dallas26.7 5Denver20.7 6Phoenix19.7 7Houston18.3 7St. Louis18.3 9Las Vegas Chicago New York Kansas City Cincinnati11.3 Peer Average Philadelphia Cleveland Pittsburgh Hartford Washington, D.C Atlanta9.3 19Baltimore9.3 21Milwaukee8.3 21Oklahoma City8.3 23Louisville8.0 24Nashville7.7 25Detroit7.3 26Memphis7.0 27Indianapolis6.7 27San Diego6.7 29San Antonio6.3 30Providence6.0 31New Orleans5.7 31Salt Lake City5.7 33Columbus5.3 34Charlotte4.7 34Richmond4.7 36Birmingham4.0 37Boston3.0 37Buffalo3.0 39San Francisco2.7 40San Jose2.0 41Austin1.7 41Raleigh1.7 43Minneapolis1.3 43Tampa1.3 45Miami1.0 45Seattle1.0 45Virginia Beach1.0 48Jacksonville0.7 48Orlando0.7 50Portland0.3 Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality Index Report Change in Air Quality Percent change in number of days air quality index exceeded 100 for ozone, to Denver-6.1 2Riverside Oklahoma City Miami St. Louis Hartford Milwaukee Dallas Chicago Kansas City Phoenix Los Angeles New Orleans Las Vegas Salt Lake City Cleveland Detroit Sacramento-59.3 Peer Average Cincinnati Pittsburgh Nashville Louisville Minneapolis San Francisco Houston New York San Antonio Providence Washington, D.C Memphis Philadelphia Indianapolis Baltimore Atlanta San Diego Birmingham Columbus Portland Richmond Buffalo Boston Seattle Austin Jacksonville San Jose Charlotte Tampa Orlando Raleigh Virginia Beach-93.3 Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality Index Report

Mean Child Household Income at Age 30 vs. Parent Household Income Mean Child Household Income ($1000s) Parent Household Income ($1000s) Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States Intergenerational Mobility

Economic Opportunity Absolute Social Mobility Predicted income percentile in 2011/12 for a person born in 1980/82 to parents with low-income 1Salt Lake City45.8 2San Jose45.5 3Pittsburgh44.8 4Boston44.7 5Minneapolis44.6 6San Francisco44.5 7San Diego44.3 8New York43.9 9Los Angeles Providence Seattle Washington, D.C Houston Sacramento Buffalo Oklahoma City Hartford Riverside Denver41.7 United States Portland San Antonio Dallas Philadelphia Phoenix Kansas City Austin Miami Las Vegas Chicago Orlando Tampa St. Louis Baltimore Milwaukee Nashville New Orleans Raleigh Virginia Beach Cincinnati Cleveland Richmond Louisville Columbus Birmingham Jacksonville Detroit Indianapolis Atlanta Charlotte Memphis33.7 Source: Harvard Equality of Opportunity Project Five Factors Strongly Correlated with Upward Mobility 1.Commute time 2.Income inequality (Gini coefficient) 3.School quality 4.Social capital (voter turnout, etc.) 5.Family structure (single parent families)

How have you used WWS tables or data? Where We Stand Where We Stand (WWS) rankings ignite discussion and help guide decision making. Join others in using the data in WWS for presentations, research reports, strategic planning, business reports, and grant applications.

Shared Measures Bridge Condition Housing + Transportation Costs Freight Tonnage Truck Congestion Costs Similar Measures Transit Access Transit Ridership Annual Hours of Delay Mode Split Vehicle Miles Traveled per Capita Fatality Rate Transportation WWS Tables on Connected2045 Performance Measures

Guiding Principle: Support Public Transportation Invest in public transportation to spur economic development, protect the environment and improve quality of life for regional citizens. Transportation Connected2045 Performance Measures

