Titelfoto auf dem Titelmaster einfügen Deutscher Wetterdienst Dr. Paul James, German Weather Service, ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, 9. Sept. 2013 NowCastMIX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The use of Doppler radar products for nowcasting tornadoes DWD workshop on tornado forecasting, February 24th 2005, Langen 1. introduction 2. products.
Advertisements

Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
ECMWF long range forecast systems
5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
Göber, Pardowitz, Kox: Linguistic uncertainy of warning uncertainty 1 Verification of the linguistic uncertainty of warning uncertainty Martin Göber 1,3,
SIPR Dundee. © Crown copyright Scottish Flood Forecasting Service Pete Buchanan – Met Office Richard Maxey – SEPA SIPR, Dundee, 21 June 2011.
Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE Advanced Diagnosis and Warning system for.
Statistical Postprocessing of Weather Parameters for a High-Resolution Limited-Area Model Ulrich Damrath Volker Renner Susanne Theis Andreas Hense.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Improving Excessive Rainfall Forecasts at HPC by using the “Neighborhood - Spatial Density“ Approach to High Res Models Michael Eckert, David Novak, and.
GRAPES-Based Nowcasting: System design and Progress Jishan Xue, Hongya Liu and Hu Zhijing Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Toulouse Sept 2005.
PROVIDING DISTRIBUTED FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION USING A STATISTICAL NOWCAST SCHEME Neil I. Fox and Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri- Columbia.
1 Learning to Detect Objects in Images via a Sparse, Part-Based Representation S. Agarwal, A. Awan and D. Roth IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and.
Chapter 1 Ways of Seeing. Ways of Seeing the Atmosphere The behavior of the atmosphere is very complex. Different ways of displaying the characteristics.
ASSIMILATION of RADAR DATA at CONVECTIVE SCALES with the EnKF: PERFECT-MODEL EXPERIMENTS USING WRF / DART Altuğ Aksoy National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Department of Meteorology and Geophysics University of Vienna since 1851 since 1365 TOWARDS AN ANALYSIS ENSEMBLE FOR NWP-MODEL VERIFICATION Manfred Dorninger,
Automated weather warning proposals based on post-processed numerical weather forecasts Guido Schröder, Bernhard Reichert, Dirk Heizenreder Deutscher Wetterdienst,
WWOSC 2014 Assimilation of 3D radar reflectivity with an Ensemble Kalman Filter on a convection-permitting scale WWOSC 2014 Theresa Bick 1,2,* Silke Trömel.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
Anticipating Cloud-to-Ground (CG) Lightning Utilizing Reflectivity Data from the WSR-88D. Pete Wolf, SOO National Weather Service Jacksonville, Florida.
EUMETCAL NWP, 26 – 29 November 2007, DWD-BTZ Langen, Germany Man-machine mix and the forecaster's role Dr. Wilfried Jacobs Deutscher Wetterdienst Bildungs-
Nowcasting thunderstorms in complex cases using radar data Alessandro Hering* Stéphane Sénési # Paolo Ambrosetti* Isabelle Bernard-Bouissières # *MeteoSwiss.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey, R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group.
STEPS: An empirical treatment of forecast uncertainty Alan Seed BMRC Weather Forecasting Group.
Post-Processing at DWD Post-Processing at DWD Sebastian Trepte (FEZE) Grid-based forecasts COSMO, GME - derived products (thunderstorm ind., weather-related.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
Dieter Mayer, Reinhold Steinacker, Andrea Steiner University of Vienna, Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, Vienna, Austria Presentation at the 10th.
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
1- Near-Optimized Filtered Forecasts (NOFF) using wavelet analysis (O-MAPLE) 2- Probabilistic MAPLE (Probability of rain occurrence at different thresholds)
LAPS __________________________________________ Analysis and nowcasting system for Finland/Scandinavia Finnish Meteorological Institute Erik Gregow.
NCAR Auto-Nowcaster Convective Weather Group NCAR/RAL.
Improving Ensemble QPF in NMC Dr. Dai Kan National Meteorological Center of China (NMC) International Training Course for Weather Forecasters 11/1, 2012,
Combining mesoscale, nowcast, and CFD model output in near real-time for protecting urban areas and buildings from releases of hazardous airborne materials.
NOWCASTING AND WARNINGS AT DEUTSCHER WETTERDIENST (DWD) Klaus Baehnke Deutscher Wetterdienst Offenbach/M., Germany.
Nowcasting Thunderstorms with SIGnificant weather Object Oriented Nowcasting System Pascal Brovelli, Stéphane Sénési, Etienne Arbogast, Philippe Cau, Sandrine.
Use of radar data in ALADIN Marián Jurašek Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute.
Priority project Advanced interpretation COSMO General Meeting, 18. September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
The Rapid Developing Thunderstorm (RDT) product CDOP to CDOP2
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the SESAR project EMS Annual Conference, Sept. 13 th, 2013.
Purpose To deepen your knowledge to use satellite images for practical nowcasting during situations of summer convection  Model monitoring  Interpretation.
GII to RII to CII in South Africa Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service Senior Scientist.
Paper WSN05 Toulouse 5-9 September, 2005 VERIFICATION OF OPERATIONAL THUNDERSTORM NOWCASTS E. Ebert, T. Keenan, J. Bally and S. Dance Bureau of.
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
 Federal Aviation Administration’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on certification of aircraft for operation in supercooled large drop (SLD) icing conditions.
Forecasting the weather
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
UAH 28 Sept 2008R. Boldi NSSTC/UAH 1 Hazardous Cell Tracking Robert Boldi 29 September 2008 NSSTC/UAH.
Progress in Radar Assimilation at MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger 1, Marco Stoll 2 and Andrea Rossa 3 1 MeteoSwiss 2 Geographisches Institut, University.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
ASAP Convective Weather Research at NCAR Matthias Steiner and Huaqing Cai Rita Roberts, John Williams, David Ahijevych, Sue Dettling and David Johnson.
Encast Global forecasting.
60 min Nowcasts 60 min Verification Cold Front Regime
Overview of Deterministic Computer Models
NCAR Research on Thunderstorm Analysis & Nowcasting
Storm detection, tracking and prediction
NMHS persective; Trends in acquisition, use and management of observations Jochen Dibbern, Deutscher Wetterdienst Workshop Vision for WIGOS in 2040.
A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning
WMO NWP Wokshop: Blending Breakout
Aiding Severe Weather Forecasting
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
Science of Rainstorms with applications to Flood Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

Titelfoto auf dem Titelmaster einfügen Deutscher Wetterdienst Dr. Paul James, German Weather Service, ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, 9. Sept NowCastMIX Automatic integrated warnings from continuously monitored nowcasting systems using spatially clustered fuzzy-logic assessments of storm attributes

NowCastMIX in AutoWARN Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept  The AutoWARN process at the DWD monitors several systems automatically for potential warning situations on different time scales.  Warning polygons are sent to duty meteorologists for possible modification before products are generated.  NowCastMIX integrates all data from nowcasting systems  Consistent, optimised and intelligent warning solution

NowCastMIX in AutoWARN Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept  NowCastMIX monitors several nowcasting systems on a 5 minutes update cycle  Radar products, lightning, surface obs., NWP model outputs for background  Data mapped onto a 1 x 1 km grid with assessment of cell motion vector field  Storm severity assessments using a fuzzy-logic method  Spatial and temporal optimisation using clustering techniques  Warning polygons covering the next 60 minutes produced and sent on to AutoWARN

Warning events: Thunderstorms / Rain  Different warning events are given an code number (ii) (e.g. „31“)  10 thunderstorm and 3 torrential rain event types need to be monitored in AutoWARN  The thunderstorm severity depends on the presence (and magnitude) of these attributes:  Severe Gusts  Torrential Rain  Hail The 10 Thunderstorm and 3 Torrential rain events NowCastMIX - Overview Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