Transportation Connected2045 Performance Measures St. Louis Ranks 27 th on Transit Ridership 23.2 annual transit boardings per capita 33 rd on Job Access by Transit 24.1 percent of jobs can be accessed within 90 minute commute via transit Transit Ridership Transit boardings per capita, New York San Francisco Washington, D.C Boston96.6 5Chicago75.2 6Philadelphia70.1 Peer Average66.9 7Seattle65.8 8Portland60.3 9Los Angeles Baltimore Salt Lake City Denver Pittsburgh Minneapolis Las Vegas San Diego Milwaukee Buffalo Miami Atlanta New Orleans Cleveland Austin San Antonio San Jose Charlotte St. Louis Phoenix Orlando Hartford Sacramento Providence Louisville Houston Dallas Columbus Riverside Virginia Beach Cincinnati Tampa Detroit Jacksonville Kansas City Raleigh Nashville Memphis9.9 47Richmond9.8 48Indianapolis7.2 49Birmingham4.5 50Oklahoma City3.7 Source: Federal Transit Administration, National Transit Database Job Access by Transit Share of jobs the typical working- age resident can reach via transit within 90 minutes, Salt Lake City58.9 2San Jose58.4 3Milwaukee48.6 4Denver47.5 5Las Vegas44.0 6Portland39.9 7Austin39.0 8San Antonio37.0 9New York36.6 9Washington, D.C New Orleans San Francisco Columbus Seattle Buffalo Indianapolis Louisville Baltimore Boston Hartford Raleigh Charlotte Minneapolis Houston Cleveland San Diego29.1 Peer Average Cincinnati Nashville Phoenix Richmond Memphis Los Angeles St. Louis Philadelphia Chicago Birmingham Jacksonville Pittsburgh Oklahoma City Detroit Providence Atlanta Sacramento Dallas Kansas City Tampa Miami Orlando Virginia Beach Riverside7.9 Source: Brookings, Metropolitan Policy Program, 2011

Transportation Connected2045 Performance Measures Guiding Principle: Strengthen Intermodal Connections Support freight movement and connections that are critical to the movement of people and goods. In thousands

Transportation St. Louis Combined Statistical Area, 2012 Connected2045 Performance Measures Truck Congestion Costs Value of lost time and excess fuel consumption in millions of dollars, New York2,541 2Los Angeles2,290 3Chicago1,716 4Atlanta775 5Miami739 6Dallas734 7Philadelphia730 8Washington, D.C.656 9Houston San Francisco Phoenix Boston Seattle Detroit 475 Peer Average Baltimore Denver San Diego Riverside St. Louis Orlando Tampa Portland Indianapolis Minneapolis Cincinnati Pittsburgh Nashville Sacramento Charlotte Austin Memphis San Jose Kansas City Columbus Louisville San Antonio Las Vegas Milwaukee Virginia Beach Cleveland New Orleans Oklahoma City Birmingham Jacksonville Buffalo Raleigh 96 47Hartford75 48Salt Lake City71 49Providence69 50Richmond62 Source: Texas Transportation Institute, Urban Mobility Report Freight Tonnage Amount of freight imported to, exported from, or shipped within the region in thousands of tons, Houston1,114,885 2Los Angeles892,421 3New York864,781 4Chicago799,804 5New Orleans490,251 6San Francisco488,382 7Dallas435,366 8Philadelphia435,353 9Detroit375,677 10Atlanta372,690 11St. Louis341,863 12Seattle320,076 13Minneapolis318,213 14Miami299,080 Peer Average269,456 15Boston232,927 16Phoenix222,524 17Tampa218,062 18Washington, D.C.215,935 19Portland210,859 20Indianapolis203,196 21Pittsburgh196,983 22Cleveland195,675 23Denver193,525 24San Antonio188,719 25Kansas City188,285 26Baltimore175,626 27Nashville172,260 28Cincinnati167,571 29Orlando163,412 30Birmingham159,204 31Columbus157,224 32Salt Lake City149,109 33Sacramento143,508 34Virginia Beach141,427 35Charlotte138,952 36Buffalo122,765 37Richmond120,824 38Austin116,397 39Milwaukee115,183 40Louisville114,738 41Jacksonville114,607 42San Diego107,454 43Oklahoma City104,850 44Raleigh104,297 45Memphis100,716 46Las Vegas96,329 47Hartford62,449 Source: Federal Highway Administration, Freight Analysis Framework

Transportation Connected2045 Performance Measures Guiding Principle: Support Neighborhoods and Communities Connect communities to opportunities across the region