13:15 UTC, Cell motion vector field NowCastMIX Cell motion vector field  Background cell motion vector field (CVF) is constructed using the following sources:  Pattern-Matching of radar echoes in consecutive images -> motion vectors  Explicit cell tracking vectors* (KONRAD and CellMOS systems) (*mapped with a Gaussian distribution)  Form weighted mean -> CVF  Loop over all input tracking vectors to remove possible erroneous outliers  Successive improvement of CVF Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

 Warning cones are created, opening up in the direction of cell motion  3 possible triggers for creating a cone:  KONRAD Cell ( Radar echoes > 46 dBZ )  CellMOS Cell ( Radar echoes > 37 dBZ + Lightning Strike )  Lightning Strike with weaker radar echoes  Fuzzy Logic applied at the cell centre to estimate storm severity  Attribute strength (Gusts, Hail, Rain) as a function of input data  Weighting function in cases where two or more cones overlap – higher severity preferred  Total cone length = 60 min (as function of cell speed)  Initial radius = 10km, Expansion angle = 7,5 degrees NowCastMIX Construction of warning cones Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

NowCastMIX Fuzzy Logic Sets Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

 In some cases the automatically determined thunderstorm severity may not be able to capture the characteristics of the storm sufficiently  To reduce the risk of missing very severe weather, real-time synoptic station reports are routinely monitored by NowCastMIX  These report e.g. measured gust speeds, hail occurrence, recent rainfall totals etc.  The likely current location of the severe weather event is estimated using the background cell motion vector field  Note that a certain time has typically elapsed since the reported weather started  A certain temporal and spatial uncertainty typically exists, depending on the type of severe weather being reported  The severity levels of warnings in this region can be raised if necessary NowCastMIX Integration of station reports P. James / DWD - ESSL 2013 – Station Cell motion vector Current region of relevance

NowCastMIX Optimization of Warnings Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept  Optimal warnings need to find a balance between:  In nowcasting you cannot have both at the same time!  NowCastMIX would tend by nature to be over-precise  An optimal balance is approached via a clustering method Precision / Accuracy Realistic, strictly correct Complex, over detailed and rapidly changing warnings. Hard for duty meteorologists to assess and process. Hard for customers to understand and assimilate Workability / Usefulness Smoother in space and time. Easier to process for the duty meteorologists, easier for customers to assimilate. Locally less precise, some details may be left out. Greater danger of systematic biases (e.g. over warning)

 Clusters (cell groups) are formed with the DBSCAN algorithm  Examining all cells in a time window covering the last 20 minutes  The highest severity value in a cluster is mapped onto all cells in that cluster  High severity levels are thus held up for at least 20 minutes  Results in a certain temporal smoothing  Problem: The clusters themselves sometimes change significantly from one run to the next, 5 minutes later, resulting in a new source of temporal noise on larger scales  A cluster ensemble (up to ~600) is created, using differing randomly perturbed cell positions (up to 6km shifts)  To improve computational efficiency the directions of the random perturbations are successively biased towards more useful sectors as the ensemble members are generated (Adaptive Clustering Ensemble)  The clustering member which is finally used is that which is most similar to the clustering which was used 5 minutes earlier NowCastMIX Clustering Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

NowCastMIX Core Technology 5. Clustering example Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

14:05 to 15:05 UTC, NowCastMIX – From analysis to warning polygons Analysis* + Warning areas * 20 minute time window (13:45-14:05) Clusters + Warning polygonsWarning situation for the next hour Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013

 Further refinement of clustering techniques to optimise warning proposals  Inclusion of further data sources (e.g. rapid-scan based satellite products)  Can early warnings be given before the first lightning or radar signals are occurring?  Feedback from verification results and from assessments by duty meteorologists  Parameter optimisation, further tuning of fuzzy logic sets  Expansion of the warning domain to cover wider area of W. Europe (e.g. FAB EC)  Winter nowcasting (snow, freezing rain)  Radar-based detection (snow, precip.) combined with surface freezing indicators  NWP-based snow forecasts and temperature profiles  Fuzzy logic combinations of such information Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept NowCastMIX Outlook

NowCastMIX Thanks for your attention ! Questions? Dr. P. James (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany) – ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, UK, 9. Sept. 2013