Housing Cost Burdened Renters Renters paying at least 30% of income on housing as a percent of all renters, Miami64.1 2Riverside60.5 3Los Angeles59.5 4Orlando57.6 5San Diego56.9 6New Orleans56.7 7Sacramento55.0 8New York54.3 9Philadelphia Virginia Beach Tampa Detroit Jacksonville Memphis Baltimore Providence Atlanta Birmingham51.6 United States Richmond Denver Cleveland Indianapolis Portland Austin Milwaukee Hartford Chicago San Francisco Las Vegas Seattle Boston San Jose Phoenix Charlotte Buffalo St. Louis Nashville Washington, D.C Houston San Antonio Salt Lake City Minneapolis Dallas Raleigh Kansas City Oklahoma City Columbus Cincinnati Pittsburgh Louisville45.2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Housing Plus Transportation Affordability Transportation and housing costs as a percent of median household income, average 1Miami64.4 2Riverside61.4 3Orlando61.0 4Tampa60.0 5Los Angeles58.9 6New Orleans58.2 7Memphis58.2 8San Diego58.1 9Birmingham Sacramento Jacksonville Las Vegas Providence Phoenix Nashville Cleveland Detroit Charlotte Atlanta Oklahoma City53.5 Peer Average Virginia Beach Louisville San Antonio Portland Milwaukee Chicago Richmond Houston Columbus Indianapolis Pittsburgh St. Louis Austin New York Philadelphia Cincinnati Dallas Buffalo Kansas City Seattle San Francisco Salt Lake City Hartford Denver Raleigh Boston Baltimore Minneapolis San Jose Washington, D.C.42.0 Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology Housing Cost Burdened Owners Owners paying at least 30% of income on housing as a percent of all homeowners, New York38.3 2Los Angeles38.0 3Miami37.5 4Riverside36.1 5San Diego35.2 6San Francisco32.9 7Sacramento31.8 8Chicago31.5 9San Jose Las Vegas Providence Orlando Boston Virginia Beach Seattle Philadelphia Portland Hartford Tampa Jacksonville New Orleans Milwaukee Baltimore Washington, D.C.26.0 United States Atlanta Denver Phoenix Memphis Detroit Salt Lake City Austin Richmond Columbus Charlotte Cleveland Houston Dallas Nashville Minneapolis St. Louis Cincinnati San Antonio Raleigh Birmingham Kansas City Indianapolis Louisville Buffalo Pittsburgh Oklahoma City18.3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Housing Opportunity Percent of homes sold that were affordable to families earning the median income, Cincinnati83.3 2Cleveland82.7 3Buffalo82.3 4Indianapolis81.9 5St. Louis81.8 6Pittsburgh80.8 7Birmingham80.6 8Louisville79.6 9Detroit Hartford Virginia Beach Minneapolis Milwaukee Richmond Jacksonville Oklahoma City Tampa Memphis Providence Baltimore Atlanta Philadelphia Columbus Raleigh Charlotte Orlando Phoenix Washington, D.C Salt Lake City Chicago Denver64.0 United States Las Vegas San Antonio Dallas Austin Miami Houston Seattle Portland Boston Sacramento Riverside New York San Diego San Francisco San Jose Los Angeles17.6 Source: National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index

Transportation Connected2045 Performance Measures Housing Cost Burdened Owners Owners paying at least 30% of income on housing as a percent of all homeowners, New York38.3 2Los Angeles38.0 3Miami37.5 4Riverside36.1 5San Diego35.2 6San Francisco32.9 7Sacramento31.8 8Chicago31.5 9San Jose Las Vegas Providence Orlando Boston Virginia Beach Seattle Philadelphia Portland Hartford Tampa Jacksonville New Orleans Milwaukee Baltimore Washington, D.C.26.0 United States Atlanta Denver Phoenix Memphis Detroit Salt Lake City Austin Richmond Columbus Charlotte Cleveland Houston Dallas Nashville Minneapolis St. Louis Cincinnati San Antonio Raleigh Birmingham Kansas City Indianapolis Louisville Buffalo Pittsburgh Oklahoma City18.3 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Housing Plus Transportation Affordability Transportation and housing costs as a percent of median household income, average 1Miami64.4 2Riverside61.4 3Orlando61.0 4Tampa60.0 5Los Angeles58.9 6New Orleans58.2 7Memphis58.2 8San Diego58.1 9Birmingham Sacramento Jacksonville Las Vegas Providence Phoenix Nashville Cleveland Detroit Charlotte Atlanta Oklahoma City53.5 Peer Average Virginia Beach Louisville San Antonio Portland Milwaukee Chicago Richmond Houston Columbus Indianapolis Pittsburgh St. Louis Austin New York Philadelphia Cincinnati Dallas Buffalo Kansas City Seattle San Francisco Salt Lake City Hartford Denver Raleigh Boston Baltimore Minneapolis San Jose Washington, D.C.42.0 Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology Housing Affordability rank compared to H+T Affordability rank (select regions) Housing Affordability H + T Affordability New York1st34th San Francisco6th41st Boston13th46th Baltimore23rd47th Washington, D.C.24th50th

Sustainability WWS Tables on OneSTL Performance Measures

GMP Transit Ridership College Attainment Sustainability WWS Tables on OneSTL Performance Measures Housing Affordability Access to Healthy Food Choices Transportation Choice

Regions with high Transit Ridership tend to have high College Attainment relative to peer regions. Transit Ridership College Attainment Sustainability WWS Tables on OneSTL Performance Measures

Regions with high Transit Ridership tend to have low Housing Affordability relative to peer regions. Transit Ridership Housing Affordability Sustainability WWS Tables on OneSTL Performance Measures

WWS 7 th Edition, Data, & Updates Subscribe to the WWS list Where We Stand, 7 th Edition The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region